Prospects of using organs and cells from pigs for transplantation into humans.

Once pig organs can be transplanted into humans, transplantation will move into a new era. There will be unlimited access to undamaged organs, and cells for transplantation and, eventually, donation from deceased or live human beings will become obsolete. Furthermore, it will be possible to alleviate graft rejection, at least in part, by genetic modification of the source animal. Currently, there are three major obstacles to performing transplantations from pig to man: a powerful immune barrier, a potential risk of transmitting microorganisms, particularly endogenous retrovirus, and ethical issues related to the future recipients and to society at large. This article will first discuss the ongoing work with regards to overcoming the current obstacles. Also, the many potential advantages of using pig organs will be discussed in some detail. Furthermore, lessons learned from attempts at transplanting porcine cells to patients will be reviewed.

The potential advantages of transplanting organs from pig to man: A transplant Surgeon's view.

Once pig organs can be transplanted into humans, transplantation will move into a new era. There will be unlimited access to undamaged organs and cells for transplantation and, eventually, donation from deceased or live human beings will become obsolete. Furthermore, it will be possible to alleviate graft rejection, at least in part, by genetic modification of the source animal. Currently, there are three major obstacles to performing transplantations from pig to man: 1) a powerful immune barrier, 2) a potential risk of transmitting microorganisms, particularly endogenous retrovirus and 3) ethical issues related to the future recipients and to society at large.This article will first discuss ongoing work with regards to overcoming the current obstacles. Then, the many potential advantages of using pig organs will be listed. Next, the criteria for selecting the first patients for transplantation with pig organs, will be briefly discussed. Finally, some promising observations made in the context of early attempts at transplanting porcine cells to patients, will be mentioned.

The efficacy of CD40 ligand blockade in discordant pig-to-rat islet xenotransplantation is correlated with an immunosuppressive effect of immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND: The authors' aim was to evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppression with monoclonal anti-CD40 ligand antibodies (aCD40L) or nonspecific polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the pig-to-rat islet xenotransplantation model. METHODS: Fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters were transplanted under the kidney capsule of nondiabetic rats. All antibodies were administered alone or in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA). In addition, some animals were administered antibodies plus tacrolimus (TAC) or sirolimus (SIR). Twelve days after transplantation, islet xenograft survival and rejection were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: aCD40L plus CsA had a pronounced inhibitory effect on islet xenograft rejection for up to 12 days after transplantation. Unexpectedly, treatment with a monoclonal control antibody (anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin [aKLH]) plus CsA had a similar inhibitory effect. Furthermore, a similar inhibition of islet xenograft rejection was observed also in animals administered IVIG plus CsA. Monotherapy with aCD40L, aKLH, IVIG, or CsA had no effect on the rejection process. Also, when aCD40L or aKLH was administered together with TAC, islet xenograft rejection was inhibited. There was no marked difference compared with rats treated with aCD40L or aKLH and CsA. Immunosuppression with aCD40L or aKLH in combination with SIR also inhibited pig-to-rat islet xenograft rejection, but the protective effect was not as pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression with high doses of antibodies, monoclonal or polyclonal, in combination with CsA or TAC inhibits pig-to-rat islet xenograft rejection. No specific effect of co-stimulatory blockade with aCD40L could be observed. Instead, the results indicate a nonspecific immunosuppressive effect of high doses of antibodies in this model.

No transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus after transplantation of adult porcine islets into diabetic nude mice and immunosuppressed rats.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) occurs in a model of diabetes reversal by the xenotransplantation of adult porcine islets (APIs) into immunoincompetent diabetic rodents. METHODS: Black-6 nu/nu mice and Lewis rats were immunosuppressed with cyclosporin A (CsA) and FTY 720, and rendered diabetic with streptozotocin. Purified APIs were transplanted into the renal subcapsular space; 5,000 islet equivalents (IEQs) were used in the nude mice (n = 4) and 40,000 IEQs in the rats (n = 4). The nude mice were sacrificed at 75 days after transplantation. In order to confirm chronic xenograft function, the graft-bearing kidney was removed prior to sacrifice. The rats were followed until xenograft rejection, at which time they were sacrificed. Immediately after sacrifice, tissue samples (liver, spleen, and small intestine) were taken for analysis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to assess evidence of PERV transmission, and porcine cell chimerism. RESULTS: All animals became normoglycemic within 48 h of transplantation. The nude mice remained normoglycemic during the 75-day study period, with removal of the graft-bearing kidney resulting in prompt hyperglycemia. The rats remained normoglycemic until xenograft rejection, which occurred at 66 +/- 28 days. Despite the evidence of porcine cell microchimerism in recipients, real-time PCR detected no evidence of PERV transmission in any of the tissue specimens tested. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of PERV transmission following transplantation of pig islets into diabetic nude mice and immunosuppressed rats.

Intraportal pig islet xenotransplantation into athymic mice as an in vivo model for the study of the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction.

One of the main obstacles to successful intraportal islet transplantation is the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) elicited by the isolated islets when exposed to fresh human blood. In the present study, we investigated whether intraportal transplantation of pig islets into diabetic athymic mice could be used as a small animal model to study xenogeneic IBMIR in vivo. Adult porcine islets (APIs) or rat islets were implanted into the portal vein or under the renal subcapsular space of diabetic athymic mice. Graft survival and morphology were evaluated by measuring blood glucose levels and by performing immunohistochemical staining, respectively. Transplantation of rat islets, irrespective of implantation site, cured all diabetic athymic mice. APIs transplanted subcapsularly also cured all diabetic athymic mice, while none of the animals transplanted with an equivalent amount of APIs via the portal vein remained normoglycemic for more than 10 days after transplantation. Immunohistochemical staining on day 7 showed that most of intraportally transplanted APIs were entrapped in clots and infiltrated with CD11b+ leukocytes. Intraportal transplantation of APIs into athymic mice induced IBMIR, thus providing a small animal model for studying xenogeneic IBMIR.

Sirolimus does not exhibit nephrotoxicity compared to cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.

Sirolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) prevent acute rejection in man when used as primary therapies in triple drug regimens. Sirolimus does not act via the calcineurin pathway and therefore is not expected to produce the same renal side-effects. This paper presents the pooled 2-year data analysis of renal function parameters from two open-label, randomized, multicenter studies. Patients (18-68 years) receiving a primary renal allograft were randomized to receive concentration-controlled sirolimus (n = 81) or CsA (n = 80), in combination with azathioprine and steroids (n = 83), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (n = 78). From week 10 through year 2, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was significantly higher in sirolimus--than in CsA-treated patients (69.3 vs. 56.8 mL/min, at 2 years, p = 0.004). Serum uric acid was significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients and magnesium was significantly lower; these parameters were more likely to be within normal limits in the sirolimus group. Mean serum potassium and phosphorus were lower in sirolimus-treated patients. In conclusion, sirolimus, when administered as primary therapy in combination with azathioprine or MMF, has a favorable safety profile compared to CsA with regards to renal function.