Comparison of the Detection Rate and Specificity of Irregular Red Blood Cell Antibodies Between First-Time Pregnant Women and Women With a History of Multiple Pregnancies Among 18,010 Chinese Women.

Background: There is insufficient evidence to assess the risk of the production of clinically important alloimmune irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in first-time pregnant women. Methods: Using the microcolumn gel antiglobulin method, 18,010 Chinese women with a history of pregnancy and pregnant women were screened for irregular RBC antibodies, and for those with positive test results, antibody specificity was determined. The detection rate and specificity of irregular RBC antibodies in women with a history of multiple pregnancies (two or more) and first-time pregnant women were determined. Results: In addition to 25 patients who passively acquired anti-D antibodies via an intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin injection, irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 121 (0.67%) of the 18,010 women. Irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 93 (0.71%) of the 13,027 women with a history of multiple pregnancies, and antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the Rh, MNSs, Lewis, and Kidd blood group systems; irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 28 (0.56%) of the 4983 first-time pregnant women, and the antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the MNSs, Rh, and Lewis blood group systems. The difference in the percentage of patients with irregular RBC antibodies between the two groups was insignificant (χ 2 = 1.248, P > 0.05). Of the 121 women with irregular RBC antibodies, nine had anti-Mur antibodies, and one had anti-Dia antibodies; these antibodies are clinically important but easily missed because the antigenic profile of the reagent RBCs that are commonly used in antibody screens does not include the antigens that are recognized by these antibodies. Conclusion: Irregular RBC antibody detection is clinically important for both pregnant women with a history of multiple pregnancies and first-time pregnant women. Mur and Dia should be included in the antigenic profile of reagent RBCs that are used for performing antibody screens in the Chinese population.

Piperacillin-tazobactam induced immune hemolytic anemia led to increased renal impairment and eventual death from multiple organ failure in a patient with hypertensive nephropathy: case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin is one of the most common drugs that cause drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, but a complete description of the serological features and course of the disease is rare. This study completely describes the serological characteristics and course of a patient with hypertensive nephropathy who developed drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia and worsened renal function during repeated administration of piperacillin-tazobactam. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old male patient with hypertensive nephropathy who developed severe hemolytic anemia and worsened renal function during intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam anti-infective treatment due to lung infection. Serological tests showed that the result of the direct antiglobulin test for anti-IgG was positive (4 +) and anti-C3d was negative, and the irregular red blood cell antibody screening test was negative. Plasma samples collected at different times from 2 days before to 12 days after the discontinuation of piperacillin-tazobactam administration were incubated with piperacillin solution and red blood cells of O-type healthy blood donors at 37 °C, IgG piperacillin-dependent antibodies were detected, and the highest titer was 128. However, no tazobactam-dependent antibody was detected in any plasma samples. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with piperacillin-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Although blood transfusion and continuous renal replacement therapy were given, the patient died of multiple organ failure 15 days after the administration of piperacillin-tazobactam was stopped. CONCLUSION: This is the first complete description of the disease course and serological changes of piperacillin-induced immune hemolytic anemia, which is bound to help deepen the understanding of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia and draw profound lessons from it.

Case Report: Oral Cimetidine Administration Causes Drug-Induced Immune Hemolytic Anemia by Eliciting the Production of Cimetidine-Dependent Antibodies and Drug-Independent Non-specific Antibodies.

Previously, it was reported that multiple patients had hemolytic anemia associated with cimetidine administration, while only one patient who had received intravenous cimetidine was serologically diagnosed with drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) caused by cimetidine-dependent antibodies. However, the ability of oral cimetidine intake to induce the production of antibodies has not been examined. In this study, we report a 44-year-old male patient in whom oral cimetidine administration resulted in cimetidine-dependent antibodies and drug-independent non-specific antibodies, leading to the development of DIIHA. Serological tests showed that the results of direct antiglobulin test (DAT) for anti-IgG (3+) and anti-C3d (1+) were positive. The IgM and IgG cimetidine-dependent antibodies (the highest total titer reached 4,096) were detected in the plasma incubated with O-type RBCs and 1 mg/mL cimetidine or the plasma incubated with cimetidine-coated RBCs. IgG-type drug-independent non-specific antibodies were detected in blood samples collected at days 13, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake. This is the first study to report that oral administration of cimetidine can elicit the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies, leading to DIIHA, and the production of drug-independent non-specific antibodies, resulting in hemolytic anemia independent of cimetidine. Presence of pathogenic antibodies were detectable longer than 41 days. This suggests that patients with DIIHA caused by cimetidine need to be given necessary medical monitoring within 41 days after cimetidine intake.

Case Report: Drug-Induced Immune Haemolytic Anaemia Caused by Cefoperazone-Tazobactam/ Sulbactam Combination Therapy.

There has previously been a report of a patient developing haemolytic anaemia following exposure to cefoperazone. Another case has been reported involving the detection of cefoperazone-dependent antibodies in the absence of immune haemolytic anaemia. To date, no serological evidence has been reported to suggest that cefoperazone can lead to drug-induced immune haemolytic anaemia (DIIHA). This report aims to fill these gaps in knowledge by describing a case of DIIHA caused by cefoperazone-dependent antibodies. A 59-year-old man developed fatal haemolytic anaemia while receiving cefoperazone-tazobactam or cefoperazone-sulbactam for the treatment of a lung infection that occurred after craniocerebral surgery. This eventually led to renal function impairment. Prior to the discontinuation of cefoperazone treatment, the patient showed strong positive (4+) results for both anti-IgG and anti-C3d direct antiglobulin test (DAT), while cefoperazone-dependent IgM and IgG antibodies were detected. The patient's plasma and O-type RBCs were incubated with tazobactam or sulbactam solution at 37°C for 3 h, the results of DAT for anti-IgG and anti-C3d were both positive. Forty-three days after the discontinuation of cefoperazone, the results of DAT for anti-IgG and anti-C3d were negative. Meanwhile incubation of the patient's fresh serum and his own RBCs with cefoperazone at 37°C, gave rise to mild haemolysis, and the results of DAT for both anti-IgG and anti-C3d were positive. It is suggested that cefoperazone-dependent antibodies can activate complement, and the non-immunologic protein adsorption effect of tazobactam or sulbactam can enhance IgG and complement binding to RBCs. This may promote the formation of immunocomplexes and complement activation, thereby aggravating haemolysis.

Case Report: First Case of Cefotaxime-Sulbactam-Induced Acute Intravascular Hemolysis in a Newborn With ABO Blood Type Incompatibility by the Mechanism of Non-Immunologic Protein Adsorption.

Background: ABO blood type incompatibility hemolytic disease of newborn (ABO-HDN) and drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) due to non-immunologic protein adsorption (NIPA) mainly cause extravascular hemolysis. All the reported severe DIIHA were caused by drug-induced antibodies, and rare report of acute intravascular hemolysis was caused by the NIPA mechanism or ABO-HDN. Case presentation: We report the first case of acute intravascular hemolysis induced by cefotaxime sodium - sulbactam sodium (CTX - SBT) in a case of ABO-HDN which resulted in death at 55 h after birth. The mother's blood type was O and RhD-positive, and the newborn's blood type was B and RhD-positive. No irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies or drug-dependent antibodies related to CTX or SBT was detected in the mother's plasma and the plasma or the RBC acid eluent of the newborn. Before the newborn received CTX - SBT treatment, the result of direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was negative while anti-B was positive (2 +) in both plasma and acid eluent. After the newborn received CTX - SBT treatment, the results of DAT for anti-IgG and anti-C3d were both positive, while anti-B was not detected in plasma, but stronger anti-B (3 +) was detected in acid eluent. In vitro experiments confirmed that NIPA of SBT promoted the specific binding of maternal-derived IgG anti-B to B antigen on RBCs of the newborn, thereby inducing acute intravascular hemolysis. Conclusion: The NIPA effect of SBT promoted the specific binding of mother-derived IgG anti-B in newborn's plasma to the newborn's RBC B antigens and formed an immune complex, and then activated complement, which led to acute intravascular hemolysis. Drugs such as SBT with NIPA effect should not be used for newborns with HDN.