Core Warming of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Pilot Study.

Fever is a recognized protective factor in patients with sepsis, and growing data suggest beneficial effects on outcomes in sepsis with elevated temperature, with a recent pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing lower mortality by warming afebrile sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this prospective single-site RCT was to determine if core warming improves respiratory physiology of mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), allowing earlier weaning from ventilation, and greater overall survival. A total of 19 patients with mean age of 60.5 (±12.5) years, 37% female, mean weight 95.1 (±18.6) kg, and mean body mass index 34.5 (±5.9) kg/m2 with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation were enrolled from September 2020 to February 2022. Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard of care or to receive core warming for 72 hours through an esophageal heat exchanger commonly utilized in critical care and surgical patients. The maximum target temperature was 39.8°C. A total of 10 patients received usual care and 9 patients received esophageal core warming. After 72 hours of warming, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratios were 197 (±32) and 134 (±13.4), cycle thresholds were 30.8 (±6.4) and 31.4 (±3.2), ICU mortalities were 40% and 44%, 30-day mortalities were 30% and 22%, and mean 30-day ventilator-free days were 11.9 (±12.6) and 6.8 (±10.2) for standard of care and warmed patients, respectively (p = NS). This pilot study suggests that core warming of patients with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation is feasible and appears safe. Optimizing time to achieve febrile-range temperature may require a multimodal temperature management strategy to further evaluate effects on outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04494867.

Core warming of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients undergoing mechanical ventilation-A protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, is spreading rapidly across the globe, with little proven effective therapy. Fever is seen in most cases of COVID-19, at least at the initial stages of illness. Although fever is typically treated (with antipyretics or directly with ice or other mechanical means), increasing data suggest that fever is a protective adaptive response that facilitates recovery from infectious illness. OBJECTIVE: To describe a randomized controlled pilot study of core warming patients with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This prospective single-site randomized controlled pilot study will enroll 20 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard-of-care or to receive core warming via an esophageal heat exchanger commonly utilized in critical care and surgical patients. The primary outcome is patient viral load measured by lower respiratory tract sample. Secondary outcomes include severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (as measured by PaO2/FiO2 ratio) 24, 48, and 72 hours after initiation of treatment, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Resulting data will provide effect size estimates to guide a definitive multi-center randomized clinical trial. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04426344. CONCLUSIONS: With growing data to support clinical benefits of elevated temperature in infectious illness, this study will provide data to guide further understanding of the role of active temperature management in COVID-19 treatment and provide effect size estimates to power larger studies.

Considerations for the Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Cardiac Arrest.

The use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is common during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from cardiac arrest, but logistic and practical challenges of obtaining satisfactory images without sacrificing the quality of CPR have resulted in some centers utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during CPR. Although TEE avoids many of the downsides of TTE, several challenges exist in routine deployment. An alternative approach, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), is routinely used by electrophysiologists during regular cardiac electrophysiologic procedures, such as atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this review, we evaluate various considerations in the potential for use of ICE as a novel means of enhancing resuscitation during CPR.

Inhaled nitric oxide to treat intermediate risk pulmonary embolism: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that adjunctive inhaled NO would improve RV function and viability in acute PE. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial conducted at four academic hospitals. Eligible patients had acute PE without systemic arterial hypotension but had RV dysfunction and a treatment plan of standard anticoagulation. Subjects received either oxygen plus 50 parts per million nitrogen (placebo) or oxygen plus 50 ppm NO for 24 h. The primary composite endpoint required a normal RV on echocardiography and a plasma troponin T concentration <14 pg/mL. The secondary endpoint required a blood brain natriuretic peptide concentration <90 pg/mL and a Borg dyspnea score ≤ 2. The sample size of N = 76 tested if 30% more patients treated with NO would achieve the primary endpoint with 80% power and alpha = 5%. RESULTS: We randomized 78 patients and after two withdrawals, 38 were treated per protocol in each group. Patients were well matched for baseline conditions. At 24 h, 5/38 (13%) of patients treated with placebo and 9/38 (24%) of patients treated with NO reached the primary endpoint (P = 0.375). The secondary endpoint was reached in 34% with placebo and 13% of the NO (P = 0.11). In a pre-planned post-hoc analysis, we examined how many patients with RV hypokinesis or dilation at enrollment resolved these abnormalities; 29% more patients treated with NO resolved both abnormalities at 24 h (P = 0.010, Cochrane's Q test). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe submassive PE, inhaled nitric oxide failed to increase the proportion of patients with a normal troponin and echocardiogram but increased the probability of eliminating RV hypokinesis and dilation on echocardiography. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01939301.