Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Psychother Res ; : 1-10, 2024 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484281

RESUMO

Objective: Patients and therapists possess psychotherapy-related expectations, such as their forecast of what processes will promote improvement. Yet, there remains limited research on such change process expectations, including their independent and dyadic associations with psychotherapy outcome. In this study, we explored the predictive influence of participants' change process expectations, and their level of congruence, on therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: Patients (N = 75) and therapists (N = 17) rated their change process expectations at baseline, and patients rated their psychological distress at baseline and three months into treatment. RESULTS: Multilevel models indicated that patients' expectations for therapy to work through sharing sensitive contents openly and securely were positively related to subsequent improvement (B = -1.097; p = .007). On the other hand, patients' expectations for therapy to work through the exploration of unexpressed contents were negatively related to improvement (B = 1.388; p = .049). When patients rated the sharing of sensitive contents openly and securely higher than their therapists, they reported better outcomes (B = -16.528; p = .035). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that patients' expectations produce diverse effects during early stages of treatment, and that patients' belief in their ability to share sensitive contents may constitute a potential target to improve therapy effectiveness.

2.
J Affect Disord ; 347: 39-44, 2024 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992767

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Results of studies concerning a possible beneficial effect of Intranasal-Oxytocin (IN-OT) as an add-on treatment for patients with major depression (MDD) have been inconsistent. One possible explanation to account for the difference in the effect of IN-OT is comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD). This randomized controlled study was aimed to explore the differential effect of IN-OT administration among depressive patients with or without comorbid borderline personality disorder. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted on a specific subset of patients who participated in an RCT evaluating the impact of IN-OT as add-on treatment for patients with severe mental illness. Patients treated in inpatient settings (N = 58) were randomized and double-blindly allocated to receive twice daily IN-OT (32 IU) or placebo for a period of four weeks. The effect of IN-OT on therapy process and outcome was examined among patients with (n = 35) and without (n = 23) comorbid BPD. RESULTS: An interaction effect between diagnosis and group was observed on the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (B = 8.93, p = .007). Further analysis revealed that patients without BPD demonstrated significantly greater improvements following OT administration (B = -8.32, p = .001), whereas patients with BPD did not show significant improvement (B = 0.61, p = .76). The interactive pattern was also observed in the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (B = 0.25, p = .02), where patients without BPD demonstrated significantly larger improvements following OT administration (B = -0.29, p = .0009) as compared to placebo, while patients with BPD demonstrated no significant improvement (B = -0.04, p = .55). We did not find a harmful effect of IN-OT administration among patients with MDD and comorbid BPD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD and comorbid BPD benefit less from IN-OT administration as compared to depressed patients without BPD. Future studies should aim to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from IN-OT administration.


Assuntos
Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Ocitocina/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/complicações , Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/epidemiologia , Depressão
3.
J Psychiatr Res ; 169: 355-363, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101184

RESUMO

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) have been found to suffer a greater decline in psychological well-being compared to the general population in times of stress. The present study aimed to examine clinical and endocrine resilience factors of psychological well-being in SMI patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: After Covid-19 crisis outburst in Israel 112 participants, 69 outpatients, and 43 inpatients and day treatment patients were recruited. Outpatients signed an online informed consent and filled in questionnaires regarding their level of mental health symptoms (OQ-45), fear of Covid-19 (FCV), and psychological well-being (PWB). Inpatients answered the same questionnaires and in addition, went through a positive social interaction paradigm while providing three saliva samples to measure their s-IgA and oxytocin (OT) levels. RESULTS: A strong negative correlation was found in the whole sample between reported mental health symptoms, fear of Covid-19, and well-being. Hierarchical regression did not find additional contribution of the fear of the pandemic in predicting well-being beyond the impact of symptomatology. For inpatients (N = 39) only, hierarchical regression found that oxytocin, but not s-IgA could explain 5% of the variance of well-being (R2 = 0.05) in individuals with SMI regardless of their mental health symptoms (R2 = 0.46) and their marital status (R2 = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: OT is suggested as a possible independent biological resilience factor of well-being in times of major stress among SMI patients. It is still unknown whether OT is a mediator that contributes to well-being or a biological marker that indicates the degree of beneficial social interactions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Ocitocina , Pandemias , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores , Imunoglobulina A
4.
Psychother Res ; : 1-11, 2023 Oct 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856680

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The effects of oxytocin (OT) administration on psychotherapeutic processes have thus far been elusive. This study explored the effect of OT administration on patient-therapist congruence of the working alliance. METHOD: Inpatients with mental disorders (N = 87) participating in a randomized controlled trial received OT (n = 44) or placebo (n = 43) intranasally twice a day, for four weeks. Patients and therapists rated the alliance after each session. RESULTS: Oxytocin significantly moderated the level of agreement (b = -0.56, SE = 0.25, t = -2.30, p = 0.02), such that patients receiving OT demonstrated lower discrepancy (b = -0.73, p < 0.001) than did those receiving placebo (b = -1.30, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the mutual covariance of patient-therapist ratings across sessions was positive and significant for patients receiving placebo (b = 0.26, p = 0.01) but not for patients in the OT group (b = -0.06, p = .56). CONCLUSION: Oxytocin can reduce discrepancies of patient-therapist perceptions of the alliance, although additional studies are needed to explore OT's effect on alliance development over time. As alliance congruence is associated with therapy outcomes, such intervention may lead to enhancement of therapeutic gains.

5.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 151: 106074, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36905736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies exploring the potential augmenting effect of oxytocin for patients with mental disorders have thus far reported mixed effects. However, oxytocin's effect may differ across patients with different interpersonal characteristics. This study aimed to examine the moderating role of attachment and personality traits on the effect of oxytocin administration on the therapeutic working alliance and symptomatic change, among hospitalized patients with severe mental illness. METHODS: Patients (N = 87) were randomly assigned to receive oxytocin or placebo, as an add-on to psychotherapy for a period of four weeks, in two inpatient units. Therapeutic alliance and symptomatic change were measured weekly, and personality and attachment were assessed at pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Oxytocin administration was significantly associated with improvement of depression (B=2.12, SE=0.82, t = 2.56, p = .012), and suicidal ideation (B=0.03, SE=0.01, t = 2.44, p = .016) for patients low in openness and extraversion, respectively. Nonetheless, oxytocin administration was also significantly associated with a deterioration in the working alliance for patients high in extraversion (B=-0.11, SE=0.04, t = -2.73, p = .007), low in neuroticism (B=0.08, SE=0.03, t = 2.01, p = .047) and low in agreeableness (B=0.11, SE=0.04, t = 2.76, p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Oxytocin may act as a double-edged sword when it comes to its effect on treatment process and outcome. Future studies should focus on routes to characterize patients who might benefit the most from such augmentation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pre-registration in clinicaltrials.com: NCT03566069; Israel Ministry of Health: MOH_2017-12-05_002003.


Assuntos
Ocitocina , Transtornos da Personalidade , Humanos , Ocitocina/farmacologia , Personalidade , Psicoterapia , Israel
6.
Vaccine ; 41(9): 1567-1572, 2023 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36725432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The public's willingness to get vaccinated continues to be a source of concern. In this study we assessed the psychometric properties of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale (C19-VHS) as well as the association between the scale and self-reported past COVID-19 vaccination, approximately two weeks after the national vaccine distribution plan was launched in Israel. METHODS: Participants were recruited via an online survey distributed through social media platforms and mailing lists. A total of 650 individuals completed the C19-VHS, the general vaccine hesitancy scale, and the fear of COVID-19 scale, and reported on demographic and pandemic-related characteristics. Principal component and Cronbach's alpha analyses were performed to assess the factor structure and reliability of the scale. Logistic regressions were employed to assess the scale's convergent and discriminative validity. RESULTS: Two factors pertaining to "lack of confidence" (Factor 1) and "risk perception" (Factor 2) emerged. Cronbach's alpha indicated good reliability of Factor 1 (0.93), with lower reliability of Factor 2 (0.72). Younger age was associated with higher risk perception, with women showing less confidence and perceiving greater risks. Lower hesitancy significantly predicted actual COVID-19 vaccine uptake after adjusting for demographic and pandemic-related factors (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 1.11-1.21, p <.001). Older age, being a woman, and receiving the flu vaccine in the past year were also predictive of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. DISCUSSION: The C19-VHS measure shows robust psychometric properties and is associated with actual vaccine uptake. Future studies assessing COVID-19 vaccination attitudes may utilize this scale to assess current COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in different contexts and cultures.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Feminino , Israel , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medo , Vacinação
7.
Neuropsychobiology ; 82(1): 14-23, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603563

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, several studies were conducted to explore the potential augmenting effect of oxytocin for the treatment of individuals with severe mental illness. Nonetheless, studies exploring its effects in routine inpatient settings using high-quality randomized controlled trials are scarce. The current study assessed the effect of oxytocin administration on treatment process and outcome among psychiatric inpatients, while employing a rigorous experimental methodology. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted at a public psychiatric hospital in Israel. Patients (N = 87, 71.3% female participants) were administered intranasal oxytocin/placebo twice daily for 4 weeks, as add-on to usual care. Patients were assessed for severity of anxiety and depression symptoms and their working alliance with their therapist after each therapy session, and treatment outcome was assessed weekly. Multilevel modeling was performed to assess the linear change from pre- to post-treatment. RESULTS: Patients receiving OT demonstrated significantly larger symptomatic improvements (B = -0.01, t [437] = -2.36, p = 0.01). Larger gains were also observed for depression (B = -0.14, p < 0.001 in the OT group, B = -0.06, p = 0.02 in the placebo group) and general distress (B = -0.57, p < 0.001 in the OT group, B = -0.29, p = 0.02 in the placebo group). No significant effect was observed for anxiety, the working alliance, or attachment. DISCUSSION: Oxytocin has the potential to improve treatment outcome among inpatients. Nonetheless, additional controlled research is needed to further assess its effects on therapy process, as well as to account for therapeutic, pharmacological, and neuronal intervening factors.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Intranasal , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Ocitocina/farmacologia , Ocitocina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Int J Ment Health Addict ; 21(2): 1120-1131, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34744529

RESUMO

The psychosocial stressors related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns have been shown to lead to an exacerbation of suicide risk. The present study aims to examine (a) the contribution of mental pain intensity to psychological distress and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic and (b) the protective role of mental pain tolerance in buffering these adverse mental health effects. A total of 652 adults (74.2% female, M = 33.99 years, SD = 13.74) were assessed through an online survey during the first mandatory lockdown in Italy. Participants completed measures of mental pain intensity and tolerance, psychological distress, and suicidal ideation. Results showed that mental pain intensity significantly predicted increases in psychological distress and suicidal ideation while mental pain tolerance significantly buffered the adverse effects of mental pain intensity on psychological distress and suicidal ideation. The findings highlight that tolerance for mental pain may act as a powerful protective factor during the pandemic. Evidence-based public health interventions fostering tolerance for mental pain during a pandemic are needed in order to effectively reduce suicide in potential risk groups.

9.
Int J Public Health ; 67: 1604326, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35719737

RESUMO

Objectives: Studies assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric patients have mostly focused on cross-sectional evaluations of differences in levels of distress. In this study, we aimed to assess changes in distress and well-being following the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak as compared with pre-pandemic levels, as well as potential predictors of symptomatic deterioration, among psychiatric outpatients treated in a public mental health hospital in Israel. Methods: Patients evaluated for distress and well-being before the pandemic (n = 55) were re-evaluated at the end of the first lockdown in Israel. Results: Analyses revealed a significant decrease in the patients' sense of personal growth. Increases in distress were significantly associated with fear of COVID-19 beyond patient characteristics. Conclusion: These results suggest that the pandemic has a short-term effect on patients' well-being, and that fear of the pandemic is associated with elevations in distress.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Pandemias
10.
Psychiatry Res Commun ; 2(1): 100027, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35128542

RESUMO

BACKGROUND& AIMES: Psychiatric admissions during the covid-19 pandemic were limited, overlooking their possible benefit. This study focused on assessing the effect of the fear of covid on the mental health and well-being of inpatients as opposed to outpatients. METHODS: During the first lockdown, forty-four inpatients and day care patients (inpatient group) and 74 outpatients (outpatient group) were recruited after an informed consent procedure. Fear of the infection was assessed using the Fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S); severity of mental health symptomatology was evaluated with the outcome questionnaire-45 (OQ-45); wellbeing was assessed with the Psychological well-being scale (PWB). OUTCOMES: There was no difference between the inpatient group and outpatient group in their fear of COVID-19 levels.FCV-19 predicted changes in the outpatient OQ total score (B â€‹= â€‹2.21, p â€‹< 0.001), OQ interpersonal relation subscale (B â€‹= â€‹0.34, p â€‹= 0.01), PWB total score (B â€‹= â€‹-0.05, p â€‹< 0.001), PWB environmental mastery subscale (B â€‹= â€‹-0.07, p â€‹< 0.001) and PWB positive relation subscale (B â€‹= â€‹-0.05, p â€‹< 0.001), but not in the inpatient group. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health and wellbeing of the outpatient group, which had less therapeutic contact than the inpatient group, correlated with the fear of covid, supporting the hypothesis that intensive psychiatric therapy had a protective effect on the mental health consequences of "fear of covid".

11.
Front Psychiatry ; 12: 691055, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34594245

RESUMO

The potential of Oxytocin (OT) as a facilitator of psychotherapy has been previously acknowledged, nonetheless, randomized controlled trials thus far have not yielded conclusive results. One approach suggested to clarify empirical inconsistencies is to refine the study hypotheses and data collection process by utilizing an in-depth idiographic exploration of the investigated phenomena. In this case illustration we provide an in-depth analysis comparing two patients hospitalized in a closed psychiatric ward with depression and undergoing psychotherapy twice a week. These two patients were randomly allocated to receive either OT or placebo, twice a day for a period of 4 weeks. Both patients completed longitudinal assessments of process and outcome measures, and therapists' clinical notes were extracted and reviewed. Reliable clinical change was calculated for all outcome and process measures. The results indicated that the patient receiving OT showed significant improvement in interpersonal distress, as well as in anxiety and depression symptoms, while the placebo patient showed no significant change during the study period. Furthermore, while both patients showed no significant changes in the therapeutic alliance ratings, the therapist of the OT patient regularly reported positive changes in alliance in the medical notes, while no such report was observed in the placebo patient. These results suggest that changes produced by OT administration may be more noticeable by the therapist. Implications for future studies aimed at assessing the effect of OT on psychotherapy process and outcome are discussed.

13.
J Psychiatr Res ; 138: 280-283, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872965

RESUMO

Although the co-occurrence of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia have been previously reported, the scope and magnitude of this comorbidity across large samples have not been sufficiently established. This study was aimed to assess the co-occurrence between schizophrenia and ASD in a large dataset, and to examine its predominance across different age and sex groups. Schizophrenia patients and age and sex frequency controls (n = 49,334) were assessed for the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder. The sample was stratified by age and sex, and co-occurrence was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results indicated that schizophrenia was associated with ASD (OR = 7.01, 95%CI 2.98-16.43, p < .0001) across all age groups aside from 50 to 70 years. This association was significant among male participants (OR = 11.69, 95%CI 3.59-38.01, p < .0001) but not among female participants (OR = 2.33, 95%CI 0.60-9.03, p = .21). These findings indicate a large overlap between schizophrenia and ASD, and point to the need to expand the understanding of the potential mediating mechanisms of this co-occurrence.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Esquizofrenia , Idoso , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia
14.
J Clin Psychol ; 77(6): 1296-1306, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The extensive reliance on symptoms for the study of psychotherapy is often criticized. In this study we examined whether the subjective sense of mental pain predicts psychotherapy process and outcome, above and beyond the effect of symptomatic distress. METHODS: Outpatients (n = 53) treated in a psychiatric hospital completed measures of mental pain intensity and tolerance, symptomatic distress, and session climate at pretreatment and posttreatment. Multilevel modeling was utilized to assess the predictive effect of mental pain, while controlling baseline symptomatic distress. RESULTS: Patients with high mental pain at baseline showed significant reductions in distress, while patients with low mental pain showed no significant improvement. Moreover, low mental pain and high mental pain tolerance predicted decreases in session smoothness. CONCLUSIONS: Mental pain can serve as a predictive marker for psychotherapy process and outcome, and complement the reliance on symptomatic distress in psychotherapy research.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Dor , Processos Psicoterapêuticos , Psicoterapia , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Psychiatry Res ; 289: 113100, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32425276

RESUMO

Mental health clinicians worldwide have been expressing concerns regarding the broad psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, only a few studies have thus far evaluated the degree of fear of COVID-19, partially due to the lack of validated measures. In this study we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S), recently developed to assess different aspects of the fear of the pandemic, in a normative population of participants in Israel. Participants (n = 639) were asked to complete the FCV-19S scale, as well as to report anxiety, depression, and stress levels using validated scales. The results a unidimensional factor structure of the FCV-19S which explained 53.71% of the variance. When forcing a two-factor structure model, the analysis revealed two factors pertaining to emotional fear reactions and symptomatic expressions of fear. Gender, sociodemographic status, chronic illness, being in an at-risk group, and having a family member dying of COVID-19 were positively associated with fear of COVID-19. The measure was associated with anxiety, stress and depression. These results suggest that the FCV-19S has good psychometric properties, and can be utilized in studies assessing the effects of the pandemic on the population's mental health.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Medo/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/normas , Psicometria/normas , Adulto , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Depressão/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pandemias , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
16.
Psychother Res ; 30(3): 325-336, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31174454

RESUMO

Objectives: Although process and outcome feedback is considered to be facilitative of psychotherapeutic processes, recent studies have suggested that such feedback may not produce the same effect when applied to highly distressed patients. This study examined the effect of process and outcome feedback in highly distressed patients treated in a public mental health center in Israel.Method: Patients (n = 197) were randomly allocated to receive feedback, or to treatment as usual. Therapists in the feedback condition received weekly reports, whereas therapists in the control group received no feedback. After attrition from study and treatment, a total of 123 cases were analyzed.Results: Feedback had no significant effect on either symptom reduction or on well-being. However, patients in the feedback group showed higher gains in alliance as compared to the treatment as usual group.Conclusion: Process and outcome feedback might have a potential beneficial effect of improving alliance for patients with severe symptomatology, with whom the establishment of an alliance can be challenging. The current findings also stress the need to continue to study the effect of feedback on therapy outcomes in diverse clinical settings. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.


Assuntos
Retroalimentação Psicológica , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Angústia Psicológica , Processos Psicoterapêuticos , Adulto , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Aliança Terapêutica
17.
Suicide Life Threat Behav ; 49(4): 1072-1084, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30125385

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we reexamine the mental pain-suicidality link in adolescence, by focusing on mental pain tolerance as a critical factor in explaining youth suicidal behavior. METHOD: In a series of three studies, participants completed measures of mental pain (tolerance and intensity), emotional regulation, depression, and suicidality. Study 1 included a nonclinical sample of 183 Israeli adolescents. Study 2 included a nonclinical sample of 139 Israeli adolescents, who completed additional measures of self-esteem, optimism, mindfulness, meaning in life, positive affectivity, and life satisfaction. Study 3 included suicidal psychiatric inpatients (N = 24), nonsuicidal psychiatric inpatients (N = 24), and nonclinical adolescents (N = 24). RESULTS: In Study 1, mental pain tolerance was significantly associated with depression, suicidality, and emotion-regulation skills. In Study 2, mental pain tolerance was significantly associated with measures of psychological resources. In Study 3, we found that suicidal psychiatric inpatients reported significantly lower levels of mental pain tolerance than nonsuicidal psychiatric inpatients and nonclinical adolescents. No significant group difference was found in the reported intensity of mental pain. CONCLUSIONS: Findings imply that mental pain tolerance may be a better indicator for suicidal behavior during adolescence than reported pain intensity.


Assuntos
Emoções/fisiologia , Autoimagem , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia , Suicídio/psicologia , Adolescente , Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Plena , Otimismo , Satisfação Pessoal
18.
BMC Psychiatry ; 18(1): 317, 2018 09 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30261851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental health clinicians have previously been reported to express reservations regarding the utility and accuracy of the psychiatric classification systems. In this study we aimed to examine clinicians' experiences with instances of perceived inaccuracy of a schizophrenia diagnosis. METHODS: Mental health clinicians (N = 175) participated in an online survey assessing prevalence and perceived reasons for inaccuracies of a schizophrenia diagnosis. Respondents included psychiatric ward directors (13.1%), senior psychiatrists and psychologists (40.5%), and psychiatry and clinical psychology residents (36%). RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported encountering instances where a schizophrenia diagnosis was assigned even though clinical presentation did not match diagnostic criteria. Seventy-three percent of senior psychiatrists in a position to determine a diagnosis declared assigning schizophrenia even when controversial among clinical staff, and 15% of them declared doing so frequently. The likelihood of frequently assigning a schizophrenia diagnosis even when clearly controversial was predicted by the perception that an inaccurate diagnosis is assigned due to the presence of negative symptoms (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.04-4.66, p = 0.039) and due to patient-related factors, such as the need to facilitate rehabilitation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.90, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Although a schizophrenia diagnosis is considered relatively stable and clear, our study indicates that, in clinical practice, the assignment of this diagnosis is frequently controversial. These controversies are associated with the perception that an inaccurate diagnosis is assigned due to diagnostic considerations, or due to the possibility that patients might benefit from such a diagnosis. Implications and limitations for psychiatric practice and discourse are discussed.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Erros de Diagnóstico/psicologia , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...