The Report of the 2021-2022 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Resource Guide for the Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Faculty in Professional Practice Settings.

The 2021-22 Professional Affairs Committee was charged to (1) Develop a resource guide for member institutions and faculty regarding payment for the practice-related activities of pharmacy faculty; (2) Nominate at least one person for an elected AACP or Council Office; and (3) Consider ways that AACP can improve its financial health. This report describes the methodology and content utilized for the development of an online resource guide for member institutions, faculty, and practice sites regarding the integration of clinical faculties' patient care services into patient care settings, including models for payment and value-based payment structures that can be utilized to support the practice-related activities of faculty. The committee offers a revision to a current association policy statement, a proposed policy statement as well as recommendations to AACP and suggestions to colleges and schools of pharmacy pertaining to the committee charges.

Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception: A review of the current landscape.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to review the current supply-side, demand-side, and regulatory landscape of pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) in the United States. SUMMARY: Pharmacists appear to be supportive of pharmacist-prescribed HC. However, support does not necessarily indicate likelihood to implement the practice, even when reimbursement mechanisms exist. The likelihood of implementation can be increased with education and training of HC prescribing. Previous investigations suggest that women broadly support accessing contraception within a pharmacy. Expanded access, where available, can improve rates of use and adherence. Women at higher risk for unintended pregnancy, such as younger women and women without health insurance, are likely to use the pharmacy to procure HC. Despite a willingness to pay for HC consultations with pharmacists, costs can remain a significant barrier for many women. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding access to HC through pharmacist-prescriptive authority could help curb the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Pharmacists are well positioned for such a role; however, significant barriers for pharmacists and patients remain. Examination of current implementation methods will assist policy makers in overcoming these barriers.

Residency pathways to ambulatory care practice: Essential insights for students, residents, and educators.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a guiding document describing residency training opportunities in ambulatory care for students, postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents, practicing pharmacists, and pharmacy educators. SUMMARY: Student pharmacists, residents, practitioners, and educators can benefit from a guiding document describing the various pathways to develop as an ambulatory care practitioner through residency training. The benefits and differences of PGY1 and postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) ambulatory care residency programs are included. CONCLUSION: There are many possible training options for pharmacists interested in pursuing a career in ambulatory care pharmacy practice. In addition to the required ambulatory and community experience required for all Doctorate of Pharmacy students, postgraduate training in an ambulatory environment can allow for specialization. Candidates for residency training can complete a PGY1 pharmacy residency or a PGY1 community-based pharmacy residency, possibly followed by a PGY2 ambulatory care residency. Career paths for ambulatory care pharmacists vary regionally across the country according to competition for positions, local availability of training programs, and the experience of regional leaders. A comprehensive description of these available training pathways and advantages of each are beneficial for students, residents, practicing pharmacists, and educators.

Agreement between pharmacists for problem identification: an initial quality measurement of cognitive services.

BACKGROUND: Recent changes in national reimbursement policies expand the ability of pharmacists to seek reimbursement for cognitive services. The quality of pharmacist-provided cognitive services has, until now, remained unassessed. Pharmacists should demonstrate the quality and value of their work to ensure the continued and expanded acceptance of reimbursement for their services. A preliminary step in assessing quality is to compare agreement between pharmacists for basic problem identification. OBJECTIVE: To quantify agreement between pharmacist reviewers for problem identification among Utah Medicaid recipients. METHODS: Five pharmacists retrospectively reviewed drug regimens, patient characteristics, diagnosis codes, and procedures for 80 Medicaid patients in September 2008 and identified drug-related problems (DRPs) in 15 predetermined categories. Data for each patient were reviewed twice, and each combination of 2 pharmacists reviewed the same 8 patients' information. We calculated a reliability coefficient to compare the number of DRPs identified and used prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) to determine interrater reliability for the presence of a specific DRP. RESULTS: Of the 15 DRPs categorized by pharmacist reviewers, 1 (untreated indications) had a PABAK coefficient of 0.20, indicating a relatively low level of agreement between reviewers. All other DRP categories had good to excellent agreement, with PABAK coefficients ranging between 0.43 and 0.98. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist reviewers exhibited less variability in DRP identification or categorization than had been expected for most categories. This work supports the conclusion that pharmacists in our center provide a basic and necessary level of quality for problem assessment. Future work is needed to document the impact of this quality on patient outcomes.