The optimal threshold of PD-L1 combined positive score to predict the benefit of PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have become the first-line treatment of metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEACs). This study aims to figure out the optimal combined positive score (CPS) cutoff value. METHODS: We searched for randomized phase III trials to investigate the efficacy of ICIs plus chemotherapy for metastatic GEACs compared with chemotherapy alone. Pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) based on PD-L1 expression were performed. RESULTS: A total of six trials (KEYNOTE-062, KEYNOTE-590, KEYNOTE-859, ATTRACTION-04, CheckMate 649, and ORIENT-16) were included, comprising 5,242 patients. ICIs plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86 in global patients; HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.98 in Asian patients) and PFS (HR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.82 in global patients; HR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.73 in Asian patients) compared with chemotherapy alone. The differences in OS (ratio of HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.40; predictive value: - 5.1%) and PFS (ratio of HR: 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.36; predictive value: - 13.5%) were not statistically significant between the global and Asian patients. Subgroup analyses indicated that the optimal CPS threshold was at ≥ 5 for OS and ≥ 10 for PFS with the highest predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit derived from ICIs plus chemotherapy is similar between Asian and global GEAC patients. However, those with a PD-L1 CPS < 5 or CPS < 10 may not have significant benefits from ICIs therapy. Therefore, it is advisable to routinely assess PD-L1 expression in GEAC patients considered for ICIs treatment.

Combined anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor and anti-VEGF for MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.

Epigenetic modifications of chromatin, including histone acetylation, and tumor angiogenesis play pivotal roles in creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In the randomized phase 2 CAPability-01 trial, we investigated the potential efficacy of combining the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody sintilimab with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) chidamide with or without the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in patients with unresectable chemotherapy-refractory locally advanced or metastatic microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) colorectal cancer. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either the doublet arm (sintilimab and chidamide, n = 23) or the triplet arm (sintilimab, chidamide and bevacizumab, n = 25). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks (18wPFS rate) was met with a rate of 43.8% (21 of 48) for the entire study population. Secondary endpoint results include a median PFS of 3.7 months, an overall response rate of 29.2% (14 of 48), a disease control rate of 56.3% (27 of 48) and a median duration of response of 12.0 months. The secondary endpoint of median overall survival time was not mature. The triplet arm exhibited significantly improved outcomes compared to the doublet arm, with a greater 18wPFS rate (64.0% versus 21.7%, P = 0.003), higher overall response rate (44.0% versus 13.0%, P = 0.027) and longer median PFS rate (7.3 months versus 1.5 months, P = 0.006). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events observed in both the triplet and doublet arms included proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia and diarrhea. There were two treatment-related fatalities (hepatic failure and pneumonitis). Analysis of bulk RNA sequencing data from the patients suggested that the triplet combination enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration, resulting in a more immunologically active tumor microenvironment. Our study suggests that the combination of a PD-1 antibody, an HDACi, and a VEGF antibody could be a promising treatment regimen for patients with MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04724239 .

The relationship between brain metastasis and HER2 expression status in gastric cancer

Background Brain metastasis (BM) in gastric cancer (GC) is underestimated, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is a durable poor prognostic factor. We explored the relationship between the two and made a survival analysis. Methods HER2 expression and BM status were collected from GC patients who were diagnosed between December 2009 and May 2021. We collected GC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from the SEER database. The primary endpoint was survival from the diagnosis of BM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine potential risk factors of BM at diagnosis in SEER database. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Result There were 513 HER2-positive GC patients, including 16 (3.1%) with BM. Among 38 brain metastasis GC patients we collected, 16 (42.1%) patients were HER2 positive. We collected 34,199 GC patients from the SEER database and there were 260 (0.76%) patients with BM at diagnosis. GC patients that are male, white, of younger age, with primary lesions located in the proximal stomach or with distant lymph nodes, liver, bone, or lung metastasis are more likely to develop BM. The median overall survival time from diagnosis of BM was 12.73 months, and the survival time from brain metastasis of HER2-positive patients was numerically shorter, though the difference was not significant (5.30 months vs.16.13 months, P = 0.28.) Conclusion The incidence of BM in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer is 4.08 times higher than that in general patients. The median overall survival time from BM is shorter for HER2-positive patients (AU)

Perioperative toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, and the addition of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is under investigation. In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 study (NEOSUMMIT-01), patients with resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer clinically staged as cT3-4aN + M0 were randomized (1:1) to receive either three preoperative and five postoperative 3-week cycles of SOX/XELOX (chemotherapy group, n = 54) or PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus SOX/XELOX, followed by toripalimab monotherapy for up to 6 months (toripalimab plus chemotherapy group, n = 54). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response or near-complete response rate (tumor regression grade (TRG) 0/1). The results showed that patients in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group achieved a higher proportion of TRG 0/1 than those in the chemotherapy group (44.4% (24 of 54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 30.9%-58.6%) versus 20.4% (11 of 54, 95% CI: 10.6%-33.5%)), and the risk difference of TRG 0/1 between toripalimab plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group was 22.7% (95% CI: 5.8%-39.6%; P = 0.009), meeting a prespecified endpoint. In addition, a higher pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group (22.2% (12 of 54, 95% CI: 12.0%-35.6%) versus 7.4% (4 of 54, 95% CI: 2.1%-17.9%); P = 0.030), and surgical morbidity (11.8% in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group versus 13.5% in the chemotherapy group) and mortality (1.9% versus 0%), and treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events (35.2% versus 29.6%) were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, the addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving TRG 0/1 compared to chemotherapy alone and showed a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04250948 .

The relationship between brain metastasis and HER2 expression status in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BM) in gastric cancer (GC) is underestimated, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is a durable poor prognostic factor. We explored the relationship between the two and made a survival analysis. METHODS: HER2 expression and BM status were collected from GC patients who were diagnosed between December 2009 and May 2021. We collected GC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from the SEER database. The primary endpoint was survival from the diagnosis of BM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine potential risk factors of BM at diagnosis in SEER database. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULT: There were 513 HER2-positive GC patients, including 16 (3.1%) with BM. Among 38 brain metastasis GC patients we collected, 16 (42.1%) patients were HER2 positive. We collected 34,199 GC patients from the SEER database and there were 260 (0.76%) patients with BM at diagnosis. GC patients that are male, white, of younger age, with primary lesions located in the proximal stomach or with distant lymph nodes, liver, bone, or lung metastasis are more likely to develop BM. The median overall survival time from diagnosis of BM was 12.73 months, and the survival time from brain metastasis of HER2-positive patients was numerically shorter, though the difference was not significant (5.30 months vs.16.13 months, P = 0.28.) CONCLUSION: The incidence of BM in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer is 4.08 times higher than that in general patients. The median overall survival time from BM is shorter for HER2-positive patients.

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023.

The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.

Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives.

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle symptoms of earlier disease and the low rate of regular screening. Systemic therapies for GC, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have evolved significantly in the past few years. For resectable GC, perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard treatment. Ongoing investigations are exploring the potential benefits of targeted therapy or immunotherapy in the perioperative or adjuvant setting. For metastatic disease, there have been notable advancements in immunotherapy and biomarker-directed therapies recently. Classification based on molecular biomarkers, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability (MSI), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), provides an opportunity to differentiate patients who may benefit from immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Molecular diagnostic techniques have facilitated the characterization of GC genetic profiles and the identification of new potential molecular targets. This review systematically summarizes the main research progress in systemic treatment for GC, discusses current individualized strategies and presents future perspectives.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with sintilimab in mismatch-repair deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer: an open-label, single-centre phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery, but this approach can lead to multiple complications. We aimed to investigate the clinical activity and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with sintilimab, a single-agent PD-1 antibody, in patients with mismatch-repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study was done at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Patients aged 18-75 years with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled and received neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy (200 mg by intravenous infusion) every 21 days. After an initial four cycles of treatment, patients and clinicians could choose one of the following options: total mesorectal excision surgery, followed by four cycles of adjuvant sintilimab with or without CapeOX chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, orally administered twice daily on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, intravenously administered on day 1 every 3 weeks), determined by clinicians; or another four cycles of sintilimab followed by radical surgery or observation (only for patients with a clinical complete response; also known as the watch and wait strategy). The primary endpoint was the complete response rate, which included both a pathological complete response after surgery and a clinical complete response after completion of sintilimab treatment. Clinical response was evaluated by digital rectal examination, MRI, and endoscopy. Response was assessed in all patients who received treatment at least until the first tumour response assessment, after the first two cycles of sintilimab. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04304209). FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2019, and June 18, 2022, 17 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of sintilimab. The median age was 50 years (IQR 35-59) and 11 (65%) of 17 patients were male. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses because they were lost to follow-up after the first sintilimab cycle. Of the remaining 16 patients, six underwent surgery, of whom three had a pathological complete response. Nine other patients had a clinical complete response and chose the watch and wait strategy. One patient had a serious adverse event and discontinued treatment; this patient did not have a complete clinical response and refused to undergo surgery. A complete response was thus noted for 12 (75%; 95% CI 47-92) of 16 patients. One of the three patients who underwent surgery but did not have a pathological complete response showed an increase in tumour volume after the initial four cycles of sintilimab (at which point they underwent surgery); this patient was deemed to have primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 17·2 (IQR 8·2-28·5) months, all patients were alive and none had disease recurrence. Only one (6%) patient had a grade 3-4 adverse event, which was deemed a serious adverse event (grade 3 encephalitis). INTERPRETATION: The preliminary results of this study suggest that anti-PD-1 monotherapy is effective and tolerable for patients with mismatch-repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer and could potentially spare some patients from radical surgery. Longer treatment courses might be needed to achieve maximum effects in some patients. Longer follow-up is also needed to observe the duration of response. FUNDING: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, and Innovent Biologics.

Clinical Benefit of First-Line Programmed Death-1 Antibody Plus Chemotherapy in Low Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1-Expressing Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Post Hoc Analysis of JUPITER-06 and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus chemotherapy was approved as a first-line treatment for high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by the European Medicines Agency, whereas the US Food and Drug Administration approved this regimen regardless of PD-L1 expression. The superiority of programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone in patients with low PD-L1-expressing ESCC remains debatable. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Chinese JUPITER-06 study focusing on efficacy stratified by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS; using JS311 antibody) was conducted. Electronic databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials for meta-analysis. Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and progression-free survival and odds ratios for objective response rate according to PD-L1 expression were performed. RESULTS: The post hoc analysis of JUPITER-06 showed more prominent clinical benefit with PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone in both the high and low PD-L1-expressing subgroups. Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, and two PD-L1 expression scoring criteria, TPS (≥ 1%/< 1%) and combined positive score (CPS, ≥ 10/< 10), were analyzed. Significant overall survival benefit by adding PD-1 antibody to chemotherapy was observed in both the TPS < 1% (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97) and CPS < 10 (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.89) subgroups. Similarly, significantly prolonged progression-free survival was observed in both the TPS < 1% (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.86) and CPS < 10 (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.84) subgroups. In addition, the objective response rate of the TPS < 1% subgroup was significantly improved (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.29). In all high PD-L1-expressing subgroups, the pooled benefit of PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy was significantly better than that of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study provided novel evidence supporting the superiority of PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced ESCC with low PD-L1 expression. Further studies of predictive biomarkers are warranted.

Comparison of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and tumor regression grade in evaluating the effect of preoperative systemic therapy of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and tumor regression grade (TRG) play key roles in evaluating tumor response. We analyzed the consistency of TRG and RECIST 1.1 for gastric cancer (GC) patients and compared their prognostic values. METHODS: Patients with GC who received preoperative chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy and had records of TRG from December 2013 to October 2021 were enrolled retrospectively. TRG 0-1 and 2-3 are considered as corresponding to complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)/progress disease (PD) in RECIST 1.1, respectively. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The consistency of RECIST and TRG was examined by kappa statistics. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULT: One hundred fifty seven GC patients were enrolled, including 125 with preoperative chemotherapy and 32 with chemoimmunotherapy. Among them, 56 patients had measurable lesions. Only 19.6% (11/56) of the patients had consistent results between RECIST 1.1 and TRG. TRG was correlated with both OS and DFS (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) while response according to RECIST1.1 was not (P = 0.86 and 0.23, respectively). The median DFS had not reached in the TRG 0-1 group and was 16.13 months in TRG 2-3 group. TRG 2-3 was associated with young age and peritoneal or liver metastasis. Besides, preoperative chemoimmunotherapy had a significantly higher pCR rate than chemotherapy alone (34.4% vs 8.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TRG was in poor agreement with RECIST 1.1. TRG was better than RECIST 1.1 in predicting DFS and OS for GC patients who received preoperative therapy.

Optimizing Chemotherapy of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Our Experiences and Pooled Analysis of Literature.

Background: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is rare, and its appropriate treatment remains unknown. We aim to explore the characteristics and optimal treatment of it. Methods: The data on clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular alteration, treatment, and survival of patients diagnosed with PACC at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2005 to 2020 were collected. The optimal treatment was explored by co-analyzing our results and published literatures. Results: Twenty-two PACC patients were enrolled. Eight of 17 non-metastatic patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based regimen (n = 3) had a better median disease-free survival (mDFS) than those with gemcitabine-based regimen (n = 5) (unreached vs 27 months). Eight metastatic patients received first-line chemotherapy. Four patients received second-line chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) of the fluoropyrimidine-based regimen was 85.7% (6/7), much better than that of the gemcitabine-based regimen (0/5). One patient who had responded to the first-line FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + leucovorin + irinotecan) regimen received olaparib as maintenance treatment for 5 months with good tolerance. Thirty-one published literatures, with a total of 86 cases, were included in the co-analysis. The ORR of the first-line fluoropyrimidine-based regimen (n = 47) was higher than that of gemcitabine-based regimen (n = 39) (59.6% vs 15.3%, P < .001). Eight of 11 patients treated with the FOLFIRINOX regimen achieved partial response (PR). Conclusions: For patients with metastasis, a fluorouracil-based regimen such as FOLFIRINOX may be preferred, and maintenance treatment of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors after effective platinum-containing treatment for breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation patients must be assessed.

The Impact of Mismatch Repair Status on Prognosis of Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical role of deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) in gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial. We aimed to analyze the relationship between dMMR/MSI-H and clinicopathological features along with survival. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with GC at the three big cancer centers in China from 2015 to 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. MMR/MSI status was assessed using immunohistochemistry/PCR. Clinical and pathological data were collected from the medical record system. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients with dMMR/MSI-H status were enrolled for analysis. The prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR in GC was 6.6%. Another 694 proficient MMR (pMMR) GC patients were enrolled for comparison. Compared with pMMR patients, dMMR/MSI-H patients were associated with older age, female predominance, distal location in the stomach, earlier TNM stage, intestinal subtype, better differentiation, and more negative HER2 status. The median overall survival (OS) of the dMMR/MSI-H group was better than that of the pMMR/microsatellite stability (MSS) group (not reached vs. 53.9 months, p = 0.014). Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact in both disease-free survival (DFS) and OS of dMMR/MSI-H patients (p = 0.135 and 0.818, respectively). dMMR/MSI-H patients had poorer response and progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line chemotherapy, though they were statistically significant (p = 0.361 and 0.124, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: dMMR/MSI-H GC patients have specific clinicopathological characteristics and better prognosis than pMMR patients.

PD-1 antibody camrelizumab for Epstein-Barr virus-positive metastatic gastric cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Gastric cancer (GC) patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity have demonstrated promising response with immunotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab as salvage treatment in EBV-positive mGC. In this single-arm, phase 2 prospective clinical trial (NCT03755440), stage IV EBV-positive GC patients who failed/could not tolerate previous lines of chemotherapy were given intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, and toxicity. Exploratory analysis included the associations between treatment response and tumor mutation burden (TMB), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Six eligible patients were enrolled in the first stage of the study. No patient achieved an objective response; thus, the study did not proceed to the second stage. The DCR was 67% (4/6). The median PFS rate was 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-not reached [NR]) and median OS was 6.8 months (95% CI: 1.7-NR). All treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2, with reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (n=4 [67%]) being the most commonly observed event. The only patient with PD-L1 combined positive score >1 had disease progression. Two stable disease and one disease progression were observed in three patients with TMB >10 Mut/Mb. EBV positivity may not be a good predictor for response to camrelizumab in mGC. Newer biomarkers are needed to identify EBV-positive mGC respondents who might benefit from immunotherapy.

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021.

There exist differences in the epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selections between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has organized a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub-specialties of gastric cancer to compile a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer since 2016 and renews it annually. Taking into account regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted expert consensus judgment on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes in China. The 2021 CSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer covers the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and screening of gastric cancer. Based on the 2020 version of the CSCO Chinese Gastric Cancer guidelines, this updated guideline integrates the results of major clinical studies from China and overseas for the past year, focused on the inclusion of research data from the Chinese population for more personalized and clinically relevant recommendations. For the comprehensive treatment of non-metastatic gastric cancer, attentions were paid to neoadjuvant treatment. The value of perioperative chemotherapy is gradually becoming clearer and its recommendation level has been updated. For the comprehensive treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, recommendations for immunotherapy were included, and immune checkpoint inhibitors from third-line to the first-line of treatment for different patient groups with detailed notes are provided.

Relationship of HER2 Alteration and Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The impact of HER2 somatic mutations in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has not been well studied and its relationship with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is yet to be fully elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2017 to February 2020, the data of patients with CRC who underwent next-generation sequencing and had detailed record of clinicopathological information were investigated. HER2 alteration and its relationship with MSI-H were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 731 patients who underwent sequencing, 55 patients (7.5%) had HER2 alteration, including 29 (4.0%) with HER2 somatic mutations, 24 (3.3%) with HER2 gene amplification, and 2 patients (0.2%) with both HER2 mutations and amplification. R678Q was the most common mutated kinase domain, and no HER2 kinase domain in-frame insertions/deletions were found in HER2 mutated cases. MSI-H was found in 5.2% of our cohort and 36.8% of MSI-H patients had HER2 mutation. For HER2 mutated cases, 48.3% were MSI-H, whereas none of the HER2 amplification cases were MSI-H. MSI-H patients with HER2 mutation had significantly worse median progression-free survival for programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody than those without HER2 alteration (p = .036). CONCLUSION: High MSI-H rate was found in HER2 mutated cases, but no MSI-H was found in HER2 amplification cases. MSI-H patients with HER2 mutated had worse progression-free survival for PD-1 antibody than those without. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study highlights the high microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) rate in HER2 mutated cases but no MSI-H in HER2 amplification cases. Moreover MSI-H patients with HER2 mutated had worse progression-free survival for programmed death-1 antibody than those without. Further research to explore the internal relationship between HER2 alteration and MSI-H is needed.

Bedaquiline-containing regimens in patients with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: focus on the safety.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization recommends countries introducing new drug and short treatment regimen for drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) should develop and implement a system for active pharmacovigilance that allows for detection, reporting and management of adverse events. The aim of the study is to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) of bedaquiline-containing regimen in a cohort of Chinese patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB based on active drug safety monitoring (aDSM) system of New Drug Introduction and Protection Program (NDIP). METHODS: AEs were prospectively collected with demographic, bacteriological, radiological and clinical data from 54 sites throughout China at patient enrollment and during treatment between February, 2018 and December, 2019. This is an interim analysis including patients who are still on treatment and those that have completed treatment. A descriptive analysis was performed on the patients evaluated in the cohort. RESULTS: By December 31, 2019, a total of 1162 patients received bedaquiline-containing anti-TB treatment. Overall, 1563 AEs were reported, 66.9% were classified as minor (Grade 1-2) and 33.1% as serious (Grade 3-5). The median duration of bedaquiline treatment was 167.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 75-169] days. 86 (7.4%) patients received 36-week prolonged treatment with bedaquiline. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was 47.1% and 7.8%, respectively. The most frequently reported AEs were QT prolongation (24.7%) and hepatotoxicity (16.4%). There were 14 (1.2%) AEs leading to death. Out of patients with available corrected QT interval by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) data, 3.1% (32/1044) experienced a post-baseline QTcF ≥ 500 ms, and 15.7% (132/839) had at least one change of QTcF ≥ 60 ms from baseline. 49 (4.2%) patients had QT prolonged AEs leading to bedaquiline withdrawal. One hundred and ninety patients reported 361 AEs with hepatotoxicity ranking the second with high occurrence. Thirty-four patients reported 43 AEs of hepatic injury referred to bedaquiline, much lower than that referred to protionamide, pyrazinamide and para-aminosalicylic acid individually. CONCLUSIONS: Bedaquiline was generally well-tolerated with few safety concerns in this clinical patient population without any new safety signal identified. The mortality rate was generally low. These data inform significant positive effect to support the WHO recent recommendations for the wide use of bedaquiline.

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of BRAF Mutated Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Background: BRAF V600E mutation is associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but the comparison of clinic-pathologic features between V600E and non-V600E mutation was not well-known in CRC patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and pathological features, prognostic value of BRAF mutations in CRC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to characterize the clinical and pathological features and survival of patients with BRAF mutated CRC. Patients were classified according to BRAF status as BRAF V600E mutation and non-V600E mutations. Difference of characteristics and survival between the two groups was analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in gender, family history, location of primary tumor, metastatic sites between patients with BRAF-V600E mutation and non-V600E mutations. Patients with V600E mutation were younger than those with non-V600E mutations (p = 0.002). Patients with BRAF V600E mutation showed a poorer outcome than those with non-V600E mutations (23.1 vs. 49.9 months, respectively, p = 0.0024). Lack of CDX2 expression was associated with worse prognosis (mOS: 9.4 m vs. not reached, respectively, p = 0.016). Status of V600E mutation did not affect the mPFS and ORR of first-line or second-line treatment. Conclusion: BRAF V600E mutation defines a distinct subgroup of CRC with worse prognosis. Lack of CDX2 expression is associated with poor OS. Status of V600E mutation did not affect the mPFS of first-line or second-line treatment.

Classification of gastric cancer by EBV status combined with molecular profiling predicts patient prognosis.

PURPOSE: To identify how Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status combined with molecular profiling predicts the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and their associated clinical actionable biomarkers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A next-generation sequencing assay targeting 295 cancer-related genes was performed in 73 EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) and 75 EBV-negative gastric cancer (EBVnGC) specimens and these results were compared with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: PIK3CA, ARID1A, SMAD4, and PIK3R1 mutated significantly more frequently in EBVaGC compared with their corresponding mutation rate in EBVnGC. As the most frequently mutated gene in EBVnGC (62.7%), TP53 also displayed a mutation rate of 15.1% in EBVaGC. PIK3R1 was revealed as a novel mutated gene (11.0%) associated almost exclusively with EBVaGC. PIK3CA, SMAD4, PIK3R1, and BCOR were revealed to be unique driver genes in EBVaGC. ARID1A displayed a significantly large proportion of inactivated variants in EBVaGC. A notable finding was that integrating the EBV status with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and large genomic instability (LGI) categorized the tumors into four distinct molecular subtypes and optimally predicted patient prognosis. The corresponding median OSs for the EBV+/TMB-high, EBV+/TMB-low, EBV-/LGI-, and EBV-/LGI+ subtypes were 96.2, 75.3, 44.4, and 20.2 months, respectively. The different subtypes were significantly segregated according to distinct mutational profiles and pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Novel mutations in PIK3R1 and TP53 genes, driver genes such as PIK3CA, SMAD4, PIK3R1, BCOR, and ARID1A, and distinguished genomic profiles from EBVnGC were identified in EBVaGC tumors. The classification of gastric cancer by EBV, TMB, and LGI could be a good prognostic indicator, and provides distinguishing, targetable markers for treatment.

Prospective observation: Clinical utility of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma patients.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinomas (EBVaGCs) may account for 8-9% of all gastric cancer (GC) patients. All previous reports on EBVaGC were retrospective. Prospective study is warranted to evaluate the exact role of EBV status in predicting the prognosis of GC. It is of special interest to figure out whether dynamic detection of plasma EBV-DNA load could be a feasible biomarker for the monitor of EBVaGC. From October 2014 to September 2017, we consecutively collected GC patients (n = 2,760) from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center for EBER examination. We detected EBV-DNA load in plasma and tissue samples of EBVaGC patients at baseline. Subsequently, plasma EBV-DNA load was dynamically monitored in EBVaGC patients. The overall prevalence of EBVaGC is 5.1% (140/2,760). The incidence rate of EBVaGC decreased with advanced AJCC 7th TNM stage (p < 0.001), with the corresponding percentages of 9.3, 9.9, 6.7 and 1.4% for Stage I, II, III and IV patients. EBVaGC patients were predominately young males with better histologic differentiation and earlier TNM stage than EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC) patients. EBVaGC patients were confirmed to had a favorable 3-year survival rate (EBVaGC vs. EBVnGC: 76.8% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.0001). Though only 52.1% (73/140) EBVaGC patients gained detectable EBV-DNA and 43.6% (61/140) reached a positive cutoff of 100 copies/ml, we found the plasma EBV-DNA load in EBVaGC decreased when patients got response, while it increased when disease progressed. Our results suggested that plasma EBV-DNA is a good marker in predicting recurrence and chemotherapy response for EBVaGC patients.