Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019.

Decisions on market authorization (MA) and reimbursement have different durations across countries because of health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and negotiations between manufacturers and national authorities. To overcome this delay, France has implemented a Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU) program that allows early access to drugs before MA, in order to treat patients with unmet medical needs. The objectives of our study were to establish the added therapeutic benefit (ATB) of ATUs for solid tumors and to investigate the correlations between three tools evaluating ATB and survival outcomes and drug costs. Data on ATUs granted from January 2009 to December 2019 to treat solid tumors were analyzed. An assessment of their ATB was conducted using the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Value Framework (ASCO-VF), the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and the French HTA criterion, clinical added value (CAV). The latter score determines reimbursement and national market access. Thirty-five drugs in 39 indications were granted ATUs. All of them obtained MA and derived a clinical benefit to be reimbursed by the Social Security. Twenty-eight (71.8%) had CAV compared to preexisting therapies. 24/38 (63.2%) had a 4-5 ESMO-MCBS score and 19/33 (57.6%) had an ASCO-VF score over 45. No correlations were found between cost, PFS, OS, CAV and ASCO-VF score, while high ESMO-MCBS scores were correlated to OS. In conclusion, many patients were treated with innovations before MA thanks to ATU, although there are discrepancies between ATB scales, hence the importance of international collaboration in the evaluation of innovative therapies.

[Knowledge of geriatric oncology in nursing homes: survey among healthcare professionals working in nursing homes in Pays-de-la-Loire.] / Connaissance de l'onco-gériatrie en Ehpad : enquête réalisée auprès des professionnels de santé dans les Ehpad des Pays-de-la-Loire.

OBJECTIVE: The increased incidence of cancer with age and rise of oral chemotherapy will affect the management of nursing home's residents. The aim of our study was to evaluate knowledge and practices in oncogeratric of nursing home's professionals from Pays-de-la-Loire and to raise awareness. METHODS: In partnership with UCOG-pl, OMEDIT and Observatoire du Cancer, we realised an observational survey from April to September 2017. Three questionnaires were sent to coordonary doctors (CD), nurses and paramedics, along with informative documents. RESULTS: In 589 nursing homes, 82 CD, 147 nurses and 240 paramedics gave an answer. The estimation of cancer's prevalence was 8,75%. Breast and prostate cancers were the most frequent. Nursing homes were an appropriate place to screen cancers by 79% of professionals. Some difficulties were reported by more than 80 % of them (coordination, residents' relationships...). At least, 20% of professionals couldn't define properly oncogeriatric. Only 73% of CD, 16% of nurses and 5% of paramedics knew about ongeriatric evaluations. Only 50% of CD knew about the G8 table, 15% of the oral cancer treatment file, 34% UCOG and 23% of the Observatoire du Cancer. Less than 5% of other professionals knew about this tool and these organisations. After information, most of the professionals think they will use them. Oral chemotherapy was already used by 90% of nurses, but the follow-up was considered inadequate. DISCUSSION: Our survey shows a low awareness about oncogeriatric by the nursing home's professionals. This misreading and under-diagnosis of cancer in nursing homes could partly explain by the lake of training, communication and coordination with oncology professionals and the distinctive characteristics of nursing home's residents. Study suggests that raising awareness of oncogeriatric and its challenges to all professionals would improve the care of the elderly with cancer.

Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years.

INTRODUCTION: The cancer incidence continues to rise worldwide. Medical innovation has a major impact on patient survival, but within drug development, it can take more than 10 years to obtain marketing authorisation (MA). The time required for access to therapeutic innovation remains critical, so France has developed a specific expanded access program named ATU, which allows the administration of drugs before the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval. The purpose of this study is to put in perspective the average time to access antineoplastic drugs worldwide, taking into account ATU, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and EMA approvals. METHODS: The ATU system allows the use of a medicine before its MA, under exceptional conditions. All antineoplastic drugs in oncology that have benefited from the ATU system are analysed in terms of tumour site, biomarkers and number of patients who have access to the drug. RESULTS: Between 1st January 2007 and 31st December 2019, 36 of 64 drugs (56.2%) that received MA in oncology were assigned an ATU, to the benefit of 16,927 patients. Thanks to the ATU, 25 of 36 drugs (69.4%) were made available early, on average 203 d (95% CI, 76-330) before FDA approval and on average 428 d (95% CI, 272-583) before EMA approval. Only three of 36 drugs were approved by the EMA before the FDA, and the average time lapse between European MA and FDA approval for these 36 drugs was 216 d (95% CI, 140-293). CONCLUSION: This article demonstrates that the ATU system allows patients to benefit from therapeutic innovations before MA in Europe and USA, with full coverage by the healthcare system.

Access to innovation through the national early access program and clinical trials for patients with malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The arrival of immunotherapies and targeted therapies challenged the authorities to make them available as soon as possible. France has effective tools, such as clinical trials (CTs) and a national early access program (temporary authorizations for use [ATUs] and temporary recommendations for use [RTUs]), allowing the use of innovative drugs, whether or not they have been authorized or used off-label, for cases that have reached a therapeutic impasse. METHODS: The methodology involved real-time data collection from ATUs, RTUs (between September 1, 2009 and September 1, 2019), and CT authorizations (from December 1, 2017 to September 1, 2019) that were filed and reviewed by the French National Agency for Medicines for metastatic melanoma (MM). RESULTS: In total, 45 CTs were authorized for MM (51% early phase trials and 44% phase 2 and 3 trials), mainly for the metastatic line (86%) and with an industrial sponsor (73%). Immunotherapies and targeted therapies (63% and 24%, respectively) mostly were used in combination. Three RTUs were authorized for the adjuvant treatment of MM, whereas 13 drugs were available through nominal ATUs (nATUs), of which 5 were awarded a cohort ATU (cATU). This enabled the treatment of 6538 patients (28% through nATUs and 72% through cATUs). All of these drugs were granted marketing authorization and were included in the reimbursement list. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to CTs and the national early access program, patients in France have been able to benefit from innovative MM treatments. LAY SUMMARY: Several tools allow the use of innovative drugs in France, even if they are not yet authorized or used off-label. From December 1, 2017 to September 1, 2019, 45 clinical trials have been authorized for metastatic melanoma, mostly using immunotherapy (63%) and targeted therapy (24%) at an early phase (51%). Since 2010, the national early access program has treated 6538 patients, including 28% under nominative temporary authorizations for use and 72% under cohort temporary authorizations for use. Fourteen drugs are available through nominative temporary authorizations for use, and 5 are available through cohort temporary authorizations for use, and all of these drugs were granted marketing authorization.

Efficacy and safety of panitumumab in a cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in France: PANI OUEST, a post-EMA-approval descriptive study with a geriatric oncology focus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Bretagne-Pays de la Loire cancer observatory, an oncology network created by the French Ministry of Health, is specifically dedicated to assess the use of new targeted anticancer therapies in routine practice. In line with the French National Cancer III program, our cancer network set up a real-life cohort, which is independent of the pharmaceutical industry, for patients with colorectal cancer to monitor patient safety and quality of care and promote pharmacovigilance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Panitumumab monotherapy was assessed in 243 patients with wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma who were treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) between July 2008 and December 2010 after prior chemotherapy using oxaliplatine and irinotecan. This was a post-European medicine agency marketing (EMA-M) study Results: This study shed light on the best practices, strategic adaptations, clinical results (treatment objective responses, 13%; progression free survival, 2.99 months [2.73-3.15]; and overall survival, 6.8 months [5.49-8.38]) as well as expected or unexpected (grade 3 or 4: 11.5%) secondary effects in the phase IV panitumumab treatment of mCRC. CONCLUSION: Our results are similar to those by Amado whose phase III study led to obtaining EMA-M for panitumumab and tend to confirm the antitumor activity of this antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody in the treatment of mCRC. In addition, our results opened avenues to further assessment of panitumumab use as monotherapy as well as its benefit-risk ratio while taking into account the patients' general and clinical characteristics. In 2012, the French National Authority for Health appended these data to the panitumumab transparency committee report.

Long survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Results of real life study of 344 patients.

The treatment landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed fundamentally over the last decade by the development of antiangiogenic agents, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and immunotherapy. Outside of the context of a clinical trial, the treatments are used sequentially. We describe results under real-life conditions of a sequential treatment strategy, before the era of immunotherapy. All patients were treated according to their prognostic score (either Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center or International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) for advanced renal cell carcinoma. A treatment strategy involving 1 to 4 lines was determined including a rechallenge criterion for the repeat use of a treatment class. Three hundred forty-four patients were included over 3 years. Overall survival was 57 months in patients with good or intermediate prognosis and 19 months in patients with poor prognosis. In the former group, the proportions of patients treated with 2 to 4 treatment lines were 70%, 38% and 16%, respectively. The best objective response rates for lines 1 to 4 were 46%, 36%, 16% and 17%, respectively. Grade III/IV toxicity did not appear to be cumulative. The recommended strategy was followed in 68% of patients. A large proportion of patients with good or intermediate prognosis who progress after two lines of treatment still have a performance status good enough to receive a systemic treatment, which justifies such a strategy. Overall survival of patients with good and intermediate prognosis was long, suggesting a benefit from the applied approach. These results might be used as selection criterion for the treatment of patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

[Management of cancer patients with oral therapy at home in Brittany and Pays de la Loire areas: Survey (end of 2016) and cartography]. / Prise en charge des patients sous voies orales anticancéreuses au domicile en Bretagne et Pays de la Loire : enquête fin 2016 et cartographie.

INTRODUCTION: The Cancer Observatory, from the OMEDITs (Observatory for Medicines and Medical Devices and Treatment Innovations) of Bretagne and Pays de la Loire areas has conducted a survey aiming to know and map the current practices of management of patients by Oral Anti-cancer Drug (OAD) in inter-region. METHODS: Forty eight cancer centers received by e-mail in July and October 2016 a questionnaire concerning the management of OADs : from prescription by the specialist of oncology, to the intervention of the pharmacist (analysis and pharmaceutical consulting), to follow-up by nurse, as well as the financing of this activity and the feelings of the actors about this organizational set up. RESULTS: Fifty-seven professionals from 31 centers, including the most important ones, responded to the survey. As a result, half of the establishments carry out a pharmaceutical analysis for some or all of the OAD prescriptions and only 30% carry out a pharmaceutical consulting. The nurse consultation is, on the other hand, more largely implanted (74% of the centers) as well as the telephone follow-up (6%). More than 90% of professionals believe that the organizational set up could be improved and more secure by, at least, the stronger involvement of pharmacists, the development of tools for nurse (for monitoring, therapeutic education…) and by improving the city-hospital link. CONCLUSION: This survey shows the variability in the management of patients under OAD because of the lack of resources to ensure the fairness and sustainability of the organizational set up. The hospital/city link could still be optimized to secure patient care.

[Optimizing good use and costs of anticancer drugs: A French inter regional study of the Observatory of Cancer]. / Optimisation du bon usage et maîtrise des coûts des médicaments anticancéreux : expérience de l'Observatoire dédié au Cancer Bretagne - Pays-de-la-Loire.

Optimizing the care management of patients is a major issue for our society. In Brittany-Pays-de-la-Loire (almost 10% of French population), an observatory of cancer has been created in 2003. Its main objective was the follow-up of expensive drugs. The knowledge of the use of these drugs in clinical practice has led to development of a thesaurus of good use. Thus, regular exchanges between clinicians have almost totally reduced not medically justified prescriptions by the thesaurus after and before administration to patient. The thesaurus has given away to national guidelines from 2007. For example, in these two regions, optimization of the use of gemcitabine and bevacizumab has allowed to save respectively 2.5 millions euros between 2005 and 2008 and 3 millions euros between 2009 and 2010 (breast cancer only). Optimizing the use of anticancer drugs has allowed a real health economy without any bad impact on patient management. Respecting medical ethics, the main objective remains to optimize health care. This highly participation of clinicians currently allows to reflect together on the relevance of the last chemotherapy.