Increasing hepatitis B vaccination coverage and decreasing hepatitis B co-infection prevalence among people with HIV-1 in Germany, 1996-2019. Results from a cohort study primarily in men who have sex with men.

OBJECTIVES: Viral hepatitis co-infection among people living with HIV is known to accelerate the progression of liver disease and AIDS. An increased prevalence and incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among people living with HIV demands continuous monitoring to adapt targeted prevention strategies to reach the global goals of eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat. METHODS: We determined the prevalence and incidence of HBV for the years 1996-2019 from yearly blood sample testing and questionnaire reports among people living with HIV belonging to a nationwide, multicentre observational, prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Among this study population of 3479 participants, the majority (87%) indicated that being men who have sex with men (MSM) was their likely HIV transmission route; 51% were recruited from Berlin. HBV prevalence for acute/chronic and resolved infections decreased from 4.1% and 45% in 1996-1999 to 1.3% and 16% in 2019, respectively. Simultaneously, participants with a serological status indicating HBV vaccination increased from 25% in 1996-1999 to 69% in 2019. Among vaccinated participants with relevant information (n = 1135), 38% received their first HBV vaccination after HIV infection. The HBV incidence rate in 565 eligible participants decreased from 6.9/100 person-years in 2004-2007 to 0.45/100 person-years in 2015. CONCLUSION: Increasing vaccination coverage because of a general HBV vaccination recommendation and catch-up vaccination efforts among risk groups decreased HBV infection prevalence over time among this study population of people living with HIV, primarily MSM and from Berlin. Despite this success, the prevalence and incidence of HBV remains higher than in the general population in Germany. This emphasizes the need for continued HBV prevention by promoting HBV vaccination and HBV screening at regular intervals based on the individual risk behaviour.

Cohort profile: the German ClinSurv HIV project--a multicentre open clinical cohort study supplementing national HIV surveillance.

BACKGROUND: New forms of HIV/AIDS therapy require new surveillance instruments to meet shifting public health demands. The Clinical Surveillance of HIV Disease (ClinSurv HIV) project was established in 1999 as a collaboration between major HIV treatment centres in Germany and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). The project contributes to national HIV surveillance and focuses on the changing epidemiology of HIV/AIDS after the introduction of new therapies in 1995. METHODS: ClinSurv HIV is designed as an open multicentre observational cohort study of HIV-infected patients. Anonymized data on diagnoses, treatment and laboratory parameters are collected in a standardized format. Data are currently sampled biannually via 11 centres specializing in HIV diagnosis and care within the legal framework of the German Protection against Infection Act [Infektionsschutzgesetz (IfSG)]. RESULTS: A total of 14874 patients were enrolled in the study by 30 June 2009. Of these, 10221 patients (68.7%) were enrolled after 1 January 1999 and 6006 patients (40.4%) were known to have been diagnosed as positive for HIV before 1999. Evaluation indicators, such as the number of newly enrolled patients per half-year period, loss to follow-up, completeness of data per case, availability of data per possible clinical contact, and internal quality control parameters, show a very stable evolution in the cohort, which although open, can be observed. Comparison with the national HIV surveillance data suggests a high degree of representativeness according to major demographic variables. CONCLUSION: Bearing in mind the obvious strengths and weaknesses discussed, the German ClinSurv HIV cohort provides a broad range of research opportunities in the field of HIV/AIDS both within Germany and in international collaborative research.

[Long-term efficacy of second-line treatment of HIV infection after class change following virological failure on protease inhibitor-based therapy]. / Langfristig wirksame Zweit-Therapie der HIV-Infektion bei Klassenwechsel nach virologischem Versagen unter Protease-Inhibitoren.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While there are evidence-based recommendations for the initial combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) of HIV infection, there are no comparative studies on long-term efficacy of different second-line strategies after initial virological failure. The aim of this study was to compare different second-line strategies after virological failure of an initial protease inhibitor (PI) based regimen, specifically the comparison between change to a different PI and class change to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort study retrospectively analyzed patient data documented for the Clinical Surveillance of HIV Disease project (ClinSurv) between 1999 and 2008, run by the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, Germany. Follow-up data for at least three months of a treatment switch after virological failure of the first-line regimen were available for 157 patients out of the 14,377 patients in the ClinSurv cohort. Eighty-four (54%) of these had a PI-based first-line regimen and were therefore included into the analysis. Fifty-one (61%) of the 84 patients were switched to a different PI (group 1), 33 (39%) to a NNRTI (group 2). Primary end points were the probability of virological failure of the second-line regimen, the duration of a successful second-line regimen and the time to suppression of viral load below the level of detectability. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the median time to virological suppression with 88 days in group 1 and 57 days in group 2 (p = 0.16). After > 3,000 days more than 50% of patients in group 2 (class switch to NNRTI) were still on an effective regimen, their risk of virologic failure thus was significantly lower than in group 1 (switch to a different PI), where the median duration of second-line therapy was only 581 days. Multivariate Cox regression analysis did not identify any of the available covariates as significant predictors of duration of the second-line treatment or as confounders. For group 1, with patients switching within the PI class, there was a more than two-fold risk of virological failure during the time of observation (HR = 2.3; 95%CI 1.1 - 4.9; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Class switch to a NNRTI as opposed to changing to a different PI following virological failure of a PI-based first-line regimen is associated with significantly better durability of the second-line regimen.