Risk of burns in pressure cooker usage: a comprehensive analysis of explosive injuries.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of pressure cookers for quick and efficient cooking, literature has insufficiently highlighted the potential dangers resulting from inappropriate handling. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of 32 patients who presented with pressure cooker burns, emphasizing the serious risks associated with their misuse. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from patients admitted to Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital Burn Center between 2017 and 2020 with pressure cooker burns in Türkiye. Data encompassed patient characteristics, burn causes, locations, severities, treatments, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 32 patients (29 female/3 male) with a mean age of 42.3 (8-83). Patients were categorized based on burn areas, revealing associated injuries such as ocular (34.3%) and ear injuries (6.25%). The average hospital stay was 10.5 days [2-37]. While five pressure cookers exploded due to product-related issues, 26 explosions resulted from user errors (15.6%/81.2%). Importantly, no mortality was observed among the patients. CONCLUSION: While pressure cookers facilitate rapid food preparation, this study underscores the severe risks arising from product or usage errors. This study emphasizes the need for more effective usage instructions and increased awareness about pressure cookers to prevent burn risks. We anticipate that educational programs focused on safe pressure cooker use could significantly reduce the incidence of serious injuries.

Are trauma victims with obesity lucky in penetrating trauma injuries?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to reveal the protective effect of body mass index (BMI) and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness (SATT), together with scores covering the abdomen, in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: The data of 234 abdominal penetrating trauma patients over the age of 16 who applied to the emergency general sur-gery unit of Istanbul Medipol Hospital between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Sex, age, types of penetrating injuries, BMI, need for blood transfusion and intensive care unit (ICU), mortality, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI), and Flint Colon Injury Score (FCIS) were recorded. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: Gunshot Wound (GW) and Stab Wound (SW).While there was no significant difference in all parameters examined in all patients and GW patients in terms of BMI, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of blood transfusion need in SW patients (p=0.035). As a result of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis for the SATT variable, the cutoff value between mortality (p=0.866) and SATT (mm) values in all patients was 11 mm for all patients and 12 mm for GW patients. A significant difference was found in all patients and separately in GW and SW groups in terms of ICU and blood transfusion need, length of stay, ISS, PATI, and FCIS scores in non-operated patients (p<0.05). When all patients were examined, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of mortality (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: It is the first study to evaluate penetrating abdominal injuries with both BMI and SATT comprehensively and with all abdominal scores. A cutoff value to be determined for SATT with larger and multicenter studies can take its place as a parameter in the penetrating trauma algorithm.