The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system.

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of indications is essential to the rational utilization of resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system and to assess whether the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines are useful in clinical practice. METHODS: The indication for colonoscopy was assessed on 3000 consecutive examinations performed at 7 institutions. RESULTS: The rate of colonoscopies "generally not indicated" according to the ASGE guidelines was 24.5% for outpatients and 15.5% for inpatients; the rates of examinations performed for an indication not listed in the ASGE guidelines were 12% and 20.1%, respectively. Generally not indicated colonoscopies were significantly less frequent for procedures requested by gastroenterologists or family physicians than those requested by other specialists, but were similar. Most generally not indicated examinations requested by gastroenterologists were for routine follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; when these patients were excluded, the rate of generally not indicated endoscopies requested by gastroenterologists was also lower than the corresponding rate for examinations requested by family physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, the rate of colonoscopies performed for generally not indicated reasons is high, particularly among examinations not requested by a gastroenterologist. Many colonoscopies are performed for indications not listed in the ASGE guidelines.

Quality assurance and colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Little is known concerning the usefulness and feasibility of quality assurance programs in gastrointestinal departments. The aim of this study was to identify the indicators of quality in colonoscopy, to check their use in clinical practice, and to identify their threshold values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in four endoscopic units. In the first phase, a questionnaire was used to identify the indicators that were considered important and easy to record; in the second phase, the selected items were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Data from 603 colonoscopies were evaluated. The selected indicators were: rate of cecal intubation, rate of examinations with normal findings, rates of complications, appropriateness of indications, use of a washing machine for disinfection, duration of the disinfection procedure, rate of procedures repeated due to poor colon cleansing, rate of operative procedures, length of waiting time, rate of procedures performed for follow-up of known disease, experience of the operator, and rate of procedures performed with the patient under conscious sedation. A striking difference emerged between the technical standards at three centers, which were fairly good, and the standard at the fourth center, which was less satisfactory. The length of the waiting time was high in all centers, as well as the rate of examinations conducted with an inappropriate indication. The rate of procedures performed under conscious sedation varied widely between the centers. CONCLUSIONS: The study of the indicators of quality of colonoscopy is feasible and easy to perform in clinical practice, and can be useful for quality assurance programs.

Are we correctly using the inhibitors of gastric acid secretion and cytoprotective drugs? Results of a multicentre study.

AIM: To evaluate indications and frequency of prescriptions of pH-modifying and cytoprotective drugs in hospital departments. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Multicentre cohort transverse relevation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On a randomly selected day the clinical charts of 3685 inpatients were reviewed by a gastroenterologist and data were collected concerning the drug used, its dosage and indications for the prescription. RESULTS: 26.8% of hospitalized patients were under treatment on the day of the study. Ranitidine was the most frequently prescribed (73.9%). The purpose of treatment was cure of acute disease or symptoms in 27% of cases and prevention of peptic damage in 73%. Fear of development of stress mucosal lesions (28%) and therapy with other drugs (56%) motivated prophylactic treatment in the majority of cases. The examination of clinical charts failed to demonstrate any need for treatment in 51.4% of the patients. Disparities in the frequency of prescription between different departments and hospitals were found. CONCLUSION: Criteria used for prescription of drugs for peptic diseases in hospitalized patients should be strictly monitored to avoid excessive and unmotivated use also in general practice.

First bleeding episode from oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study of endoscopic predictive factors.

Two hundred patients affected by liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices were studied in 9 Gastrointestinal Units in Lombardy (Northern Italy) in order to assess factors possibly related to variceal bleeding. Only patients without any previous episode of gastrointestinal bleeding were included in the prospective evaluation. For each patient demographic data, aetiology of cirrhosis, various clinical and biochemical parameters able to group patients into the three Child-Pugh Classes, endoscopic items for calculation of Beppu's and of NIEC prognostic scores were recorded on computerized cards. Patients were regularly interviewed every three months for one year and underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at enrollment, after six months and in case of bleeding. Within the twelve-month follow-up period, 29 out of the 200 patients (14%) bled and 52 out of 200 died (26%). In 16 of the 52 patients who died (59% of bleeding patients) death was directly related to gastrointestinal bleeding. Bleeding from oesophageal varices was endoscopically proven in 19/29 patients, in another 9 bleeding was classified as from unknown source and in one patient a bleeding gastric ulcer was diagnosed. Univariate analysis of all the recorded clinical, biochemical and endoscopic parameters, performed by Chi-square method and Fisher exact test showed that the presence of RWM (p < 0.001) was the only factor significantly associated to variceal bleeding within one year. Relationship between size of varices and bleeding was very close to the statistical significance but did not achieve it (p = 0.058).

Free perforation due to colonic adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease.

Free perforation of the bowel due to cancer in Crohn's disease is very rare. One case found among 75 cases of Crohn's disease is reported. The perforation occurred in a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon in a 54-year-old woman with a 17-year history of Crohn's disease, who had undergone two previous operations of small bowel and colonic resection. A right hemicolectomy was performed; the patient had an uneventful recovery and does not show recurrence of cancer at 31-month follow-up. This is in contrast with a recent review, in which a very poor prognosis was claimed for the perforated colonic cancer in Crohn's disease.

Association of ulcerative colitis, sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma in a patient with IgA deficiency.

A case of an unusual association of ulcerative colitis, sclerosing cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma and IgA deficiency in a 22-year-old man is reported. The patient was admitted to the hospital with jaundice. Ulcerative colitis had been diagnosed 4 years before. The association of sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma was demonstrated. In addition IgA deficiency was discovered. Possible pathogenetic implications are discussed.