RESUMO
Introduction Generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) is defined as an increased range of motion across multiple joints in an individual beyond the mean range of motion in the general population, with a reported prevalence between 5% and 15%. It becomes less common with age and is more common in females and in the lower limbs. Musculoskeletal injury (MSI) is damage to musculoskeletal systems, usually due to strenuous activity. There is conflicting literature regarding whether the risk of MSI during strenuous activity is higher in individuals with GLL and a dearth of evidence from the Indian subcontinent regarding GLL. This study determines if GLL predisposes to musculoskeletal injuries among patients. Materials and methods One hundred eighty patients each were selected as cases and controls after obtaining informed consent, a Beighton score assessment, and a questionnaire regarding injury-filled in all participants with GLL. Result Thirty-three participants (18.33%) in the case group and 16 participants (8.89%) in the control group were found to have GLL. An odds ratio of 2.30 (using a 2x2 RC table) was calculated between participants with GLL among the cases and controls with a Beighton score of 4/9, and a significantly higher mean Beighton score (p=0.018) was found among participants presenting with MSI (cases) than participants without MSI (controls). Discussion The study found that there was a significant prevalence of GLL in the adult population, especially in females compared to males. The younger age group was also comparatively much more involved. It also proved that GLL was more common in patients with MSI and that hyper-mobile people had a twofold chance of injury compared to the general population. The joints of the lower limb were more frequently involved, probably the weight-bearing joints, the most common being the ankle and knee. People with GLL also had higher chances of repeating injuries. Conclusion This study has implications for the prevention of injuries in people with GLL. Screening such individuals to identify those with GLL using the Beighton score could be beneficial. Though orthopedic surgeons primarily manage people with MSI, they rarely identify individuals with GLL, and making a diagnosis regarding the same definitely helps these individuals live pain-free lives.
RESUMO
Background: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are common in the active population of the Armed Forces. Symptomatic instability prompts individuals to seek a cure or a sheltered appointment. Despite the increasing numbers of ACL reconstructions performed, the outcomes have not been so spectacular with only a meager percentage of our patients returning to preinjury levels of activity. With the premise that an all-inside ACL reconstruction is likely to result in better functional outcomes, the aim of this study was to compare the short-term functional outcomes of a large consecutive series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using the translateral all-inside ACL reconstruction technique (AI) and standard anteromedial portal technique (AM) with a minimum follow-up of one year. Methods: A total of 240 patients with isolated ACL tear underwent ACL reconstruction via the AI or AM technique. Their preoperative and postoperative scores were compared to look for any significant differences in functional outcomes. Results: The two groups were matched for age, BMI, mechanism of injury, and interval from injury to surgery. There was no difference in their preoperative scores. Postoperatively, although there were significant improvements across both groups, there was no significant difference between the groups at any point of time. Conclusion: The AI technique has garnered interest in recent literature in addressing ACL injuries. This study found no discernible benefit of the AI technique when compared to the AM technique in terms of functionality following an ACL reconstruction at any point of time up to 1 year following surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder dislocation and anterior instability are most commonly attributed to pathology of the capsulolabral complex with the presence of bony loss at the humeral and glenoid surfaces. Unassessed bone loss has been a cause of failure of primary soft tissue procedures or recurrence of symptoms, despite adequate address of soft tissue pathology. PURPOSE: To study the anthropometric and radiologic dimensions of the coracoid in relation to glenoid bone loss, its adequacy in filling glenoid defects in an Indian population, and whether the choice of surgical technique (congruent arc vs classical) and graft positioning alters the surgical results. This study also intended to establish whether computed tomography measurements correlate with actual anthropometric measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 64 participants with 108 healthy shoulders were included in this study. Additionally, 100 skeletally mature bone specimens of the scapula were measured to assess glenoid diameter as well as coracoid width and length in 2 perpendicular planes with a humeral subtraction 3-dimensional en face glenoid view. RESULTS: Specimen and participant measurements proved that the congruent arc technique was able to fill up to 50% more glenoid bone loss than the classical technique in an Indian population (mean ± SD, 13.45 ± 6.97 vs 7.96 ± 4.89 mm, respectively), with computed tomography being the best and most accurate modality to study it. The mean difference in the bone block length restoration of the glenoid bony arc was 5.41 ± 2.08 mm. Radii of curvature were congruent in populations of the Indian subcontinent. CONCLUSION: The congruent arc technique can be performed in an Indian population but with caution and careful presurgical assessment of bone loss. However, adequate coracoid dimension to accommodate the implant for fixation without failure must be ensured, as anthropometry suggests the existence of a subset of the population in whom the graft may have compromised width for accommodating standard implants for fixation.