Regulation of nuclear poly(A) addition controls the expression of immunoglobulin M secretory mRNA.

B-cell differentiation is accompanied by a dramatic increase in cytoplasmic accumulation and stability of the IgM heavy chain (mu) secretory mRNA. Despite considerable effort, the mechanism is unknown. We have identified three short motifs upstream of the secretory poly(A) site, which, when mutated in the mu heavy chain gene, significantly increase the accumulation of the secretory form of poly(A)(+) mRNA relative to the membrane form and regulate the expression of the secretory poly(A) site in a developmental manner. We show that these motifs bind U1A and inhibit polyadenylation in vitro and in vivo. Overexpression of U1A in vivo results in the selective inhibition of the secretory form. Thus, this novel mechanism selectively controls post-cleavage expression of the mu secretory mRNA. We present evidence that this mechanism is used to regulate alternative expression of other genes.

Reduction of target gene expression by a modified U1 snRNA.

Although the primary function of U1 snRNA is to define the 5' donor site of an intron, it can also block the accumulation of a specific RNA transcript when it binds to a donor sequence within its terminal exon. This work was initiated to investigate if this property of U1 snRNA could be exploited as an effective method for inactivating any target gene. The initial 10-bp segment of U1 snRNA, which is complementary to the 5' donor sequence, was modified to recognize various target mRNAs (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase [CAT], beta-galactosidase, or green fluorescent protein [GFP]). Transient cotransfection of reporter genes and appropriate U1 antitarget vectors resulted in >90% reduction of transgene expression. Numerous sites within the CAT transcript were suitable for targeting. The inhibitory effect of the U1 antitarget vector is directly related to the hybrid formed between the U1 vector and target transcripts and is dependent on an intact 70,000-molecular-weight binding domain within the U1 gene. The effect is long lasting when the target (CAT or GFP) and U1 antitarget construct are inserted into fibroblasts by stable transfection. Clonal cell lines derived from stable transfection with a pOB4GFP target construct and subsequently stably transfected with the U1 anti-GFP construct were selected. The degree to which GFP fluorescence was inhibited by U1 anti-GFP in the various clonal cell lines was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis. RNA analysis demonstrated reduction of the GFP mRNA in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartment and proper 3' cleavage of the GFP residual transcript. An RNase protection strategy demonstrated that the transfected U1 antitarget RNA level varied between 1 to 8% of the endogenous U1 snRNA level. U1 antitarget vectors were demonstrated to have potential as effective inhibitors of gene expression in intact cells.

The NMR structure of the 38 kDa U1A protein - PIE RNA complex reveals the basis of cooperativity in regulation of polyadenylation by human U1A protein.

The status of the poly(A) tail at the 3'-end of mRNAs controls the expression of numerous genes in response to developmental and extracellular signals. Poly(A) tail regulation requires cooperative binding of two human U1A proteins to an RNA regulatory region called the polyadenylation inhibition element (PIE). When bound to PIE RNA, U1A proteins also bind to the enzyme responsible for formation of the mature 3'-end of most eukaryotic mRNAs, poly(A) polymerase (PAP). The NMR structure of the 38 kDa complex formed between two U1A molecules and PIE RNA shows that binding cooperativity depends on helix C located at the end of the RNA-binding domain and just adjacent to the PAP-interacting domain of U1A. Since helix C undergoes a conformational change upon RNA binding, the structure shows that binding cooperativity and interactions with PAP occur only when U1A is bound to its cognate RNA. This mechanism ensures that the activity of PAP enzyme, which is essential to the cell, is only down regulated when U1A is bound to the U1A mRNA.

Position-dependent inhibition of the cleavage step of pre-mRNA 3'-end processing by U1 snRNP.

The 3' ends of most eukaryotic pre-mRNAs are generated by 3' endonucleolytic cleavage and subsequent polyadenylation. 3'-end formation can be influenced positively or negatively by various factors. In particular, U1 snRNP acts as an inhibitor when bound to a 5' splice site located either upstream of the 3'-end formation signals of bovine papilloma virus (BPV) late transcripts or downstream of the 3'-end processing signals in the 5' LTR of the HIV-1 provirus. Previous work showed that in BPV it is not the first step, 3' cleavage, that is affected by U1 snRNP, but rather the second step, polyadenylation, that is inhibited. Since in HIV-1 the biological requirement is to produce transcripts that read through the 5' LTR cleavage site rather than being cleaved there, this mechanism seemed unlikely to apply. The obvious difference between the two examples was the relative orientation of the 3'-end formation signals and the U1 snRNP-binding site. In vitro assays were therefore used to assess the effect of U1 snRNP bound at various locations relative to a cleavage/polyadenylation site on the 3' cleavage reaction. U1 snRNP was found to inhibit cleavage when bound to a 5' splice site downstream of the cleavage/polyadenylation site, as in the HIV-1 LTR. U1 snRNP binding at this location was shown not to affect the recruitment of multiple cleavage/polyadenylation factors to the cleavage substrate, indicating that inhibition is unlikely to be due to steric hindrance. Interactions between U1A, U1 70K, and poly(A) polymerase, which mediate the effect of U1 snRNP on polyadenylation of other pre-mRNAs, were shown not to be required for cleavage inhibition. Therefore, U1 snRNP bound to a 5' splice site can inhibit cleavage and polyadenylation in two mechanistically different ways depending on whether the 5' splice site is located upstream or downstream of the cleavage site.

Fourteen residues of the U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein are required for homodimerization, cooperative RNA binding, and inhibition of polyadenylation.

It was previously shown that the human U1A protein, one of three U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-specific proteins, autoregulates its own production by binding to and inhibiting the polyadenylation of its own pre-mRNA. The U1A autoregulatory complex requires two molecules of U1A protein to cooperatively bind a 50-nucleotide polyadenylation-inhibitory element (PIE) RNA located in the U1A 3' untranslated region. Based on both biochemical and nuclear magnetic resonance structural data, it was predicted that protein-protein interactions between the N-terminal regions (amino acids [aa] 1 to 115) of the two U1A proteins would form the basis for cooperative binding to PIE RNA and for inhibition of polyadenylation. In this study, we not only experimentally confirmed these predictions but discovered some unexpected features of how the U1A autoregulatory complex functions. We found that the U1A protein homodimerizes in the yeast two-hybrid system even when its ability to bind RNA is incapacitated. U1A dimerization requires two separate regions, both located in the N-terminal 115 residues. Using both coselection and gel mobility shift assays, U1A dimerization was also observed in vitro and found to depend on the same two regions that were found in vivo. Mutation of the second homodimerization region (aa 103 to 115) also resulted in loss of inhibition of polyadenylation and loss of cooperative binding of two U1A protein molecules to PIE RNA. This same mutation had no effect on the binding of one U1A protein molecule to PIE RNA. A peptide containing two copies of aa 103 to 115 is a potent inhibitor of polyadenylation. Based on these data, a model of the U1A autoregulatory complex is presented.

U1 snRNP inhibits pre-mRNA polyadenylation through a direct interaction between U1 70K and poly(A) polymerase.

It has previously been shown in vivo that bovine papillomavirus represses its late gene expression via a 5' splice site sequence located upstream of the late polyadenylation signal. Here, the mechanism of repression is determined by in vitro analysis. U1 snRNP binding to the 5' splice site results in inhibition of polyadenylation via a direct interaction with poly(A) polymerase (PAP). Although the inhibitory mechanism is similar to that used in U1A autoregulation, U1A within the U1 snRNP does not contribute to PAP inhibition. Instead the U1 70K protein, when bound to U1 snRNA, both interacts with and inhibits PAP. Conservation of the U1 70K inhibitory domains suggests that polyadenylation regulation via PAP inhibition may be more widespread than previously thought.

Involvement of the carboxyl terminus of vertebrate poly(A) polymerase in U1A autoregulation and in the coupling of splicing and polyadenylation.

Interactions required for inhibition of poly(A) polymerase (PAP) by the U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein, a reaction whose function is to autoregulate U1A protein production, are examined. PAP inhibition requires a substrate RNA to which at least two molecules of U1A protein can bind tightly, but we demonstrate that the secondary structure of the RNA is not highly constrained. A mutational analysis reveals that the carboxy-terminal 20 amino acids of PAP are essential for its inhibition by the U1A-RNA complex. Remarkably, transfer of these amino acids to yeast PAP, which is otherwise not affected by U1A protein, is sufficient to confer U1A-mediated inhibition onto the yeast enzyme. A glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing only these 20 PAP residues can interact in vitro with an RNA-U1A protein complex containing two U1A molecules, but not with one containing a single U1A protein, explaining the requirement for two U1A-binding sites on the autoregulatory RNA element. A mutational analysis of the U1A protein demonstrates that amino acids 103-119 are required for PAP inhibition. A monomeric synthetic peptide consisting of the conserved U1A amino acids from this region has no detectable effect on PAP activity. However, the same U1A peptide, when conjugated to BSA, inhibits vertebrate PAP. In addition to this activity, the U1A peptide-BSA conjugate specifically uncouples splicing and 3'-end formation in vitro without affecting uncoupled splicing or 3'-end cleavage efficiencies. This suggests that the carboxy-terminal region of PAP with which it interacts is involved not only in U1A autoregulation but also in the coupling of splicing and 3'-end formation.

Drosophila SNF/D25 combines the functions of the two snRNP proteins U1A and U2B' that are encoded separately in human, potato, and yeast.

The plant and vertebrate snRP proteins U1A and U2B' are structurally closely related, but bind to different U snRNAs. Two additional related snRNP proteins, the yeast U2B' protein and Drosophila SNF/D25 protein, are analyzed here. We show that the previously described yeast open reading frame YIB9w encodes yeast U2B' as judged by the fact that the protein encoded by YIB9w bindsto stem-loop IV of yeast U2 snRNA in vitro and is part of the U2 snRNP in vivo. In contrast to the human U2B' protein, specific binding of yeast U2B' to RNA in vitro can occur in the absence of an accessory U2A' protein. The Drosophila SNF-D25 protein, unlike all other U1A/U2B' proteins studied to date, is shown to be a component of both U1 and U2 snRNPs. In vitro, SNF/D25 binds to U1 snRNA on itsown and to U2 snRNA in the presence of either the human U2A' protein or of Drosophila nuclear extract. Thus, its RNA-binding properties are the sum of those exhibited by human or potato U1A and U2B' proteins. Implications for the role of SNF/D25 in alternative splicing, and for the evolution of the U1A/U2B' protein family, are discussed.

The influence of 5' and 3' end structures on pre-mRNA metabolism.

The 5' cap structure of RNA polymerase II transcripts and the poly(A) tail found at the 3' end of most mRNAs have been demonstrated to play multiple roles in gene expression and its regulation. In the first part of this review we will concentrate on the role played by the cap in pre-mRNA splicing and how it may contribute to efficient and specific substrate recognition. In the second half, we will discuss the roles that polyadenylation has been demonstrated to play in RNA metabolism and will concentrate in particular on an elegant mechanism where regulation of polyadenylation is used to control gene expression.

The human U1A snRNP protein regulates polyadenylation via a direct interaction with poly(A) polymerase.

The human U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein autoregulates its production by binding its own pre-mRNA and inhibiting polyadenylation. The mechanism of this regulation has been elucidated by in vitro studies. U1A protein is shown not to prevent either binding of cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) to its recognition sequence (AUUAAA) or to prevent cleavage of U1A pre-mRNA. Instead, U1A protein bound to U1A pre-mRNA inhibits both specific and nonspecific polyadenylation by mammalian, but not by yeast, poly(A) polymerase (PAP). Domains are identified in both proteins whose removal uncouples the polyadenylation activity of mammalian PAP from its inhibition via RNA-bound U1A protein. Finally, U1A protein is shown to specifically interact with mammalian PAP in vitro. The possibility that this interaction may reflect a broader role of the U1A protein in polyadenylation is discussed.

A complex secondary structure in U1A pre-mRNA that binds two molecules of U1A protein is required for regulation of polyadenylation.

The human U1A protein-U1A pre-mRNA complex and the relationship between its structure and function in inhibition of polyadenylation in vitro were investigated. Two molecules of U1A protein were shown to bind to a conserved region in the 3' untranslated region of U1A pre-mRNA. The secondary structure of this region was determined by a combination of theoretical prediction, phylogenetic sequence alignment, enzymatic structure probing and molecular genetics. The U1A binding sites form (part of) a complex secondary structure which is significantly different from the binding site of U1A protein on U1 snRNA. Studies with mutant pre-mRNAs showed that the integrity of much of this structure is required for both high affinity binding to U1A protein and specific inhibition of polyadenylation in vitro. In particular, binding of a single molecule of U1A protein to U1A pre-mRNA is not sufficient to produce efficient inhibition of polyadenylation.

Common and unique transcription factor requirements of human U1 and U6 snRNA genes.

The human U1 and U6 genes have similar basal promoter structures. A first analysis of the factor requirements for the transcription of a human U1 gene by RNA polymerase II in vitro has been undertaken, and these requirements compared with those of human U6 gene transcription by RNA polymerase III in the same extracts. Fractions containing PSE-binding protein (PBP) are shown to be essential for transcription of both genes, and further evidence that PBP itself is required for U1 as well as U6 transcription is presented. On the other hand, the two genes have distinct requirements for TATA-binding protein (TBP). On the basis of chromatographic and functional properties, the TBP, or TBP complex, required for U1 transcription appears to differ from previously described complexes required for RNA polymerase I, II or III transcription. The different TBP requirements of the U1 and U6 promoters are reflected by specific association with either TFIIB or TFIIIB respectively, thus providing a basis for differential RNA polymerase selection.

The human U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein inhibits polyadenylation of its own pre-mRNA.

Human, mouse, and Xenopus mRNAs encoding the U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein contain a conserved 47 nt region in their 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). In vitro studies show that human U1A protein binds to two sites within the conserved region that resemble, in part, the previously characterized U1A-binding site on U1 snRNA. Overexpression of human U1A protein in mouse cells results in down-regulation of endogenous mouse U1A mRNA accumulation. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that excess U1A protein specifically inhibits polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs that contain the conserved 3' UTR from human U1A mRNA. Thus, U1A protein regulates the production of its own mRNA via a mechanism that involves pre-mRNA binding and inhibition of polyadenylation.

The human U1 snRNA promoter correctly initiates transcription in vitro and is activated by PSE1.

A DNA-dependent in vitro transcription system for the human U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) promoter has been developed. This in vitro transcription system uses extracts of tissue culture cells to drive transcription of an RNA polymerase II-transcribed snRNA gene. A U1 promoter (-393 to +192) template was constructed in which the sequences from +10 to +171 were replaced with a 179-bp sequence from a G-less cassette. This DNA template thus retained all of the known U1 promoter elements, including the U1 3'-end box (positions +175 to +191), which is responsible for snRNA 3'-end formation. HeLa cell nuclear extracts were shown to drive specific transcription of this promoter by RNA polymerase II. This transcription system has many of the properties observed for wild-type snRNA promoters in vivo. Transcription was shown to initiate at +1 (and -2) relative to the U1 promoter and to efficiently (greater than 90%) form a 3' end corresponding to the 3' end found in the primary transcript of U1 in vivo. The transcription signal is responsive to either deletion or replacement of the U1 distal sequence (enhancer-like) and proximal sequence (TATA-like) elements, as well as the 3'-end box. Additionally, the signal was shown by depletion/repletion experiments to be responsive to a protein called PSE1 (related to Ku), which has recently been shown to specifically bind sequences in the U1 promoter. This in vitro snRNA transcription system should facilitate the biochemical analysis of the human U1 snRNA promoter and lead to a better understanding of the differences between snRNA and mRNA promoters.

Purification and characterization of proximal sequence element-binding protein 1, a transcription activating protein related to Ku and TREF that binds the proximal sequence element of the human U1 promoter.

The promoter structure of the known small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes contains two major effectors of transcriptional activity, a proximal sequence element (PSE) and a distal sequence element (DSE). In previous work, methidiumpropyl-EDTA-Fe(II) footprinting was used to demonstrate the existence in human placental extracts of a protein producing footprints within the PSE and the DSE of the human U1 snRNA gene. This protein (PSE1) has now been purified to homogeneity from both human placental extract and K562 cell nuclear extract. PSE1 consists of two subunits, an alpha subunit with an apparent molecular mass of 83 kDa, and a beta subunit with an apparent molecular mass of 73 kDa in K562 nuclear extracts and 63 kDa in placental extracts. Footprinting and UV cross-linking assays indicate that purified PSE1 binds to the PSE and DSE of the U1 gene. Monoclonal antibodies were prepared which specifically recognize the individual subunits of PSE1. PSE1 is immunologically similar to and shares amino acid sequence with a protein (TREF) which binds the human transferrin receptor (HTFR) promoter. An in vitro transcription system was established for a template consisting of a minimal HTFR promoter placed upstream of the human U1 snRNA-coding region and shown by immunodepletion/addback experiments to specifically require PSE1. Transcription from the adenovirus 2 major late promoter was unaffected in these experiments. This result supports a functional role of PSE1 as a transcriptional activating protein, but its role in transcription of snRNA genes remains to be established. PSE1 also has an immunological relationship to and shares amino acid sequence with the p70 and p86 subunits of the human Ku autoantigen. Ku, PSE1, and TREF may thus be identical proteins or members of a family of heterodimeric proteins consisting of related subunits. Our results support earlier proposals that Ku may be a transcriptional activator.

Binding of transcription factors to the promoter of the human U1 RNA gene studied by footprinting.

The promoter structure of the known small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes contains two major effectors of transcriptional activity: a proximal sequence element and a distal sequence element. In addition to these two functional elements (called elements B and D), the human U1 snRNA gene contains at least three minor elements (elements A, C, and E) that contribute to overall transcriptional efficiency (Murphy, J.T., Skuzeski, J.M., Lund, E., Steinberg, T.H., Burgess, R.R., and Dahlberg, J.E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 1795-1803). To elucidate further the function of these transcription elements, we carried out a computer search to look for sequences in the U1 gene homologous to known transcription factor consensus sequences. Where such homology was found, DNase I and MPE-Fe(II) (methidiumpropyl-EDTA-Fe(II] footprinting was employed to study the interactions of these promoter regions with proteins partially purified from extracts of HeLa cells or human placenta. Footprints were observed over element D (the distal element) corresponding to sequences homologous to the octanucleotide binding protein (OCTA) and activator protein 1 (AP1). Protection was also observed over element B (the proximal element) corresponding to possible sites for stimulatory protein 1 (Sp1), enhancer core, major late transcription factor (MLTF), and a U1-specific transcription factor. Prior to this study, no specific transcription factor footprints had been observed over proximal elements of any snRNA gene. Footprints were also found over elements A and E. The results of the computer search and the footprinting are discussed in light of what is known about snRNA promoter activity.

Interactions of T7 RNA polymerase with T7 late promoters measured by footprinting with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II).

The interactions of T7 RNA polymerase with T7 late promoters were studied by using quantitative footprinting with methidiumpropyl-EDTA X Fe(II) [MPE-Fe(II)] as the DNA cleaving agent. Class II and class III T7 promoters have a highly conserved 23 base pair sequence from -17 to +6. Among class III promoters the -22 to -18 region is also highly conserved. For a class II promoter, T7 RNA polymerase protects the -17 to -4 region from MPE-Fe(II) cleavage; when GTP is present, protection extends from -17 to +5 (noncoding strand). For a class III promoter, protection extends from -20 to -4 and in the presence of GTP from -20 to +5 (noncoding strand). The protected regions for the coding strands of both promoters were nearly identical with that seen for the noncoding strands. The binding constant for the class III promoter is (4 +/- 1.5) X 10(7) M-1 and in the presence of GTP increases to (10 +/- 1.7) X 10(7) M-1. These binding constants are about 1000 and 200 times greater, respectively, than values reported previously [Ikeda, R. A., & Richardson, C. C. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 3614-3618]. The differences in binding constants are probably due to tRNA and high salt used in those earlier experiments. Both tRNA and high salt (greater than 50 mM NaCl and greater than 10 mM MgCl2) inhibit the binding of the polymerase to the promoter. Optimal binding conditions occur at 2-5 mM MgCl2 and 0-10 mM NaCl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Synthesis in vitro of a seven amino acid peptide encoded in the leader RNA of Rous sarcoma virus.

Sequences of avian retroviral RNAs suggest that short open reading frames in the putatively untranslated leader sequences might direct the synthesis of small peptides. Previous analyses indicate that translation of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) RNA in vitro faithfully reflects translation of the viral RNA in the chick cell. Accordingly, we sought to determine if the heptapeptide LP1, encoded in the open reading frame closest to the 5' end of RSV RNA, could be synthesized in vitro since this would strongly suggest that it might also be synthesized in vivo. Here we confirm that RSV RNA directs the synthesis of LP1 in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. LP1 is rapidly degraded in the lysate by an aminopeptidase activity. On the basis of the following observations, we propose that the open reading frame encoding LP1 plays a role in the life cycle of avian retroviruses. The LP1 open reading frame is ubiquitous with respect to position and length in 12 strains of avian retrovirus. In the amino acid sequences of the 12 strains, only three of the seven residues are invariant. On the basis of the conservation of the -3 and +4 nucleotides flanking the AUG codon, the strengths of initiation for translation of LP1 are approximately the same in the different viruses. The LP1 open reading frame is positioned in front of sites on retrovirus RNA that are required for initiation of cDNA synthesis and for packaging of the RNA into mature virus.