Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Surg Res ; 32(5): 261-6, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11111169

RESUMO

Laparoscopic influence on cell-mediated immunity and tumour evolution is controversial. The objective of the present study was to assess tumour growth and immune patterns after laparoscopy on an experimental study. Lewis rats, bearing an intrapancreatic ductal carcinoma randomly underwent one of the following 2-hour procedures: anaesthesia, laparotomy or CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. Cell-mediated immunity was investigated through determination of serum IL1beta concentrations by ELISA and TNFalpha, IL6 and iNOS gene transcriptions in blood white cells and peritoneal cells by RT-PCR 1 day after operation. Tumour growth and spread patterns were assessed on anatomopathological examination 2 weeks after surgery. Tumour growth and spread were unaffected no matter what procedure was applied, but port-site seeding occurred in half of the cases undergoing laparoscopy. No significant change in acute-phase protein response, represented by IL1beta serum concentration, was found after laparoscopy. TNFalpha, IL6 and inducible NO synthase gene transcriptions were enhanced in blood white cells and depressed in peritoneal immune cells after laparoscopy. In our experimental conditions, cell-mediated immune response to CO(2) pneumoperitoneum seems to be a good systemic immune activation and a less acute peritoneal immune response as opposed to control laparoscopy. This early impairment of peritoneal macrophage immune activity, observed after a long-lasting CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, might be responsible for the high rate of port site recurrence.


Assuntos
Imunidade Celular , Laparoscopia , Animais , Interleucina-1/sangue , Interleucina-6/genética , Neoplasias Experimentais/imunologia , Neoplasias Experimentais/cirurgia , Óxido Nítrico Sintase/genética , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II , Concentração Osmolar , Ductos Pancreáticos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/imunologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos Lew , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Transcrição Gênica , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/genética
2.
Am J Surg ; 176(4): 370-2, 1998 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The possibility of performing minimally invasive exploration of the abdomen could avoid unnecessary appendectomies. Micro-optics and instruments of 2 mm in diameter allow this type of exploration, but the feasibility and the accuracy of the diagnosis resulting from this method have not been evaluated. METHODS: A prospective study of 36 patients (11 men and 25 women) operated on for acute right iliac fossa pain was carried out. The abdomen was explored with a 2 mm optic and with a 10 mm optic in order to characterize the aspect of the appendix. The results were compared with the postoperative pathologic findings of the appendix. RESULTS: The micro-optic procedure failed in 3 patients. The appendix was visualized in 26 patients: in 18 patients through the needle-optic alone, 8 patients requiring additional instruments. The appendix was visualized in all cases with the 10 mm optic. Appendectomy was performed in 34 patients: with microinstruments in 6, with 5 mm instruments in 26, and through a MacBurney incision in 2. The appendix was not removed in 2 patients. A correct diagnosis was made by microlaparoscopy and confirmed by the pathology in 21 patients (58%), made and confirmed in 32 patients with a 10 mm optic (89%). Minor complications included a cecal wall insufflation in 1 patient and a peroperative hemorrhage on a 2 mm port site in another with an uneventful postoperative course. One postoperative parietal hematoma required reoperating removal. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The low quality of the image obtained with microlaparoscopy does not permit safely evaluating the aspect of the appendix in case of acute right iliac pain. This method is not recommended for routine abdominal exploration.


Assuntos
Abdome Agudo/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apêndice/patologia , Laparoscopia , Abdome Agudo/etiologia , Abdome Agudo/cirurgia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/etiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...