Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37961568

RESUMO

Both enhanced motion-induced nausea and increased static imbalance are \observed symptoms in migraine and especially vestibular migraine (VM). Motion-induced nausea and static imbalance were investigated in a mouse model, nestin/hRAMP1, expressing elevated levels of human RAMP1 in the CNS, which enhances CGRP signaling in the nervous system. Behavioral surrogates such as the motion-induced thermoregulation and postural sway center of pressure (CoP) assays were used to assess motion sensitivity. Tail vasodilation analysis revealed that this model exhibits an increased sensitivity to CGRP's effects at lower doses compared to control mice. In addition, the nestin/hRAMP1 mice exhibit a higher dynamic range in postural sway than their wildtype counterparts, along with increased sway observed in nestin/hRAMP1 male mice that was not present in male littermate controls. Results from migraine blocker experiments were challenging to interpret, but the data suggests that olcegepant is incapable of reversing CGRP-induced alterations in the nestin/hRAMP1 mice, while rizatriptan was ineffective in both the nestin/hRAMP1 and control mice. The results indicate that overexpression of hRAMP1 leads to heightened endogenous CGRP signaling. Results also suggest that both olcegepant and rizatriptan are ineffective in reducing CGRP-triggered nausea and sway in this hypersensitive CGRP mouse model. This study suggests that hypersensitivity to CGRP may be a mouse model for difficult to treat cases of vestibular migraine.

2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 36(12): 4313-4319, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36207199

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) on hospital mortality and non-home discharge for patients undergoing cardiac surgery over a 16-year period in Australia and New Zealand. DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study covering the period January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2019. SETTING: One hundred one hospitals in Australia and New Zealand that submitted data to the Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (aged >18) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or combined valve + coronary artery surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors analyzed 252,948 cardiac surgical patients from 101 hospitals, with a median age of 68.3 years (IQR 60-75.5), of whom 74.2% (187,632 of 252,948) were male patients. A U-shaped relationship was observed between ICU LOS and hospital mortality, with significantly elevated mortality at short (<20 hours) and long (>5 days) ICU LOS, which persisted after adjustment for illness severity and across clinically important subgroups (odds ratio for mortality with ICU LOS >5 days = 3.21, 95% CI 2.88-3.58, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration of ICU LOS after cardiac surgery is associated with increased hospital mortality in a U-shaped relationship. An ICU LOS >5 days should be considered a meaningful definition for prolonged ICU stay after cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Austrália/epidemiologia
3.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 31(9): 679-687, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35046101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that displays of unacceptable behaviour, including bullying, discrimination and harassment, between healthcare workers (HCWs) may impair job performance, and in turn, increase the frequency of medical errors, adverse events and healthcare-related complications. The objective of this systematic review was to summarise the current evidence of the impact of unacceptable behaviour occurring between HCWs on clinical performance and patient outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from 1 January 1990 to 31 March 2021. The search results were screened by two independent reviewers and studies were included if they were original research that assessed the effects of unacceptable behaviour on clinical performance, quality of care, workplace productivity or patient outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using tools relevant to the study design and the data were synthesised without meta-analysis. RESULTS: From the 2559 screened studies, 36 studies were included: 22 survey-based studies, 4 qualitative studies, 3 mixed-methods studies, 4 simulation-based randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 other study designs. Most survey-based studies were low quality and demonstrated that HCWs perceived a relationship between unacceptable behaviour and worse clinical performance and patient outcomes. This was supported by a smaller number of higher quality retrospective studies and RCTs. Two of four RCTs produced negative results, possibly reflecting inadequate power or study design limitations. No study demonstrated any beneficial effect of unacceptable behaviour on the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the mixed quality of evidence and some inconsistencies in the strengths of associations reported, the overall weight of evidence shows that unacceptable behaviour negatively affects the clinical performance of HCWs, quality of care, workplace productivity and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the evaluation and implementation of interventions that reduce the frequency of these behaviours.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Local de Trabalho , Humanos
4.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(10): 3167-3173, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. METHODS: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P = .511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95% CI 0.77-1.14; P = .494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95% CI 0.98-1.23; P = .115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P = .007). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/mortalidade , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Idoso , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/epidemiologia , Falha de Prótese , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/mortalidade , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 7: CD010031, 2017 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28707751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fungal infection of the toenails, also called onychomycosis, is a common problem that causes damage to the nail's structure and physical appearance. For those severely affected, it can interfere with normal daily activities. Treatment is taken orally or applied topically; however, traditionally topical treatments have low success rates due to the nail's physical properties. Oral treatments also appear to have shorter treatment times and better cure rates. Our review will assist those needing to make an evidence-based choice for treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of oral antifungal treatments for toenail onychomycosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases up to October 2016: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched five trials registers and checked the reference lists of included and excluded studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We sought to identify unpublished and ongoing trials by correspondence with authors and by contacting relevant pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing oral antifungal treatment to placebo or another oral antifungal treatment in participants with toenail onychomycosis, confirmed by one or more positive cultures, direct microscopy of fungal elements, or histological examination of the nail. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 48 studies involving 10,200 participants. Half the studies took place in more than one centre and were conducted in outpatient dermatology settings. The participants mainly had subungual fungal infection of the toenails. Study duration ranged from 4 months to 2 years.We assessed one study as being at low risk of bias in all domains and 18 studies as being at high risk of bias in at least one domain. The most common high-risk domain was 'blinding of personnel and participants'.We found high-quality evidence that terbinafine is more effective than placebo for achieving clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) 6.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.96 to 9.08, 8 studies, 1006 participants) and mycological cure (RR 4.53, 95% CI 2.47 to 8.33, 8 studies, 1006 participants). Adverse events amongst terbinafine-treated participants included gastrointestinal symptoms, infections, and headache, but there was probably no significant difference in their risk between the groups (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.47, 4 studies, 399 participants, moderate-quality evidence).There was high-quality evidence that azoles were more effective than placebo for achieving clinical cure (RR 22.18, 95% CI 12.63 to 38.95, 9 studies, 3440 participants) and mycological cure (RR 5.86, 95% CI 3.23 to 10.62, 9 studies, 3440 participants). There were slightly more adverse events in the azole group (the most common being headache, flu-like symptoms, and nausea), but the difference was probably not significant (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.12; 9 studies, 3441 participants, moderate-quality evidence).Terbinafine and azoles may lower the recurrence rate when compared, individually, to placebo (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.38, 1 study, 35 participants; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.07, 1 study, 26 participants, respectively; both low-quality evidence).There is moderate-quality evidence that terbinafine was probably more effective than azoles for achieving clinical cure (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95, 15 studies, 2168 participants) and mycological cure (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.88, 17 studies, 2544 participants). There was probably no difference in the risk of adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.17; 9 studies, 1762 participants, moderate-quality evidence) between the two groups, and there may be no difference in recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.79, 5 studies, 282 participants, low-quality evidence). Common adverse events in both groups included headache, viral infection, and nausea.Moderate-quality evidence shows that azoles and griseofulvin probably had similar efficacy for achieving clinical cure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.96, 5 studies, 222 participants) and mycological cure (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.51, 5 studies, 222 participants). However, the risk of adverse events was probably higher in the griseofulvin group (RR 2.41, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.73, 2 studies, 143 participants, moderate-quality evidence), with the most common being gastrointestinal disturbance and allergic reaction (in griseofulvin-treated participants) along with nausea and vomiting (in azole-treated participants). Very low-quality evidence means we are uncertain about this comparison's impact on recurrence rate (RR 4.00, 0.26 to 61.76, 1 study, 7 participants).There is low-quality evidence that terbinafine may be more effective than griseofulvin in terms of clinical cure (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.72, 4 studies, 270 participants) and mycological cure (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.90, 5 studies, 465 participants), and griseofulvin was associated with a higher risk of adverse events, although this was based on low-quality evidence (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.82, 2 studies, 100 participants). Common adverse events included headache and stomach problems (in griseofulvin-treated participants) as well as taste loss and nausea (in terbinafine-treated participants). No studies addressed recurrence rate for this comparison.No study addressed quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found high-quality evidence that compared to placebo, terbinafine and azoles are effective treatments for the mycological and clinical cure of onychomycosis, with moderate-quality evidence of excess harm. However, terbinafine probably leads to better cure rates than azoles with the same risk of adverse events (moderate-quality evidence).Azole and griseofulvin were shown to probably have a similar effect on cure, but more adverse events appeared to occur with the latter (moderate-quality evidence). Terbinafine may improve cure and be associated with fewer adverse effects when compared to griseofulvin (low-quality evidence).Only four comparisons assessed recurrence rate: low-quality evidence found that terbinafine or azoles may lower the recurrence rate when compared to placebo, but there may be no difference between them.Only a limited number of studies reported adverse events, and the severity of the events was not taken into account.Overall, the quality of the evidence varied widely from high to very low depending on the outcome and comparison. The main reasons to downgrade evidence were limitations in study design, such as unclear allocation concealment and randomisation as well as lack of blinding.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Dermatoses do Pé/tratamento farmacológico , Griseofulvina/uso terapêutico , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Onicomicose/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Azóis/administração & dosagem , Azóis/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Griseofulvina/administração & dosagem , Griseofulvina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naftalenos/administração & dosagem , Naftalenos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Prevenção Secundária , Terbinafina
7.
J Bacteriol ; 199(19)2017 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28652300

RESUMO

Vibrio vulnificus is an estuarine bacterium and potent opportunistic human pathogen. It enters the food chain by asymptomatically colonizing a variety of marine organisms, most notably oysters. Expression of the brp-encoded extracellular polysaccharide, which enhances cell-surface adherence, is regulated by cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) and the activator BrpT. The Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus homologs VpsT and CpsQ, directly bind c-di-GMP via a novel W[F/L/M][T/S]R motif, and c-di-GMP binding is absolutely required for activity. Notably, BrpT belongs to a distinct subclass of VpsT-like regulators that harbor a proline in the third position of the c-di-GMP binding motif (WLPR), and the impact of this change on activity is unknown. We show that the brp locus is organized as two linked operons with BrpT specifically binding to promoters upstream of brpA and brpH Expression data and structural modeling suggested that BrpT might be less dependent on c-di-GMP binding for activity than VpsT or CpsQ. We show that the affinity of BrpT for c-di-GMP is low and that signal binding is not a requisite for BrpT function. Furthermore, a BrpT mutant engineered to carry a canonical WLTR motif (BrpTP124T) bound c-di-GMP with high affinity and its activity was now c-di-GMP dependent. Conversely, introduction of the WLPR motif into VpsT suppressed its dependence on c-di-GMP for activity. This is the first demonstration of reduced dependence on signal association for regulator function within this motif family. Thus, BrpT defines a new class of VpsT-like transcriptional regulators, and the WLPR motif variant may similarly liberate the activity of other subclass members.IMPORTANCE A Vibrio genome may encode nearly 100 proteins that make, break, and bind c-di-GMP, underscoring its central role in the physiology of these bacteria. The activity of the biofilm regulators VpsT of V. cholerae and CpsQ of V. parahaemolyticus is regulated by the direct binding of c-di-GMP via a novel W[F/L/M][T/S]R motif. The V. vulnificus homolog, BrpT, bears an unusual WLPR variant and remains active at low intracellular c-di-GMP levels. This suggests that the WLPR motif may also liberate the activity of other members of this subclass. A single point mutation at the 3rd position of the motif was sufficient to moderate dependence on c-di-GMP binding for activator function, highlighting the simplicity with which complex bacterial signaling networks can be rewired.

8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 10: CD009612, 2016 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many treatments for the common cold exist and are sold over-the-counter. Nevertheless, evidence on the effectiveness and safety of nasal decongestants is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, and short- and long-term safety, of nasal decongestants used in monotherapy to alleviate symptoms of the common cold in adults and children. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 6, June 2016), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1946 to July 2016), Embase (2010 to 15 July 2016), CINAHL (1981 to 15 July 2016), LILACS (1982 to July 2016), Web of Science (1955 to July 2016) and clinical trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs investigating the effectiveness and adverse effects of nasal decongestants compared with placebo for treating the common cold in adults and children. We excluded quasi-RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently extracted and summarised data on subjective measures of nasal congestion, overall patient well-being score, objective measures of nasal airway resistance, adverse effects and general recovery. One review author acted as arbiter in cases of disagreement. We categorised trials as single and multi-dose and analysed data both separately and together. We also analysed studies using an oral or topical nasal decongestant separately and together. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 trials with 1838 participants. Fourteen studies included adult participants only (aged 18 years and over). In six studies the intervention was a single dose and in nine studies multiple doses were used. Nine studies used pseudoephedrine and three studies used oxymetazoline. Other decongestants included phenylpropanolamine, norephedrine and xylometazoline. Phenylpropanolamine (or norephedrine) is no longer available on the market therefore we did not include the results of these studies in the meta-analyses. Eleven studies used oral decongestants; four studies used topical decongestants.Participants were included after contracting the common cold. The duration of symptoms differed among studies; in 10 studies participants had symptoms for less than three days, in three studies symptoms were present for less than five days, one study counted the number of colds over one year, and one study experimentally induced the common cold. In the single-dose studies, the effectiveness of a nasal decongestant was measured on the same day, whereas the follow-up in multi-dose studies ranged between one and 10 days.Most studies were conducted in university settings (N = eight), six at a specific university common cold centre. Three studies were conducted at a university in collaboration with a hospital and two in a hospital only setting. In two studies the setting was unclear.There were large differences in the reporting of outcomes and the reporting of methods in most studies was limited. Therefore, we judged most studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias. Pooling was possible for a limited number of studies only; measures of effect are expressed as standardised mean differences (SMDs). A positive SMD represents an improvement in congestion. There is no defined minimal clinically important difference for measures of subjective improvement in nasal congestion, therefore we used the SMDs as a guide to assess whether an effect was small (0.2 to 0.49), moderate (0.5 to 0.79) or large (≥ 0.8).Single-dose decongestant versus placebo: 10 studies compared a single dose of nasal decongestant with placebo and their effectiveness was tested between 15 minutes and 10 hours after dosing. Seven of 10 studies reported subjective symptom scores for nasal congestion; none reported overall patient well-being. However, pooling was not possible due to the large diversity in the measurement and reporting of symptoms of congestion. Two studies recorded adverse events. Both studies used an oral decongestant and each of them showed that there was no statistical difference between the number of adverse events in the treatment group versus the placebo group.Multi-dose decongestant versus placebo: nine studies compared multiple doses of nasal decongestants with placebo, but only five reported on the primary outcome, subjective symptom scores for nasal congestion. Only one study used a topical decongestant; none reported overall patient well-being. Subjective measures of congestion were significantly better for the treatment group compared with placebo approximately three hours after the last dose (SMD 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.92; P = 0.02; GRADE: low-quality evidence). However, the SMD of 0.49 only indicates a small clinical effect. Pooling was based on two studies, one oral and one topical, therefore we were unable to assess the effects of oral and topical decongestants separately. Seven studies reported adverse events (six oral and one topical decongestant); meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference between the number of adverse events in the treatment group (125 per 1000) compared to the placebo group (126 per 1000). The odds ratio (OR) for adverse events in the treatment group was 0.98 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.40; P = 0.90; GRADE: low-quality evidence). The results remained the same when we only considered studies using an oral decongestant (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.39; P = 0.80; GRADE: low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of single-dose nasal decongestants due to the limited evidence available. For multiple doses of nasal decongestants, the current evidence suggests that these may have a small positive effect on subjective measures of nasal congestion in adults with the common cold. However, the clinical relevance of this small effect is unknown and there is insufficient good-quality evidence to draw any firm conclusions. Due to the small number of studies that used a topical nasal decongestant, we were also unable to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of oral versus topical decongestants. Nasal decongestants do not seem to increase the risk of adverse events in adults in the short term. The effectiveness and safety of nasal decongestants in children and the clinical relevance of their small effect in adults is yet to be determined.


Assuntos
Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Descongestionantes Nasais/administração & dosagem , Administração Intranasal , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Descongestionantes Nasais/efeitos adversos , Oximetazolina/administração & dosagem , Fenilpropanolamina/administração & dosagem , Pseudoefedrina/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Dis Model Mech ; 9(9): 953-64, 2016 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27483356

RESUMO

Cell and tissue degeneration, and the development of degenerative diseases, are influenced by genetic and environmental factors that affect protein misfolding and proteotoxicity. To better understand the role of the environment in degeneration, we developed a genetic model for heat shock (HS)-stress-induced degeneration in Drosophila This model exhibits a unique combination of features that enhance genetic analysis of degeneration and protection mechanisms involving environmental stress. These include cell-type-specific failure of proteostasis and degeneration in response to global stress, cell-nonautonomous interactions within a simple and accessible network of susceptible cell types, and precise temporal control over the induction of degeneration. In wild-type flies, HS stress causes selective loss of the flight ability and degeneration of three susceptible cell types comprising the flight motor: muscle, motor neurons and associated glia. Other motor behaviors persist and, accordingly, the corresponding cell types controlling leg motor function are resistant to degeneration. Flight motor degeneration was preceded by a failure of muscle proteostasis characterized by diffuse ubiquitinated protein aggregates. Moreover, muscle-specific overexpression of a small heat shock protein (HSP), HSP23, promoted proteostasis and protected muscle from HS stress. Notably, neurons and glia were protected as well, indicating that a small HSP can mediate cell-nonautonomous protection. Cell-autonomous protection of muscle was characterized by a distinct distribution of ubiquitinated proteins, including perinuclear localization and clearance of protein aggregates associated with the perinuclear microtubule network. This network was severely disrupted in wild-type preparations prior to degeneration, suggesting that it serves an important role in muscle proteostasis and protection. Finally, studies of resistant leg muscles revealed that they sustain proteostasis and the microtubule cytoskeleton after HS stress. These findings establish a model for genetic analysis of degeneration and protection mechanisms involving contributions of environmental factors, and advance our understanding of the protective functions and therapeutic potential of small HSPs.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiologia , Meio Ambiente , Proteínas de Choque Térmico Pequenas/metabolismo , Estresse Fisiológico , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Animais , Axônios/patologia , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Voo Animal , Resposta ao Choque Térmico , Microtúbulos/metabolismo , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/patologia , Neuroglia/patologia , Agregados Proteicos , Ubiquitina/metabolismo
10.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 3(2): 3, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24757593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the adverse effect of intravitreal injection of normal saline (NS) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in mouse eyes. METHODS: NS or PBS was injected intravitreally into C57BL/6J mouse eyes. Retinal lesions were monitored by fundus imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and histological investigations. Retinal immune gene expression was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The toxic effect of NS and PBS or retinal protein from NS- or PBS-injected eyes on retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) was tested in B6-RPE-07 mouse RPE cell cultures. RESULTS: Intravitreal injection of NS dose-dependently induced localized retinal lesion in mice. Histological investigations revealed multiple vacuoles in photoreceptor outer segments and RPE cells. The lesions recovered over time and by 3 weeks post injection the majority of lesions vanished in eyes receiving 1 µl NS. Inflammatory genes, including TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, iNOS, and VEGF were upregulated in NS injected eyes. Intravitreal injection of PBS did not cause any pathology. The treatment of B6-RPE07 cells with 30% PBS or 30% NS did not affect RPE viability. However, incubation of 1-µg/ml retinal protein from NS-injected eyes, but not PBS-injected eyes induced RPE cell death. CONCLUSION: NS is toxic to the C57BL/6J mouse retina and should not be used as a vehicle for intraocular injection. PBS is not toxic to the retina and is a preferred vehicle. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: NS is not a physiological solution for intraocular injection in the C57BL/6J mice and questions its suitability for intraocular injection in other species, including human.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...