RESUMO
Objetivo: Analizar si la fragilidad puede mejorar la predicción de mortalidad en los pacientes ingresados en UCI tras una cirugía digestiva. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo, observacional y con seguimiento a 6 meses de una cohorte de pacientes que ingresaron en UCI entre el 1 de junio de 2018 hasta el 1 de junio de 2019. Ámbito: UCI quirúrgica de un hospital de tercer nivel. Pacientes: Serie de pacientes sucesivos mayores de 70 años que ingresaron en UCI inmediatamente después de una intervención quirúrgica sobre el aparato digestivo. Fueron incluidos 92 pacientes y se excluyeron 2 por pérdida de seguimiento a los 6 meses. Intervenciones: Al ingreso en UCI se estimó gravedad y pronóstico mediante el APACHE II, y fragilidad mediante la Clinical Frailty Scale y el modified Frailty Index. Variables de interés principales: Mortalidad en UCI, intrahospitalaria y a los 6 meses. Resultados: El modelo que mejor predice mortalidad en UCI es el APACHE II, con un área bajo la curva ROC (ABC) de 0,89 y una buena calibración. El modelo que combina APACHE II y Clinical Frailty Scale es el que mejor predice mortalidad intrahospitalaria (ABC: 0,82), mejorando significativamente la predicción del APACHE II aislado (ABC: 0,78; Integrated Discrimination Index: 0,04). La fragilidad es un factor predictor de mortalidad a los 6 meses, siendo el modelo que combina la Clinical Frailty Scale y el modified Frailty Index el que ha demostrado mayor discriminación (ABC: 0,84). Conclusiones: La fragilidad puede complementar al APACHE II mejorando su predicción de mortalidad hospitalaria. Además, ofrece una buena predicción de la mortalidad a los 6 meses de la cirugía. Para la mortalidad en UCI, la fragilidad pierde su poder de predicción mientras que el APACHE II aislado muestra una excelente capacidad predictiva (AU)
Objective: To analyze whether frailty can improve the prediction of mortality in patients admitted to the ICU after digestive surgery. Design: Prospective, observational, 6-month follow-up study of a cohort of patients admitted to the ICU between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019. Setting: Surgical ICU of a third level hospital. Patients: Series of successive patients older than 70 years who were admitted to the ICU immediately after a surgical intervention on the digestive system. 92 patients were included and 2 were excluded due to loss of follow-up at 6 months. Interventions: Upon admission to the ICU, severity and prognosis were assessed by APACHE II, and fragility by the Clinical Frailty Scale and the modified Frailty Index. Main variables of interest: ICU, in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Results: The model that best predicts mortality in the ICU is the APACHE II, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 and a good calibration. The model that combines APACHE II and Clinical Frailty Scale is the one that best predicts in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.82), significantly improving the prediction of isolated APACHE II (AUC: 0.78; Integrated Discrimination Index: 0.04). Frailty is a predictor of mortality at 6 months, being the model that combines Clinical Frailty Scale and Frailty Index the one that has shown the greatest discrimination (AUC: 0.84). Conclusions: Frailty can complement APACHE II by improving its prediction of hospital mortality. Furthermore, it offers a good prediction of mortality 6 months after surgery. For mortality in ICU, frailty loses its predictive power, whereas isolated APACHE II shows excellent predictive capacity (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade , APACHE , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether frailty can improve the prediction of mortality in patients admitted to the ICU after digestive surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, 6-month follow-up study of a cohort of patients admitted to the ICU between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019. SETTING: Surgical ICU of a third level hospital. PATIENTS: Series of successive patients older than 70 years who were admitted to the ICU immediately after a surgical intervention on the digestive system. 92 patients were included and 2 were excluded due to loss of follow-up at 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Upon admission to the ICU, severity and prognosis were assessed by APACHE II, and fragility by the Clinical Frailty Scale and the modified Frailty Index. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: ICU, in-hospital and 6-month mortality. RESULTS: The model that best predicts mortality in the ICU is the APACHE II, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 and a good calibration. The model that combines APACHE II and Clinical Frailty Scale is the one that best predicts in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.82), significantly improving the prediction of isolated APACHE II (AUC: 0.78; Integrated Discrimination Index: 0.04). Frailty is a predictor of mortality at 6 months, being the model that combines Clinical Frailty Scale and Frailty Index the one that has shown the greatest discrimination (AUC: 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty can complement APACHE II by improving its prediction of hospital mortality. Furthermore, it offers a good prediction of mortality 6 months after surgery. For mortality in ICU, frailty loses its predictive power, whereas isolated APACHE II shows excellent predictive capacity.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , APACHE , Idoso , Seguimentos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether frailty can improve the prediction of mortality in patients admitted to the ICU after digestive surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, 6-month follow-up study of a cohort of patients admitted to the ICU between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019. SETTING: Surgical ICU of a third level hospital. PATIENTS: Series of successive patients older than 70 years who were admitted to the ICU immediately after a surgical intervention on the digestive system. 92 patients were included and 2 were excluded due to loss of follow-up at 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Upon admission to the ICU, severity and prognosis were assessed by APACHE II, and fragility by the Clinical Frailty Scale and the modified Frailty Index. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: ICU, in-hospital and 6-month mortality. RESULTS: The model that best predicts mortality in the ICU is the APACHE II, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 and a good calibration. The model that combines APACHE II and Clinical Frailty Scale is the one that best predicts in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.82), significantly improving the prediction of isolated APACHE II (AUC: 0.78; Integrated Discrimination Index: 0.04). Frailty is a predictor of mortality at 6 months, being the model that combines Clinical Frailty Scale and Frailty Index the one that has shown the greatest discrimination (AUC: 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty can complement APACHE II by improving its prediction of hospital mortality. Furthermore, it offers a good prediction of mortality 6 months after surgery. For mortality in ICU, frailty loses its predictive power, whereas isolated APACHE II shows excellent predictive capacity.
RESUMO
TITLE: Sindrome de Lance-Adams tras endocarditis infecciosa.
Assuntos
Ataxia Cerebelar/etiologia , Endocardite/complicações , Mioclonia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SíndromeRESUMO
El estreptococo B hemolítico del grupo A es una bacteria aerobia Gram +, que puede producir una gran variedad de síndromes infecciosos en el puerperio. Hasta un tercio de las infecciones se complicará con un shock tóxico estafilocócico, caracterizado por shock y disfunción multiorgánica. Cultivos, diagnóstico y tratamiento precoces son vitales para el buen pronóstico. Presentamos el caso de una paciente puerperal con un síndrome de shock tóxico estreptocócico, complicado con una isquemia mesentérica masiva, donde tratamiento antibiótico y cirugía precoz fueron claves para la evolución
B hemolytic group A streptococcus is an aerobic Gram-positive bacteria that can produce a wide variety of infectious syndromes in the puerperium. Up to one-third of infections will be complicated by streptococcal toxic shock, characterized by shock and multiorgan dysfunction. Early cultures, diagnosis and treatment are vital to good prognosis. We present the case of a puerperal patient with streptococcal toxic shock, complicated by massive mesenteric ischemia, in whom antibiotic treatment and early surgery were the key to outcome
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Isquemia Mesentérica/metabolismo , Isquemia Mesentérica/patologia , Infecções do Sistema Genital/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/metabolismo , Infecções Estreptocócicas/virologia , Colite Isquêmica/metabolismo , Colite Isquêmica/patologia , Erisipela/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/complicações , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Infecções do Sistema Genital/metabolismo , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Colite Isquêmica/complicações , Colite Isquêmica/enzimologia , Erisipela/classificaçãoRESUMO
No disponible
