Can 24 h of ambulatory ECG be used to triage patients to extended monitoring?

BACKGROUND: Access to long-term ambulatory recording to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited for economical and practical reasons. We aimed to determine whether 24 h ECG (24hECG) data can predict AF detection on extended cardiac monitoring. METHODS: We included all US patients from 2020, aged 17-100 years, who were monitored for 2-30 days using the PocketECG device (MEDICALgorithmics), without AF ≥30 s on the first day (n = 18,220, mean age 64.4 years, 42.4% male). The population was randomly split into equal training and testing datasets. A Lasso model was used to predict AF episodes ≥30 s occurring on days 2-30. RESULTS: The final model included maximum heart rate, number of premature atrial complexes (PACs), fastest rate during PAC couplets and triplets, fastest rate during premature ventricular couplets and number of ventricular tachycardia runs ≥4 beats, and had good discrimination (ROC statistic 0.7497, 95% CI 0.7336-0.7659) in the testing dataset. Inclusion of age and sex did not improve discrimination. A model based only on age and sex had substantially poorer discrimination, ROC statistic 0.6542 (95% CI 0.6364-0.6720). The prevalence of observed AF in the testing dataset increased by quintile of predicted risk: 0.4% in Q1, 2.7% in Q2, 6.2% in Q3, 11.4% in Q4, and 15.9% in Q5. In Q1, the negative predictive value for AF was 99.6%. CONCLUSION: By using 24hECG data, long-term monitoring for AF can safely be avoided in 20% of an unselected patient population whereas an overall risk of 9% in the remaining 80% of the population warrants repeated or extended monitoring.

Diagnostic yield of ambulatory cardiac monitoring in pediatric patients with palpitations.

Background: Palpitations are a frequent reason for referral to pediatric cardiology providers and diagnostic workup includes ambulatory cardiac monitoring. While common practice, the diagnostic yield is unknown in the pediatric population. The objective is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of 24-h Holter and extended ambulatory cardiac monitoring in pediatric patients with palpitations. Methods and Results: All pediatric patients aged 10-18 years who had ambulatory cardiac monitoring (1-30 days) through the Pocket Electrocardiogram (PocketECG™) system (Medi-Lynx) between January 2016 and July 2020 were included. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis code of palpitations (R00.2) during enrollment were evaluated separately. Tachyarrhythmia diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (AF), nonsustained supraventricular tachycardia (nSVT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (nVT), and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Age, heart rates, arrhythmia type, and symptomatic transmission data were collected and analyzed. A total of 2388 patients (mean age 11.6 years, 58% F) with the R00.2 code had ambulatory cardiac monitoring (28% 24-h Holter, 72% extended) performed during the study period and there were 6287 total patients (mean age 13.9 years, 54% F) that underwent ambulatory cardiac monitoring (42% 24-h Holter, 58% extended) during that time. Of 2388 patients, 321 (13%) were diagnosed with tachyarrhythmia: AF (9), nSVT (192), SVT (59), and nVT (61). In the overall cohort, 764 (12%) patients were diagnosed with tachyarrhythmia: AF (22), nSVT (478), SVT (85), nVT (177), and VT (2). Symptomatic transmissions with normal cardiac rhythm were common in the R00.2 (n = 1697, 71%) and overall (n = 3848, 61%) groups. No episodes of nSVT, SVT, nVT, or VT were associated with symptomatic transmissions. Conclusion: Ambulatory cardiac monitors are an integral part of the diagnostic workup for pediatric palpitations patients and have demonstrated a high yield of combined positive arrhythmia diagnoses and symptomatic normal transmissions. Further prospective study of this population with the integration of clinical information is warranted.

Diagnostic yield is dependent on monitoring duration. Insights from a full-disclosure mobile cardiac telemetry system.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advancement of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring methods, the most important factor influencing diagnostic yield (DY) may still be monitoring duration. Ambulatory ECG monitoring, typically with 24-48 hours duration, is widely used but may result in underdiagnosis of rare arrhythmias. AIMS: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the DY and monitoring duration in a large patient cohort and investigate sex and age differences in the presentation of arrhythmias. METHODS: The study population consisted of 25 151 patients (57.8% women; median [interquartile range, IQR], 71 [64-78] years), who were examined with mobile cardiac telemetry during 2017 in the United States, using the PocketECGTM that continuously transmits a signal on a beat-to-beat basis. We investigated the occurrence of atrial fibrillation at a burden of both ≤1% (atrial fibrillation [AF], ≤1%) and ≤10% (AF ≤10%), premature ventricular contractions (PVC; >10 000 per 24 hours), non-sustained ventricular tachycardias (nsVT), sustained ventricular tachycardias (VT ≥30 seconds), atrioventricular blocks (AVB), pauses of >3 seconds duration, and bradycardia (heart rate <40 beats per minute for ≥60 seconds). RESULTS: The median (IQR) recording duration was 15.4, 8.2-28.2) days. The DY increased gradually with monitoring duration for all types of investigated arrhythmias. Compared to DY after up to 30 days of monitoring, a standard 24 hours monitoring resulted in DY for males/females of 20%/18% for AF ≤1%, 29%/28% for AF ≤10%, 45%/40% for PVCs, 17%/11% for nsVT, 17%/11% for VT ≥30 seconds, 49%/42 for AVB, 27%/20% for pauses, 36%/29% for bradycardia. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients suffering from arrhythmias may remain undiagnosed due to insufficient ECG monitoring time.