Cecal volvulus secondary to mesodiverticular band.

Meckel's diverticula are one of the most common gastrointestinal anomalies, yet mesodiverticular bands are rare. The treatment of these bands commonly requires surgery. A healthy patient in his 20s presented to the emergency department with a 1 day history of acute onset abdominal pain. Computed tomography imaging was consistent with volvulus of the large intestine. In the operating room, the patient was noted to have a band between the ileal mesentery and tip of a Meckel's diverticulum, consistent with a mesodivertiular band, through which cecum had volvulized. The patient underwent resection. The patient recovered without major complications. Mesodiverticular bands are rare, but may present as hemoperitoneum, small bowel obstruction, or volvulus. Pre-operative diagnosis of a mesodiverticular band is often difficult and they are most commonly diagnosed intraoperatively. Treatment should include surgery and may include simple lysis of the band, bowel resection, or more extensive resection if other pathology is present.

Bone Anchor Fixation in the Repair of Blunt Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Western Trauma Association Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are rare but require a variety of operative techniques to repair including bone anchor fixation (BAF) when tissue tears off bony structures. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of BAF technique for blunt TAWH repair. Bone anchor fixation and no BAF repairs were compared, hypothesizing increased hernia recurrence with BAF repair. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the WTA blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed including all patients who underwent repair of their TAWH. Patients with BAF were compared to those with no BAF with bivariate analyses. RESULTS: 176 patients underwent repair of their TAWH with 41 (23.3%) undergoing BAF. 26 (63.4%) patients had tissue fixed to bone, with 7 of those reinforced with mesh. The remaining 15 (36.6%) patients had bridging mesh anchored to bone. The BAF group had a similar age, sex, body mass index, and injury severity score compared to the no BAF group. The time to repair (1 vs 1 days, P = .158), rate of hernia recurrence (9.8% vs 12.7%, P = .786), and surgical site infection (SSI) (12.5% vs 15.6%, P = .823) were all similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This largest series to date found nearly one-quarter of TAWH repairs required BAF. Bone anchor fixation repairs had a similar rate of hernia recurrence and SSI compared to no BAF repairs, suggesting this is a reasonable option for repair of TAWH. However, future prospective studies are needed to compare specific BAF techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes including patient-centered outcomes such as pain and quality of life.

A western trauma association multicenter comparison of mesh versus non-mesh repair of blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) occur in <1 % of trauma patients. Optimal repair techniques, such as mesh reinforcement, have not been studied in detail. We hypothesize that mesh use will be associated with increased surgical site infections (SSI) and not improve hernia recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Western Trauma Association blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed. Patients who underwent TAWH repair during initial hospitalization (1/2012-12/2018) were included. Mesh repair patients were compared to primary repair patients (non-mesh). A logistic regression was conducted to assess risk factors for SSI. RESULTS: 157 patients underwent TAWH repair during index hospitalization with 51 (32.5 %) having mesh repair: 24 (45.3 %) synthetic and 29 (54.7 %) biologic. Mesh patients were more commonly smokers (43.1 % vs. 22.9 %, p = 0.016) and had a larger defect size (10 vs. 6 cm, p = 0.003). Mesh patients had a higher rate of SSI (25.5 % vs. 9.5 %, p = 0.016) compared to non-mesh patients, but a similar rate of recurrence (13.7 % vs. 10.5%, p = 0.742), hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Mesh use (OR 3.66) and higher ISS (OR 1.06) were significant risk factors for SSI in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Mesh was used more frequently in flank TAWH and those with a larger defect size. Mesh use was associated with a higher incidence and risk of SSI but did not reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. When repairing TAWH mesh should be employed judiciously, and prospective randomized studies are needed to identify clear indications for mesh use in TAWH.

The Effect of Body Mass Index on the Creation of an End-Colostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

With the increasing prevalence of obesity, there has been a parallel increase in the incidence of rectal cancer. The association of body mass index (BMI) and end-colostomy creation versus primary anastomosis in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer has not been described. This is a retrospective study of patients with rectal cancer from 2012 to 2018 using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. 16,446 (92.1%) underwent primary anastomosis and 1,418 (7.9%) underwent creation of an end-colostomy. Patients with a BMI of 25-29.9 (overweight) comprised the most frequent group to have a proctectomy (reference group), but the least likely to have an end-colostomy. Patients with severe obesity (BMI 50+) had an adjusted odds ratio for end-colostomy of 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-4.7) compared to the reference group. Patients who have severe obesity should be counseled regarding the likelihood of an end-colostomy and may benefit from medical weight management or weight-loss surgery.

Risk factors for recurrence in blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias: A secondary analysis of a Western Trauma association multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated risk factors for recurrence of blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH). METHODS: Twenty trauma centers identified repaired TAWH from January 2012 to December 2018. Logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: TAWH were repaired in 175 patients with 21 (12.0%) known recurrences. No difference was found in location, defect size, or median time to repair between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Mesh use was not protective of recurrence. Female sex, injury severity score (ISS), emergency laparotomy (EL), and bowel resection were associated with hernia recurrence. Bowel resection remained significant in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Female sex, ISS, EL, and bowel resection were identified as risk factors for hernia recurrence. Mesh use and time to repair were not associated with recurrence. Surgeons should be mindful of these risk factors but could attempt acute repair in the setting of appropriate physiologic parameters.

Retrospective review of intervention for traumatic blunt spleen injuries in adolescents by trauma center type.

BACKGROUND: Management guidelines for pediatric blunt spleen injuries (BSI) include adolescent patients but few studies have compared current management of adolescents with respect to other age groups by center type. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2017-2018 National Trauma Quality Improvement (TQIP) data of children (6-12), adolescents (13-17) and young adults (18-24) with BSI presenting to an adult, pediatric only, or adult/pediatric trauma center, comparing the rate of splenic intervention for adolescents by trauma center was performed. RESULTS: Children had lower odds of spleen intervention than adolescents at both adult (OR 0.61 95%CI 0.39, 0.95) and adult/pediatric (OR 0.55 95%CI 0.35, 0.87) centers but did not differ at pediatric centers (OR 0.94 95%CI 0.39, 2.2) (n = 10,494). Adolescents adjusted odds of intervention was equal to adults at adult trauma centers (OR 1.2 95%CI 0.95, 1.4). CONCLUSION: Adolescents are more likely to undergo interventions for BSI as compared to children at both adult and adult/pediatric trauma centers.

Management of blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) occur in approximately 15,000 patients per year. Limited data are available to guide the timing of surgical intervention or the feasibility of nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients presenting with blunt TAWH from January 2012 through December 2018 was conducted. Patient demographic, surgical, and outcomes data were collected from 20 institutions through the Western Trauma Association Multicenter Trials Committee. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one patients with TAWH were identified. One hundred and seventy-six (62.6%) patients underwent operative hernia repair, and 105 (37.4%) patients underwent nonoperative management. Of those undergoing surgical intervention, 157 (89.3%) were repaired during the index hospitalization, and 19 (10.7%) underwent delayed repair. Bowel injury was identified in 95 (33.8%) patients with the majority occurring with rectus and flank hernias (82.1%) as compared with lumbar hernias (15.8%). Overall hernia recurrence rate was 12.0% (n = 21). Nonoperative patients had a higher Injury Severity Score (24.4 vs. 19.4, p = 0.010), head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (1.1 vs. 0.6, p = 0.006), and mortality rate (11.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.031). Patients who underwent late repair had lower rates of primary fascial repair (46.4% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.012) and higher rates of mesh use (78.9% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Recurrence rate was not statistically different between the late and early repair groups (15.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.869). CONCLUSION: This report is the largest series and first multicenter study to investigate TAWHs. Bowel injury was identified in over 30% of TAWH cases indicating a significant need for immediate laparotomy. In other cases, operative management may be deferred in specific patients with other life-threatening injuries, or in stable patients with concern for bowel injury. Hernia recurrence was not different between the late and early repair groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

Evaluation of a High-risk Patient Reminder System for Colonoscopy Surveillance.

Objectives: In this paper we report the evaluation of a proprietary recall system for promoting compliance with recommended follow-up in high-risk patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review for patients of an active private colon and rectal surgery practice having colonoscopy in 2006. Patients selected were <80 years of age and assessed to be high-risk by findings at exam or personal/family history of colorectal neoplasm with a recommendation for follow-up surveillance colonoscopy ranging from months to 5 years. Up to 6 months from recommendation was considered to be within compliance. Results: A total of 795 patients met the inclusion criteria, with average age of 63.2 years, 422 (53.1%) being men. Compliance with surveillance colonoscopy recommendations was 62.5%. The recall system impacted patient behavior with compliant patients being sent a median of one letter (average, 1.5) and late or no follow-up patients being sent a median of 4 letters (average, 3.9). Conclusions: Multiple contacts with patients are required to improve compliance with surveillance. Our findings support at least 4 to 5 efforts to remind patients of the importance to schedule a colonoscopy is necessary to optimize compliance.