Managing cold intolerance after hand injury: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review seeks to understand whether cold intolerance (CI) improves with time and if there is any role for management strategies such as behavioural therapy, surgery, or pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Two independent reviewers used a predefined search strategy to query MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Articles written in English, Studies of interventions (such as pharmacotherapy or behavioural therapy) for cold intolerance in adult patients with a history of hand injury along with prevalence over time were included for review. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included, with twelve prognostic studies of the effect of time on CI, four studies of self management/behavioural therapies, and a single study of surgical treatment of neuromas. No studies of pharmacotherapies were identified for inclusion in the hand injury literature. Most studies (76.4%) were either prevalence or prospective cohort studies; no level I or II evidence studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: Cold intolerance does not resolve over time for the vast majority of patients. Behavioral and self-management studies have low efficacy and studies presented had a high risk of bias. There is a lack of evidence for the use of pharmacotherapy in CI and this could be considered for future studies.

Changes in end of life care 5 years after the introduction of a rapid response team: a multicentre retrospective study.

RATIONALE: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are intended to stabilize deteriorating patients on the ward, but recent studies suggest that RRTs may also improve end-of-life care (EOLC). We sought to study the effect of introducing an RRT on EOLC at our institutions, and compare the EOLC care received by patients who were consulted by the RRT with that of patients who were not consulted by the RRT. METHODS: Retrospective review of 450 consecutive deaths at 3 institutions. We compared demographic factors and EOLC received before (2005) and 5 years after (2010) the introduction of an RRT. We also compared these same factors for patients who died in 2010 with and without RRT consultation. RESULTS: There were no differences in the proportion of patients who had Patient/Family Conferences or orders to limit life support on the ward between 2005 and 2010. Although the RRT was consulted for 30% of patients eligible to be seen by the RRT, the RRT was involved in only 11.1% of Patient/Family Conferences that took place on the ward. The prevalence of palliative care consultation and orders for opioids as needed was higher in 2010 than 2005, but those seen by the RRT were less likely to receive a palliative care consultation (30.2% vs. 55.9%), spiritual care consultation (25.4% vs. 41.3%) or an order for sedatives as needed (44.4% vs. 65.0%) than those who were not seen by the RRT. There was no change in the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU in 2010 compared with 2005, and multivariable logistic regression showed that the year of death did not influence the likelihood of ICU admission based on any comorbid or demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an RRT was not associated with significant improvements in EOLC at our institutions. However, almost 1/3 of dying patients were consulted by the RRT, suggesting that the RRT could play a role in facilitating improved EOLC for some inpatients.

Rapid response teams, do not resuscitate orders, and potential opportunities to improve end-of-life care: a multicentre retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Rapid response teams (RRTs) were created to stabilize acutely ill patients on the ward, but recent studies suggest that RRTs may improve end-of-life care (EOLC). To learn more about the role of the RRT in EOLC at our institutions, we conducted a retrospective review. METHODS: Retrospective review of 300 RRT consultations at 3 academic hospitals in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: The typical consultation was for an elderly patient with chronic illness. More than 90% had a "full resuscitation" order at the time of consultation. One third were admitted to the intensive care unit within 48 hours of the RRT consultation, and 24.7% ultimately died. Twenty-seven (9.3%) had a patient/family conference on the ward within 48h of the RRT consultation, 24 (8.3%) of whom changed their resuscitation order as a result. Among those who changed their resuscitation order, fewer than 20% were referred to the palliative care or spiritual care service, or prescribed comfort medications as needed (pro re nata), within 48 h of the RRT consultation; 2 patients died without receiving any common EOLC orders, and 15 (63%) died before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: RRT consultation is an important milestone for many patients approaching EOL. RRTs frequently participate in EOL discussions and decision-making, but they may miss opportunities to facilitate EOLC.