Examining the relative influence of dispersal and competition on co-occurrence and functional trait patterns in response to disturbance.

Disturbance gradients are particularly useful for understanding the relative influences of competition and dispersal. Shortly after disturbance, plant composition should be influenced more strongly by dispersal than competition; over time, this should reverse, with competition becoming more important. As such, we predicted that plant functional traits associated with high dispersal ability would be over-represented shortly after a disturbance event occurs, while those associated with high competitive ability would have increased representation as time progresses. Additionally, it has been suggested that competitive interactions may contribute to negative co-occurrence patterns; if this is the case, negative co-occurrence patterns should also increase as time-since-disturbance increases. Here, we examine how functional trait and co-occurrence patterns change over time following a herbicide-based disturbance, compared to undisturbed vegetation, in a temperate, old-field grassland dominated by herbaceous perennials. In our study system, negative co-occurrence patterns were most pronounced in disturbed plots one year after herbicide application, consistent with several lines of evidence that dispersal can strongly impact both composition and co-occurrence patterns. Over three years post-disturbance, co-occurrence patterns in disturbed plots decreased, becoming more similar to control plots. This pattern is inconsistent with the expectation that competition contributes to negative co-occurrence patterns, at least over three growing seasons. More pronounced negative co-occurrence patterns were associated with higher species evenness among plots. Functional traits related to increased dispersal (mean seed mass, and proportion of stoloniferous/rhizomatous species) and competitive ability (mean species height, and mean specific leaf area) did not differ significantly across treatments, with the exception of mean height in the third-year post-disturbance; however, the overall trajectory of this trait was inconsistent with theoretical expectations. Overall, co-occurrence patterns changed across the gradient of time-since disturbance, but not as expected; functional trait patterns (trait means, functional diversity measures) were not responsive to our experimental disturbance gradient.

Smaller species experience mild adversity under shading in an old-field plant community.

Plant competition experiments commonly suggest that larger species have an advantage, primarily in terms of light acquisition. However, within crowded natural vegetation, where competition evidently impacts fitness, most resident species are relatively small. It remains unclear, therefore, whether the size advantage observed in controlled experiments is normally realized in habitats where competition is most intense. We characterized the light environment and tested for evidence of a size advantage in competition for light in an old-field plant community composed of perennial herbaceous species. We investigated whether larger species contributed to reduced light penetration (i.e., greater shading), and examined the impact of shade on smaller species by testing whether their abundance and richness were lower in plots with less light penetration. Light penetration in plots ranged from 0.3% to 72.4%. Significant effects were more common when analyses focused on small plants that reached reproduction (i.e., flowering rooted units); focusing on only flowering plants (i.e., excluding nonflowering rooted units) can clarify community patterns. Plots with a greater mean species height had significantly lower light penetration, and plots with lower light penetration had significantly lower flowering abundance and richness of small species. However, the impact of shade on the flowering abundance and richness of small species was relatively small (R 2 values between 8% and 15%) and depended on how we defined "small species." Synthesis: Our results confirm that light penetration in herbaceous vegetation can be comparable to levels seen in forests, that plots with taller species cast more shade, and that flowering smaller species are less abundant and diverse in plots where light penetration is low. However, variation in mean plot height explained less than 10% of variation in light penetration, and light penetration explained between 5 and 15% of variation in the flowering abundance and richness of small species. Coupled with the fact that flowering small species were present even within the most heavily shaded plots, our results suggest that any advantage in light competition by large species is limited. One explanation is that at least some small species in these communities are shade-tolerant. Shade tolerance in predominantly herbaceous communities, particularly among small plant species, requires further research.

Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and nondominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally.

Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants-the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage-and nondominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where nondominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will deplete most resources, forcing nondominant plants into a narrower niche space. Conversely, if dominant plants are constrained by the environment, they might not exhaust available resources but instead may ameliorate environmental stressors that usually limit nondominants. Hence, the nature of interactions among nondominant species could be modified by dominant species. Furthermore, these differences could translate into a disparity in the phylogenetic relatedness among dominants compared to the relatedness among nondominants. By estimating phylogenetic dispersion in 78 grasslands across five continents, we found that dominant species were clustered (e.g., co-dominant grasses), suggesting dominant species are likely organized by environmental filtering, and that nondominant species were either randomly assembled or overdispersed. Traits showed similar trends for those sites (<50%) with sufficient trait data. Furthermore, several lineages scattered in the phylogeny had more nondominant species than expected at random, suggesting that traits common in nondominants are phylogenetically conserved and have evolved multiple times. We also explored environmental drivers of the dominant/nondominant disparity. We found different assembly patterns for dominants and nondominants, consistent with asymmetries in assembly mechanisms. Among the different postulated mechanisms, our results suggest two complementary hypotheses seldom explored: (1) Nondominant species include lineages adapted to thrive in the environment generated by dominant species. (2) Even when dominant species reduce resources to nondominant ones, dominant species could have a stronger positive effect on some nondominants by ameliorating environmental stressors affecting them, than by depleting resources and increasing the environmental stress to those nondominants. These results show that the dominant/nondominant asymmetry has ecological and evolutionary consequences fundamental to understand plant communities.