Modified Colson flap with subcutaneous liposuction for one-stage donor site removal: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and cosmetic results of an innovative procedure for modified Colson flap-graft consisting of immediate defatting of the flap by a liposuction cannula. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among patients with deep hand burns requiring a modified Colson flap between 2018 and 2021. Outcomes included functional and cosmetic assessment of the hand through a quality-of-life questionnaire, a sensitivity scale and a scar assessment scale. RESULTS: During this period, 7 patients were operated on using our technique. One patient was lost to follow-up; 7 patients with a median age of 44 years were included, with a total of 10 burned hands. The burns were thermal in 5 out of 7 cases and the coverage concerned the whole hand in 50% of the cases. The flaps all received cannula defatting. The median time to flap weaning was 23 days (20 to 30 days). The median follow-up was 16 months. One case required remote flap weaning. The median POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) per patient was 4 and 2 per observer. The median BMRCSS (British Medical Research Council Sensory Scale) was 122. One case had recovered S2 sensitivity, the other cases had S3 or S4 sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Immediate defatting is one of the factors in tegumental quality allowing rapid functional recovery of the hand. The cannula defatting technique does not appear to require additional defatting time. The use of the liposuction cannula allows a one-step, homogeneous, and easier defatting, with a lower risk of devascularization.

Risk factors and failures in the management of limb injuries in combat casualties.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of war wounds is based on a sequential surgical strategy, which frequently faces therapeutic failures, which then burden the final functional result. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors of failure of the different treatments to prevent the therapeutic failure. METHODS: A monocentric case-control study was done on French war-wounded soldiers treated for an open fracture caused by an invasive war weapon. The primary end point was the treatment failure three months after the injury. The risk factors of failure studied were the traumatic mechanism, the general and local lesional assessment, and the surgery performed. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016, 57 soldiers were included, with an average follow-up of 3.42 years. On 81 limb segments studied, the most injured segment was the leg (37.0%). A vital or urgent surgery requirement (OR = 1.56; p = 0.02) and bone loss substance (OR = 5.45; CI95% = 1.54-20.09) were risk factors of failure for limb salvage treatment. Improvised explosive device traumatic mechanism (OR = 1.56; p = 0.02) and the persistence of surgical site contamination after two debridement procedures (OR = 1.20; p = 0.04) were risk factors of failure for amputation procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Two main risk factors of treatment failure are highlighted: those in relation to traumatic mechanisms and general lesional assessment and those in relation to surgical site conditions. There is no over risk of failure in relation to surgical procedure and treatment.

Input of a Multi-Disciplinary Meeting in the Treatment of Osteoarticular Infections in French War Casualties.

INTRODUCTION: Extremity war-wounds present an elevated risk of infection and compromise reconstructive procedures. In a French military hospital, a multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) was created to standardize the care given to soldiers with osteoarticular infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MDM decisions. METHODS: An observational case study was performed including the French wounded at war treated for an osteoarticular infection between 2004 and 2016. They were separated into two groups according to their time of management: before (group A) or after (group B) the MDM creation in September 2010. Various operative and bacteriological parameters were analyzed retrospectively. A questionnaire was created to evaluate healthcare professionals' satisfaction toward the usefulness of the MDM on their practice. RESULTS: During the study period, 38 patients were included: 19 in group A and 19 in group B. Initial tests found an infection with one pathogen in 15 patients, an infection with 2 pathogens in 11 patients, and an infection with 3 or more pathogens in 12 patients. Enterobacter cloacae was the most common pathogen. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli were also frequent. The mean number of samples taken to conduct the bacteriological tests per operating session was significantly higher for group B than for group A. Twelve of the 14 questioned healthcare professionals believed the MDM was very useful in their patient management. CONCLUSION: The MDM seems to have had a beneficial impact on orthopedic surgeon practices. A significant increase of the number of samples taken was the most obvious sign that the French recommended practices for osteoarticular infections were followed since the creation of MDM.

Sequential management of tibial fractures using a temporary unicortical external fixator.

INTRODUCTION: The development of damage control orthopedics (DCO) procedures has led to the development of temporary unicortical external fixators (TUEFs) intended to limit deep infectious complications and facilitate early conversion to internal fixation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in two French military trauma centers, including on patients being treated for tibial fractures with a TUEF (UNYCO® - Orthofix®) followed by an early conversion to intramedullary nailing. RESULTS: Eleven patients with an average age of 41 were included between September 2015 and June 2017. A total of 12 TUEFs were implanted for one closed fracture and 11 open fractures, including one type I, eight types II, and two Gustilo types IIIB. The indication of DCO was related to hemodynamic instability in three cases, to the severity of soft tissue lesions in eight cases, and to the context of treatment in one case. The conversion to IM nailing was made after an average of 7.6 days. No significant loss of reduction was observed until internal osteosynthesis, which was performed with "fixator in place" in ten cases. The coverage of Gustilo type III injuries was performed by free flap transfers at the same time as IM nailing. All the patients were reviewed with an average follow-up of 16.5 months. Bone union was achieved in all cases. Two IM nailing dynamizations were carried out, but no bone grafting was required. Two cases of pandiaphysitis were observed and treated without functional complications. DISCUSSION: Despite a limited number of patients, this study demonstrates the reliability of the TUEF to maintain the reduction of tibial fractures and facilitate early conversion to IM nailing. Unicortical fixation does not prevent septic complications related to the severity of soft tissue injuries.

Initial management of complex hand injuries in military or austere environments: how to defer and prepare for definitive repair?

INTRODUCTION: The damage control orthopedics (DCO) concept is a sequential surgical management strategy indicated when ideal primary treatment is not possible or suitable. DCO principles are routinely applied to hand traumas in wartime practice, but could also be useful in a civilian setting when immediate specialized management cannot be carried out. METHODS: The authors report three typical observations of soldiers treated for a complex hand trauma on the field by orthopedic surgeons from the French Military Health Service (FMHS). Application of the hand DCO concept is analyzed and discussed considering the literature and the FMHS experience. RESULTS: With regards to treating the hand, DCO necessitates a meticulous debridement with precise wound assessment, the frequent use of a primary definitive internal fixation by K-wires, and the possibility of a temporary coverage. These simple and fast procedures help avoid infection and prepare the hand for secondary repair. CONCLUSION: Hand DCO can be applied by any surgeon in various situations: in association with polytrauma, complex injuries requiring multiple reconstructions, or delayed transfer to a specialized center.