Same-day trial of void and discharge following standard vs. MOSESTM holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes and to assess the safety and feasibility of same-day trial of void (TOV) in patients who underwent standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) vs. MOSESTM HoLEP (MoLEP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent HoLEP (100 W) or MoLEP (120 W) with same-day catheter removal three hours postoperatively at our institution from August 2018 to September 2021. Patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Data were compared as means with standard deviation and medians with interquartile range (IQR) or numbers and percentages. Continuous and categorical variables were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared test, respectively. Predictors of shorter enucleation time and failed same-day TOV were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients included, 28 underwent HoLEP while 62 had MoLEP. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the successful TOV (23 [82%] vs. 58 [93.5%], p=0.1) and readmission rate (3 [10.7%] vs. 1 [1.6%], p=0.08); however, the MoLEP group had a significantly shorter mean enucleation time (p<0.001), mean hemostasis time (p<0.001), mean morcellation time (p=0.003), and lower mean energy used (p<0.001). On the logistic regression model, MoLEP (odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.007-0.19, p<0.001), lower preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p=0.03), and smaller prostate size (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p<0.001) were independent predictors of shorter enucleation time. History of preoperative retention was the only significant factor associated with a failed same-day TOV (p=0.04). There was no difference in intraoperative or postoperative complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes between the two technologies. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day TOV and discharge are feasible following standard HoLEP and MoLEP, with comparable outcomes; however, the use of MOSESTM technology offered better enucleation efficiency with excellent hemostatic potential. Preoperative retention was the only predictor of failed same-day TOV.

Health Care Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Countrywide Survey in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept; it is increasingly being integrated into health care. As studies on attitudes toward AI have primarily focused on physicians, there is a need to assess the perspectives of students across health care disciplines to inform future curriculum development. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore and identify gaps in the knowledge that Canadian health care students have regarding AI, capture how health care students in different fields differ in their knowledge and perspectives on AI, and present student-identified ways that AI literacy may be incorporated into the health care curriculum. METHODS: The survey was developed from a narrative literature review of topics in attitudinal surveys on AI. The final survey comprised 15 items, including multiple-choice questions, pick-group-rank questions, 11-point Likert scale items, slider scale questions, and narrative questions. We used snowball and convenience sampling methods by distributing an email with a description and a link to the web-based survey to representatives from 18 Canadian schools. RESULTS: A total of 2167 students across 10 different health professions from 18 universities across Canada responded to the survey. Overall, 78.77% (1707/2167) predicted that AI technology would affect their careers within the coming decade and 74.5% (1595/2167) reported a positive outlook toward the emerging role of AI in their respective fields. Attitudes toward AI varied by discipline. Students, even those opposed to AI, identified the need to incorporate a basic understanding of AI into their curricula. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a nationwide survey of health care students across 10 different health professions in Canada. The findings would inform student-identified topics within AI and their preferred delivery formats, which would advance education across different health care professions.

Patient-prosthesis mismatch and surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes: Retrospective analysis of single-center surgical data.

BACKGROUND: Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) has been identified as a risk factor for mortality and reoperation in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We present a retrospective analysis of risk factors for PPM and the effects of PPM on early postoperative outcomes after SAVR. METHODS: Chart review was conducted for patients (N = 3003) undergoing SAVR. PPM was calculated from valve reference orifice areas and patient body surface area. Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for PPM and develop a risk score from these results. Regression was also conducted to identify associations between projected PPM status and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Risk factors for PPM included female sex, higher body mass index (BMI), and use of the St. Jude Epic valve. Patients receiving St. Jude trifecta valves or mechanical valves were less likely to have predicted PPM. We developed a risk score using BMI, sex, and valve type, and retrospectively predicted PPM in our cohort. Mild PPM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.267), severe PPM (OR = 2.869), male sex (OR = 2.091), and younger age (OR = 0.940) were all predictors of SAVR reoperation, while aortic root replacement was associated with reduced reoperation rates (OR = 0.122). Severe PPM carried a risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 3.599), and moderate PPM carried a smaller but significant risk (OR = 1.920). Other factors increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality included older age, renal failure, and diabetes. CONCLUSION: PPM could be retrospectively predicted in our cohort using a risk calculation from sex, BMI and valve type. We conclude that all degrees of PPM carry risk for mortality and reoperation.

Prolactin and androgen R1881 induce pro-survival carboxypeptidase-D and EDD E3 ligase in triple-negative and HER2+ breast cancer.

Plasma membrane carboxypeptidase-D (CPD) hydrolyzes C-terminal arginine (Arg) from extracellular substrates, and Arg is converted into nitric oxide (NO) in the cell. CPD is upregulated by prolactin (PRL) and androgens in breast cancer (BCa) cells, increasing NO production to promote cell survival. EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase, upregulated by PRL/androgens, is implicated in TORC1 signaling. This study investigated CPD and EDD in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2+ BCa. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a negative correlation between CPD or EDD mRNA expression in TNBC patients and relapse-free survival. Immunohistochemistry showed that benign and malignant breast tissues stained abundantly for the PRL receptor (PRLR) and androgen receptor (AR). CPD and EDD staining were elevated in TNBC and HER2+ tumors as compared to benign tissues. In TNBC/HER2+ cell lines, CPD and EDD protein expression were upregulated by PRL or synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881) at 3-6 h. PRL/R1881-induced CPD in TNBC and HER2+ cells increased intracellular NO production, which was abolished by PRLR antagonist ∆1-9-G129R-hPRL and AR antagonist flutamide. In turn, treatment with NO increased viability and decreased apoptosis in Arg-deprived TNBC cells. Cell viability and apoptosis were also affected in HER2+ cells with CPD knockdown. Lastly, EDD knockdown decreased PRL/R1881-induced phosphorylation of initiation factor 4E binding protein-1 and decreased 4E release in TNBC cells. In summary, PRL/R1881-induced CPD promotes TNBC/HER2+ cell survival through production of NO, and EDD promotes TNBC cell survival by TORC1 activation. This study implicates CPD and EDD as useful therapeutic targets for TNBC/HER2+ tumors, and suggests that PRLR and AR blockade are also beneficial to these patients.