Body mass index has no impact on sperm quality but on reproductive hormones levels.

The influence of overweight and obesity on sperm quality and reproductive hormone levels is under discussion. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on sperm quality and reproductive hormones. We analysed semen samples and serum levels of FSH, LH, T and PRL of a total of 2110 men attending our andrology unit from 1994 to 2010 due to infertility work-up. Patients were stratified according to their BMI in four groups. Main outcome measures were sperm motility, morphology and concentration. Serum levels of FSH, LH, T and PRL were evaluated as well. No statistically significant difference was found for sperm quality and BMI between patients categorised according to the four BMI levels. T (P < 0.001) and LH (P = 0.006) significantly differed between the four groups. In multivariable analysis, BMI did not have significantly independent influence on all assessed sperm quality parameters, whereas BMI significantly influenced hormone values for LH (P = 0.001), T (P = <0.001) and PRL (P = 0.044). We therefore conclude that BMI has no significant impact on sperm quality parameters. However, serum levels of LH, T and PRL were significantly influenced by BMI.

Impact of cell phone use on men's semen parameters.

The objective of the present retrospective study was to report our experience concerning the effects of cell phone usage on semen parameters. We examined 2110 men attending our infertility clinic from 1993 to October 2007. Semen analysis was performed in all patients. Serum free testosterone (T), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL) were collected from all patients. The information on cell phone use of the patients was recorded and the subjects were divided into two groups according to their cell phone use: group A: cell phone use (n = 991); group B: no use (n = 1119). Significant difference was observed in sperm morphology between the two groups. In the patients of group A, 68.0% of the spermatozoa featured a pathological morphology compared to only 58.1% in the subjects of group B. Patients with cell phone usage showed significantly higher T and lower LH levels than those who did not use cell phone. No significant difference between the two groups was observed regarding FSH and PRL values. Our results showed that cell phone use negatively affects sperm quality in men. Further studies with a careful design are needed to determine the effect of cell phone use on male fertility.