Systolic anterior motion begins at low left ventricular outflow tract velocity in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the dynamic cause for mitral systolic anterior motion (SAM) is a Venturi or a flow drag (pushing) mechanism. BACKGROUND: In obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), if SAM were caused by the Venturi mechanism, high flow velocity in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) should be found at the time of SAM onset. However, if the velocity was found to be normal, this would support an alternative mechanism. METHODS: We studied with echocardiography 25 patients with obstructive HCM who had a mean outflow tract gradient of 82 +/- 6 mm Hg. We compared mitral valve M-mode echocardiogram tracings with continuous wave (CW) and pulsed wave (PW) Doppler tracings recorded on the same study. A total of 98 M-mode, 159 CW, and 151 PW Doppler tracings were digitized and analyzed. For each patient we determined the LVOT CW velocity at the time of SAM onset. This was done by first determining the mean time interval from Q-wave to SAM onset from multiple M-mode tracings. Then, CW velocity in the outflow tract was measured at that same time interval following the Qwave. RESULTS: Systolic anterior motion began mean 71 +/- 5 ms after Q-wave onset. Mean CW Doppler velocity in the LVOT at SAM onset was 89 +/- 8 cm/s. In 68% of cases SAM began before onset of CW and PW Doppler LV ejection. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic anterior motion begins at normal LVOT velocity. At SAM onset, though Venturi forces are present in the outflow tract, their magnitude is much smaller than previously assumed; the Venturi mechanism cannot explain SAM. These velocity data, along with shape, orientation and temporal observations in patients, indicate that drag, the pushing force of flow, is the dominant hydrodynamic force that causes SAM.

Mechanism of benefit of negative inotropes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Drugs with negative inotropic effect are widely used to decrease obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the mechanism of therapeutic benefit has not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used M-mode, two-dimensional, and pulsed Doppler echocardiography to study 11 patients with obstructive HCM before and after medical elimination of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. We measured 148 digitized pulsed Doppler tracings recorded in the left ventricular cavity 2.5 cm apical of the mitral valve. Successful treatment slowed average acceleration of left ventricular ejection by 34% (P=.001). Mean time to peak velocity in the left ventricle was prolonged 31% (P=.001). Mean time to an ejection velocity of 60 cm/s was prolonged 91% (P=.001). Before treatment, left ventricular ejection velocity peaked in the first half of systole; after successful treatment, it peaked in the second half (P=.001). In contrast, after treatment, we found no change in peak left ventricular ejection velocity. We also found no change in the distance between the mitral coaptation point and the septum, as measured in two planes, indicating no treatment-induced alteration of this anatomic relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment eliminates mitral-septal contact and obstruction by decreasing left ventricular ejection acceleration. By slowing acceleration, treatment reduces the hydrodynamic force on the protruding mitral leaflet and delays mitral-septal contact. This, in turn, results in a lower final pressure gradient.

Mid-systolic drop in left ventricular ejection velocity in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy--the lobster claw abnormality.

UNLABELLED: In many patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, an abrupt mid-systolic drop in left ventricular ejection velocity can be detected. We analyzed 27 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who had 43 echocardiographic examinations (mean gradient 53 +/- 6 mm Hg). Exams showing a mid-systolic drop had higher mean outflow tract pressure gradients (90 +/- 6 compared with 29 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.001). After medical elimination of obstruction, the mid-systolic drop was no longer seen. We measured 105 pulsed-wave Doppler tracings in the left ventricular cavity and compared them with 90 continuous-wave tracings through the outflow tract. There was a close temporal correlation between the nadir of the left ventricular velocity drop and the peak continuous-wave left ventricular outflow tract velocity (r = 0.99). There was also a close temporal correlation between the onset of the fall in pulsed velocity and the onset of M-mode mitral-septal contact (r = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The mid-systolic drop in left ventricular velocity is due to impedance to ejection and provides evidence of true obstruction. As left ventricular ejection velocity falls to its mid-systolic nadir because of impedance of ejection, velocity downstream in the left ventricular outflow tract actually rises to its peak. This disparity in the two velocities, deceleration in the left ventricular cavity and acceleration in the left ventricular outflow tract, indicates that the outflow orifice is progressively narrowed over time as the mitral valve is forced into the septum by the rising pressure difference. The obstruction phase is best described as a time-dependent, amplifying feedback loop. The orifice narrows over time because of the rising pressure difference; the pressure difference rises over time because of the narrowing orifice.