Impaired spelling in Alzheimer's disease: a linguistic deficit?

Different kinds of real words and pronounceable pseudowords (PWs) were presented for writing to dictation to patients with the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to age- and education-matched healthy controls. Though spelling less accurately on all tasks, AD patients responded in a manner generally qualitatively similar to controls. Except for a slightly enhanced effect of spelling regularity in real word writing accuracy, AD patients showed the same sensitivity to various lexical, orthographic and phonological variables as controls. Both groups showed no difference in spelling accuracy for words and PWs with regular vs ambiguous spelling patterns, and groups also showed similar orthographic preferences when spelling PWs having several different acceptable pronunciations. Finally, AD patients and controls produced similar types of errors when spelling real words. Dementia severity was related to the overall accuracy, but not to the pattern, of spelling responses. It is suggested that the decline in response accuracy in cognitively demanding writing tasks in patients with more advanced dementia is most likely due to semantic impairment and impairments of nonlinguistic functions of attention, executive control and praxis, rather than to a disturbance within language specific processes.

Lexical semantic and associative priming in Alzheimer's disease.

Semantic memory impairment was investigated in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) using a threshold oral word reading task to assess priming of different lexical relationships. Healthy elderly controls showed significant priming for associatively related nouns (tempest-teapot) and also for nouns semantically related either because both designate basic-level exemplars of a common superordinate category (cousin-nephew) or because the target names the superordinate category of the prime (daughter-relative). AD patients, in contrast, showed preserved priming of lexical associates but impaired priming of certain semantic relationships. They showed no priming between words designating coordinate exemplars within a category, despite preserved priming of the superordinate category label. Findings are consistent with the view that at least part of the semantic deficit in AD is due to disruption of semantic knowledge that affects relationships among basic-level concepts, more than the relationships between these concepts and their corresponding superordinate category of membership.