Unmasking the Mimic: Radionecrotic Lesion Masquerading as Brain Neoplasia on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Corpus callosotomy is a therapeutic approach for drug-resistant epilepsy, with positive outcomes observed in managing atonic seizures. Despite a decline in its usage, radiosurgical callosotomy remains a viable option for drug-resistant epilepsy due to its low risks of post-radiation neoplasia, albeit not with exceptions. Brain radionecrosis is characterized by tissue death and vascular endothelial damage following the procedure. Despite the low risk of intracranial secondary malignancy associated with radiation in some cases, post-radiation lesions might present with distinct characteristics needing a thorough diagnostic approach. Herein, we present a unique case of a patient with focal epilepsy who developed a radionecrotic lesion following radiosurgical callosotomy, affecting the anterior cingulate cortex, and mimicking a central nervous system (CNS) tumor. Molecular imaging techniques, including 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18-FDG PET/CT) and 11C-acetate PET/CT scans, were employed to differentiate the lesion from a tumor. This case underscores the importance of considering radionecrosis as a differential diagnosis in patients who undergo radiosurgical callosotomy presenting with ring-like enhancement lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Comparison of microvascular decompression, percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy, and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A long term quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular decompression (MVD), radiofrequency rhizotomy (RFR), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are surgical techniques frequently used in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TN), although the results reported for each of these are diverse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare long-term pain control obtained by MVD, SRS, and RFR in patients with idiopathic TN. METHODS: To compare the results obtained by MVD, SRS, and RFR we chose a quasi-experimental, ambispective design with control groups but no pretest. A total of 52 participants (MVD n = 33, RFR n = 10, SRS n = 9) were included. Using standardized outcome measures, pain intensity, pain relief, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment were assessed by an independent investigator. The TREND statement for reporting non-randomized evaluations was applied. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at the initial postoperative period and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: MVD has shown better results in pain scales compared to ablative procedures. Significant differences between groups were found regarding pain intensity and pain relief at the initial postoperative period (p < 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.022), 1 year (p < 0.001), 2 years (p = 0.002), and 3 years (p = 0.004) after the intervention. Those differences exceeded the thresholds of the minimal clinically important difference. A higher percentage of patients free of pain was observed in the group of patients treated by MVD, with significant differences at the initial postoperative period (p < 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.02), 1 year (p = 0.001), and 2 years (p = 0.04) after the procedure. Also, a higher risk of pain recurrence was observed in the RFR and SRS groups (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.33-7.46; p = 0.009; and HR 4.26, 95% CI 1.77-10.2; p = 0.001, respectively) compared to the MVD group. No significant differences were found in terms of quality of life and satisfaction with treatment. A higher incidence of complications was observed in the MVD group. CONCLUSION: Concerning pain control and risk of pain recurrence, MVD is superior to RFR and SRS, but not in terms of quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, and safety profile.

Relative cerebral blood volume as response predictor in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma with anti-angiogenic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is one of the most common brain tumors in adult populations, usually carrying a poor prognosis. While several studies have researched the impact of anti-angiogenic therapies, especially anti-VEFG treatments in glioblastoma, few have attempted to assess its progress using imaging studies. PURPOSE: We attempted to analyze whether relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI (DSC-MRI) could predict response in patients with glioblastoma undergoing Bevacizumab (BVZ) treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving anti-angiogenic therapy with BVZ between 2012 and 2017 in our institution. Patients were scheduled for routine MRIs at baseline and first-month follow-up visits. Studies were processed for DSC-MRI, cT1, and FLAIR images, from which relative cerebral blood volume measurements were obtained. We assessed patient response using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group criteria and overall survival. RESULTS: 40 patients were included in the study and were classified as Bevacizumab responders and non-responders. The average rCBV before treatment was 4.5 for both groups, and average rCBV was 2.5 for responders and 5.4 for non-responders. ROC curve set a cutoff point of 3.7 for rCBV predictive of response to BVZ. Cox Multivariate analysis only showed rCBV as a predictive factor of OS. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant difference was found in rCBV between patients who responded and those who did not respond to BVZ treatment. rCBV may be a low-cost and effective marker to assess response to Bevacizumab treatment in GBM.

Assessing the Malignancy Risk of a Meningioma by Its Location.

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas represent 30% of primary intracranial tumors. The current incidence is up to 4.5 cases per 100,000 habitants worldwide. Although there is no prognostic difference among benign histopathological subtypes, atypical meningiomas and malignant meningiomas (WHO grade II and III respectively) may extend to the adjacent brain parenchyma, dura mater, and osseous tissue with a recurrence score (21-49%). This manuscript analyzes the malignancy risk according to neoplastic localization through a logistic retrospective analysis from a total sample of 452 patients with grade I, II, and III (WHO) meningiomas. METHODS: Detailed data collection through a three-year retrospective analysis (January 2008 to December 2011) was applied at Mexico's National Neurology and Neurosurgery Institute including patients with intracranial or spinal-cord meningioma, preoperative imaging study availability and post-surgical histopathological diagnosis. Formal written consent was not required with a waiver by the appropriate national research ethics committee in accordance with the provisions of the regulations of the general health law of Mexico. RESULTS: Convexity lesions displayed an increased risk of malignancy turning for non-benign meningiomas with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.7, p=0.0002) meanwhile skull-base meningiomas present an inverse risk with an odds ratio of 0.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.9, p=0.02), as well as spinal-cord meningiomas with an odds ratio of 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.9). CONCLUSION: Skull base and spinal cord meningiomas usually have benign behavior, meanwhile grade II or III meningiomas within this location are rare. The present work provides an additional criterion for decision making, according to the meningioma's location.

The Thalamic Arteriovenous Malformations Have Better Prognosis than Basal Ganglia Malformations Regarding Obliteration: Prognostic Factors Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare vascular congenital lesions that affect mainly patients during their productive years of life. In order to obtain a better quality of life for patients with this disease, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. Radiosurgery is one of the treatment modalities available for AVMs, but many factors may influence the effectiveness of this strategy. Classically, it has been said that deep-seated lesions have a particular behavior compared with AVMs in other regions, but a differentiation between thalamic lesions and those located in the basal ganglia has not been made. METHODS: Institutional records for central core AVMs treated with radiosurgery between January 2004 and January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Brainstem lesions were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients with deep-seated AVMs were included. Forty-three (87.8%) were located in the thalamus and 6 (12.2%) in the area of basal ganglia. The nidus mean volume was 4.1 cm3 (SD: 4.1), the maximum diameter mean was of 19.5 mm (SD: 8.0). The prescription dose was 18.2 Gy (SD: 2.1), and the follow-up time was 75.8 months (SD: 32.5). There was a greater obliteration rate in thalamic AVMs compared with those located in the basal ganglia: 81.4% versus 33.3% (P = 0.026), respectively. There was no association between categorical variables and obliteration rate. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery is a good option for patients with thalamic and basal ganglia AVMs, but a multidisciplinary approach to decision-making is mandatory in order to achieve the best results.

Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery of Grade I Intracranial Meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the local control rate and complication rate in the treatment of grade I intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients with grade I meningioma who received radiosurgery with a dedicated linear accelerator from January 2002 to August 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and progression-free survival analysis through a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with 78 grade I meningiomas received radiosurgery, 39 underwent surgery plus adjuvant radiosurgery, and 36 only radiosurgery. The follow-up median time was 68 months (range, 35-120 months). The tumor control rate was 93%, the 5-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% confidence interval, 77%-98%). Acute toxicity was 2.6%, and grade 1-2 late toxicity was 26.6%. Postradiosurgery edema was the main late morbidity. Age >55 years was the only significant factor for attaining a response >75%. The background of surgery before radiosurgery was the only significant prognostic factor for showing edema (odds ratio 5.78 [95% confidence interval, 2.14-15.64]). CONCLUSIONS: The local control rate attained in our series is similar to that reported in other series worldwide; the acute toxicity rate was low and late toxicity was moderate.

Intracranial arteriovenous malformations treated with LINAC-based conformal radiosurgery: validation of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score as a predictor of outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score (RBAS) as a predictor of outcome in patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with LINAC-based conformal radiosurgery. METHODS: We analysed 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 22 months. One patient (2.5%) pertained to Spetzler-Martin Grade I, 11 (27.5%) to Grade II, 19 (47.5%) to Grade III, eight (20%) to Grade IV and one (2.5%) to grade V. The mean RBAS was 2.0 (range: 0.76-5.56). The mean obliteration prediction index (OPI) and the Karlsson index (KI) were 0.74 (range: 0.2-2.86) and 109.48 (range: 3.0-350.7) respectively. Outcomes were analysed according to the OPI, KI and RBAS. RESULTS: We analysed different cutoff points in the RBAS and found a significant difference to predict the outcome in four scores: 1.2, 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8. In the group with RBAS < or = 1.8, 13 (68%) had an excellent outcome and six (33%) did not, while with RBAS>1.8, seven (32%) had an excellent outcome and 14 (67%) did not (p = 0.02). We did not find any correlation between Spetzler-Martin grading scale or OPI and outcome (p = 0.7 and p = 0.3 respectively). The KI predicted the excellent outcome in 8/9 patients (89%) with KI < or = 27 and in 12/31 patients (39%) with KI>27 (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The RBAS seems to be a good predictor of outcome in patients with AVMs treated with LINAC-based conformal radiosurgery as in patients treated with Gamma Knife. It remains only to find the best cutoff point based on a larger series and longer follow-up.