Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Surg ; 189(5): 450-8, 1999 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10549733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is increasingly used in severely ill and acutely septic patients. In animals undergoing laparoscopy, the hemodynamic response to sepsis is blunted. Specific interventions to augment the hemodynamic potential may make laparoscopic intervention a safer alternative in septic patients. We compared different interventions to improve hemodynamic performance during exploratory laparoscopy in a porcine endotoxic shock model. STUDY DESIGN: Domestic pigs (n = 12) received intravenous lipopolysaccharide injection and underwent surgical abdominal exploration using either laparoscopy or conventional laparotomy. For comparison, pigs exposed to endotoxin underwent laparoscopy with these interventions: intravenous infusions of prostacyclin (n = 5) or indomethacin (n = 4), intravenous crystalloid resuscitation (n = 5), pulmonary hyperventilation (n = 4), or abdominal insufflation with air (n = 5). Hemodynamic measurements and blood gas analyses were obtained using Swan-Ganz and arterial catheters. RESULTS: Septic animals treated with prostacyclin undergoing laparoscopy had a higher cardiac index (CI, p < 0.01), stroke volume (SV; p < 0.001) and oxygen delivery (p < 0.05) than the untreated group. Likewise, treatment with indomethacin was associated with a higher CI (p < 0.001), SV (p < 0.005), and oxygen delivery (p < 0.005) compared with the untreated group. These effects may be secondary to a decreased pulmonary vascular resistance, demonstrated in the animals that received either prostacyclin (p < 0.05) or indomethacin (p < 0.05). In addition, animals given aggressive fluid resuscitation had a significantly higher CI (p < 0.05) and SV (p < 0.001) than those with normal fluid resuscitation during laparoscopy. Manipulation of arterial pH by insufflation of the abdomen with air to create the pneumoperitoneum, or by aggressively hyperventilating the animals, did not improve CI. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects of laparoscopy on cardiovascular hemodynamics in the septic state may be mediated by increased pulmonary vascular resistance, diminished venous return, or both. Specific interventions to reverse these variables may ameliorate hemodynamic changes seen.


Assuntos
Hemodinâmica , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Análise de Variância , Animais , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/farmacologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Endotoxemia , Epoprostenol/farmacologia , Escherichia coli , Hidratação , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Indometacina/farmacologia , Pneumoperitônio Artificial , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA