RESUMO
Background: Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition of the optic nerve. ON is associated with development of demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). CNS lesions visualized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the finding of oligoclonal IgG bands (OB) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are used to stratify the risk of MS after a "first" episode of ON. However, the diagnosis of ON in absence of typical clinical manifestations can be challenging. Methods and Materials: Here we present three cases with changes in the optic nerve and ganglion cell layer in the retina over the disease course. (1) A 34-year-old female with a history of migraine and hypertension had suspect amaurosis fugax (transient vision loss) in the right eye. This patient developed MS four years later. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed dynamic changes of the thickness of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) over time. (2) A 29-year-old male with spastic hemiparesis and lesions in the spinal cord and brainstem. Six years later he showed bilateral subclinical ON identified using OCT, visual evoked potentials (VEP) and MRI. The patient fulfilled diagnosis criteria of seronegative neuromyelitis optica (NMO). (3) A 23-year-old female with overweight and headache had bilateral optic disc swelling. With OCT and lumbar puncture, idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) was excluded. Further investigation showed positive antibody for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). Conclusions: These three cases illustrate the importance of using OCT to facilitate quick, objective and accurate diagnosis of atypical or subclinical ON, and thus proper therapy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if melatonin is equally efficient as partial sleep deprivation in inducing sleep without interfering with epileptiform discharges in EEG recordings in children 1-16 years old. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 129 EEGs recorded after melatonin intake and 113 EEGs recorded after partial sleep deprivation. Comparisons were made concerning occurrence of epileptiform discharges, the number of children who fell asleep and the technical quality of EEG recordings. Comparison between different age groups was also made. RESULTS: No significant differences were found regarding occurrence of epileptiform discharges (33% after melatonin intake, 36% after sleep deprivation), or proportion of unsuccessful EEGs (8% and 10%, respectively). Melatonin and sleep deprivation were equally efficient in inducing sleep (70% in both groups). Significantly more children aged 1-4 years obtained sleep after melatonin intake in comparison to sleep deprivation (82% vs. 58%, p⩽0.01), and in comparison to older children with melatonin induced sleep (58-67%, p⩽0.05). Sleep deprived children 9-12 years old had higher percentage of epileptiform discharges (62%, p⩽0.05) compared to younger sleep deprived children. CONCLUSION: Melatonin is equally efficient as partial sleep deprivation to induce sleep and does not affect the occurrence of epileptiform discharges in the EEG recording. Sleep deprivation could still be preferable in older children as melatonin probably has less sleep inducing effect. SIGNIFICANCE: Melatonin induced sleep have advantages, especially in younger children as they fall asleep easier than after sleep deprivation. The procedure is easier for the parents than keeping a young child awake for half the night.
