Magnitude of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission among household and non-household contacts of TB patients.

The household and non-household contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) face varying degrees of risk of infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. To quantify new infection and to determine the risk factors associated with new infection among named contacts in San Francisco, CA, USA. We performed a cohort study in patients with culture-positive pulmonary TB. We analyzed patient, contact, environmental and bacterial characteristics. Of the 2422 contacts named by 256 patients, 149 (6.2%) had new infection due to recent transmission from 79 (30.9%) patients. Of the 149 new infections, 87 (58.4%) occurred among household contacts and 62 (41.6%) among non-household contacts. Numerous acid-fast bacilli in sputum (odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95%CI 1.32-5.25) and contacts being named by more than one patient (OR 2.90, 95%CI 1.23-6.85) were associated with new infection among household contacts. Being older than 50 years (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.09-3.41) and an Asian/Pacific Islander (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.50-6.37) were associated with new infection among non-household contacts. Fewer than one third of patients caused new infection to his/her contacts. A substantial proportion of transmission resulting in new infection occurred outside of the household. The risk factors for infection among household and non-household contacts are different and should be considered when prioritizing control interventions. .

Impact of Euro-American sublineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on new infections among named contacts.

BACKGROUND: The impact of demographic, clinical, and bacterial factors on new infection by Euro-American lineage Mycobacterium tuberculosis among contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To describe the risk factors for new infection by Euro-American M. tuberculosis sublineages in San Francisco, California. DESIGN: We included contacts of patients with TB due to Euro-American M. tuberculosis. Sublineages were determined by large-sequence polymorphisms. We used tuberculin skin testing or QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube to identify contacts with new infection. Regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to determine the risk factors for new infection. RESULTS: We included 1488 contacts from 134 patients with TB. There were 79 (5.3%) contacts with new infection. In adjusted analyses, contacts of patients with TB due to region of difference 219 M. tuberculosis sublineage were less likely to have new infection (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.06-0.84) than those with other sublineages. Other risk factors for new infection were contacts exposed to more than one patient with TB, contacts exposed for 30 days, or contacts with a history of smoking or excessive alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to well-known exposure and clinical characteristics, bacterial characteristics independently contribute to the transmissibility of TB in San Francisco.

Reduced sensitivity of the QuantiFERON(®) test in diabetic patients with smear-negative tuberculosis.

SETTING: Immunosuppressive conditions have been associated with low sensitivity of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). However, no systematic analysis of patient and bacterial characteristics has been performed before. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and the risk factors for false-negative QuantiFERON(®)-TB (QFT) assay and TST in TB patients. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected in a community-based study of TB in San Francisco, CA, USA. We included 300 TB patients who underwent QFT and TST. RESULTS: The risk factors for false-negative QFT were human immunodeficiency virus infection and the use of QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold. In patients with sputum smear-negative TB, diabetes mellitus (DM) was associated with false-negative QFT (OR 2.85, 95%CI 1.02-7.97, P = 0.045). TST sensitivity was higher than QFT sensitivity in DM patients (OR 9.46, 95%CI 2.53-35.3). CONCLUSIONS: In San Francisco, QFT sensitivity was lower than that of TST, especially in patients with DM. Stratified analysis by sputum smear results showed that this association was specific to smear-negative TB. In contrast, TST was not affected by the presence of DM.

Programmatic impact of using QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in routine contact investigation activities.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the proportion of contacts tested with QuantiFERON ® -TB Gold (QFT-G) compared to the tuberculin skin test (TST) who were successfully evaluated and treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and to assess the correlation of positive test results with measures of TB exposure. METHODS: Contacts of culture-confirmed pulmonary TB cases reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health between 1 March 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included. RESULTS: Of 1291 contacts meeting the eligibility criteria, 641 (50%) were tested with QFT-G and 650 (50%) with TST. Contacts tested with QFT-G were more likely to complete evaluation (64% vs. 56%, OR(adj ) = 1.52, 95%CI 1.12-2.06). Infected contacts started (89% vs. 72%, OR(adj) = 5.18, 95%CI 2.10-14.18) and completed (70% vs. 53%, OR(adj) = 3.37, 95%CI 1.78-6.56) LTBI treatment more often in the group tested with QFT-G. Positive QFT-G results, but not positive TST results, correlated with the intensity, proximity and duration of TB exposure in foreign-born subjects. CONCLUSION: More contacts were successfully evaluated and treated for LTBI when screened with QFT-G compared to TST. Measures of exposure correlated better with QFT-G-positive results and, therefore, appropriately identified high-risk contacts for TB prevention.