Implementation of a novel web-based objective structured clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to identify factors that impact student performance on a web-based objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) that was developed to improve the evaluation process of students who complete a fourth-year surgical clerkship in trauma-critical care. METHODS: We created a multiple-choice OSCE with commercially available software. Clinical cases were developed for incorporation into 7 quizzes that were assembled to appear as 1 examination. Students used intensive care unit flow sheets to review data, to develop a systems-based problem list and differential diagnoses, and to produce treatment recommendations. RESULTS: No difference was noted in a comparison of the mean scores that were achieved by students on a previous paper (essay format) OSCE and the new web OSCE. There was a correlation of student performance on the web OSCE to the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) subject examination that had been completed the previous year (r = 0.60; P < .0001). Performance on the NBME subject examination was the only independent factor that affected reporter, interpreter, and manager skills that were assessed by the OSCE (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a web OSCE resulted in similar performance of the class as compared with performance on the previous paper OSCE. Correlation of student achievement on the web OSCE to the NBME subject examination supported the construct validity of this institutional examination beyond the areas of face and content validity in which OSCEs may excel.

The prevalence of major depression or dysthymia among aged Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Estimates of the prevalence of major depression vary widely. Current estimates range from 2 to 14 % depending upon the definition and procedure for diagnosis. Further, most estimates are for special populations, either living in selected geographic areas or receiving specific types of medical care. A national survey of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries provides an opportunity to assess the current level of major depression or dysthymia among a diverse population of older Americans. STUDY DESIGN: The Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) was administered to a national random sample of 1,000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries. We used the Mental Component Summary (MCS) measure of the SF-36 to estimate the prevalence of major depression or dysthymia. Logistic regression was used to examine associated factors. RESULTS: The response rate was 61.7%. Using an MCS score of 42 or lower, prevalence of major depression or dysthymia was estimated to be 25% for respondents age 65 years and older. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of major depression or dysthymia was associated with years of education (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.87), difficulties performing activities of daily living (OR = 1.72), and Medicaid enrollment (OR = 2.67). CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that one-quarter of the respondents reported mental health problems consistent with major depression or dysthymia. This is higher than previously reported. Like previous studies, years of education, physical impairment, and poverty are strong predictors of major depression or dysthymia. The high rate of major depression or dysthymia implies there may be considerable unmet need among elderly Medicare FFS beneficiaries for diagnosing and treating mental illness.