Intra- and postoperative relative angiotensin II deficiency in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery.

Introduction: The classical axis of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) makes an important contribution to blood pressure regulation under general anesthesia via the vasopressor angiotensin II (Ang II). As part of the alternative RAS, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) modulates the pro-inflammatory and fibrotic effects of Ang II by processing it into the organ-protective Ang 1-7, which is cleaved to Ang 1-5 by ACE. Although the levels of ACE2 may be associated with postoperative complications, alternative RAS metabolites have never been studied perioperatively. This study was designed to investigate the perioperative kinetics and balance of both RAS axes around major abdominal surgery. Methods: In this observational cohort study, 35 patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were included. Blood sampling was performed before and after induction of anesthesia, at 1 h after skin incision, at the end of surgery, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. The equilibrium concentrations of Ang I-IV, Ang 1-7, and Ang 1-5 in plasma were quantified using mass spectrometry. The plasma protein levels of ACE and ACE2 were measured with ELISA. Results: Surgery caused a rapid, transient, and primarily renin-dependent activation of both RAS axes that returned to baseline on POD 1, followed by suppression. After induction, the Ang II/Ang I ratio persistently decreased, while the ACE levels started to increase on POD 1 (all p < 0.01 versus before anesthesia). Conversely, the ACE2 levels increased on POD 3 and 7 (both p < 0.001 versus before anesthesia), when the median Ang 1-7 concentrations were unquantifiably low. Discussion: The postoperative elevation of ACE2 may prolong the decrease of the Ang II/Ang I ratio through the increased processing of Ang II. Further clarification of the intraoperative factors leading to relative Ang II deficiency and the sources of postoperatively elevated ACE2 is warranted.

Intravenous diclofenac and orphenadrine for the treatment of postoperative pain after remifentanil-based anesthesia : A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative intravenous diclofenac reduces patient opioid demand and is commonly used in surgical units. Orphenadrine is mainly used in combination with diclofenac for musculoskeletal injuries and postoperative pain control. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac-orphenadrine, diclofenac alone and saline. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center clinical study investigating the opioid-sparing effect of a combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine versus diclofenac alone versus isotonic saline solution. Initially 72 patients were included and received total intravenous anesthesia during cruciate ligament surgery. All patients were postoperatively treated with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device containing hydromorphone. Pharmacological safety was assessed by laboratory parameters, vital signs, and delirium detection scores. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in cumulative dose of PCA analgesics required after 24 h postsurgery, with 5.90 mg (SD ± 2.90 mg) in the placebo group, 5.73 mg (SD ± 4.75 mg) in the diclofenac group, and 4.13 mg (SD ± 2.57 mg) in the diclofenac-orphenadrine group. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups in cumulative dose of PCA analgesics required 2 h postsurgery (n = 65). Mean dose of hydromorphone required after 2 h was 1.54 mg (SD ± 0.57 mg) in the placebo group, 1.56 mg (SD ± 1.19 mg) in the diclofenac-only group, and 1.37 mg (SD ± 0.78 mg) in the diclofenac-orphenadrine group. However, when comparing the diclofenac-orphenadrine group and the diclofenac group combined to placebo there was a significant reduction in PCA usage in the first 24 h postsurgery. In total, there were 25 adverse events reported, none of which were rated as severe. CONCLUSION: Orphenadrine-diclofenac failed to significantly reduce postoperative opioid requirements. However, in an exploratory post hoc analysis the diclofenac-orphenadrine and the diclofenac group combined versus placebo showed a tendency to reduce opioid demand in postoperative pain control. Further research is required to determine the value of orphenadrine as an adjuvant in a multimodal approach for postoperative pain management.