Ultrasound-based scoring system for differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder may be neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Correct diagnosis would help reduce unnecessary cholecystectomies. This study aimed to determine the predictive value of individual ultrasound characteristics for diagnosis of neoplastic polyps and to build a scoring system based on these characteristics. METHODS: A total of 109 patients with gallbladder polyps ≥ 6 mm underwent conventional ultrasound examination and received finally diagnosis by pathological examination. All images were analyzed to determine characteristics of the lesions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the predictors of neoplastic polyps, and a scoring system was built based on multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Maximum diameter, height/width ratio, base width, presence of hyper-echoic spots, and intralesional blood flow were statistically significant (P = 0.011, P = 0.016, P = 0.003, P = 0.031, and P = 0.022, respectively) predictors of neoplastic lesions. The total score = (Maximum diameter, ≥ 13.9 mm = 1, < 13.9 = 0) + (Base width, ≥ 3.5 mm = 1, < 3.4 = 0) + (Height/width ratio, ≤ 1.05 = 1, > 1.05 = 0) + (Hyper-echoic spots, presence = 0, absence = 1) + (Blood flow, presence = 1, absence = 0). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the risk of neoplastic polyps with scores of 3 or higher were 81.6%, 86.7%, and 84.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This ultrasound-based scoring system could be a useful means for differentiating between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps in the clinic.

Influence of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and PSA density on prostate cancer detection with contrast-enhanced sonography using contrast-tuned imaging technology.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and PSA density on prostate cancer detection with contrast-enhanced sonography using contrast-tuned imaging technology compared with baseline imaging (combination of grayscale and power Doppler imaging). METHODS: In all, 161 patients were evaluated with grayscale, power Doppler, and contrast-tuned imaging. Biopsy was performed at 10 sites in each patient. When an abnormality was shown on any of these examinations, the biopsy was directed toward the abnormality. Cancer detection between contrast-tuned imaging and baseline imaging was compared for different subgroups according to PSA level (4-10, 10-20, and >20 ng/mL), prostate volume (<35, 35-50, 50-65, and >65 mL), and PSA density (<0.15, 0.15-0.30, 0.30-0.50, and >0.50). RESULTS: In total, 413 sites were malignant in 78 patients. By biopsy site, the accuracy was greater for contrast-tuned imaging than for baseline imaging in all PSA level, prostate volume, and PSA density subgroups except 0.30 to 0.50 (all P < .05). Contrast-tuned imaging had significantly higher sensitivity in the subgroups with PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/mL, prostate volumes between 35 and 65 mL, and PSA densities between 0.15 and 0.50 than baseline imaging (all P < .05); it also had significantly higher specificity for all PSA level subgroups except 10 to 20 ng/mL, all prostate volume subgroups except 35 to 50 mL, and all PSA density subgroups except 0.30 to 0.50 (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-tuned imaging could improve cancer detection over baseline imaging in patients with different PSA levels, prostate volumes, and PSA densities.

Value of contrast-enhanced sonographic micro flow imaging for prostate cancer detection with t-PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging (MFI) with conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in detecting prostate cancer with serum total prostate-specific antigen (t-PSA) of 4.0-10.0 ng/mL. To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic MFI in detecting prostate cancer with t-PSA in diagnostic gray zone. METHODS: 47 patients with t-PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/mL underwent gray scale, power Doppler TRUS and MFI examinations before ultrasound guided biopsies. Biopsies were performed at twelve sites in the base, the mid-gland and the apex of the prostate in each patient, when there was no abnormal ultrasound finding. When an abnormality was present at MFI, the biopsy specimen from the corresponding site was directed toward the abnormal finding. With histological results of prostate biopsy as reference standards, we assessed the cancer detection of these three methods. RESULTS: 564 specimens were collected in this study, in which 101 were prostate cancer confirmed histologically. 152 of 564 specimens were demonstrated abnormal on MFI images, in which 71 were malignant and 81 were benign confirmed histologically. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for MFI in detecting prostate caner were 70.3%, 82.5%, 80.3%, 46.7% and 92.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV for MFI were significantly better than gray scale (38.6%, 86.9%) and power Doppler (32.7%, 86.0%) (P<0.001) TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic MFI could significantly improve the detection rate of prostate cancer with t-PSA in diagnostic gray zone (4-10 ng/mL) than conventional ultrasound.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with contrast-tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography.

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The present study was to perform contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) technology to detect prostate cancer and compare the use of CnTI technology for the detection of prostate cancer with conventional ultrasonography. The preliminary data from our study suggested that targeted biopsy of the prostate with CnTI technology could improve the cancer detection and detect higher grade prostate cancers. OBJECTIVES: To perform contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) technology to detect prostate cancer. To evaluate the detection of prostate cancer with CnTI compared with conventional grey-scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 150 patients referred for prostate biopsy were evaluated using transrectal grey-scale, power Doppler and CnTI ultrasonography. Biopsy was performed at 10 sites in each patient. If an abnormality was found at any of these three ultrasonography examinations, a biopsy specimen was targeted towards from the corresponding site. The performances of the three ultrasonography techniques for prostate cancer detection were compared. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected at 383 sites from 73 patients. The combination of these three examinations detected more patients with prostate cancer than grey-scale (P= 0.002), power Doppler (P= 0.001) or baseline imaging (the combination of grey-scale and power Doppler; P= 0.031) alone. By biopsy site, CnTI had higher sensitivity and accuracy (73.1% and 83.7%) than grey-scale (50.9%; P < 0.001 and 78.8%; P < 0.001) or power Doppler (48.3%; P < 0.001 and 77.7%; P < 0.001), while the specificity was similar for grey-scale (88.4%), power Doppler (87.8%) and CnTI (87.3%; P > 0.05 in each case). CnTI had higher sensitivity (73.1% vs 62.9%; P < 0.001), specificity (87.3% vs 82.1%; P < 0.001) and accuracy (83.7% vs 77.2%; P < 0.001) than baseline imaging. The mean Gleason score of CnTI-positive cases was significantly higher than CnTI-negative cases (7.1 vs 6.3; P= 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS using CnTI technology enables a visualization of the microvasculature associated with prostate cancer. CnTI technology could be used to guide biopsy and improve the detection rate of prostate cancer. CnTI technology was able to detect higher grade prostate cancers.

Differential diagnosis of azoospermia and etiologic classification of obstructive azoospermia: role of scrotal and transrectal US.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of scrotal and transrectal ultrasonography (US) in the differential diagnosis of azoospermia and the etiologic classification of obstructive azoospermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Between April 2006 and November 2008, 100 infertile men (mean age, 32 years; range, 22-51 years) with azoospermia were evaluated at scrotal and transrectal US, with an emphasis on abnormal US findings of the seminal tract and measurement of testicular volume. On the basis of the results of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular fine-needle aspiration cytology, or testicular biopsy, 97 patients with azoospermia were divided into obstructive or nonobstructive groups. The remaining three patients had Klinefelter syndrome and did not undergo testicular biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different indexes for discrimination between obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Cases of obstructive azoospermia were further classified according to obstructive causes. RESULTS: Seminal tract abnormalities were more common in obstructive (92.2% [59 of 64 patients]) than in nonobstructive (2.8% [one of 36 patients]; P < .001) azoospermia. Testicular volume was significantly larger for obstructive (median, 16.0 mL; range, 8.4-27.5 mL) than for nonobstructive (median, 8.6 mL; range, 0.9-21.0 mL; P < .001) azoospermia. The area under the ROC curve for discrimination between the groups through combined assessment of the seminal tract and testicular volume at scrotal and transrectal US was 0.96. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for combined assessment in discriminating between obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia were 95.3% (61 of 64 patients), 97.2% (35 of 36), and 96.0% (96 of 100), respectively. CONCLUSION: Scrotal US and transrectal US are effective imaging modalities for distinguishing obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia and can provide meaningful diagnostic information for determining the etiologic classification of obstructive azoospermia.