Lipid Nanoemulsions of Rebamipide: Formulation, Characterization, and In Vivo Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects.

Rebamipide has low oral bioavailability (10%) due to its low solubility and permeability. Lipid nanoemulsions (LNEs) were prepared in order to improve its oral bioavailability. Rebamipide-loaded lipid nanoemulsions were formulated by hot homogenization and ultrasonication method. Olive oil and egg lecithin in various concentrations as emulsifier were used in the preparation of LNEs. The lipid nanoemulsions were evaluated for various parameters. The globule size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP) of the formulations ranged from 230.3 ± 3.88 to 279.8 ± 5.76 nm, 0.204 ± 0.008 to 0.246 ± 0.029, and - 27.7 ± 2.05 to - 31.0 ± 1.87 mV, respectively. Entrapment efficiency and assay values ranged from 99.90 ± 0.006 to 99.92 ± 0.002% and 99.3 ± 0.808 to 99.6 ± 0.360, respectively. Physical stability test results revealed that the optimized LNEs were stable for 2 months at both room (25°C) and refrigerated temperature (4°C). The optimized LNE showed 4.32-fold improvement in the oral bioavailability in comparison to a marketed tablet suspension. In vivo anti ulcer activity of rebamipide LNE was studied by testing the prophylactic effect in preventing the mucosal damage in stomach region. The mucosa of stomach in animals was damaged by per oral administration of 80% alcohol. Maximum prophylactic antiulcer activity was observed by per oral delivery of rebamipide as LNE. Our results indicated that LNEs were a promising approach for the oral delivery of rebamipide for systemic effects along with local effects in protecting gastric region, which gets damaged during peptic ulcers.

A standardized vascular disease health check in europe: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: No clinical trials have assessed the effects or cost-effectiveness of health check strategies to detect and manage vascular disease. We used a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of several health check strategies in six European countries. METHODS: We used country-specific data from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom to generate simulated populations of individuals aged 40-75 eligible for health checks in those countries (e.g. individuals without a previous diagnosis of diabetes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or serious chronic kidney disease). For each country, we used the Archimedes model to compare seven health check strategies consisting of assessments for diabetes, hypertension, lipids, and smoking. For patients diagnosed with vascular disease, treatment was simulated in a standard manner. We calculated the effects of each strategy on the incidence of type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and microvascular complications in addition to quality of life, costs, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: Compared with current care, health checks reduced the incidence of MACE (6-17 events prevented per 1000 people screened) and diabetes related microvasular complications (5-11 events prevented per 1000 people screened), and increased QALYs (31-59 discounted QALYs) over 30 years, in all countries. The cost per QALY of offering a health check to all individuals in the study cohort ranged from €14903 (France) to cost saving (Poland). Pre-screening the population and offering health checks only to higher risk individuals lowered the cost per QALY. Pre-screening on the basis of obesity had a cost per QALY of €10200 (France) or less, and pre-screening with a non-invasive risk score was similar. CONCLUSIONS: A vascular disease health check would likely be cost effective at 30 years in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom.