Aberrant Collaterals in Cirrhosis and Challenges in its Management.

Portosystemic collateral formation in cirrhotic patients plays an essential role in the natural history of patients. A thorough understanding of collateral anatomy and hemodynamics in cirrhosis, it is important to envisage diagnosis and outcomes of portal hypertension. The understanding of the patterns of aberrant portosystemic collateral channels has important implications both for the clinician and the interventionist. In this case report, our patient presented to us with the formation of aberrant collaterals at the site of subcostal hernia for which he underwent a mesh repair eight years back. The technical challenges in the management of shunt closure of these aberrant collaterals were discussed.

Evaluating the Practice of Prescribing Beta-blockers in Compensated Cirrhosis by Gastroenterologists in the Asia Pacific Region.

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) have a role in the management of portal hypertension. They are currently advocated in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) based on Baveno-VII consensus. Current survey aimed to evaluate the practice and perceptions of prescribing NSBBs in portal hypertension by gastroenterologists and hepatologists in Asia-Pacific region in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Out of 1500 gastroenterologists approached in the region, 328 gastroenterologists responded and completed the survey. 75% of the respondents were found not to be following practice of evaluating CSPH as they prescribed NSBBs in patients of compensated cirrhosis with high-risk varices only. Major concerns raised were non-availability of hepatic venous pressure gradient and reliable non-invasive tests as surrogate of CSPH to adapt PREDESCI methodology. While 56.7% used carvedilol as the preferred NSBB to treat patients with compensated cirrhosis, 43.3% used propranolol. This survey assessed the real-world scenario of prescribing NSBBs among practicing gastroenterologists/hepatologists in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Distinct course of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis with gastric variceal bleeding as their first decompensation: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data exist on course of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis with gastric variceal (GV) bleeding as their index decompensation. We evaluated long-term outcomes in this subgroup and compared them with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients with esophageal variceal (EV) bleeding. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis with GVs (IGV-1 and GOV-2) bleeding as their index decompensation were analyzed in this retrospective study. Incidence of new-onset clinical decompensations and survival were estimated and compared with a cohort of patients with EVs bleeding matched for etiology and disease severity using competing risk analysis. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with GVs related bleeding (n = 51) (mean age-48.1 ± 12.9 years, 80% males, non-viral cirrhosis: 80.3%) were similar to the cohort of EVs bleeding (n = 51) (mean age-45.9 ± 14.2, 88% males, non-viral cirrhosis: 78.4%). The 1-year and 3-year rates of new-onset ascites were (17.9%, 34.2%) and (23.9%, 49%) in patients with GVs and EVs related index bleeding, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.035). The 1-year and 3 year rate of rebleed was (35.6%, 46.3%) and (13.9%, 35.7%) in patients with GVs and EVs related index bleeding, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.1). While overall survival was similar across both the groups (GV: 29.6% vs EV: 21.6%, p = 0.495), rebleeding-related deaths occurred exclusively in patients with GV (rebleeding-related deaths: GV: 40% vs EVs: 0%; non-bleeding liver-related deaths: GV: 60% vs EV: 100%; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding predominates the course of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis presenting with GVs related bleeding, whereas ascites is the most significant event on follow-up in those with EVs related bleeding.

Assessing the Risk of Further Decompensation and Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis With Variceal Bleeding as Their First Decompensation Event.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on long-term outcomes of patients with compensated cirrhosis presenting with acute variceal bleeding (AVB) as an index and lone decompensating event. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of further decompensation, survival, and risk factors of mortality in these patients. METHODS: Patients with otherwise compensated cirrhosis presenting with AVB as their index decompensating event (n = 463) were analyzed in this single-center retrospective study. The incidence of individual decompensation events and survival was estimated using competing risk analysis. Risk factors for poor outcomes were identified. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.4 (13.2) years, with most patients (86.5%) being males. Alcohol-related liver disease (42.3%) and viral cirrhosis (22.4%) were the main etiologies with a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 14 (11-15) at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 42 (24-62) months, 292 patients experienced further decompensations: ascites (n = 283; 96.9%), rebleeding (n = 157; 53.8%), and hepatic encephalopathy (n = 71; 24.3%). Most events occurred with similar frequency across different etiologies, except acute-on-chronic liver failure, which was more common in nonviral cirrhosis (Gray test, P = 0.042). Patients with viral and nonviral cirrhosis had similar survival (5-year survival: 91% and 80.1%, respectively; P = 0.062). Patients with early further decompensations (onset <6 weeks of index AVB event) (n = 40) had a higher mortality (52.5% vs 20.2% for late decompensations; P < 0.001). Active alcohol consumption (hazard ratio [HR]: 9 [5.31-15.3], P < 0.001), high white blood cell count at presentation (HR: 2.5 [1.4-4.4], P = 0.001), and early decompensation (HR: 6.2 [3.6-10.6], P < 0.001) predicted poor survival. DISCUSSION: Despite a high incidence of further decompensation, 5-year survival of patients at this stage of cirrhosis is more than 80% across all etiologies in the absence of early further decompensation and active alcohol consumption.

Prevalence and Clinical Features of Portopulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Echocardiographic Study.

Objective The present study was conducted to delineate the prevalence and clinical features of portopulmonary hypertension in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Possible associations between echocardiographic variables and portopulmonary hypertension were also explored. Methods A prospective, observational study was conducted between September 2017 and August 2018. Differences in demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic findings in cirrhosis patients with and without portopulmonary hypertension were compared. Results The prevalence of portopulmonary hypertension in patients with hepatic cirrhosis was found to be 9.3%. Hemoglobin was significantly lower among patients with portopulmonary hypertension compared to those without portopulmonary hypertension (5.50±0.68 g/dl vs. 7.26±1.43 g/dl, p=0.001). All patients with portopulmonary hypertension displayed right atrial (major: p=0.0001 and minor: p=0.001) and right ventricular (basal, p=0.0001; longitudinal, p=0.0001) dilation. Several variables such as right ventricular systolic pressure (p=0.0001), pulmonary artery diameter (major: p=0.0001; right: p=0.0001; and left: p=0.007), pulmonary vascular resistance (p=0.0001), tricuspid regurgitation (p=0.0001), pulmonary regurgitation peak pressure gradient (p=0.0001), pulmonary regurgitation end diastolic gradient (p=0.0001), left atrial dimension (major axis: p=0.002), left atrial volume (p=0.04), left ventricular outflow tract (p=0.001), inferior vena cava diameter (p=0.001), and inferior vena cava collapsibility (p=0.001) were higher in patients with portopulmonary hypertension compared to patients without portopulmonary hypertension. Conclusions The present study revealed a 9.3% prevalence of portopulmonary hypertension among patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Patients with portopulmonary hypertension displayed significantly lower haemoglobin levels, right and left ventricular dilation, and higher values of several echocardiographic variables as compared to those without portopulmonary hypertension.

Virus related acute pancreatitis and virus superinfection in the 'Dual disease' model of acute pancreatitis and SARS-Co-V2 infection: A multicentre prospective study.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 can cause acute pancreatitis (AP) and SARS-CoV-2 superinfection can occur in patients with AP during prolonged hospitalisation. Our objective was to characterize SARS-CoV-2 related AP and study the impact of SARS-CoV-2 superinfection on outcomes in AP. METHODS: In this multicentre prospective study, all patients with AP and SARS-CoV-2 infection between August 2020 and February 2021 were divided into two groups: SARS-CoV-2-related AP and superadded SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with AP. The two groups were compared with each other and the whole cohort was compared with a non-COVID AP cohort. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with SARS-CoV-2 and AP (SARS-CoV-2-related AP; n = 18 and AP with SARS-CoV-2 superadded infection; n = 67) were included during the study period. They had a higher mortality [28 (32.9%) vs. 44 (19.1%), aOR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5-5.3)] than 230 propensity matched non-COVID AP patients. Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 and AP patients was due to critical COVID. SARS-CoV-2-related- AP (n = 18) had a higher but statistically insignificant mortality than SARS-CoV-2 superinfection in AP [8/18 (44.4%) vs 20/67 (29.8%), p = 0.24]. On multivariable analysis, infection with SARS-CoV-2 (aHR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.43.7) was a predictor of in-hospital mortality in addition to organ failure (OF) in patients with AP. CONCLUSION: Patients with AP and SARS-CoV-2 infection had a higher mortality than matched non-COVID AP patients which was largely attributable to the severity of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 related AP had higher OF and in-hospital mortality.