[Reasons for non-acceptance and non-use of a home telemonitoring application by multimorbid patients aged 65 years and over]. / Motive für die Nichtakzeptanz und Nichtnutzung einer Telemonitoring-Anwendung im häuslichen Umfeld durch multimorbide Patienten über 65 Jahre.

BACKGROUND: User acceptance is a key indicator and driver for the use and implementation of telemonitoring applications (TMA) in healthcare. Despite various positive effects that previous studies have revealed for users of TMA, there are always patients who discontinue their participation in a telemedicine study or even decline participation. There is little evidence for the reasons for non-acceptance and non-use of TMA, especially in multimorbid patients at the age of 65 and over in their home environment. To close this research gap, this sub-study focuses on patient-reported reasons for non-acceptance and non-use of TMA in the home environment. METHODS: This study follows a mixed-method approach and focuses on patients' perspective. Quantitative data collection took place via computer-assisted telephone interviews among all drop-outs and non-participants. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with drop-out patients and non-users. Eligible patients were recruited consecutively by general practitioners, informed and included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. Amongst others, patients measured their vital signs (blood pressure, heart frequency, oxygen saturation, weight) via telemedical measures and sent them via tablet to a Care Coordination Center to ascertain the need for intervention. Collected data on non-acceptance and non-use of TMA were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Nine general practices in two German cities included a total of 177 patients according to the inclusion criteria. During the study, 61 study participants (34.5 %) dropped out, 80 patients (31.1 %) declined participation in the study. Drop-outs and non-participants were significantly older than active participants (p=.004 and p=.001, respectively). Predominant reasons for drop-out were the lack of the perceived added value and the content-related variety of the program on the patient's tablet, the missing interest/need for telemedical monitoring as well as the time spent participating in the study. Patients living alone, single and widowed patients reported significantly more difficulties in handling the hardware (tablet) (p=.040) and the program (Motiva) (p=.013) than married and cohabiting patients. These reasons were also reported mainly by female patients, patients aged 75 years and over, and those with a low level of education. CONCLUSION: In order to increase the acceptance and the added value of TMA for patients, the individual needs of the future target group should be analyzed at the beginning of the development. To ensure maximum user centricity, individual development steps should be continuously evaluated by the target group. TMA should be adapted to the functional abilities of elderly, multimorbid patients through, e. g., an appropriate design of the content, which is tailored to patients' individual needs. TMA should be used to an appropriate degree to avoid overburdening and should fit unobtrusively into patients' usual daily routine. For patient-specific acceptance of TMA, easy handling of the telemedical measuring and input devices is as important as the variety of offers on the platform and personal contact for technical queries. Special attention should be paid to patients who live alone, women, elderly patients over 75 years of age, and poorly educated patients in order to ensure full and easy access to technology-based telemonitoring for their own healthcare.

[Quality of documented diagnosis in primary care - An analysis using the example of thyroid disorders]. / Qualität der hausärztlichen Diagnosedokumentation in Patientenakten ­ Eine Analyse am Beispiel von Schilddrüsenerkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: Routine data of statutory health insurance (SHI) provide a great potential for evaluating the healthcare situation in Germany by providing, e. g., morbidity estimates. In the context of secondary data, analyses based on insurance data were conducted using the outpatient medical billing diagnosis. If, however, medical billing data, which are collected for this primary purpose, are the only source of these morbidity estimates, a limited validity of outpatient medical diagnostic data will have to be assumed or validity will have to be assured. This investigation aimed to analyse the quality of family practitioners' documentation regarding diagnostic data in patients with thyroid disease based on medical records for billing purposes. METHODS: As part of the pilot study General practitioners' Views on Polypharmacy and its Consequences for Patient Health Care, the medical records of 548 multi-morbid patients with thyroid disease from six general practices in Dresden, Saxony, were analysed with respect to the congruence of prescriptions of thyroid medication and associated thyroid diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to investigate predictors of limited diagnostic data of thyroid disease. RESULTS: There was insufficient documentation of thyroid diagnoses in 26.8% (n=147) of the included patients diagnosed with or treated for thyroid disease. The proportion of undocumented (1.1 to 35.8%), imprecise (4.6 to 22.3%) and non-specific documented (14.9 to 73.8%) thyroid diagnoses varied in all general practices. Due to undocumented thyroid disease, the corrected prevalence of thyroid diseases summarised for all practices was 5.5 percentage points higher than the originally documented prevalence (29.7 instead of 24.2%). An increasing number of prescribed drugs was a significant predictor for inadequate documentation of thyroid disease (for 5 to 8 routinely taken medications: OR=2.4/p<0.001; for 9 to 12: OR=4.0/p<0.001; for 13 to 20: OR=7.4/p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the limited data quality of outpatient medical billing diagnoses as a basis for morbidity estimates, GPs' diagnostic data should be subjected to regular internal and external diagnostic validation in SHI routine data. Additional case-related interviews with documenting GPs would significantly increase data validity. Also, intelligent e-tools supporting electronic patient documentation could be helpful to improve the quality of primary care documentation.

The Learning Objective Catalogue for Patient Safety in Undergraduate Medical Education--A Position Statement of the Committee for Patient Safety and Error Management of the German Association for Medical Education.

BACKGROUND: Since the report "To err is human" was published by the Institute of Medicine in the year 2000, topics regarding patient safety and error management are in the focal point of interest of science and politics. Despite international attention, a structured and comprehensive medical education regarding these topics remains to be missing. GOALS: The Learning Objective Catalogue for Patient Safety described below the Committee for Patient Safety and Error Management of the German Association for Medical Education (GMA) has aimed to establish a common foundation for the structured implementation of patient safety curricula at the medical faculties in German-speaking countries. METHODS: The development the Learning Objective Catalogue resulted via the participation of 13 faculties in two committee meetings, two multi-day workshops, and additional judgments of external specialists. RESULTS: The Committee of Patient Safety and Error Management of GMA developed the present Learning Objective Catalogue for Patient Safety in Undergraduate Medical Education, structured in three chapters: Basics, Recognize Causes as Foundation for Proactive Behavior, and Approaches for Solutions. The learning objectives within the chapters are organized on three levels with a hierarchical organization of the topics. Overall, the Learning Objective Catalogue consists of 38 learning objectives. All learning objectives are referenced with the National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education. DISCUSSION: The Learning Objective Catalogue for Patient Safety in Undergraduate Medical Education is a product that was developed through collaboration of members from 13 medical faculties. In the German-speaking countries, the Learning Objective Catalogue should advance discussion regarding the topics of patient safety and error management and help develop subsequent educational structures. The Learning Objective Catalogue for Patient Safety can serve as a common ground for an intensified, constructive, subject-specific discussion about these topics at the medical faculties, and guide the implementation of hopefully multiple patient safety curricula in undergraduate medical education.