Persistent Impairment in Immune Reconstitution and Worse Survival Outcomes in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients with Early Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.

Patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at an increased risk of mortality due to transplantation-related complications in the first year post-transplantation, owing in part to the profound immune dysregulation with T cell and B cell lymphopenia and functional impairment. Although several large studies have reported higher mortality rates from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in HSCT recipients, to date no study has focused on the impact of early COVID-19 infection on immune reconstitution post-transplantation and the correlation with transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive adult patients who underwent their first allogeneic HSCT at our institution. Thirteen patients (21.3%) experienced early COVID-19 infection, with a median time to diagnosis of 100 days post-transplantation. In multivariable analysis, patients with early COVID-19 infection had significantly worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 13.05; P = .019) and progression-free survival (aHR, 6.68; 95% CI, 2.11 to 21.11; P = .001). This was attributed mainly to higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among early COVID-19 patients (P = .042). Allogeneic HSCT recipients with early COVID-19 infection had significant delays in absolute lymphocyte count (95% CI, -703.69 to -56.79; P = .021), CD3+CD4+ cell (95% CI, -105.35 to -11.59; P = .042), CD3+CD8+ cell (95% CI, -324.55 to -57.13; P = .038), and CD3-CD56+ cell (95% CI, -193.51 to -47.31; P = .014) recovery compared to those without early COVID-19 infection. Our findings suggest that patients with early COVID-19 infection after allogeneic HSCT have higher NRM and worse survival, at least in part due to impaired immune reconstitution post-transplantation.

Oncology pharmacy practice in the United States: Results of a comprehensive, nationwide survey.

Introduction: This study was designed to describe the landscape of oncology pharmacy practice at patient facing institutional healthcare organizations throughout the United States. Methods: The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) Practice Outcomes and Professional Benchmarking Committee conducted a multi-organization, voluntary survey of HOPA members between March 2021 and January 2022. Four overarching domains were targeted: institutional description, job function, staffing, and training/certification. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 68 responses were analyzed including 59% and 41% who self-identified their organization as academic and community centers, respectively. The median number of infusion chairs and annual infusion visits were 49 (interquartile range (IQR): 32-92) and 23,500 (IQR: 8300-300,000), respectively. Pharmacy departments reported to a business leader, physician leader, and nursing leader 57%, 24%, and 10% of the time, respectively. The median oncology pharmacy full-time equivalents was 16 (IQR: 5-60). At academic centers, 50% (IQR: 26-60) of inpatient and 30% (IQR: 21-38) of ambulatory pharmacist FTEs were dedicated to clinical activities. At community centers, 45% (IQR: 26-65) of inpatient and 50% (IQR: 42-58) of ambulatory pharmacist FTEs were dedicated to clinical activities. As many as 18% and 65% of organizations required or encouraged certification for oncology pharmacists, respectively. The median number of Board-Certified Oncology Pharmacists was 4 (IQR: 2-15). Conclusion: As the number of patients with cancer rises, the oncology workforce must grow to support this expanding population. These results describe the practice landscape of oncology pharmacy at US healthcare institutions to serve as a foundation for future research evaluating metrics and benchmarks.

HyperCVAD versus pegaspargase-containing regimens for Hispanic adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: There are significant disparities in outcomes among Hispanic patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Recent studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes of pegaspargase-containing ALL regimens (PEG-CAR) in young adults however, outcomes in Hispanic ethnicity continue to be underreported. METHODS: We evaluated outcomes of newly diagnosed, adult B-cell ALL Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients consecutively treated with a PEG-CAR or HyperCVAD between January 2011 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) while secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 105 included patients, 48 (45.7%) were treated with a PEG-CAR and 57 (54.3%) with HyperCVAD. Median age was 38 years (range, 18-75 years), 61% were Hispanic, and 35.2% had poor-genetic risk. Hispanic patients demonstrated significantly worse 5-year EFS with a PEG-CAR compared to that seen with HyperCVAD (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.32-5.04; p = .006) whereas non-Hispanic patients had better outcomes with PIR (52.4% vs. 42.0%). Hispanic ethnicity (p = .015) and male sex (p = .019) were independent predictors for poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic patients with B-cell ALL had worse EFS with a PEG-CAR as compared with HyperCVAD. Future studies will aim to confirm these findings and establish a tailored treatment approach for this high-risk population.

Strategies to Mitigate the Drug-Drug Interaction between Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Tacrolimus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients on Azole Antifungals: Results of a Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NIM/r) inhibits tacrolimus metabolism resulting in a profound drug-drug interaction that is further complicated by the use of azole antifungals. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We describe three strategies, in 4 patient cases, for the initiation of NIM/r in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) recipients on tacrolimus at the time of diagnosis. Patients 1 and 2 (strategy 1) experienced prolonged, elevated tacrolimus concentrations after an empiric 33% reduction in tacrolimus dose and adjustment of azole antifungal at NIM/r initiation (strategy 1) and with complete discontinuation of tacrolimus and azole antifungal at NIM/r initiation (strategy 2). Patients 3 and 4 (strategy 3) did not experience elevated tacrolimus concentrations on NIM/r treatment with complete discontinuation of tacrolimus and azole antifungal and a 12-24-h delay in NIM/r initiation. Reinitiation of tacrolimus after NIM/r completion resulted in variable tacrolimus concentrations. CONCLUSION: NIM/r-tacrolimus is a serious drug-drug interaction which can be mitigated by early discontinuation of tacrolimus and azole antifungals, close monitoring, and reinitiation of tacrolimus and antifungal 48-72 h after completion of therapy.

Impact of triple intrathecal prophylaxis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia adults receiving HyperCVAD: A COVID-19 practice change.

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) requires both systemically and locally directed therapies to prevent central nervous system (CNS) recurrence. In response to restrictions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution adopted triple intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy for CNS prophylaxis during HyperCVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine). We retrospectively reviewed records of newly diagnosed adult all patients who were consecutively treated with HyperCVAD between January 2011 and July 2022. Outcomes of patients who received triple IT chemotherapy and standard of care (SOC) CNS prophylaxis were compared. The primary endpoint was CNS relapse-free survival (RFS) while secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival, number of outpatient, and total ITs per patient, and CNS treatment-related toxicities. A total of 37 patients including 21 in the triple IT and 16 in the SOC cohorts were evaluated. There were no differences between the triple IT and SOC cohorts with respect to CNS-RFS (89.6% vs. 80.4%; HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.45-5.39; p = .49), cumulative incidence of relapse (8.9% vs. 19.6%; HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.3-5.3; p = .87), and overall survival (89.6% vs. 85.7%; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.20-4.21; p = .90) at 2-years. Significantly fewer IT doses were administered in the triple IT cohort (p = .011) and the number of additional outpatient appointments to administer IT chemotherapy were markedly reduced as 98.6% of IT doses were administered during scheduled admissions compared to 76.8% (p < .001). The adoption of triple IT chemotherapy did not increase CNS treatment-related toxicities but rather, the inverse was observed. Triple IT chemotherapy during HyperCVAD represents a feasible alternative to SOC CNS prophylaxis, especially during times of resource restriction and when minimization of patient exposures is desired.

Effect of Sirolimus levels between days 11 and 20 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the risk of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Sirolimus plus tacrolimus is an accepted regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, with both agents implicated as risk factors for SOS. We analyzed 260 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT following myeloablative conditioning using total body irradiation (TBI)-based (n = 151) or chemotherapy only (n = 109) regimens, with sirolimus plus tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. SOS occurred in 28 patients at a median of 22 (range, 12-58) days. Mean sirolimus trough levels were higher between days 11 and 20 following transplant in patients who developed SOS (10.3 vs. 8.5 ng/ml, P = 0.008), with no significant difference in mean trough levels between days 0 and 10 (P = 0.67) and days 21-30 (P = 0.37). No differences in mean tacrolimus trough levels during the same time intervals were observed between those developing SOS and others. On multivariable analysis, a mean sirolimus trough level ≥ 9 ng/ml between days 11 and 20 increased the risk of SOS (hazard ratio 3.68, 95% CI: 1.57-8.67, P = 0.003), together with a longer time from diagnosis to transplant (P = 0.004) and use of TBI (P = 0.006). Our results suggest that mean trough sirolimus levels ≥ 9 ng/mL between days 11 and 20 post transplant may increase the risk of SOS and should be avoided.

Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes when ideal body weight is used to dose busulfan in obese hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Weight-based dosing of intravenous busulfan is widely used in hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, a variety of dosing weights have been described. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the pharmacokinetic impact of using ideal body weight as the initial dosing weight in obese as compared to non-obese transplant recipients. The secondary objectives were to describe the use of alternative dosing weights, the impact on survival, and the rates of toxicities. The mean steady-state concentration was 779.3 ng/mL (n = 82) in the non-obese cohort and 673.7 ng/mL (n = 63) in the obese cohort (p < 0.001). A smaller proportion of concentrations were below goal in the non-obese cohort (10% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Ideal body weight and adjusted body weights with a 25 and 40% correction factor are appropriate in non-obese patients; adjusted body weights with a 25 and 40% correction factor are appropriate in obese patients. There was no difference in overall survival (p = 0.18); there was a difference in median progression-free survival (1078 vs. 500 days, p = 0.045) in the non-obese compared to obese cohorts. The use of ideal body weight to dose busulfan resulted in lower steady-state concentrations, a larger proportion of subtherapeutic concentrations, and worse progression-free survival in obese patients.

Impact of a Clinical Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacist on Tacrolimus Nephrotoxicity, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Institutional Revenue Generation in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.

CONTEXT: Tacrolimus requires close therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to ensure efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned on transplant teams to interpret levels and recommend therapy modifications. Their impact in the immediate postoperative setting has not been described previously. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a clinical solid organ transplant pharmacist on nephrotoxicity, TDM, and revenue generation in adult kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective assessment of adult kidney transplant recipients at University of Florida Health Shands Hospital. INTERVENTION: A transplant pharmacist rounded 5 days a week and made medication recommendations on transplant recipients-including tacrolimus dose modifications based on levels. Pharmacy services were expanded to include medication reconciliation, medication counseling, and delivery of discharge medications to bedside. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of nephrotoxicity during tacrolimus exposure. RESULTS: Of the 70 kidney transplant recipients in the postpharmacist cohort, 18 (25.7%) experienced nephrotoxicity while on tacrolimus, compared to 18 (25%) of the 72 in the prepharmacist cohort ( P = .922). A significantly greater proportion of recipients who experienced nephrotoxicity were male, had hypertension, or experienced delayed or slow graft function. The rate of appropriately drawn tacrolimus troughs significantly increased from 23.4% to 30.3% in the postpharmacist cohort ( P < .001). The median outpatient pharmacy revenue generated per recipient significantly increased from US$345.49 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-4727.56) to US$4834.95 per recipient (IQR: 3592.78-6224.60; P < .001). The length of stay (7 days, IQR: 6-9, vs 8 days, IQR: 6-9; P = .107) and the 30-day readmission rate were similar between groups (20.8% vs 21.4%; P = .931).