Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Experience and Pathological Quality: Are They Always Linked?

Objective: We investigated whether pathological outcomes improved with experience and surgeon generation after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: The study included 1338 patients who underwent RALP between February 2010 and April 2020. We created learning curves for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, and positive surgical margin (PSM) after adjustment for confounders. We compared the outcomes between the first and second generation of surgeons in regression models. Results: The learning curve regarding PLND indications showed a significant increase with experience for the first generation, whereas the second generation had a learning curve that remained flat at a higher level (92.3%) and significantly better than the first generation (p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of LN removed showed a significant increase with experience in both generations, but the overall median number of LN removed was significantly higher in the second generation compared with the first generation (12 vs 10, p < 0.001). However, the learning curve for PSM remained flat at ∼20% after adjustment and did not show improvement with experience in both generations of surgeons (p = 0.794). Conclusions: Surgeons showed improvement with experience and education with RALP with respect to the indications for PLND and number of LNs removed. However, there was no improvement over time and generations for PSM. Experience based solely on the number of patients operated on is not an intrinsic factor in the pathological quality of RALP. Factors other than experience may also play a role in oncologic improvement.

Independent validation of a pre-specified four-kallikrein marker model for prediction of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Accurate markers for prostate cancer (PC) risk stratification could aid decision-making for initial management strategies. The 4Kscore has an undefined role in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We included 1476 patients with 4Kscore measured prior to RP at two institutions. The 4Kscore was assessed for prediction of adverse pathology at RP and biochemical recurrence (BCR) relative to a clinical model. We pre-specified that all analyses would be assessed in biopsy Grade Group 1 (GG1) or 2 (GG2) PC patients, separately. RESULTS: The 4Kscore increased discrimination for adverse pathology in all patients (delta area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) 0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.002, 0.016; clinical model AUC 0.767), driven by GG1 (delta AUC 0.040, 95% CI 0.006, 0.073) rather than GG2 patients (delta AUC 0.005, 95% CI -0.012, 0.021). Adding 4Kscore improved prediction of BCR in all patients (delta C-index 0.014, 95% CI 0.007, 0.021; preop-BCR nomogram C-index 0.738), again with larger changes in GG1 than in GG2. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates prior investigations on the use of 4Kscore in men with biopsy-confirmed PC. Men with GG1 PC and a high 4Kscore may benefit from additional testing to guide treatment selection. Further research is warranted regarding the value of the 4Kscore in men with biopsy GG2 PC.

Intracorporeal urinary diversion during robot-assisted radical cystectomy using indocyanine green.

INTRODUCTION To describe the feasibility of total intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic assisted radical cystectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) and the Firefly system of the da Vinci Xi robot and to evaluate the digestive and urinary outcomes of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the Institutional Review Board, we studied all consecutive patients who underwent robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and intracorporeal urinary derivation (ICUD) with the da Vinci Xi robot using ICG and the Firefly system, in our institution from January 1st 2018 to September 15th 2018. Pre, intra and postoperative data were analyzed with a follow up of at least 1 month. RESULTS: We included 25 patients. Preoperative data were the following: 92 % were men, median age was 74 years (IQR 69-76), 64% of patients had an ASA score ≥ 3. Median operative time was 390 min (IQR 360-460). Median return to bowel function was 3 days for gas (IQR 2-5) and 5 days for stool (IQR 3-6). Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 7-10). After a median follow up of 9.6 months (IQR 8.3-12.5), only one patient (4%) presented with postoperative obstructive syndrome. There were 2 (8%) urinary leaks and 1 (4%) uretrero-enteric stricture. There were no digestive fistulas recorded. Eleven patients (44%) were readmitted within 90 days for complications. CONCLUSIONS: Total intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic assisted radical cystectomy using ICG is a feasible technique that might reduce return of bowel function and with low urinary and digestive complications.

Alternative surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis removal.

BACKGROUND: The Inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) are used as definitive treatment for severe erectile dysfunction. Removal of an IPP can be challenging, especially for the non-andrologists and junior urologists. The classic penoscrotal incision for explanation can disrupt anatomy, which increases the risk of complications and makes future re-implantation difficult. This article aims to describe a simple surgical method for the removal of IPP, which avoids the penoscrotal incision and reduces the risk of urethral damage and additional fibrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2015 and February 2019, 15 patients underwent IPP removal using the same technique. Multiple incisions were performed directly over each component of the IPP for their removal. Four incisions of 2 cm each were made at the following sites: one incision on both sides of the ventral base of the penis, one inguinal incision, and one scrotal incision. Each incision provides direct access to one component of the IPP (cylinders, reservoir, and pump). RESULTS: The mean duration of the surgery was 41 min (between 35 and 48 min). All procedures were completed successfully with a smooth course. None of the patients had any residual component of the IPP at the time of surgery. Neither complications (urethral or intestinal injury) nor excessive bleeding (> 100 mL) were documented in all patients. CONCLUSION: Our approach provides direct exposure of all components of the IPP. It reduces the risk of urethral iatrogenic injury and the local fibrosis (which is greater with the penoscrotal incision) that may impair future reinsertion of IPP. It is simple, safe, reproducible and easy to be performed by junior or unexperienced urologists in urgent cases. CONTEXTE: Les implants péniens hydrauliques (IPH) constituent le traitement définitif des dysfonctions érectiles. Le retrait de ces prothèses peut être difficile, surtout pour les jeunes urologues. L'incision classique péno-scrotale est. peu anatomique. Elle est. associée à un risque de plaies urétrales et de fibrose pouvant limiter l'insertion ultérieure de nouvelles prothèses. Nous présentons dans cet article une méthode alternative simple pour le retrait des IPH qui permet d'éviter l'incision péno-scrotale et les risques qui s'y associent. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODES: Entre novembre 2015 et février 2019, 15 patients ont été opérés pour extraction d'IPH infectés, en utilisant la même technique chirurgicale. Une incision de 2 cm est. réalisée en face de chaque élément de l'IPH pour permettre son extraction: une incision scrotale, une autre inguinale et une de chaque côté de la base ventrale du pénis. RÉSULTATS: La durée moyenne de l'intervention était de 41 min (entre 35 et 48 min). Toutes les interventions ont été bien tolérées. Les éléments des IPH ont été retirés sans fragments résiduels. Aucune complication n'a été notée. CONCLUSION: L'approche décrite permet l'exposition directe des composantes des IPH. Elle permet la réduction du risque des lésions urétrales iatrogène et de fibrose ultérieure. Celle-ci est. plus fréquente avec l'incision péno-scrotale et peut limiter l'éventuelle insertion de nouveaux implants. Notre technique est. reproductible et simple pour être appliquée sans danger par les jeunes urologues peu expérimentés.

Atlas of Ex Vivo Prostate Tissue and Cancer Images Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Project for Intraoperative Positive Surgical Margin Detection During Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an optical device that aims to image histological architecture and may be used to reduce positive surgical margins. The ability of CLE to describe prostatic and periprostatic tissues, and prostate cancer (PCa) is still an object of investigation. OBJECTIVE: To create an atlas of ex vivo CLE images of prostatic and periprostatic tissues, and PCa in order to recognise different prostatic structures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From November 2017 to February 2018, 15 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for biopsy-proven PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Based on preoperative data and macroscopic examination, tumour location was assessed and confirmed on frozen sections. Prior to ex vivo CLE analysis, prostates were stained with fluorescein 10%. We used a GastroFlex probe to collect images of periprostatic tissue (adipose tissue, fibrous and connective tissues, vessels, nerve sheets, seminal vesicles, and urethra). Normal prostatic glands and tumour tissue according to the Gleason grade were analysed. Each PCa Gleason score was represented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 139 video clips and 237 pictures of prostatic and periprostatic tissues were collected. Among them, we selected 16 highly representative images. Adipose tissue, fibrous tissue, and connective tissue were supposable in all 15 specimens. PCa glands captured fluorescein in their cytoplasm, normal prostatic glands did not capture fluorescein, and glandular structures were easily recognisable. The principal limitation of this study is its ex vivo nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Each CLE image was correlated with the corresponding haematoxylin/eosin/saffron definitive pathology image, allowing building of an atlas as a necessary tool to assess the diagnostic performance of CLE during radical prostatectomy in achieving negative surgical margins. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we aim to provide an atlas of images illustrating prostatic, periprostatic, and PCa tissues obtained using Cellvizio confocal laser endomicroscopy as a tool for further interpretation of intraoperative surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.

Sleep related painful erection: an algorithm for evaluation and management.

BACKGROUND: Sleep related painful erection (SRPE) is a rare parasomnia consisting of nocturnal penile tumescence accompanied by pain that awakens the individual. Normal non-painful erections are experienced when awake. No penile anatomic abnormalities are present. No conclusive randomized clinical trial is present in the literature about the management of this rare condition. The aim of this article is to review the current knowledge about the management of SRPE and to suggest an algorithm to help physicians evaluate and manage SRPE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review was conducted through PubMed database using the terms: sleep, pain, painful, penile, and erection. The reference lists of the articles were also reviewed. The search returned 23 references that were published between 1987 and 2019. Results were presented in a descriptive manner. RESULTS: Treatment decision for now is based on reports of the treatment success, the sustainability of remission, the tolerability by the patients and the potential side effects of each medication. From data available in literature, Baclofen is the mostly used medication with a tolerable profile of adverse effects. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are considered potential treatments and are already widely used and tolerated for other indications, but so far only 2 successful trials have been reported for SRPE. Cinitapride is very promising, but only one case was studied and no side effects were reported. Clozapine can be very dangerous although highly effective. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited number of treatment trials and reported cases, the low level of evidence and the lack of randomized clinical trials, no treatment consensus for SRPE can be reached. We suggested a useful tool for clinicians: an algorithm for the management of SRPE to facilitate their access to the literature without exhaustive return to case reports and series upon each case faced.

CONTEXTE: L'érection nocturne douloureuse est. une parasomnie, caractérisée par des épisodes de tumescence douloureuse provenant exclusivement lors du sommeil, avec une anatomie normale et des érections indolores lorsque le patient est. réveillé. La prise en charge de cette maladie est. inconnue vue le petit nombre de cas et le manque d'études randomisées. Nous présentons dans cet article une revue de la littérature concentrée sur les stratégies thérapeutiques décrites. Un algorithme est. suggéré pour faciliter l'évaluation et la prise en charge des patients. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODES: La revue de la littérature a été réalisée en utilisant la base de donnée PubMed et les termes: « sleep, pain, painful, penile, erection ¼. Les références des articles ont été revues. En total 23 références ont été utiles pour notre revue. Les résultats ont été présentés d'une manière descriptive. RÉSULTATS: Les stratégies thérapeutiques actuelles se basent sur les essais décrits dans la littérature à travers un nombre limité de patients. La durée de la rémission et les effets secondaires minimes rendent certains traitements supérieurs. Le baclofen est. le plus utilisé grâce à son efficacité et à son faible potentiel d'effets secondaires. Le cinitapride a été très efficace lors d'un essai unique chez un seul patient, sans effets secondaires rapportés. Les inhibiteurs de la phosphodiesterase de type 5, largement utilisés en urologie, ont été trouvés utiles pour le traitement des érections nocturnes douloureuses chez 2 patients. La clozapine qui est. très efficace, présente un profil d'effets secondaires dangereux. CONCLUSION: A cause du faible nombre de cas et des essais thérapeutiques rapportés, le meilleur traitement des patients ayant des érections douloureuses nocturnes reste indéterminé. Nous suggérons un algorithme utile aux praticiens pour l'évaluation, le diagnostic et la prise en charge de ces patients.

Development of Nomograms to Predict the Recovery of Erectile Function Following Radical Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Given the number of confounders in predicting erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP), a nomogram predicting the chance to be functional after RP would be useful to patients' and clinicians' discussions. AIM: To develop preoperative and postoperative nomograms to aid in the prediction of erectile function recovery after RP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function domain score-based erectile function. METHODS: A prospective quality-of-life database was used to develop a series of nomograms using multivariable ordinal logistic regression models. Standard preoperative and postoperative factors were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The nomograms predicted the probability of recovering functional erections (erectile function domain scores ≥24) and severe erectile dysfunction (≤10) 2 years after RP. RESULTS: 3 nomograms have been developed, including a preoperative, an early postoperative, and a 12-month postoperative version. The concordance indexes for all 3 exceeded 0.78, and the calibration was good. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These nomograms may aid clinicians in discussing erectile function recovery with patients undergoing RP. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study included a large population, validated instrument, nerve-sparing grading, and nomograms that are well calibrated with excellent discrimination ability. Limitations include current absence of external validation and an overall low comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that these nomograms will allow for a more accurate discussion between patients and clinicians regarding erectile function recovery after RP. Mulhall JP, Kattan MW, Bennett NE, et al. Development of Nomograms to Predict the Recovery of Erectile Function Following Radical Prostatectomy J Sex Med 2019;16:1796-1802.

Splenorenal fusion mimicking renal cancer: One case report and literature review.

Splenorenal fusion is an extremely rare benign entity. This abnormality is presented in a case of a 29-year-old-male patient. We discuss the distinction between this condition and renal splenosis and their embryology. The course of this condition and modalities of investigation including radiological imaging, management, and pitfalls are reviewed.

Outcomes after salvage radical prostatectomy and first-line radiation therapy or HIFU for recurrent localized prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite no consensus on the optimal management of recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation or HIFU therapy, salvage prostatectomy (sRP) is reserved for only 3% of patients because of technical challenges and frequent post-operative complications. We assessed outcomes after sRP in a series of patients with localized PCa and that had received radiation therapy or HIFU as a first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from nine French referral centers on patients treated with sRP between 2005 and 2017 were collected. Pre- and post-operative data, including oncological and functional outcomes after first treatment and sRP, were analyzed to determine the predictors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after sRP. RESULTS: First-line treatments were external beam-radiation therapy (EBRT) for 30 (55%), brachytherapy (BT) for 10 (18%), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for 15 (27%). Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis was 6.4 (4.9-9.5) ng/mL, median PSA at nadir was 1.9 (0.7-3.0) ng/mL, and median (IQR) to first BCR was 13 (6-20) months. Of the 55 patients, 44 (80%) received robot-assisted salvage radical prostatectomy and 11 (20%) received salvage retropubic radical prostatectomy. Restoration of continence was achieved in 90% of preoperatively continent patients; 24% that had received nerve-sparing (NS) procedures were potent after surgery. Prolonged catheterization due to anastomotic leakage was the most common complication. Age, preoperative clinical stage, NS procedure, and a pathological Gleason score were predictors for BCR. CONCLUSIONS: sRP was safe, feasible, and effective using either an open or robot-assisted approach, in experienced hands. Age, preoperative clinical stage, NS procedure, and pathological GS were linked with BCR after sRP.

Vasa nervorum angiogenesis in prostate cancer with perineural invasion.

BACKGROUND: Perineural invasion (PNI) is generally accepted as a major route of cancer dissemination in malignancies associated with highly enervated organs. However, the effect of cancer cells on vasa nervorum remains unknown. We studied this effect in locally advanced prostate cancer, a high-risk feature associated with approximately 20% of prostate cancer specific mortality. METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry for CD34, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), FSHR, podoplanin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and VEGFR-2 as well as histochemical methods to examine the vasa nervorum of nerves invaded by cancer cells in tissue samples from 85 patients. RESULTS: The percentage of the nerve area occupied by CD34-positive vasa nervorum endothelial cells in nerves with PNI was much higher than in nerves without PNI (7.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.4; P < 0.001 and 5.8 ± 0.6 vs 1.23 ± 0.8; P < 0.001 in pT3a and pT3b prostate cancer specimens, respectively). In 19/85 of the patients the CD34-positive vasa nervorum microvessels have a thick basement membrane, similar to the vessels in diabetic microangiopathy. This subendothelial layer contains collagen fibers. Vasa nervorum endothelia and Schwann cells express FGF-2 (nuclear localization) and FSHR (plasma membrane and cytoplasmic staining). Prostate cancer cells invading nerves express VEGF, a critical cytokine in tumor angiogenesis. The vasa nervorum of prostatic nerves with PNI did not express detectable levels of VEGFR-2. No podoplanin-positive lymphatic vessels were seen in nerves. CONCLUSION: In locally advanced prostate cancer, PNI of cancer cells is associated with formation of new endoneurial capillaries and changes of vasa nervorum morphology.

Angiomyxoma of the ureter imitating an upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Angiomyxomas are rare benign neoplasms of mesenchymal origin arising from the soft tissues of the perineum and pelvis. CASE PRESENTATION: To our knowledge, we report the first case of ureteral angiomyxoma arising de novo in a fifty-four-year-old female patient who presented with macroscopic hematuria. DISCUSSION: The pathological findings, radiological features and operative management will be discussed. CONCLUSION: Angiomyxomas are notorious for their locally infiltrative nature and their propensity to recur. Clinical suspicion is capital to reach the diagnosis and a holistic care is key to a good outcome.

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy After Selective Embolization and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Short-Term Oncological and Functional Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for localized renal tumors. Laparoscopic PN (LPN) after selective embolization of tumor (LPNE) in a hybrid operating room has been developed to make LPN easier and safer. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of LPNE and robot-assisted PN (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an LPNE at Angers University Hospital between May 2015 and April 2017, and a RAPN at Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon hospital between October 2014 and April 2017 were prospectively included. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 month, and the oncological outcomes were evaluated using the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent LPNE and 48 underwent RAPN. There was no difference between oncological and functional outcomes, with 2 PSM (4.4%) in the LPNE group and 4 PSM (10.3%) in the RAPN group (P = .32), and a mean change in eGFR at 1 month of -5.5% for LPNE and -8.3% for RAPN (P = .17). The mean surgical time was shorter in the LPNE group (150 vs. 195 minutes; P < .001), and mean estimated blood loss was less in the LPNE group (185 vs. 345 mL; P = .04). CONCLUSION: The short-term oncological and functional outcomes for LPNE were comparable with those for RAPN. A longer follow-up and a larger cohort of patients would be necessary to verify the benefits of LPNE, which appears to be a very interesting alternative to RAPN.

Comparison of Short-Term Functional, Oncological, and Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Beyond the Learning Curve.

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) when performed by highly experienced surgeons. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted, including the 50 last patients having undergone LPN and RPN for T1-T2 renal tumors in two institutions between 2013 and 2016, performed by two different surgeons with an experience of over 200 procedures each in LPN and RPN, respectively, at the beginning of the study. Perioperative parameters and functional and oncological outcomes were collected and compared between the LPN and RPN groups. RESULTS: The laparoscopic approach was associated with a longer warm ischemia time (15.7 versus 23 minutes; P < .001) and hospital stay (3.6 versus 4.6 days; P = .01). Conversely, estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the RPN group (381 mL versus 215 mL; P < .001), but transfusion rates were similar between the two groups (8% versus 6%; P = .33). In the RPN group, three patients (6%) required conversion to open partial nephrectomy and three patients (6%) required a conversion to radical nephrectomy (RN), while no conversion was needed in the LPN group. There were no differences in terms of perioperative complications, and change in renal function was comparable in the two groups postoperatively. Positive surgical margin rates were similar in the RPN and LPN groups (2% versus 6%; P = .36). After a median follow-up of 19 and 14 months in the RPN and LPN groups, respectively (P = .38), recurrence-free survivals did not differ significantly (P = .94). CONCLUSION: In this series, perioperative and short-term oncological and functional outcomes appeared broadly comparable between RPN and LPN when performed by highly experienced surgeons.

Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of hospital volume (HV) and surgeon volume (SV) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent a RAPN from 2009 to 2015, at 11 institutions, were included in a retrospective study. To evaluate the impact of HV, we divided RAPN into four quartiles according to the caseload per year: low HV (<20/year), moderate HV (20-44/year), high HV (45-70/year), and very high HV (>70/year). The SV was also divided into four quartiles: low SV (<7/year), moderate SV (7-14/year), high SV (15-30/year), and very high SV (>30/year). The primary endpoint was the Trifecta defined as the following combination: no complications, warm ischaemia time (WIT) <25 min, and negative surgical margins. RESULTS: In total, 1 222 RAPN were included. The mean (sd) caseload per hospital per year was 44.9 (26.7) RAPNs and the mean (sd) caseload per surgeon per year was 19.2 (14.9) RAPNs. The Trifecta achievement rate increased significantly with SV (69.9% vs 72.8% vs 73% vs 86.1%; P < 0.001) and HV (60.3% vs 72.3% vs 86.2% vs 82.4%; P < 0.001). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate (P = 0.02), length of hospital stay (LOS; P < 0.001), WIT (P < 0.001), and operative time (P < 0.001), all decreased significantly with increasing SV. The PSM rate (P = 0.02), LOS (P < 0.001), WIT (P < 0.001), operative time (P < 0.001), and major complications rate (P = 0.01), all decreased significantly with increasing HV. In multivariate analysis adjusting for HV and SV (model 3), HV remained the main predictive factor of Trifecta achievement (odds ratio [OR] 3.70 for very high vs low HV; P < 0.001), whereas SV was not associated with Trifecta achievement (OR 1.58 for very high vs low SV; P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In this multicentre study HV and SV both greatly influenced RAPN perioperative outcomes, but HV appeared to have a greater impact than SV.

Pudendal schwannoma: A case report and literature review.

Schwannomas are benign nerve sheath tumours most often associated with the cranial nerves and the peripheral nerve system of the neck and extremities. Pelvic schwannomas are rare, with only about 25 cases reported. We report the case of a 34-year-old man referred for worsening pain of 10 years duration involving the right testicle and right penile shaft. Magnetic resonance imaging discovered a well-circumscribed pelvic tumour of 3.2 × 2.8 × 3.2 cm. Considering the possible complications involved in exposing the pudendal nerve during surgical resection, we performed an extensive literature search to aid preoperative planning. The most commonly described surgical approach for pelvic schwannomas has been open median laparotomy with transperitoneal dissection. To our knowledge, pudendal schwannomas have never been described in the literature. However, after considering the location and characteristics of the tumour, we chose laparoscopy because it offers the advantages of better visualization of anatomical structures with minimal invasiveness and faster recovery. At the 3-week follow-up, the patient described a significant decrease in pain and normal neurological and urological examinations.

EAU policy on live surgery events.

CONTEXT: Live surgery is an important part of surgical education, with an increase in the number of live surgery events (LSEs) at meetings despite controversy about their real educational value, risks to patient safety, and conflicts of interest. OBJECTIVE: To provide a European Association of Urology (EAU) policy on LSEs to regulate their organisation during urologic meetings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The project was carried out in phases: a systematic literature review generating key questions, surveys sent to Live Surgery Panel members, and Internet- and panel-based consensus finding using the Delphi process to agree on and formulate a policy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The EAU will endorse LSEs, provided that the EAU Code of Conduct for live surgery and all organisational requirements are followed. Outcome data must be submitted to an EAU Web-based registry and complications reported using the revised Martin criteria. Regular audits will take place to evaluate compliance as well as the educational role of live surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This policy represents the consensus view of an expert panel established to advise the EAU. The EAU recognises the educational role of live surgery and endorses live case demonstration at urologic meetings that are conducted within a clearly defined regulatory framework. The overriding principle is that patient safety must take priority over all other considerations in the conduct of live surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY: Controversy exists regarding the true educational value of live surgical demonstrations on patients at surgical meetings. An EAU committee of experts developed a policy on how best to conduct live surgery at urologic meetings. The key principle is to ensure safety for every patient, including a code of conduct and checklist for live surgery, specific rules for how the surgery is organised and performed, and how each patient's results are reported to the EAU. For detailed information, please visit www.uroweb.org.

Does increasing the nodal yield improve outcomes in contemporary patients without nodal metastasis undergoing radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients without LN metastases undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 7,310 patients treated at 7 centers with RP and pelvic LN dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer between 2000 and 2011. Patients with LN metastases (n = 398) and other reasons (stated later in the article) (n = 372) were excluded, which left 6,540 patients for the final analyses. RESULTS: Overall, median biopsy and RP Gleason score were both 7; median prostate specific antigen level was 6 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 5); and median number of LNs removed was 6 (IQR: 8). A total of 3,698 (57%), 2,064 (32%), and 508 (8%) patients had ≥ 6, ≥ 10, and ≥ 20 LNs removed, respectively. Patients with more LNs removed were older, had a higher prostate specific antigen level, had higher clinical and pathologic T stage, and had higher RP Gleason score (all P<0.002). Within a median follow-up of 21 (IQR: 16) months, more LNs removed was associated with an increased risk of BCR (continuous: P = 0.021; categorical: P = 0.014). In multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic factors, none of the nodal stratifications predicted BCR. CONCLUSIONS: The number of LNs did not have any prognostic significance in our contemporary cohort of patients with LN-negative prostate cancer. This suggests that the risk of missed clinically significant micrometastasis may be minimal in patients currently treated with RP and having a lower LN yield.

Predictors of survival in patients with soft tissue surgical margin involvement at radical cystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The presence of positive soft tissue surgical margins (STSM) at radical cystectomy (RC) is rare. Although some patients with STSM experience disease recurrence rapidly, some have long-term local disease control. We sought to describe the oncologic outcomes, identify predictors, and assess the impact of location and multifocality in patients with positive STSMs at RC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 4,335 patients treated with RC and pelvic lymphadenectomy at 11 academic centers from 1981 to 2008. STSM was defined as the presence of tumor at inked areas of soft tissue on the RC specimen. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models addressed recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival after surgery. RESULTS: STSM were identified in 231 patients (5%). Actuarial recurrence-free survival estimates at 2 and 5 years after RC were 26 ± 3 and 21 ± 3%, respectively. Actuarial cancer-specific survival estimates at 2 and 5 years after RC were 33 ± 3 and 25 ± 4%, respectively. Higher body mass index (p = 0.050), higher tumor stage (p = 0.017), presence of grade 3 disease (p = 0.046), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.003), and lymph node involvement (p = 0.003) were all independently associated with disease recurrence. Furthermore, higher tumor stage (p = 0.015), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006), and lymph node involvement (p = 0.006) were independently associated with cancer specific mortality. Location and multifocality of STSM were not associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients with STSM at RC had poor outcomes, more than one-fifth had durable cancer control. Pathologic features associated with disease recurrence in the general RC population also stratify patients with STSM into differential risk groups.

Indications for and anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: practice patterns of uro-oncologists in North America.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevailing practice of uro-oncologists regarding the indications for and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 9-question survey was sent as a hyperlink by electronic mail to all members of the Society of Urologic Oncology. Participants were asked about their surgical volume, indications for PLND, which nodal packets are dissected as delineated on anatomical schema, and type of surgical approach. RESULTS: Of 340 members, 183 urologists (58%) completed the survey. Of these, 43% were ≥ 10 years out of fellowship and 62% performed >50 radical prostatectomies per year. Of the surveyed surgeons, 45% performed PLND on all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. The remainder used various risk-stratification schemas. A total of 32 different indications for PLND were reported, the most common being "intermediate risk" according to the American Urological Association's risk classification. As to extent of PLND, 15% perform a PLND limited to the external iliac, while 30% include the external iliac, obturator fossa, and hypogastric lymph nodes. Among surgeons using both open and robotic approaches, 19% reported that the indication for and extent of lymphadenectomy performed differ based on the surgical approach used. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide insight into the practice patterns of uro-oncologists regarding PLND and highlight the lack of uniformity in determining when and how a PLND should be performed. Collaborative efforts are needed to develop guidelines on this issue and are a necessary step toward standardization of reporting the outcomes of surgical clinical trials.