Ovarian reserve in patients with FMR1 gene premutation and the role of fertility preservation.

INTRODUCTION: Women with premutation (PM) of the FMR1 gene may suffer from reduced ovarian reserve or even premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). We studied hormonal and ultrasound ovarian reserve, fertility and fertility preservation outcomes in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective cohort study of 63 female FMR1 premutation carriers. RESULTS: Sixty-three female patients bearing an FMR1 premutation were included. Median age was 30 years [26.5-35]. Median number of CGG triplets was 83 [77.2-92]. Before diagnosis of PM, 19 women (30%) had had in all 35 pregnancies, resulting in 20 births, including 7 affected children. After diagnosis of PM, 17 women (26.1%) had in all 23 pregnancies, at a median age of 34.5 years [32.2-36.0]: 2 after preimplantation genetic diagnosis, 3 after oocyte donation, 18 spontaneously, and 5 ending in medical termination for Fragile X syndrome. Thirty-three patients (52.4%) had POI diagnosis (median age, 30 years [27-34]) with median FSH level 84 IU/L [50.5-110] and median AMH level 0.08 ng/ml [0.01-0.19]. After POI diagnosis, 8 women had in all 9 pregnancies: 3 following oocyte donation, and 6 spontaneous in 5 women (15.1%). Eight of the 9 pregnancies resulted in a live birth (including 2 affected children) and 1 in medical termination for trisomy 13. The median age of the 30 patients without POI was 31 years [25.2-35.0]. Thirteen women (20.6%) underwent fertility preservation, at a median age of 29 years [24-33]: FSH 7.7 IU/L [6.8-9.9], AMH 1.1 ng/mL [0.95-2.1], antral follicle count 9.5 [7.7-14.7]. A median 15 oocytes [10-26] were cryopreserved in a median 2 cycles [1-3]. At the time of writing, no oocytes had yet been thawed for in vitro fertilization. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of early fertility preservation after diagnosis of FMR1 premutation in women, due to early deterioration of ovarian reserve. Genetic counseling is essential in these patients, as spontaneous pregnancies are not uncommon, even in cases of impaired ovarian reserve, and can lead to birth of affected children.

Fertility outcomes several years after urgent fertility preservation for breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the fertility outcomes of women who tried to conceive after breast cancer treatment and fertility preservation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational, bicentric cohort study. SUBJECTS AND EXPOSURE: All patients who had undergone fertility preservation before breast cancer treatment between January 2013, and July 2019 were included (n=844). The end-point date was March 1, 2022. Patients with missing data on pregnancy attempts after cancer diagnosis (n=195) were excluded from the pregnancy analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative incidences of pregnancy and live birth were calculated. For women who became pregnant, the time to conception was calculated between the first fertility preservation consultation and the estimated day of conception. For those who did not conceive, we considered the time between first fertility preservation consultation and the end-point date or the date of patient death. A Cox regression model was used to study the predictive factors of pregnancy and live birth. RESULTS: Among the 649 patients with available data on pregnancy attempts after breast cancer diagnosis, 255 (39.3% [35.5-43.2]) tried to conceive (median follow-up 6.5 years). Overall, 135 (52.9% [46.6-59.2]) of these patients achieved a pregnancy, mainly through unassisted conception (79.3% [72.8-84.8]), and 99 reported a live birth (representing 38.8% of patients who attempted conception). In our cohort, 48 months after the first fertility preservation consultation, the cumulative incidence of pregnancy was 33.1% ([27.6-37.9]). After adjustment for age, parity, type of chemotherapy administration and endocrine therapy, only multiparity at diagnosis and absence of chemotherapy were positive predictive factors of pregnancy after cancer. Of the 793 patients who had vitrified oocytes/embryos, 68 used them (27% [21.3-32.5] of the patients who tried to conceive), resulting in 8 live births (11.8% [5.2-21.9]). Women who used their cryopreserved oocytes/embryos were older at the first consultation of fertility preservation (HR 1.71(1.42-2.21)), and chose more often to vitrify embryos (HR 1.76(1.28-2.23). CONCLUSION: Although pregnancy rates after fertility preservation for breast cancer are low, most conceptions are achieved without medical assistance. Our findings provide useful information to advise women on the different techniques of fertility preservation, their efficacy and safety, as well as the relatively high chances of unassisted conception.

Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Are embryo culture conditions, including type of incubator, oxygen tension, and culture media, associated with obstetric or neonatal complications following in vitro fertilization (IVF)? METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed from January 01, 2008, until October 31, 2021. The studies reporting quantitative data on at least one of the primary outcomes (birthweight and preterm birth) for the exposure group and the control group were included. For oxygen tension, independent meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, comparing hypoxia/normoxia. For culture media, a network meta-analysis was carried out using R software, allowing the inclusion of articles comparing two or more culture media. RESULTS: After reviewing 182 records, 39 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 28 studies were kept for review. Meta-analysis about the impact of incubator type on perinatal outcomes could not be carried out because of a limited number of studies. For oxygen tension, three studies were included. The pairwise meta-analysis comparing hypoxia/normoxia did not show any statistical difference for birthweight and gestational age at birth. For culture media, 18 studies were included. The network meta-analysis failed to reveal any significant impact of different culture media on birthweight or preterm birth. CONCLUSION: No difference was observed for neonatal outcomes according to the embryo culture conditions evaluated in this review. Further research is needed about the safety of IVF culture conditions as far as future children's health is concerned.

Stratification of the risk of ovarian dysfunction by studying the complexity of intermediate and premutation alleles of the FMR1 gene.

FMR1 premutation female carriers are at risk of developing premature/primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) with an incomplete penetrance. In this study, we determined the CGG repeat size among 1095 women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) / POI and characterized the CGG/AGG substructure in 44 women carrying an abnormal FMR1 repeat expansion number, compared to a group of 25 pregnant women carrying an abnormal FMR1 CGG repeat size. Allelic complexity scores of the FMR1 gene were calculated and compared between the two groups. In the DOR/POI cohort, 2.1% of women presented with an intermediate repeat size and 1.9% with a premutation. Our results suggest that the risk of POI is highest in the mid-range of CGG repeats. We observed that the allelic score is significantly higher in POI women compared to the pregnant women group (p-value = 0.02). We suggest that a high allelic score due to more than 2 AGG interspersions in the context of an intermediate number of repetitions could favor POI. Larger studies are still needed to evaluate the relevance of this new tool for the determination of the individual risk of developing POI in women with abnormal number of CGG repeats.

Impact of oxygen tension during in vitro maturation: a sibling-oocyte prospective double-blinded study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oxygen (O2) tension (20% vs. 5%) has an impact on oocyte maturation rates and morphology during in vitro maturation (IVM). DESIGN: A prospective, observational, monocentric, sibling-oocyte study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 143 patients who underwent IVM for fertility preservation purposes from November 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed. Patients were included when ≥2 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were retrieved. The cohort of COCs obtained for each patient was randomly split into two groups: group 20% O2 and group 5% O2. INTERVENTION: Cumulus-oocyte complexes were incubated for 48 hours either under 5% O2 or 20% O2. After 24 and 48 hours of culture, every oocyte was assessed for maturity and morphology, to estimate oocyte quality. Morphology was evaluated considering six parameters (shape, size, ooplasm, perivitelline space, zona pellucida, and polar body characteristics), giving a total oocyte score ranging from -6 to +6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maturation rates and total oocyte scores were compared using paired-sample analysis between group 20% O2 and group 5% O2. RESULTS: Patient median age was 31.4 [28.1-35.2] years-old. The mean serum antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count were 3.2 ± 2.3 ng/mL and 27.2 ± 16.0 follicles, respectively. A mean of 10.7 COCs per cycle were retrieved, leading to 6.1 ± 2.4 metaphase II oocytes vitrified (total maturation rate = 57.3%; 991 metaphase II oocytes/1,728 COCs). A total of 864 COCs were included in each group. Oocyte maturation rates were not different between the two groups (group 20% O2: 56.82% vs. group 5% O2: 57.87%, respectively). Regarding oocyte morphology, the mean total oocyte score was significantly higher in group 5% O2 compared with group 20% O2 (3.44 ± 1.26 vs. 3.16 ± 1.32, P=.014). CONCLUSION: As culture under low O2 tension (5% O2) improves oocyte morphology IVM, our results suggest that culture under hypoxia should be standardized. Additional studies are warranted to assess the impact of O2 tension on oocyte maturation and the benefit of IVM under low O2 tension for embryo culture after utilization of frozen material.

Prospective multicenter observational real-world study to assess the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta during IVF/ICSI procedures (DELTA Study).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta in women undergoing IVF/ICSI in routine clinical practice after one treatment cycle. STUDY DESIGN: This was a French multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 14 fertility centers between June 2020 and June 2021. During this period, 248 women undergoing IVF or ICSI were treated with follitropin delta for the first time. Women were followed up to 10-11 weeks after the first fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The main outcomes were use of dosing algorithm, follitropin delta dosing patterns, ovarian response, pregnancy, and adverse drug reactions in routine clinical practice. RESULTS: The analyzable population consisted of 223 patients with mean ± SD age of 33.0 ± 4.4 years, body weight of 65.7 ± 11.8 kg, and the median (IQR) AMH level was 2.6 (1.5-4.0) ng/mL. For 193 patients (86.5 %) it was the first IVF/ICSI cycle and for 30 (13.5 %) the second. The algorithm was used for the calculation of the starting dose for 88.3 % of the patients. The mean daily starting dose of follitropin delta was 11.4 ± 4.1mcg for the whole analyzable population and 14.4 ± 5.2 mcg for the sub-group of 26 patients dosed without the algorithm. The mean duration of stimulation with follitropin delta was 10.8 ± 5.2 days. The mean total dose of follitropin delta administered was 122.2 ± 80.0 mcg. An antagonist protocol was used in 90.3 % of patients. The mean ± SD number of oocytes retrieved among patients that started stimulation was 11.3 ± 6.8 and 46.1 % of patients achieved the targeted response of the algorithm of 8-14 oocytes retrieved. A fresh transfer was performed for 77.6 % of patients; the mean ± SD number of embryos transferred was 1.3 ± 0.5. The implantation rate was 36.0 %. Per started cycle, clinical pregnancy was reported in 35.0 % of the patients and ongoing pregnancy in 29.6 %. In total, 5 patients (2.2 %) reported an event of OHSS. CONCLUSION: Clinical results as collected in routine clinical practice are promising, showing a favorable effectiveness-safety profile of follitropin delta for a very varied patient population (including anovulatory PCOS, very poor responders, or non-IVF naïve patients). These real-world data complement results from clinical trials and provide useful information for usual clinical practice within a heterogeneous population group.

Dysfunction of Human Estrogen Signaling as a Novel Molecular Signature of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Estradiol (E2) is a major hormone-controlling folliculogenesis whose dysfunction may participate in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) infertility. To determine whether both the concentration and action of E2 could be impaired in non-hyperandrogenic overweight PCOS women, we isolated granulosa cells (GCs) and follicular fluid (FF) from follicles of women undergoing ovarian stimulation (27 with PCOS, and 54 without PCOS). An analysis of the transcript abundance of 16 genes in GCs showed that androgen and progesterone receptor expressions were significantly increased in GCs of PCOS (by 2.7-fold and 1.5-fold, respectively), while those of the steroidogenic enzymes CYP11A1 and HSD3B2 were down-regulated (by 56% and 38%, respectively). Remarkably, treatment of GC cultures with E2 revealed its ineffectiveness in regulating the expression of several key endocrine genes (e.g., GREB1 or BCL2) in PCOS. Additionally, a comparison of the steroid concentrations (measured by GC/MS) in GCs with those in FF of matched follicles demonstrated that the significant decline in the E2 concentration (by 23%) in PCOS FF was not the result of the E2 biosynthesis reduction. Overall, our study provides novel hallmarks of PCOS by highlighting the ineffective E2 signaling in GCs as well as the dysregulation in the expression of genes involved in follicular growth, which may contribute to aberrant folliculogenesis in non-hyperandrogenic women with PCOS.

Using serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels to predict the chance of live birth after spontaneous or assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY QUESTION: Is serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level predictive of cumulative live birth (CLB) rate after ART or in women trying to conceive naturally? SUMMARY ANSWER: Serum AMH level is linked to CLB after IVF/ICSI but data are lacking after IUI or in women trying to conceive without ART. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Serum AMH level is a marker of ovarian reserve and a good predictor of ovarian response after controlled ovarian stimulation. It is unclear whether AMH measurement can predict CLB in spontaneous or assisted conception. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess whether serum AMH level may predict chances of CLB in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI or IUI and/or chances of live birth in women having conceived naturally. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the following keywords: 'AMH', 'anti-mullerian hormone', 'live-birth', 'cumulative live birth'. Searches were conducted from January 2004 to April 2021 on PubMed and Embase. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, quality, and risk of bias assessment as well as data extraction. Odds ratios were estimated using a random-effect model. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed. The primary outcome was CLB. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 27 articles were included in the meta-analysis of the relation between AMH and CLB or AMH and LB after IVF/ICSI. A non-linear positive relation was found in both cases. A polynomial fraction was the best model to describe it but no discriminant AMH threshold was shown, especially no serum AMH level threshold below which live birth could not be achieved after IVF/ICSI. After IVF-ICSI, only four studies reported CLB rate according to AMH level. No statistically significant differences in mean serum AMH levels were shown between patients with and without CLB, but with a high heterogeneity. After exclusion of two studies with high risks of bias, there was no more heterogeneity [I2 = 0%] and the mean AMH level was statistically significantly higher in women with CLB. There were not enough articles/data to assess the ability of AMH to predict CLB rate or find an AMH threshold after IUI or in women without history of infertility trying to conceive without ART. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The systematic review and meta-analysis had some limitations owing to the limits and bias of the studies included. In the present meta-analysis, heterogeneity may have been caused by different baseline characteristics in study participants, different stimulating protocols for ART, different serum AMH level thresholds used and the use of various assays for serum AMH. This could explain, in part, the absence of a discriminating AMH threshold found in this analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Serum AMH level is linked to CLB rate after IVF/ICSI but no discriminating threshold can be established, therefore low serum AMH level should not be used as the sole criterion for rejecting IVF treatment, especially in young patients. Data are lacking concerning its predictive value after IUI or in women trying to conceive without ART. Our findings may be helpful to counsel candidate couples to IVF-ICSI. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021269332.

Preimplantation genetic testing for mitochondrial DNA mutation: ovarian response to stimulation, outcomes and follow-up.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How do carriers of pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) respond to ovarian stimulation? DESIGN: A single-centre, retrospective study conducted between January 2006 and July 2021 in France. Ovarian reserve markers and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes were compared for couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for maternally inherited mtDNA disease (n = 18) (mtDNA-PGT group) with a matched-control group of patients undergoing PGT for male indications (n = 96). The PGT outcomes for the mtDNA-PGT group and the follow-up of these patients in case of unsuccessful PGT was also reported. RESULTS: For carriers of pathogenic mtDNA, parameters of ovarian response to FSH and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes were not different from those of matched-control ovarian stimulation cycles. The carriers of pathogenic mtDNA needed a longer ovarian stimulation and higher dose of gonadotrophins. Three patients (16.7%) obtained a live birth after the PGT process, and eight patients (44.4%) achieved parenthood through alternative methods: oocyte donation (n = 4), natural conception with prenatal diagnosis (n = 2) and adoption (n = 2). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of women carrying a mtDNA variant who have undergone a PGT for monogenic (single gene defects) procedure. It is one of the possible options to obtain a healthy baby without observing an impairment in ovarian response to stimulation.

Knowledge, acceptability and personal attitude toward pre-implantation 1 genetic testing (PGT) and pre-natal diagnosis (PND) for females carrying BRCA pathogenic variant according to fertility preservation experience.

PURPOSE: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-M) and prenatal diagnosis (PND) followed by medical termination of pregnancy when the fetus is affected are two procedures developed to avoid the transmission of a severe hereditary disease which can be proposed to females that carried BRCA pathogenic variants. These females can also be offered fertility preservation (FP) when diagnosed with cancer or even before a malignancy occurs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the acceptability and personal attitude of women carrying a BRCA mutation toward techniques that can prevent BRCA transmission to their progeny. METHODS: Female mutated for BRCA1 or BRCA2 were invited to complete an online survey of 49 queries anonymously between June and August 2022. RESULTS: A total of 87 participants responded to the online survey. Overall, 86.2% of women considered that PGT-M should be proposed to all BRCA mutation carriers regardless of the severity of the family history, and 47.1% considered or would consider PGT-M for themselves. For PND, these percentages were lower reaching 66.7% and 29.9%, respectively. Females with personal history of breast cancer or FP achievement were more prone to undergo PND for themselves despite the overall acceptability of this procedure. Among the subgroup who had undergone FP (n = 58), there was no significant difference in acceptance of principle and personal attitude toward PGT-M and PND compared to the group without FP. CONCLUSION: BRCA pathogenic variants female carriers do need information about reproductive issues, even if they are not prone to undergo PGT-M nor PND for themselves. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined simultaneously with oocyte retrieval after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

STUDY QUESTION: Can ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) be performed after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Unilateral oophorectomy after transvaginal oocyte retrieval is feasible on stimulated ovaries during one surgical step. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the fertility preservation (FP) field, the timeframe between patient referral and start of curative treatment is limited. Combining oocyte pick-up with ovarian tissue (OT) extraction has been reported to improve FP but COH applied before OT extraction is not currently recommended. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort-controlled study involved 58 patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation immediately followed by OTC between September 2009 and November 2021. The exclusion criteria were a delay between oocyte retrieval and OTC of >24 h (n = 5) and IVM of oocytes obtained ex vivo in the ovarian cortex (n = 2). This FP strategy was performed either after COH (stimulated group, n = 18) or after IVM (unstimulated group, n = 33). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Oocyte retrieval followed by OT extraction on the same day was performed either without previous stimulation or after COH. Adverse effects of surgery and ovarian stimulation, mature oocyte yield and pathology findings of fresh OT were retrospectively analysed. Thawed OTs were analysed prospectively, for vascularization and apoptosis using immunohistochemistry, when patient consent was obtained. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No surgical complication occurred after OTC surgery in either group. In particular, no severe bleeding was associated with COH. The number of mature oocytes obtained increased after COH (median = 8.5 (25% = 5.3-75% = 12.0)) compared to the unstimulated group (2.0 (1.0-5.3), P < 0.001). Neither ovarian follicle density nor cell integrity was affected by COH. Fresh OT analysis showed congestion in half of the stimulated OT which was higher than in the unstimulated OT (3.1%, P < 0.001). COH also increased haemorrhagic suffusion (COH + OTC: 66.7%; IVM + OTC: 18.8%, P = 0.002) and oedema (COH + OTC: 55.6%; IVM + OTC: 9.4%, P < 0.001). After thawing, the pathological findings were similar between both groups. No statistical difference in the number of blood vessels was observed between the groups. The oocyte apoptotic rate in thawed OT was not statistically different between the groups (ratio of positive cleaved caspase-3 staining oocytes/total number of oocytes equal to median 0.50 (0.33-0.85) and 0.45 (0.23-0.58) in unstimulated and stimulated groups respectively, P = 0.720). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study reports FP from a small number of women following OTC. Follicle density and other pathology findings are an estimate only. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Unilateral oophorectomy can be successfully performed after COH with limited bleeding risk and an absence of impact on thawed OT. This approach could be proposed to post pubertal patients when the number of mature oocytes expected is low or when the risk of residual pathology is high. The reduction of surgical steps for cancer patients also has positive implications for introducing this approach into clinical practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was made possible through the support of the reproductive department of Antoine-Béclère Hospital and of the pathological department of Bicêtre Hospital (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France). The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

STUDY QUESTION: How should fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma be performed? SUMMARY ANSWER: Forty-eight recommendations were formulated on fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgement was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations in four sections; patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Of the 48 recommendations, none could be based on level I evidence and only 16 could be based on level II evidence, implicating that 66% of the recommendations are supported only by observational data, professional experience and consensus of the development group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. G.S. has reported grants from MSD Italia S.r.l., advisory boards for Storz, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Metronic, TESARO Bio Italy S.r.l and Johnson & Johnson, and honoraria for lectures from Clovis Oncology Italy S.r.l. M.G. has reported advisory boards for Gedeon Richter and Merck. The other authors have reported no conflicts of interest. DISCLAIMER: This document represents the views of ESHRE, ESGO and ESGE which are the result of consensus between the relevant stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.

Response to Ovarian Stimulation for Urgent Fertility Preservation before Gonadotoxic Treatment in BRCA-Pathogenic-Variant-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants increase the risk of developing early and aggressive breast cancers (BC). For these patients, fertility potential can be directly affected by oncologic treatments. In addition, evidence indicates that BRCA-mutated women had a significant reduction in their ovarian reserve. In order to improve their chances of conception after the completion of cancer treatments, fertility preservation should be proposed before the administration of gonadotoxic drugs, ideally by oocyte vitrification after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The present investigation aims to assess the ovarian response to COH in BRCA 1/2-pathogenic-variant carriers diagnosed with BC. Patient characteristics and COH outcomes were compared between BRCA-positive (n = 54) and BRCA-negative (n = 254) patients. The number of oocytes recovered did not differ between the two groups. However, the oocyte maturation rate and the number of mature oocytes obtained (7 (4.5-11.5) vs. 9 (5-14) oocytes, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in the BRCA-mutated patients. Although individualized COH protocols should be discussed, BRCA-mutated patients would benefit from FP before BC occurs, in order to cope with the potential accelerated decline of their ovarian reserve, optimize the success rate of FP by repeating COH cycles, and to preserve the feasibility of PGT-M by collecting a large amount of eggs.

Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation following COS does not delay the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer compared to IVM.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether oocyte vitrification following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation (FP) delays the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer (BC) as compared to in vitro maturation (IVM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all BC patients eligible for oocyte vitrification following COS or in vitro maturation (IVM) before initiation of NAC between January 2016 and December 2020. The inclusion criteria were female patients aged between 18 and 40, with confirmed non metastatic BC, with indication of NAC, who have had oocyte retrieval for FP after COS, or IVM + / - cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (OTC). Various time points related to cancer diagnosis, FP, or chemotherapy were obtained from a medical record review. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients with confirmed BC who had oocyte retrieval following COS (n = 57) or IVM + / - OTC (n = 140) for FP prior to NAC were included. Overall, the average time from cancer diagnosis to chemotherapy start was similar between patients having undergone COS or IVM before oocyte vitrification (37.3 ± 13.8 vs. 36. 8 ± 13.5 days; p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The indication of NAC for BC should not be considered as an impediment to urgent COS for oocyte vitrification for FP.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma, consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive information on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment (patient selection, tumor clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, special issues) in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts from across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified by a systematic search, was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

Disease-free survival does not differ according to fertility preservation technique for young women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether fertility preservation strategies using ovarian stimulation or without using it impact long-term disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective bicentric cohort study. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENT(S): In this study, 740 women with breast cancer, aged 18-43 years, who received primary fertility preservation between 2013 and 2019 after a diagnosis of localized breast cancer were included. INTERVENTION(S): Overall, 328 patients underwent at least 1 ovarian stimulation cycle (STIM group) and 412 had a technique without hormonal administration (no STIM group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Disease-free survival and overall survival up to May 2021 were compared between the 2 groups by log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used for multivariable analyses. RESULT(S): Out of the 740 women who underwent fertility preservation, follow-up data were available for 269 women in the STIM group (82%) and 330 (80%) in the no STIM group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival at 4 years were 87.9% (82.8%-92.2%) and 83.1% (78.4%-87.3%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. After adjustment on prognostic parameters, no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rate was observed between the STIM and no STIM groups (hazard ratios, 0.83 [0.64-1.08]). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 4 years was 97.6% (95.3%-99.2%) and 93.6% (90.9%-95.9%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. Overall survival was higher in the STIM group than no STIM group (log-rank test). After adjustment on prognostic parameters, the risk of death remained significantly lower in the STIM group (Hazard Ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.85]). CONCLUSION(S): In our cohort, STIM for fertility preservation in breast cancer did not significantly impact disease-free survival but was associated with higher overall survival. The disease-free survival and overall survival of young patients with breast cancer were not impacted by fertility preservation techniques irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and the use of ovarian stimulation. Nevertheless, because death and recurrence were rare events, these results should be taken with caution.

Should Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) Systematically Be Proposed to BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers?

Over the past years, BRCA genes pathogenic variants have been associated to reproductive issues. Indeed, evidence indicate that BRCA-mutated patients are not only at higher risk of developing malignancies, but may also present a reduction of the follicular stockpile. Given these characteristics, BRCA patients may be candidates to fertility preservation (FP) techniques or preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to avoid the transmission of this inherited situation. Since the success rates of both procedures are highly related to the number of oocytes that could be recovered after ovarian stimulation, predicted by ovarian reserve tests, they are ideally performed before the diagnosis of cancer and its treatment. Despite the specific reproductive challenges related to BRCA status, no international guidelines for the application of PGT and FP in this subgroup of patients is currently available. The present article aims to review the available data regarding BRCA carriers' ovarian reserve and PGT success rates in oncologic and non-oncologic contexts, to determine the actual indication of PGT and further to improve patients' care pathway.

What should be done in terms of fertility preservation for patients with cancer? The French 2021 guidelines.

AIM: To provide practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) in oncology. METHODS: We selected 400 articles after a PubMed review of the literature (1987-2019). RECOMMENDATIONS: Any child, adolescent and adult of reproductive age should be informed about the risk of treatment gonadotoxicity. In women, systematically proposed FP counselling between 15 and 38 years of age in case of treatment including bifunctional alkylating agents, above 6 g/m2 cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), and for radiation doses on the ovaries ≥3 Gy. For postmenarchal patients, oocyte cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation is the first-line FP technique. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be discussed as a first-line approach in case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk, when chemotherapy has already started and in urgent cases. Ovarian transposition is to be discussed prior to pelvic radiotherapy involving a high risk of premature ovarian failure. For prepubertal girls, ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be proposed in the case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk. In pubertal males, sperm cryopreservation must be systematically offered to any male who is to undergo cancer treatment, regardless of toxicity. Testicular tissue cryopreservation must be proposed in males unable to cryopreserve sperm who are to undergo a treatment with intermediate or severe risk of gonadotoxicity. In prepubertal boys, testicular tissue preservation is: - recommended for chemotherapy with a CED ≥7500 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥3 Gy on both testicles. - proposed for chemotherapy with a CED ≥5.000 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥2 Gy. If several possible strategies, the ultimate choice is made by the patient.