[Surgical Replacement of Descending Aorta for Adult Aortic Coarctation by Using Three-dimensional Computer Graphics Reconstruction].

Aortic coarctation is diagnosed in approximately 5% of adult patients with congenital heart disease and is commonly diagnosed through the close examination of hypertension. Various surgical strategies for adult coarctation have been recently reported. Generally, aortic replacement may require blood transfusion in case of injury of the well-developed collateral vessels. Therefore, in order to secure an operative safety, we preoperatively used a medical image viewer to identify the abnormal vessels by three-dimensional computer graphics (3DCG) reconstruction. A 34-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital with hypertension and low ankle-brachial pressure index( ABI). Chest computed tomography( CT) scan showed aortic coarctation and development of abnormal collateral vessels. Descending aorta was replaced via a left third-fourth intercostal thoracotomy under partial extracorporeal circulation. As the image viewer depicted, anatomical abnormality of the collateral vessels was identified precisely, and surgically treated without any injury. The patient was discharged 10 days postoperatively without transfusion and with a normalized ABI.

Impact of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcomes in heart transplantation with higher risk donor heart.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on outcomes in heart transplantation with higher risk donor hearts (HRDHs). METHODS: Patients transplanted in our hospital between May 2006 and December 2019 were divided into 2 groups, HRDH recipients and non HRDH recipients. HRDH was defined as meeting at least one of the following criteria: (1) donor left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50%, (2) donor-recipient predicted heart mass ratio < 0.8 or > 1.2, (3) donor age ≥ 55 years, (4) ischemic time > 4 h and (5) catecholamine index > 20. Recipients of HRDHs were divided into 3 groups according to the time of CPR (Group1: non-CPR, Group 2: less than 30 min-CPR, and Group 3: longer than 30 min CPR). RESULTS: A total of 125 recipients were enrolled in this study, composing of HRDH recipients (n = 97, 78%) and non HRDH recipients (n = 28, 22%). Overall survival and the rate of freedom from cardiac events at 10 years after heart transplantation were comparable between two groups. Of 97 HRDH recipients, 54 (56%) without CPR, 22 (23%) with CPR < 30 min, and 21 (22%) with CPR ≥ 30 min were identified. One-year survival rates were not significantly different among three groups. The 1-year rate of freedom from cardiac events was not also statistically different, excluding the patients with coronary artery disease found in early postoperative period, which was thought to be donor-transmitted disease. Multivariate logistics regression for cardiac events identified that the CPR duration was not a risk factor even in HRDH-recipients. CONCLUSION: The CPR duration did not affect the outcomes after heart transplantation in HRDH recipients.

Effect of renal function under left ventricular assist device support on the cardiac function and clinical events after heart transplantation.

AIM: We investigated the effects of pre-transplantation renal dysfunction under left ventricular assisted device (LVAD) support on post-transplantation cardiac function, and patient prognosis after heart transplantation (HTx). METHOD: All patients who were bridged by LVAD and underwent HTx at our hospital between 2007 and 2022 were included in this study. Patients were classified into two groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before HTx: renal dysfunction (RD) group (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and non-renal dysfunction (NRD) group. RESULT: A total of 132 patients were analyzed, of whom 48 were classified into the RD group and 84 into the NRD group (RD group, 47.9 ± 10.1 years; NRD group, 38.4 ± 11.9 years, p < .0001). Under LVAD support before HTx, the RD group tended to have a history of right ventricular failure (RD group, nine (19%); NRD group, seven (8%); p = .098). After HTx, the echocardiographic parameters did not differ between the two groups in the long term. Furthermore, more concise hemodynamic parameters, exemplified by right heart catheterization, were not significantly different between the two groups. Regarding graft rejection, no significant differences were found in acute cellular rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy following HTx. In contrast, patients with RD before HTx had significantly increased mortality in the chronic phase after HTx and initiation of maintenance dialysis, without any overt changes in cardiac function. CONCLUSION: Pre-transplantation renal dysfunction under LVAD support significantly affected clinical course after HTx without any overt changes in graft cardiac function.

Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation in end-stage chronic heart failure patients with a history of surgical left ventricular restoration. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 190 patients undergoing continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation at our center from November 2007 to April 2020. In total, six patients underwent continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after various types of surgical left ventricular restoration procedures, including endoventricular circular patch plasty (n = 3), posterior restoration procedure (n = 2), and septal anterior ventricular exclusion (n = 1). RESULTS: Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 1; HeartMate II, n = 1; DuraHeart, n = 1; HVAD, n = 1) was successfully implanted in all patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range, 39-60 months; censoring heart transplantation), no death was documented, which means that overall survival after left ventricular assist device implantation was 100% at any time point. Finally, three patients received heart transplantation (waiting time: 39, 56, and 61 months, respectively) and the other three patients are still awaiting heart transplantation (waiting time: 12, 41, and 76 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after surgical left ventricular restoration was safe and feasible, even if an endoventricular patch was used, and effective for bridge to transplant strategy.

Clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy as bridge to transplant strategy in muscular dystrophy: a single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: In muscular dystrophies (MD) patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) therapy is still controversial due to a progressive nature of MD-associated muscle weakness. METHODS: All the MD patients who had cf- VAD implants between March 2013 and August 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively studied. Study end points were death, major LVAD-associated complications or respiratory dysfunction caused by muscular weakness. RESULTS: A total of 11 MD patients (Becker type: n = 6; Emery-Dreifuss Myodystrophy: n = 2; Fukuyama subtype: n = 1; Limb-girdle 1B: n = 2) were enrolled. DEMOGRAPHICS: median age 41 years (IQR; 29-47); median Japanese Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support: level 3 (2-3); a median interval between MD diagnosis and LVAD implantation 9 years (6-18). The pulmonary function test at LVAD implantation showed a median of %VC; 62% (45-82), FEV1%, 82% (81-88). Survival to discharge was 100% without pulmonary complication and early VAD-related complications. During a median follow-up of 38 months (27-53), re-admissions were needed due to device infection (n = 2), cerebrovascular accidents (disabling, n = 2 and non-disabling, n = 2), ventricular tachycardia (n = 4), and right HF (n = 3), respectively. 7 patients received successful heart transplant after a median waiting time of 44 months (34-61); 3 patients are still on the waiting list (waiting time: 21, 38, and 39 months). One patient died of right HF 15 months after VAD implantation. No one had overt pulmonary dysfunction during LVAD support. CONCLUSION: In selected MD patients with end-stage HF, cf-LVAD therapy is a viable therapeutic option as bridge to heart transplant.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus conventional redo surgery for degenerated mitral valve prostheses and rings in a multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVES: Degeneration of mitral prostheses/rings may be treated by redo surgery, and, recently, by transcatheter valve-in-valve/ring implantation. This multicenter registry presents results of transcatheter valve-in-valve and repeat surgery for prostheses/rings degeneration. METHODS: Data provided by 10 German heart centers underwent propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day/midterm mortality. Perioperative outcome was assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Further, the influence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on 30-day/midterm mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, 273 patients (79 transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve [TM-ViV] and 194 redo mitral valve replacement [Re-MVR]) underwent repeat procedure for mitral prosthesis/ring degeneration. Propensity score matching distinguished 79 patient pairs. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II-predicted risk was 15.7 ± 13.7% in the TM-ViV group and 15.0% ± 12.7% in the Re-MVR group (P = .5336). TM-ViV patients were older (74.73 vs 72.2 years; P = .0030) and had higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (54 vs 40 patients; P = .0233). Severe TR incidence was similar (17.95% in TM-ViV vs 14.10%; P = .1741). Sixty-eight TM-ViV patients previously underwent mitral valve replacement, whereas 41 Re-MVR patients underwent valve repair (P < .0001). Stenosis was the leading degeneration mechanism in 42 TM-ViV versus 22 Re-MVR patients (P < .0005). The 30-day/midterm mortality did not differ between groups. Moderate or greater TR was a predictor of total (odds ratio [OR], 4.36; P = .0011), 30-day (OR, 3.76; P = .0180), and midterm mortality (OR, 4.30; P = .0378), irrespective of group. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, observed mortality was less than predicted. Redo surgery enabled treatment of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation or TR. TR was shown to be a predictor of total, 30-day, and midterm mortality in both groups.

Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: The removal of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after myocardial recovery can provide survival benefits with freedom from LVAD-associated complications. However, in the absence of standardization, the weaning evaluation and surgical strategy differ widely among centres. Therefore, we analysed the experiences of LVAD explantation with our protocol in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and investigated the validity of our weaning evaluation and surgical strategy from the perspective of optimal long-term survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: All LVAD explantation patients in our institution between May 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by our three-phase weaning assessment: (i) clinical stability with improved cardiac function under LVAD support; (ii) haemodynamic stability shown by ramp-loading and saline-loading test; (iii) intraoperative pump-off test. Explant surgery involved removal of the whole system including driveline, pump, sewing ring and outflow-graft, and closure of an apical hole. Intra-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative outcomes, including all-cause mortality and LVAD associated major complications, were retrospectively analysed. A total of 12 DCM patients (DuraHeart, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 6; HeartMate 3, n = 2) had myocardial recovery after a median 10 months [interquartile range (IQR); 6.3-15 months] support and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 37 y, IQR; 34-41 years; 83% men]. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% (IQR; 12-23%) at LVAD-implantation and 54% (IQR: 45-55%) before LVAD explantation (P < 0.001). There were no perioperative complications and median ICU stay was 4 days (IQR; 2-4 days). All patients were discharged after a median of 24 days (IQR: 17-28 days) postoperatively. No patient suffered from any cardiac event (heart failure hospitalization, re-implantation of LVAD, or heart transplantation) at a median of 40 months (IQR: 17-58 months) follow up. All patients are alive with NYHA functional class 1 with preserved left ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of LVAD explant candidates by our weaning protocol was safe and effective. In the patients completing our protocol successfully, LVAD explantation is feasible and an excellent long-term cardiac event free-survival seems to be achieved.

[Heart Transplantation at the University of Tokyo:Present and Future].

The number of heart transplantation in Japan has gradually increased since the revised organ transplantation act became effective in July 2010. The long-term survival after heart transplantation is superior, compared to the survival in Europe and United States of America( USA). However, the number of patients on a waiting list is rapidly increasing due to an extreme donor shortage. Because of stagnating heart transplantation, there is a need for an optimal solution to an insufficient donor organ supply. We have experienced 125 adult heart transplantations with acceptable survival rate of over 90% at five years. On the other hand, an expected waiting period is lengthening to far longer than five years. Here, based on our experience, we describe the "real world" outcomes and mention the future aspect of the patients on the waiting list on ventricular assist device (VAD). Our suggestions are 1) to promote VAD weaning in patients with myocardial recovery, 2) to aggressively utilize marginal donors, and 3) to expand the indication to destination therapy.

Evolution of thrombolytic therapy in patients with HeartWare ventricular assist device thrombosis: a single-institutional experience.

OBJECTIVES: Pump thrombosis remains a major challenge in heart failure patients with left ventricular HeartWare assist device. Current International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recommendations favour surgical pump exchange over lysis because safety and efficacy of lysis has been controversially reported. This study summarizes our experience on our HeartWare thrombosis prevention strategy as well as thrombolysis through implementation of our institutional standardized HeartWare assist device protocol. METHODS: Outcomes of all HeartWare thrombosis patients admitted between 2010 and 2020 were analysed. Thrombolysis therapy using tissue plasminogen activator was used as the first-line therapy in this study and thrombolysis therapy efficacy was defined as freedom from stroke, bleeding, recurrent HeartWare assist device thrombosis or surgical device exchange within 30 days after lysis application. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients have been included in this study and 66 patients (13%) collectively developed a first HeartWare-thrombosis after a median of 12 months (8-22 months) after HeartWare implantation. Forty patients were treated with unstandardized lysis, of whom 7 patients had thrombolysis associated complications, such as incomplete thrombus resolution requiring surgical pump exchange in 4 patients, but also intracranial haemorrhage occurring in 3 patients. Three patients died in the non-protocol group. Eight device thrombosis patients were treated according to our protocol, showing no lysis-associated complication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite current recommendations, preferring surgical HeartWare pump exchange in thrombosis, thrombolysis therapy for first HeartWare thrombosis can be safe and effective in a standardized protocol setting, including anticoagulation adjustment and intensified blood pressure control management.

The HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD): A Single Institutional 10-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze our 10-year experience with the HVAD in a real-world scenario in a high-volume German heart center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of adults (≥18 years) with terminal heart failure (HF), who underwent HVAD implantation for durable LVAD therapy in our center between October 2009 and March 2020. Primary and secondary end points were all-cause death after implantation and LVAD-associated complications, respectively. We focused the distinct analyses on risk profiles at the time of implantation and implant strategies, i.e., bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or destination therapy (DT). RESULTS: A total of 510 patients were included, with 229 and 281 individuals in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) level 1 (45%) and 2 to 4, respectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR: 5-54 months). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after HVAD implantation was 66% (95% CI; 61.7-70%), 49.4% (95% CI; 44.9-53.8%), and 37.4% (95% CI; 32.8-42%), not censored for LVAD exchange, LVAD explantation, or heart transplantation. INTERMACS level 1 and peri-operative temporary right heart assistance were independent risk factors for survival. Survival was best in BTT patients undergoing heart transplantation at any time during follow-up. The INTERMACS level at time of HVAD implantation did not affect survival after heart transplantation. Freedom from the combined end point of any device-associated severe complication and death was 44.5% (95% CI; 40-48.8%) at 1-year after implantation. CONCLUSION: The HVAD is a reliable pump for durable mechanical circulatory support even in high-risk patients. Still, heart transplantation outperforms durable MCS therapy for a superior long-term survival.

Association between left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality after Bentall procedure.

Root infection or dissection involving coronary artery frequently necessitates an emergent Bentall procedure, with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In contrast, concerning an elective Bentall for aneurysm, surgeons should balance the risk and benefit of surgery, especially in low LVEF cases. We investigated the association between preoperative LVEF and outcomes after Bentall. We analyzed 98 patients undergoing Bentall between April 2000 and March 2020. The patients were stratified into three groups: (a) 65 with LVEF ≥ 60%, (b) 21 with LVEF 45 to < 60%, and (c) 12 with LVEF < 45%. Baseline characteristics, survivals, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared. To assess potential non-linear relationship between LVEF and mortality, cubic spline analysis was conducted. Median age was similar (a vs b vs c, 52 vs 50 vs 44). In all groups, elective root aneurysm was 50-60%, indicating the rest were complicated and sick. Operative mortality was the highest in group c (4.6% vs 9.5% vs 16.7%, p = 0.294). Survival and MACE-free rate were the worst in group c, though their 10-year survival was 40%. LVEF was an independent risk for mortality, and cubic spline analysis showed potential non-linear association between LVEF and mortality. Although LVEF is an independent predictor of mortality after Bentall, long-term survival was occasionally achieved in low LVEF cases. While surgeons should carefully balance the risk of low LVEF and the benefit of surgery in elective cases, we should perform a non-elective procedure as needed, even if LVEF is low.

Safety, Mortality, and Hemodynamic Impact of Patients with MitraClip Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

The interactions and hemodynamic impact of transcatheter percutaneous mitral valve repair (TMR) have not yet been investigated in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but hemodynamic adverse effects are feared in the combination of TMR and LVAD for altered mitral valve flow. This study investigated the hemodynamic interplay in combination of TMR and LVAD in 119 patients, and propensity score match analysis revealed no difference in both perioperative mortality and 2-year follow-up survival (p = 0.84). Nonetheless, postoperatively mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and cardiac index improved, and multivariable cox regression analysis at 2 years identified preoperative total bilirubin and temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality but not TMR. Prior TMR has no impact on mortality or cardiovascular complications in patients with LVAD.

Surgical Interventions for Late Aortic Valve Regurgitation Associated with Continuous Flow-Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Experience Gained and Lessons Learned.

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of surgical interventions for symptomatic moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation (AR), including aortic valve replacement (AVR) and repair (AVP), in 184 patients who underwent continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (Cf-LVAD) implantation as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) between November 2007 and April 2020. Ten patients (median age, 34 (25-41) years; 60% men) underwent surgical interventions (AVR, n = 6; AVP, n = 4) late after cf-LVAD implantation. The median duration after the device implantation was 34 (24-44) months. Three patients required additional tricuspid valve repair. Aortic valve suturing resulted in severe recurrent AR 6 months postoperatively, due to leaflet cutting in one patient. Seven patients with AVR survived without regurgitation during the study period, except for one non-survivor complicated by liver failure due to postoperative right heart failure. Therefore, six patients after AVP (n = 4) and AVR (n = 2) underwent successful heart transplantation 7 (4-13) months after aortic intervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival through 5 years after cf-LVAD implantation, regardless of the surgical AV intervention chosen (log-rank test, p = 0.86). In conclusion, surgical interventions (AVR or AVP) for patients with an ongoing cf-LVAD are safe, effective, and viable options.

Right ventricular dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation in functional mitral regurgitation.

AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic importance of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with moderate-severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) receiving MitraClip procedure. RVD and TR grade are associated with cardiovascular mortality in the general population and other cardiovascular diseases. However, there are limited data from observational studies on the prognostic significance of RVD and TR in FMR receiving MitraClip procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase to assess the prognostic value of RVD and TR grade for mortality in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) receiving MitraClip procedure. Hazard ratios were extracted from multivariate models reporting on the association of RVD and TR with mortality and described as pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals. A total of eight non-randomized studies met the inclusion criteria with seven studies having at least 12 months follow-up with a mean follow-up of 20.9 months. Among the aforementioned studies, a total of 1112 patients (71.5% being male) were eligible for being included in our meta-analysis with an overall mortality rate of 28.4% (n = 316). Of the enrolled patients, RVD was present in 46.1% and moderate-severe TR in 29.2%. RVD was significantly associated with mortality compared to normal RV function (HR, 1.79, 95% CI, 1.39-2.31, P < 0.001, I2  = 0). Patients with moderate-severe TR showed increased risk of mortality compared with those in the none-mild TR group (HR, 1.61. 95% CI, 1.11-2.33, P = 0.01, I2  = 14). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates the prognostic importance of RVD and TR grade in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with significant FMR. RV function and TR parameters may therefore be useful in the risk stratification of patients with significant FMR undergoing MitraClip procedure.

Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Recent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort. METHODS: A total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; P = 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13; P = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Data do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.

Secondary aortic valve replacement in continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of secondary surgical aortic valve replacement (sSAVR) in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) in the context of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. From 2009 to 2020, 792 patients underwent cf-LVAD implantation [HVAD (Medtronic, USA), n = 585, and HM 3 (Abbott, USA), n = 207]. All cf-LVAD patients with severe AR requiring secondary AVR were enrolled in this study. A total of six patients (median, 40 years, IQR; 34-61 years, 50% male) underwent secondary surgical aortic valve replacement (sSAVR) after cf-LVAD implantation. Median time of previous LVAD support was 26 months (IQR: 21-29 months). Two patients required additional tricuspid valve repair (TVR) and one patient underwent SAVR after failed TAVR. Four patients needed temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) with a median of 30 days (IQR; 29-33 days). Three patients were bridged to urgent heart transplantation due to persevering right heart failure, whereas two destination therapy (DT) candidates survived without any associated complications. An additional DT patient died of pneumonia 1 month after sSAVR. Secondary surgical aortic valve replacement in ongoing LVAD patients is an advanced procedure for a complex cohort. In our series, sSAVR was safely performed and effective, but involved a high-risk for subsequent right heart failure, requiring urgent heart transplantation. In LVAD patients with severe AR requiring treatment where TAVR is not feasible, sSAVR can be evaluated as salvage option for bridge to transplant patients or selected destination therapy candidates.

Outcome of medical therapy, repeat intervention, and mitral valve surgery after failed MitraClip therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal treatment for residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip failure is not clearly defined. We report our clinical experience and discuss treatment options. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2018, 37 patients (75 ± 8.9 years, 46% male) were admitted for symptomatic MR (grade 3.1 ± 0.47) diagnosed after previous MitraClip therapy. Clinical outcome of these patients, who underwent medical therapy alone (n = 8, M-group), repeat MitraClip therapy (n = 8, reMC group), or mitral valve surgery (n = 21, S-group) for residual MR, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day survival was 88% (M-group), 100% (reMC-group), and 76% (S-group). The rate of discharge to home was 88% in the reMC-group, better than 38% in the M-group (p = 0.051) and 19% in the S-group (p < 0.001). Perioperative non-survivors in the S-group had high surgical risk with median logistic EuroSCORE of 64.6% (interquartile range 57.4%-87.0%); all died from low cardiac output syndrome or multiple organ failure. The main MR pathologies resulted from leaflet tear and tethering in the M-group, tethering in the reMC-group, and degenerative valve and leaflet tear in the S-group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival at 1 year showed better outcome for patients in the reMC-group (50%, 95% CI 15.2-77.5%) and S-group (47.6%, 95% CI 25.7-66.7%), as compared to those in the M-group (12.5%, 95% CI 0.70-42.3%) (log-rank test p = 0.108 and p = 0.167, respectively). CONCLUSION: Medical therapy alone after failed MitraClip therapy resulted in poor 1-year prognosis. In patients without extremely high surgical risk, repeat MitraClip therapy, or surgical revision MIGHT BE CONSIDERED depending on valve pathology and cardiac comorbidities.

Identification of characteristics, risk factors, and predictors of recurrent LVAD thrombosis: conditions in HeartWare devices.

BACKGROUND: Redictors of repetitive left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-thrombosis have not been studied yet. METHODS: We identified predictors of recurrent LVAD thrombosis in HeartWare (HVAD) patients in a long-term study from 2010 until 2020. We included all patients with two or more thrombolysis treatments for repetitive HVAD thrombosis and effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy was defined as freedom from stroke, death, another HVAD thrombosis, or surgical device exchange within 30 days after the event. Study endpoints also include all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 534 HVAD implantations have been screened, and 73 patients (13.7%) developed first HVAD thrombosis after a median of 10 months (IQR; 6-21 months). 46 of these patients had effective thrombolysis in 71.7% (n = 33/46). After a median of 14 months (IQR 4-32 months) follow-up, 17 patients (51.5%) had developed a second HVAD thrombosis and all were treated with t-PA therapy again, resulting in effectiveness in 76.5% (n = 13/17). The four patients with ineffective t-PA therapy underwent subsequent surgical HVAD exchange. Multiple Cox regression model analysis revealed time interval between HVAD implantation and first thrombosis as an independent risk factor of recurrent thrombosis (HR, 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99, p = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 year follow-up showed no significant difference in overall survival for recurrent vs non-recurrent thrombosis groups (log-rank test, p = 0.959). CONCLUSION: Recurrent HVAD thrombosis mostly appears within 12 months after first thrombosis. Systemic t-PA therapy for recurrent pump thrombosis seems safe, achieving comparable effectiveness rates to initial t-PA therapy. Survival does not differ between patients with or without recurrent HVAD thrombosis.

Cardiac recovery following left ventricular assist device therapy: experience of complete device explantation including ventricular patch plasty.

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial recovery is a rare phenomenon in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Surgical LVAD removal is associated with the risk of cardiac failure, and the individual evaluation of sufficient myocardial recovery is crucial. Thus, complete device explantation is not consistently performed to minimize perioperative risk. However, the remaining ventricular assist device components bear significant risks of infection or thrombosis. Therefore, we developed this study to evaluate a complete LVAD explantation protocol. METHODS: All patients in our institution who had an LVAD explanted were enrolled in the study. Explant surgery involved removal of the driveline, pump housing, sewing ring and outflow graft. The ventricular wall was reconstructed by double patch plasty. Our analysis focused on surgical and postoperative outcome parameters, including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (HVAD, n = 5; HeartMate II, n = 3; HeartMate 3, n = 4) had myocardial recovery and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 40 years, interquartile range (IQR) 33-52 years; 50% men]. Primary heart failure aetiology: myocarditis (n = 5), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 4), toxic cardiomyopathy (n = 2) and valvular heart failure (n = 1). The median average duration on LVAD was 10 months (25-75%: IQR 8.5-30 months). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 15% (IQR 13-18%) at LVAD implantation and 50% (IQR 45-50%) before LVAD explantation (P = 0.0025).The 30-day survival was 100%. The 1-year survival was 91.7%. All patients were discharged after a median 13 days (IQR 10-18 days) postoperatively. No patient had major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The New York Heart Association functional class remained consistent during the follow-up period (median New York Heart Association functional class: II, IQR II-II class) including preservation of ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: Complete LVAD explantation with ventricular patch plasty is feasible and has consistent long-term results.

Patients with ventricular assist device and cerebral entrapment-Supporting skullcap reimplantation.

Effects of cranioplasty (CP) and skullcap reimplantation after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for cerebral hemorrhage or malignant brain infarction in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support as bridge to transplantation has not been surveyed yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome and management after CP when aiming for transplantation. Data were collected from our prospective institutional database including all patients undergoing LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2019. Six patients needed CP procedures and were included. Our analysis focused on postoperative outcome, survival, and facilitation of heart transplantation. Study endpoints included also all-cause mortality. From a total of 1010 LVAD implantations during analysis period in our center, six bridge-to-transplantation LVAD patients [median age at LVAD implantation: 32.5 years (IQR: 24.8-39.5 years); four male, HVAD, n = 3; HM II, n = 1; HM 3, n = 2] underwent CP with imminent entrapment secondary to cerebral hemorrhage or malignant infarction. Primary heart failure etiology was myocarditis (n = 2), dilated (n = 2), or ischemic (n = 2). Median INTERMACS class was 1.5 (IQR; 1.0-2.8). Median time on LVAD support to DC procedure was 33 months (IQR: 16-48 months). The indication for DC was intraparenchymal hemorrhage (n = 4), subdural hematoma (n = 1), and malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (n = 1). After a median time of 4 months (IQR: 3.3-4.0 months, range; 2.0-10 months) post DC procedure, CP was subsequently performed without profound neurologic disabilities in all patients. After median time of 26 months (IQR: 21-42 months) follow-up, three patients successfully received heart transplantation, one patient could undergo LVAD explantation for myocardial recovery, and the remaining two patients are still on the list awaiting heart transplantation. CP procedure with skullcap reimplantation is feasible and can be safely performed in LVAD patients, which subsequently may even be eligible for heart transplantation with beneficial prognosis.