Residual symptoms and long-term outcomes after all-cause autoimmune encephalitis in adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate residual symptoms after all-cause autoimmune encephalitis in a real-life outpatient setting and compare long-term outcome measures. A secondary objective was to identify correlates of poor outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed patients referred to the Neuroimmunology clinic for evaluation of autoimmune encephalitis for whom standardized data were collected. We compared the prevalence of symptoms at the latest follow-up to presentation and calculated symptom improvement rates. We compared the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) to the Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare clinical attributes between patients with and without poor outcomes. RESULTS: We evaluated 54 patients from 2017 to 2021 of whom 33 met inclusion criteria (average age 47±20 years, 57% females, 55% seropositive). By latest follow-up, 94% improved compared to presentation but six patients (18%) had poor outcomes as defined by an mRS ≥3. The most common residual symptoms were cognitive and mood dysfunction. The highest improvement rates were in alertness and psychosis while the lowest were in motor function and ataxia. CASE had moderate correlation with mRS (r2 = 0.53 [95%CI:0.23,0.74, p = 0.0015) but it captured more nuances than mRS at both presentation and follow-up. Older age and higher post-treatment CASE score correlated with poor outcomes. DISCUSSION: Most autoimmune encephalitis patients experience symptom improvement post-treatment. The CASE score was more representative of the wide symptomatic spectrum of autoimmune encephalitis and correlated with poor outcomes. However, CASE did not capture patients with dysautonomia, sleep dysfunction, or death.

Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part I.

To date no one has identified or described the population of incapacitated patients being treated in an inpatient setting who lack proxy decision-makers. Nor, despite repeated calls for protocols to be developed for decision-making, has any institution reported on the utilization of such a protocol. In 2005, our urban tertiary care hospital instituted a protocol utilizing community members of the ethics committee to meet with the medical providers and engage in shared decision-making for patients without proxies (PWPs). We conducted a retrospective chart review and in this paper describe nearly 200 patients who were identified and treated according to the protocol over a 12 year period. After an aggressive search, family members were located for a surprising number of patients, leaving 80 patients who needed decisions to be made utilizing the PWP committee. We review the decisions required, the results of the shared decision-making meetings, and the patient outcomes. Our experience has shown that a protocol involving community volunteers to make decisions for PWPs in a timely manner is feasible and ethically defensible. The protocol has been accepted by physicians and utilized with increasing frequency. Because it was possible to gather at least minimal information on most patients, a standard of "informed best interest" was used to make decisions. PWP committee recommendations varied, but in all cases agreement was reached with the attending physicians.

Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part II.

In the United States, there is no consensus about who should make decisions in acute but non-emergent situations for incapacitated patients who lack surrogates. For more than a decade, our academic medical center has utilized community volunteers from the hospital ethics committee to engage in shared decision-making with the medical providers for these patients. In order to add a different point of view and minimize conflict of interest, the volunteers are non-clinicians who are not employed by the hospital. Using case examples and interviews with the community members, this paper describes how the protocol has translated into practice over the years since its inception. Members reported comfort with the role as well as satisfaction with the thoroughness of their discussions with the medical team. They acknowledged feelings of moral uncertainty, but expressed confidence in the process. Questions raised by the experience are discussed. Overall, the protocol has provided oversight, transparency, and protection from conflict of interest to the decision-making process for this vulnerable patient population.

A Jehovah's Witness Adolescent in the Labor and Delivery Unit: Should Patient and Parental Refusals of Blood Transfusions for Adolescents Be Honored?

A 15-year-old was admitted to the labor and delivery unit for induction of a 41-week-gestation pregnancy. Her parents, members of Jehovah's Witnesses, and the patient, who had been studying the religion but had not yet been baptized, were adamant that no blood transfusions would be accepted even if a life-threatening hemorrhage were to occur. In our analysis, we examine the underlying ethical conflict and issues raised by this case. We considered two important ethical questions in analyzing the dilemma: first, whether adolescents are capable of providing autonomous and authentic refusals for lifesaving interventions; and second, whether parents can refuse such interventions for their adolescent children based on their religious beliefs. We provided justifications for not considering the adolescent's refusal as autonomous and for overruling the parental refusal, concluding that there was ethical support for providing potentially lifesaving transfusions should they become clinically indicated. We also suggested strategies to avoid blood loss and the need for transfusions in order to respect the stated values and preferences of the patient and her family to the greatest degree possible. In order to protect the privacy of the patient and her family, details in this case have been changed and no identifiable information has been used.

Bioethics training in Uganda: report on research and clinical ethics workshops.

This essay describes and critically evaluates a co-operative educational program to train Ugandan health care workers in bioethics. It describes one "bottom-up" effort, a week-long intensive workshop in bioethics provided by the authors to health care professionals in a developing country-Uganda. We will describe the background and circumstances that led to the organization of the workshop, and review its planning, design, curriculum, and outcome. We will focus especially on measures taken to make the workshop relevant for the audience of Ugandan professionals, and describe lessons learned after two presentations of the workshop. Finally, we will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of such a format, and its potential value in raising bioethical expertise in developing countries.