Psychiatric and non-psychiatric drugs causing false-positive amphetamines urine test in psychiatric patients: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS.

INTRODUCTION: Immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS) is frequently used in clinical practice for initial screening process, being generally available, fast, and inexpensive. Exposure to widely prescribed drugs might determine false-positive UDS amphetamines, leading to diagnostic issues, wrong therapeutic choices, impairment of physician-patient relationship, and legal implications. AREAS COVERED: To summarize and comment on a comprehensive list of compounds responsible for UDS false positives for amphetamines, we conducted a literature review on PubMed along with a comparison with Real-World Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database analysis between 2010 and 2022. Forty-four articles and 125 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) involving false-positive amphetamine UDS in psychiatric patients were retrieved from FAERS. EXPERT OPINION: False-positive results were described in literature for antidepressants, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and antipsychotics, but also for non-psychiatric drugs of common use, such as labetalol, fenofibrate, and metformin. Immunoassay method is usually responsible for false-positive results, and in most cases, mass spectrometry (MS) does not eventually confirm the UDS positivity. Physicians should be aware of immunoassays' limitations and when turning to a confirmatory test. Any new cross-reaction should be reported to pharmacovigilance activities.

The potential antidepressant effect of antidiabetic agents: New insights from a pharmacovigilance study based on data from the reporting system databases FAERS and VigiBase.

Background: Growing evidence supports a bidirectional association between diabetes and depression; promising but limited and conflicting data from human studies support the intriguing possibility that antidiabetic agents may be used to relieve effectively depressive symptoms in diabetic patients. We investigated the potential antidepressant effects of antidiabetic drugs in a high-scale population data from the two most important pharmacovigilance databases, i.e., the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the VigiBase. Material and methods: From the two primary cohorts of patients treated with antidepressants retrieved from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and VigiBase we identified cases (depressed patients experiencing therapy failure) and non-cases (depressed patients experiencing any other adverse event). We then calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM), and Empirical Bayes Regression-Adjusted Mean (ERAM) for cases versus non-cases in relation with the concurrent exposure to at least one of the following antidiabetic agent: A10BA Biguanides; A10BB Sulfonylureas; A10BG Thiazolidinediones; A10BH DPP4-inhibitors; A10BJ GLP-1 analogues; A10BK SGLT2 inhibitors (i.e., those agents for which preliminary evidence from literature supports our pharmacological hypothesis). Results: For GLP-1 analogues, all the disproportionality scores showed values <1, i.e., statistically significant, in both analyses [from the FAERS: ROR confidence interval of 0.546 (0.450-0.662); PRR (p-value) of 0.596 (0.000); EBGM (CI) of 0.488 (0.407-0.582); ERAM (CI) of 0.480 (0.398-0.569) and VigiBase: ROR (CI) of 0.717 (0.559-0.921); PRR (p-value) of 0.745 (0.033); EBGM (CI) of 0.586 (0.464-0.733); ERAM of (CI): 0.515 (0.403-0.639)]. Alongside GLP-1 analogues, DPP-4 Inhibitors and Sulfonylureas showed the greatest potential protective effect. With regard to specific antidiabetic agents, liraglutide and gliclazide were associated with a statistically significant decrease in all disproportionality scores, in both analyses. Conclusion: The findings of this study provide encouraging results, albeit preliminary, supporting the need for further clinical research for investigating repurposing of antidiabetic drugs for neuropsychiatric disorders.

On the potential of drug repurposing in dysphagia treatment: New insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance study and a systematic review.

Background: Polypharmacy is common in patients with dysphagia. Routinely used drugs may influence swallowing function either improving or worsening it. We aimed to explore the potential effects of three commonly used drug classes on dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia through a systematic review and a real-world data analysis to probe the possibility of drug repurposing for dysphagia treatment. Material and Methods: Five electronic databases were searched. Studies on adults at risk for dysphagia, treated with Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors (DPP-4i), Adrenergic Beta-Antagonists (beta-blockers), or Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEi), and reporting outcomes on dysphagia or aspiration pneumonia were included. A nested case/non-case study was performed on adverse events recorded in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) on patients >64 years. Cases (dysphagia or aspiration pneumonia) were compared between patients only treated with Levodopa and patients who were concomitantly treated with the drugs of interest. Results: Twenty studies were included in the review (17 on ACEi, 2 on beta-blockers, and 1 on DPP-4i). Contrasting findings on the effects of ACEi were found, with a protective effect mainly reported in Asian studies on neurological patients. Beta-blockers were associated with a reduced dysphagia rate. The study on DPP-4i suggested no effect on dysphagia and an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia. The FAERS analysis showed a reduction of the risk for dysphagia/aspiration pneumonia with ACEi, beta-blockers, and DPP-4i. Conclusion: Our study explores the potential drug repurposing of ACEi, beta-blockers and DPP-4i in neurological patients with dysphagia to improve swallowing function and reduce aspiration pneumonia risk. Future randomized controlled studies should confirm these results and clarify the underlying mechanisms of action.

Exploring the underlying mechanisms of drug-induced impulse control disorders: a pharmacovigilance-pharmacodynamic study.

INTRODUCTION: Impulse control disorders (e.g. pathological gambling, hypersexuality) may develop as adverse reactions to drugs. Pathogenetic hypotheses have mainly focused on D3-receptor agonism, and switching to alternatives with different pharmacologic mechanisms represents a common management strategy. Nonetheless, treatment failure is common and gaining pathophysiological insights is needed. AIM: We aimed to identify targets potentially contributing to pathologic impulsivity. METHOD: We performed a pharmacovigilance-pharmacodynamic study on dopamine agonists and antipsychotics using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (January 2004-December 2021). We estimated disproportionate reporting using the Bayesian information component. Using online public databases (IUPHAR, ChEMBL, PDSP, DrugBank), we calculated drug occupancies. To identify the targets potentially contributing to impulsivity, we fitted univariate regression models interpolating information components and occupancies within dopamine agonists and antipsychotics. Sensitivity analyses were performed to check for the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Among 19 887 reports of impulsivity, 5898 recorded an antipsychotic, and 3100 a dopamine agonist. The more robust signals concerned aripiprazole (N = 3091; median information component [95% confidence interval] = 4.51[4.45-4.55]) and brexpiprazole (229; 4.00[3.78-4.16]) for antipsychotics, pergolide (105; 5.82[5.50-6.06]) and pramipexole (2009; 5.43[5.36-5.48]) for dopamine agonists. Robust, significant positive associations between drug occupancy and impulsivity reporting were found for D3 within dopamine agonists (beta = 1.52; P-value = 0.047) and 5-HT1a within antipsychotics (1.92, 0.029). CONCLUSION: Our results supported the role of D3-receptor agonism in inducing impulsivity in dopamine receptor agonists and identified a potential role of 5-HT1a receptor agonism in antipsychotics. Investigating these receptors may drive towards a better management of drug-induced impulsivity.

Safety of fexofenadine and other second-generation oral antihistamines before and after the removal of the prescription requirement in Italy and other European countries: A real-world evidence study and systematic review.

Background: The change from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) status of oral antihistamines may raise concerns about drug safety due to the possibility of misuse/abuse. In most European countries, oral antihistamines are available without prescription, whereas in Italy, only <10-tablet packs are available OTC. Objectives: To evaluate the safety profile of fexofenadine after OTC switch in Italy in a real-world setting, and to compare its safety profile to that of other European countries where larger pack sizes are available. To compare the safety of fexofenadine, cetirizine, and loratadine in Italy. To examine safety/efficacy across Europe with a systematic review. Methods: This case-by-case analysis used the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to extract data of the adverse events (AEs) related to fexofenadine, loratadine and cetirizine in Italy January 2010-June 2020. The year 2016 was taken as the index date (removal of prescription requirement) for evaluation of the reporting trend of AEs of fexofenadine in Italy and make a comparison pre/post-OTC switch. A comparison of AEs with other European countries where fexofenadine is sold OTC in large packs >20 tablets (Belgium, Portugal, Switzerland, Finland, Hungary) was made. The rate at which an AE related to oral antihistamines occurred was estimated by calculation of the reporting rate (number of cases/[defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants per day]) on the basis of IQVIA sales data using the Italian Institute of Statistics database. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. Results: There were 3760 reports of AEs with a suspected association with fexofenadine; of these, eight were reported from Italy. There was a slightly increasing trend per year, in line with a general reporting trend of other drugs. In European countries where fexofenadine is available, the impact of OTC switch on AE reporting activity was negligible: from 2016, the reporting rate increased slightly and then normalized at 3.01, an incidence value similar to that recorded before the OTC switch (3.7 in 2015). Of 22 studies included in the systematic review, 18 (82%) positively evaluated the OTC use of oral antihistamines, confirming an acceptable safety/tolerability profile. Conclusion: There was no difference in number of AEs reported for fexofenadine pre/post-OTC switch, indicating a similar safety profile. Spontaneous reporting systems are a valuable source of real-world data and support the OTC provision of oral antihistamines in Europe and fexofenadine in Italy, in addition to supporting the use of larger pack sizes in Italy.

Antibiotic-Induced Neutropenia in Pediatric Patients: New Insights From Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses and a Systematic Review.

Aim: to characterize pediatric cases of antibiotic-associated neutropenia through a multidisciplinary approach, focusing on the temporal association between the wide spectrum of treatment options and the occurrence of this relatively uncommon but potentially clinically relevant adverse event. Methods: we carried out a pharmacoepidemiological analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, a retrospective chart review and a systematic review of the literature, focusing on the time to onset (TTO) of this side effect, in the pediatric clinical setting. Results: A total of 281 antibiotic-related neutropenia events, involving 11 categories of antibiotics, were included in the time to onset analysis. The median TTO ranged from 4 to 60 days after the start of the therapy. A shorter median TTO was found from the retrospective chart review [16 patients: median days (25th-75th percentiles) = 4 (3-5)], compared to 15 (9-18) vs. 10 (6-18) for literature (224 patients) and FAERS (41 cases), respectively. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes, J01X, J01F, J01E and J04A, and the median TTOs retrieved from more than one source revealed high accordance (p > 0.05), with J01X causing neutropenia in less than a week and J01F/J01E/J04A in more than 10 days. Antibiotics were discontinued in nearly 34% of cases. In FDA Adverse Event Reporting System reports, half of the patients experiencing neutropenia were hospitalized. Conclusion: Whereas antibiotic associated neutropenia is benign in the majority of cases, yet it should not be neglected as, even if rarely, it may put children at higher risk of clinical consequences. Clinicians' awareness of antibiotic-associated neutropenia and its mode of presentation contributes to the continuous process of monitoring safety of antibiotics.

Pneumatosis Intestinalis Induced by Anticancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is a rare condition due to the presence of gas within the bowel wall; it is mainly caused by endoscopic procedures, infections and other gastrointestinal diseases. Oncological therapies have been reported to be a cause of PI as well, but their role is not clearly defined. This systematic review investigates the concurrency of PI and antitumor therapy in cancer patients, considering both solid tumors and onco-hematological ones. We performed a literature review of PubMed, Embase and the Web of Science up to September 2021 according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 62 papers reporting 88 different episodes were included. PI was mainly reported with targeted therapies (sunitinib and bevacizumab above all) within the first 12 weeks of treatment. This adverse event mostly occurred in the metastatic setting, but in 10 cases, it also occurred also in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. PI was mostly localized in the large intestine, being fatal in 11 cases, while in the remaining cases, symptoms were usually mild, or even absent. A significant risk of PI reoccurrence after drug reintroduction was also reported (6/18 patients), with no fatal outcomes. Potential pharmacological mechanisms underlying PI pathogenesis are also discussed. In conclusion, although uncommonly, PI can occur during oncological therapies and may lead to life-threatening complications; therefore, consideration of its occurrence among other adverse events is warranted in the presence of clinical suspicion.

Herpes zoster and simplex reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: new insights from a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) database analysis.

BACKGROUND: A few cases of Herpes Zoster and Simplex reactivation following COVID-19 immunization have been recently described, but the real extent of this suspected adverse event has not been elucidated yet. METHODS: We performed a nested case/control study by using the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database. We carried out a case-level clinical review of all Herpes reactivation cases following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. For cases and controls, significance was set at P = 0.05, differential risk of reporting was assessed for each vaccine as reporting odds ratio and incidence was estimated based on the total number of vaccine doses administered. RESULTS: Of 6,195 cases included in the analysis (5,934 and 273 reporting Herpes Zoster and Herpes Simplex, respectively) over 90% were non-serious. We found a slightly higher risk of reporting both for Zoster (ROR = 1.49) and Simplex (ROR = 1.51) infections following the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The estimated incidence was approximately 0.7/100,000 and 0.03/100,000 for Zoster and Simplex, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of cases (almost all of non-serious nature) makes the potential occurrence of this adverse effect negligible from clinical standpoints, thus supporting the good safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccination, which remains strongly recommended.

Managing folate deficiency implies filling the gap between laboratory and clinical assessment.

The characterization of folate status in subjects at risk of deficiency and with altered vitamin homeostasis is crucial to endorse preventive intervention health policies, especially in developed countries. Several physiological changes (i.e. pregnancy), clinical situations and diseases have been associated to increased requirement, impaired intake and absorption of folate. However clinical practice guidelines (CPG) endorse folic acid supplementation generally discarding the use of its determination in serum to assess the risk of deficiency and/or its concentration at baseline. Poor confidence on the diagnostic accuracy of serum folate assays still persists in the current CPGs although recent standardization efforts have greatly improved inter-method variability and precision. In this review we critically appraise the methodological issues concerning laboratory folate determination and the evidence on the potential adverse effects of folic acid exposure. The final aim is to build a sound background to promote serum folate-based cost-effective health care policies by optimizing folic acid supplementation in subjects at risk of deficiency and with altered folate homeostasis. Our first result was to adjust in relation to current serum folate assays the thresholds reported by CPGs as index of folate status, defined on the association with metabolic and hematologic indicators. We identify a statistically significant difference between the estimated thresholds and accordingly show that the assessment of folate status actually changes in relation to the assay employed. The use of the method-dependent thresholds here reported may pragmatically endorse the stewardship of folic acid supplementation in clinical practice and increase the cost-effectiveness of health care policies.

The use of biological agents in pregnant women affected by autoimmune disorders: Why we need more research of this neglected area.

Women of childbearing age are largely affected by several autoimmune disorders (the estimates range between 1.5 and 10 per 10,000). The increasing number of effective biological agents has dramatically revolutionized the treatment of these clinical conditions, ameliorating the patient's quality of life. The use of these agents by women during pregnancy is growing to ensure the disease activity control and avoid adverse health outcomes. However, for many newer biological agents, the degree of information concerning their use in pregnancy is often incomplete to perform a conclusive risk assessment on fetal and maternal health given the exclusion of this specific population from pharmacological clinical trials. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed the unacceptable inequities of pharmacological research and medical treatment for pregnant and lactating women, exacerbating the need for filling the gaps of quantitative and qualitative pharmacology data in this sensitive population. ere we summarize (i) what is already known about safety and effectiveness of biological agents in this understudied population (with specific focus on pregnancy-related health outcomes), and what we are going to learn from the on-going studies among pregnant women treated with biological agents; (ii) the methodological and ethical considerations that characterize the pharmacological research in pregnancy, also discussing emerging evidence on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in this clinical setting.

The impact of anti-TNFα agents on weight-related changes: new insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

INTRODUCTION: Studies in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) have inconsistently suggested that anti-TNFα therapy may be associated with excessive weight gain. AREAS COVERED: We performed a nested case/non-case analysis to investigate the anti-TNF-α inhibitor-associated body-changes in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The risk was expressed as a measure of disproportionality using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) while adjusting for sex, drugs known to cause weight gain and reporter type. We also performed a time-to-onset (TTO) analysis of body weight-related events. RESULTS: Infliximab was the most commonly involved TNF-α inhibitor in body weight-related changes, reaching an aROR of 1.42 (95%CI:1. 26; 1.59). An increased risk was especially found in patients affected by rheumatic disorders, both in the adult and pediatric population. The median TTO after the start of anti- TNFα therapy was about 6-7 months for both children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Given the potential effect of these agents on the excess weight gain in IMIDs patients, continuous attention for this side effect with appropriate counseling regarding lifestyle modifications are warranted, especially in those at high risk for obesity.

Preliminary evidence on the safety profile of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty): new insights from data analysis in EudraVigilance and adverse reaction reports from an Italian health facility.

The first vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 made available in Italy has been BNT162b2, the two-dose mRNA-based vaccine developed by Pfizer-BioNTech. The ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco hospital is located in one of the areas most affected by the pandemic, and to date over 2000 healthcare professionals have been injected with both vaccine doses. We have collected all spontaneous safety reports in which BNT162b2 was designated as the possible cause. We also have carried out a descriptive analysis of reports submitted in EudraVigilance in the same time-frame and compared our findings with those observed in clinical trials. We have identified several new and unexpected adverse reactions that will be helpful for reviewing the safety profile defined in the Summary of Product Characteristics for this vaccine.

Association between the glyco-metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs and their chemical and pharmacological profile: a network meta-analysis and regression.

BACKGROUND: Glyco-metabolic deteriorations are the most limiting adverse reactions to antipsychotics in the long term. They have been incompletely investigated and the properties of antipsychotics that determine their magnitude are not clarified.To rank antipsychotics by the magnitude of glyco-metabolic alterations and to associate it to their pharmacological and chemical properties, we conducted a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Psycinfo on 10 September 2020. We selected studies containing the endpoint-baseline difference or the distinct values of at least one outcome among glucose, HbA1c, insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, total/HDL/LDL cholesterols. Of 2094 articles, 46 were included in network meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed by the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Mean differences (MD) were obtained by random-effects network meta-analysis; relations between MD and antipsychotic properties were analyzed by linear regressions. Antipsychotic properties investigated were acidic and basic pKa, polar surface area, polarizability, and occupancies of D2, H1, M1, M3, α1A, α2A, 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C receptors. RESULTS: We meta-analyzed 46 studies (11 464 patients); on average, studies lasted 15.47 weeks, patients had between 17.68 and 61.06 years of mean age and 61.64% were males. Olanzapine and clozapine associated with greater deteriorations, aripiprazole and ziprasidone with smaller deteriorations. Higher polarizability and 5-HT1A receptor occupancy were associated with smaller deteriorations, H1, M1, and M3 receptor occupancies with larger deteriorations. CONCLUSIONS: Drug rankings may guide antipsychotic switching toward metabolically safer drugs. Mechanistic insights may suggest improvements for combination therapies and drug development. More data are required regarding newer antipsychotics.

Hyponatremia Following Antipsychotic Treatment: In Silico Pharmacodynamics Analysis of Spontaneous Reports From the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database and an Updated Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia associated with antipsychotic drugs is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction; the underlying pharmacological mechanism has not yet been explained. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between pharmacological targets of antipsychotic drugs and the occurrence of hyponatremia by conducting a nested case-control study using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the associations between antipsychotics receptor occupancy and hyponatremia. We also performed a systematic review of clinical studies on this association. RESULTS: Of 139 816 reports involving at least 1 antipsychotic, 1.1% reported hyponatremia. Olanzapine was the most frequently suspected drug (27%). A significant positive association was found between dopamine D3, D4, and hyponatremia, while adrenergic α 1, serotonin 5-HT1A, and 5-HT2A receptor occupancies were negatively associated. A multivariable stepwise regression model showed that dopamine D3 (adj. odds ratio = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.09-1.34; P < .05) predicted the risk for hyponatremia (P < .05), while serotonin 5-HT2A occupancy (Adj. odds ratio = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.68-0.90; P < .01) exhibited a protective effect against hyponatremia. Among the 11 studies included in the systematic review, incidence rates of hyponatremia diverged between 0.003% and 86%, whereas the odds of developing hyponatremia from effect studies ranged between 0.83 and 3.47. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic drugs having a combined modest occupancy for D3 and 5-HT2A receptors and higher levels of D3 receptor occupancy correspond to different degrees of risk for hyponatremia. Based on the few, relatively large-scale available studies, atypical antipsychotics have a more attenuated risk profile for hyponatremia.

Beta-blocker-associated hypoglycaemia: New insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

AIMS: To investigate the statistical association between hypoglycaemia and ß-blocker use and to define what patient and drug characteristics could potentially increase the risk for its occurrence. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between pharmacological parameters of ß-blockers and the occurrence of hypoglycaemia by conducting a case/non case analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Pharmacological properties that could represent a predictive factor for hypoglycaemia were analysed through a multilinear binary logistic regression (null hypothesis rejected for values of P < .05). We also performed a systematic review of clinical studies on this association. RESULTS: Of 83 954 selected reports, 1465 cases (1.75%) of hypoglycaemia were identified. The association was found statistically significant for nadolol (reporting odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.98 [5.40-9.03]), celiprolol (2.35 [1.35-4.10]), propranolol (2.14 [1.87-2.46]) and bisoprolol (1.42 [1.25-1.61]). Paediatric cases (n = 310) showed a positive association with hypoglycaemia for long half-life drugs (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.232 [1.398-3.563]) and a negative association for ß1-selectivity (0.644 [0.414-0.999]). Seven papers were included in the systematic review. Because of great heterogeneity in study design and demographics, hypoglycaemia incidence rates varied greatly among studies, occurring in 1.73% of the cases for propranolol treatment (n total participants = 575), 6.6% for atenolol (n = 30) and 10% for carvedilol (n = 20). CONCLUSION: Nadolol appears to be the ß-blocker significantly most associated with hypoglycaemia and children represent the most susceptible sample. Furthermore, long half-life and nonselective ß-blockers seem to increase the risk for its occurrence.

Severe hypoglycemia in children treated with nadolol: A case report and FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We describe a case of severe hypoglycemia in a 14-month-old child as a suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) to nadolol, and we performed an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Although previous reports have identified the risk of severe hypoglycemia in children during treatment with ß-blockers, little is known about hypoglycemia as an ADR in infants treated with nadolol. Moreover, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of nadolol in children aged less than 1 year old are still not fully known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted all ADR reports involving nadolol from the FAERS database; in order to reduce the risk of bias, we only considered cases that exclusively reported nadolol as the suspect drug. We then selected cases of hypoglycemia in the pediatric population and conducted a manual deduplication. RESULTS: Upon FAERS database analysis, a total of 2,674 suspected ADR reports to nadolol were found. Of these, 1,950 (73%) were solely attributed to nadolol, and 63 of them were hypoglycemic events. A total of 47 reports included the relevant pediatric age (74.6%). After deduplication, we identified 25 cases (mean age: 3.65 years old); all of these reports were categorized as serious, and hospitalization was required in 15 cases. CONCLUSION: Hypoglycemia is a reported life-threatening ADR associated with nadolol, especially in infants, in whom this drug should be used with caution.

Changes in Anthropometric Parameters After Anti-TNFα Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors have been widely used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). TNFα also plays an important role in the regulation of weight homeostasis and metabolism and has been linked to variations in anthropometric responses. This relationship in patients with IBD has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of TNFα inhibitors on changes in anthropometric measures in both adults and children with IBD through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Multiple database searches identified studies involving children and adults with IBD and treated with TNFα inhibitors and reporting at least one primary outcome measure. Where possible, data were combined for meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, height, height/velocity, and fat and lean mass. Secondary outcomes included surrogate markers of disease activity. A random-effects model was used to estimate the standardised mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: In total, 23 cohort studies (total 1167 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed on 13 of these studies. In children, 6-29.3 months of anti-TNFα therapy had a small but statistically significant effect on weight (SMD 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.49; P = 0.001) with a mean gain in z score of 0.30 (standard error [SE] 0.12). In adults, 2-22.4 months of treatment had a moderate effect on BMI (SMD 0.72; 95% CI 0.17-1.26; P = 0.010; mean gain 1.23 kg/m2; SE 0.21). A small but statistically significant increase in BMI z score was found in children (SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.03-0.53; P = 0.026; mean change 0.31 ± standard deviation [SD] 0.14) after 12-29.3 months of therapy. A meta-analysis of four studies found a negligible but statistically significant increase in height (SMD 0.16; 95% CI 0.06-0.26; P = 0.002; mean change 0.17 z score [SE 0.05]). A negligible effect on fat mass (SMD 0.24; 95% CI -0.19-0.66; P = 0.272) was found in a meta-analysis of five studies. Of note, despite the high heterogeneity among the studies that addressed the issue, these results were also consistently supported by findings from studies not included in the meta-analysis and reviewed in the systematic review. Unfortunately, a lack of data meant we were unable to perform moderator analysis on observed heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNFα treatment appears to be associated with an increase in body weight, BMI, and other anthropometric parameters. Given the differing courses of IBD between children and adults, this association should be considered before initiating biologics for undernourished, overweight, and obese patients. Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020163079.