Assessment of biophysical skin properties at different body sites in hospitalized old patients: results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Skin aging is a risk factor for a decubitus and biophysical skin properties could help to identify persons at risk. Whether such biophysical properties of aged human skin differ between areas is undetermined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether viscoelasticity, hydration or friction differ between important areas for decubitus risk. METHODS: Pilot study in 32 (18 female, 14 male) acute and subacute old patients aged 81.9 ± 5.9 years (±SD), without active skin disease after an average of 10 days of stay. Assessment of skin resilience/viscoelasticity (E) and hydration (H) at the volar forearm (VF), trochanter (TR) and the sacrum (SA), nutrition by a Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), total body water (TBW), lean body mass (LBM), % body fat (%F) by bioimpedance and routine laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, C-reactive protein, serum proteins and creatinine). RESULTS: Mean body mass index (27 ± 4.2), MNA (22.5 ± 2.9), Braden score (20 ± 2.5), E (68.5 ± 6.0%) and H (38.3 ± 6.7) at any site and laboratory parameters did not differ by sex. Men had more TBW (+12 ± 1.5 liters), LBM (+9 ± 2 kg), less %F (-8.8 ± 2.1%), increased H-TR (+7.11 ± 2.8) and H-SA (+5.68 ± 2.5). Overall E-VF correlated significantly with E-TR (r(2) = 0.40, p < 0.0001) and E-SA (r(2) = 0.40, p < 0.0001). In contrast, skin hydration was not correlated. CONCLUSION: Results of forearm elasticity experiments can be used as a model for other body sites at risk for the development of pressure ulcers.

Quality of life and quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST) in patients receiving dose-intensive or standard dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer.

Quality of life (QL) is an important consideration when comparing adjuvant therapies for early breast cancer, especially if they differ substantially in toxicity. We evaluated QL and Q-TWiST among patients randomised to adjuvant dose-intensive epirubicin and cyclophosphamide administered with filgrastim and progenitor cell support (DI-EC) or standard-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy (SD-CT). We estimated the duration of chemotherapy toxicity (TOX), time without disease symptoms and toxicity (TWiST), and time following relapse (REL). Patients scored QL indicators. Mean durations for the three transition times were weighted with patient reported utilities to obtain mean Q-TWiST. Patients receiving DI-EC reported worse QL during TOX, especially treatment burden (month 3: P<0.01), but a faster recovery 3 months following chemotherapy than patients receiving SD-CT, for example, less coping effort (P<0.01). Average Q-TWiST was 1.8 months longer for patients receiving DI-EC (95% CI, -2.5 to 6.1). Q-TWiST favoured DI-EC for most values of utilities attached to TOX and REL. Despite greater initial toxicity, quality-adjusted survival was similar or better with dose-intensive treatment as compared to standard treatment. Thus, QL considerations should not be prohibitive if future intensive therapies show superior efficacy.

Quantifying trade-offs: quality of life and quality-adjusted survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer.

We evaluated quality of life (QL) and quality-adjusted survival in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial IX, a randomised trial including 1669 eligible patients receiving tamoxifen for 5 years or three prior cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) followed by 57 months tamoxifen. During the time with CMF toxicity (Tox), without symptoms and toxicity (TWiST), and following relapse (Rel), patients scored their QL indicators and a utility indicator for subjective health estimation between 'perfect' and 'worst' health. Scores were averaged within Tox, TWiST and Rel and transformed to utilities. Mean durations for the three transition times were weighted with utilities to obtain mean quality-adjusted TWiST (Q-TWiST). Patients receiving CMF reported significantly worse scores for most QL domains at month 3, but less hot flushes. After completing chemotherapy, there were no differences by treatment groups. Benefits evaluated by Q-TWiST favoured the additional chemotherapy. CMF provided 3 more months of Q-TWiST for patients with ER-negative tumours, but CMF provided no benefit in Q-TWiST for patients with ER-positive tumours. Q-TWiST analysis based on patient ratings is feasible in large-scale cross-cultural clinical trials.

Intermediate results of health related quality of life after vertical banded gastroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate (a) health-related quality of life (HRQL) after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) (Mason) and (b) predictors of HRQL. SUBJECTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients were assessed preoperatively and then after 6, 12 and 24 months. Patients filled out questionnaires for subjective appraisal of HRQL (physical well-being, mood, physical performance, perceived health, social support and coping/adjustment). RESULTS: The greatest improvement in weight and HRQL was seen within 6 months of surgery. Twenty-four months after VBG weight reduction (P<0.05), perceived health (P<0.05), physical well-being (P<0.05), physical performance (P<0.05), mood (P<0.05), coping/adjustment (P<0.05) continued to be better than before surgery. Preoperative binge eating was the most important predictor of HRQL. CONCLUSION: Two years after VBG weight loss and a significant improvement of HRQL can be found. HRQL and weight loss are not associated in terms of outcome, indicating that weight loss alone may not be enough to improve HRQL.

Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. an explorative investigation.

We previously showed that patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer change the internal standards on which they base their quality of life estimation. In the present investigation, we explored whether this response shift similarly affects the perception of health for utility evaluation in cancer clinical trials. After radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon (pT1-4 pN>0 M0 and pT3-4 pN0 M0) and perioperative chemotherapy, patients were randomised to three treatment arms: observation only (A), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m(2) plus levamisol (B), or 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) (C). Subjective health was assessed by a linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scale anchored at 'perfect health-worst health' developed for serial assessment of utility values (Hürny C, van Wegberg B, Bacchi M, et al. Subjective health estimations (SHE) in patients with advanced breast cancer: an adapted utility concept for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 1998, 77, 985-991). Patients estimated their pre-surgery health among various quality of life indicators both before surgery and retrospectively thereafter, and their pre-adjuvant health both at the beginning of randomly assigned chemotherapy or observation and retrospectively approximately 2 months later. Thereafter, current subjective health was assessed. Paired t-tests were used to test the hypotheses of no change. Patients' estimated pre-surgery health was worse after surgery than before (n=127, mean change=-6.7, standard deviation (S.D.)=30, P=0.01), and their estimated pre-adjuvant health was worse under treatment or observation than at the beginning (n=132, mean change=-7.1, S.D.=23.8, P=0.001), in agreement with the quality of life indicators. Chemotherapy had no impact on these changes attributed to a response shift. Conventionally assessed changes between the beginning of adjuvant treatment or observation and 2 months later indicated no change in subjective health. Change scores relative to patients' retrospective estimation revealed an improvement (n=122, mean change=6.6, S.D.=24.8, P=0.004) in this period. Patients with colon cancer substantially reframe their internal standard of health as they do for quality of life. This explorative finding questions the assumption, generally made in decision models, that health estimates for utility evaluation are independent of time. Given that patients may change their standards, comparisons of health estimates across different populations and clinical situations are to be interpreted with caution.

Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials.

We investigated the hypothesis that global single-item quality-of-life indicators are less precise for specific treatment effects (discriminant validity) than multi-item scales but similarly efficient for overall treatment comparisons and changes over time (responsiveness) because they reflect the summation of the individual meaning and importance of various factors. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators for physical well-being, mood and coping were compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) and the emotional behaviour and social interaction scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in 84 patients with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy. Discriminant validity was investigated by multitrait-multimethod correlation, responsiveness by standardized response mean (SRM). Discriminant validity of the indicators was present at baseline but less under treatment. Responsiveness was demonstrated by the expected pattern among treatments (P = 0.008). In patients without chemotherapy, the SRMs indicated moderate (0.5-0.8) to large (>0.8) improvements in physical well-being (0.70), coping (0.92), HAD anxiety (0.89) and depression (1.19), and MACL mental well-being (0.68). In patients with chemotherapy for the first 3 months, small but clinically significant improvements (>).2) included mood (0.38), coping (0.41), HAD axiety (0.31) and MACL mental well-being (0.35). Patients with 6 months chemotherapy showed no changes. The indicators also reflected mood disorders (HAD) and marked psychosocial dysfunction (SIP) at baseline and under treatment according to pre-defined cut-off levels. Global indicators were confirmed to be efficient for evaluating treatments overall and changes over time. The lower reliability of single as opposed to multi-item scales affects primarily their discriminant validity. This is less decisive in large sample sizes.

Quality-of-life scores predict outcome in metastatic but not early breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: We compared the prognostic value of quality-of-life (QL) scores in the adjuvant setting and after relapse in two randomized trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: More than 2,000 premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer who were participating in randomized trials that compared adjuvant therapies completed QL assessments for physical well-being, mood, appetite, and coping at study entry and at months 3 and 18 if they remained relapse-free and, in case of relapse, at 1 month and at 6 months after relapse. Cox regression models were used to test the relationship between QL scores and disease-free survival (DFS), in the adjuvant setting, or overall survival, in the case of postrelapse QL measurement. All models were stratified by language/country group and included other factors related to QL and/or outcome. RESULTS: DFS was not significantly predicted by QL scores at baseline or month 18, or by changes in QL score between baseline and months 3 or 18. In contrast, after relapse, QL scores were predictive for subsequent overall survival. One month after relapse, better mood (P =.04) in premenopausal patients and better appetite (P =.005) in postmenopausal patients were associated with longer survival. Six months after relapse, better physical well-being (P =.03) and appetite (P =.03) in premenopausal patients and better physical well-being (P <.0001), mood (P =.002), appetite (P =.0001), and coping (P =.0001) in postmenopausal patients predicted longer survival. CONCLUSION: Any prognostic significance of QL scores in the adjuvant setting is minimal or obscured by chemotherapy effects, but there is strong prognostic significance of QL scores after disease relapse. The contrast suggests that patient perception of the severity of underlying illness may determine reported QL scores.

Experiences in the realisation of a research project on anthroposophical medicine in patients with advanced cancer.

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: To date most of the published studies on the effectiveness of complementary therapies in cancer patients have yielded controversial results because of questionable methodology. Research strategies and methodologies acceptable to both conventional and unconventional medicine are difficult to find due to different belief systems. In this publication we describe the development and implementation of a project conducted as part of National Research Programme 34 (NFP 34). Detailed analysis of our experiences might provide some information on how to deal with practical difficulties in the planning and conduct of further research projects in this field. The project involved the anthroposophical Lukas Clinic in Arlesheim and the Institute of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital, Berne. This interdisciplinary research project was devised to study the relative merits of these two schools of medicine in the care of advanced cancer patients. The project was made up of three components: (1) a registration study aimed at comparing the case mix at the two institutions; (2) a three armed randomised study on the effectiveness of supportive therapy, comparing anthroposophy to psychosocial group therapy, and (3) a longitudinal study to monitor the evaluation of quality of life of patients at the anthroposophical clinic. METHODS: After a brief review of the study protocol, which presents the theoretical framework of the project, problems of its implementation are described. Aspects of accrual, acceptance of randomisation and data availability are presented using simple descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: The registration study was duly completed with a total of 567 patients. For several reasons (not meeting inclusion requirements, high refusal rate) the accrual into the randomised study was slower than expected and required modification of the original design specifications with regard to inclusion criteria and data collection schedule. Additionally, a high dropout rate contributed to premature closure of this part of the project. The longitudinal study also suffered from low data availability at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The study protocol constituted a major effort at compromise without loss of scientific rigour, and this effort demonstrates that it is possible to allow for different views on patients, on clinical interventions and on research strategies when establishing collaboration between different schools of medicine. Despite a theoretically sound framework, the randomised part of the project proved difficult in its practical execution. Some unexpected logistical constraints and some unmet expectations influenced the feasibility of this part of the project. Therefore, careful planning of research projects in this field of medicine should always include an extended analysis of various practical aspects of study implementation.

Association between immunity and prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer patients before adjuvant treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The association of known prognostic factors with immune cell counts and beta2-microglobulin and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2r) serum levels as markers of activation of the immune system was investigated in breast cancer. METHODS: Two hundred thirty five operated stage I and II breast cancer patients to receive adjuvant treatment in IBSCG trials were assessed in a cross-sectional study immediately before the first treatment. Leukocytes, lymphocytes and lymphocyte subset counts, beta2-microglobulin and sIL-2r serum levels were assessed as immunological parameters. Prognostic factors were tumor load, receptor status, patient characteristics, and contextual factors of the immune assessment (such as time of the day, time since surgery, type of surgery, concomitant medication, co-morbidity). RESULTS: In an operated early stage breast cancer patient population, tumor load was not associated with immune cell counts, beta2-microglobulin, or sIL-2r before adjuvant treatment. There was a pattern of association of prognostically favorable factors such as estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumor and older age with higher NK cell counts or with beta2-microglobulin or sIL-2r. In addition, immune cell counts and the markers of activation of the immune system were affected by several contextual factors, such as diurnal variability, time since surgery, type of surgery, and the intake of concomitant medication. CONCLUSIONS: The association of NK cell counts and beta2-microglobulin or sIL-2r serum levels with prognostically favorable factors such as ER positive tumor and older age supports the assumption that the immune system plays a role in the course of early breast cancer. The exact nature of this role requires further study.

Response and palliation in a phase II trial of gemcitabine in hormone-refractory metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

BACKGROUND: In a phase II trial, 43 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with gemcitabine at a dose of 1,200 mg/m2 over 2 hours (later decreased to 1,000 mg/m2 due to hematological toxicity) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were proven tumor progression after hormonal treatment and increased PSA levels, a WHO PS < or = 2, adequate bone marrow reserve, liver and renal function and age < or =, 80 years. Response criteria were based on PSA levels (CR: normalization of PSA, PR: > 50% decrease). Quality of life (QL) was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 on day 1 of each treatment cycle and on day 8 of the first cycle (range of scales 0-100). Physician-rated pain intensity and use of pain medication were assessed at the same timepoints. RESULTS: Hematological toxicity of gemcitabine led to a dose-reduction in 48% of all cycles. Three of forty-three patients (RR = 7%) showed a PSA response: one CR and three PR with time to treatment failure of 8.7, 6.6 and > or = 9.3 months. Seven patients (16%) had stable disease (NC) for a median duration of 7.1 months (range 6.1-11.7 months). There was one case with objective regression of lymph node metastases. Patients reported a considerably impaired health status/QL (n = 41, median = 50) and severe fatigue (n = 41, median = 55.6) at baseline, with no change under treatment. Pain (QLQ-C30) was also severe at baseline (N=41, median=50) but was improved at the end of cycles 1 (n = 33, median change = -16.7, P = 0.0002), 2 (n = 19, median change = -33.3, P = 0.0006), 3 (n = 14, median change = -16.7, P = 0.06) and 4 (n = 9, median change = -33.3, P = 0.04). Patient-rated pain and use of analgesics as combined endpoint yielded palliation for at least 8 weeks in 14 patients (32%). Nine of these patients showed at least stable disease (CR/PR or NC by PSA level), five indicated a benefit in spite of progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine in the dose and schedule indicated above has a significant beneficial impact on pain in patients with hormone-refractory prostatic carcinoma despite its limited activity in terms of PSA response and considerable, especially hematological, toxicity.

Burdens and benefits of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and tamoxifen for elderly patients with breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII.

PURPOSE: Information on the tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for older women is limited. We studied these issues using the data collected as part of the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with operable, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone for 5 years (306 patients) or tamoxifen plus three consecutive cycles of classical cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8), and fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8) every 28 days (CMF; 302 patients). The median follow-up was 8.0 years. RESULTS: Among the 299 patients who received at least one dose of CMF, women 65 years of age or older (n = 76) had higher grades of toxicity compared with women less than 65 years old (n = 223) (P =.004). More women in the older age group compared with the younger women experienced grade 3 toxicity of any type (17% v 7%, respectively), grade 3 hematologic toxicity (9% v 5%, respectively), and grade 3 mucosal toxicity (4% v 1%, respectively). Older patients also received less than their expected CMF dose compared with younger postmenopausal women (P =.0008). The subjective burdens of treatment, however, were similar for younger and older patients based on quality-of-life measures (performance status, coping, physical well-being, mood, and appetite). For older patients, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 63% for CMF plus tamoxifen and 61% for tamoxifen alone (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.52; P =.99). For younger patients, the corresponding 5-year DFS rates were 61% and 53% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.91; P =.008), but the test for heterogeneity of CMF effect according to age group was not statistically significant. The reduced effectiveness of CMF among older women could not be attributed to dose reductions according to dose received. CONCLUSION: CMF tolerability and effectiveness were both reduced for older patients compared with younger postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen for 5 years. The development and evaluation of less toxic and more effective chemotherapy regimens are required for high-risk elderly patients.

Attitudes and Beliefs towards Disease and Treatment in Patients with Advanced Cancer Using Anthroposophical Medicine.

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, anthroposophical medicine has a long tradition, offers a special tumor treatment, is frequently used by cancer patients, and has been approved in 1998 by the Swiss government to be reimbursed by health insurances. This popularity contrasts with the fact that to date no sound evidence of the effectiveness of anthroposophical cancer treatments exists. In this study we draw a profile on a population of patients with advanced disease attending treatment at the anthroposophical Lukas Clinic (LC) regarding patients' attitudes, experiences and expectations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All newly admitted patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced or metastasized breast, gastrointestinal, lung or gynecological cancer were recruited into a registration study. In parallel, a population of patients with the same inclusion criteria attending a conventional institution (Institute of Medical Oncology, University of Bern, IMO) was taken as a reference sample. Data were collected by means of a fully structured interview, and simple descriptive statistics was used for evaluation. RESULTS: 221 and 280 patients accrued at LC and at IMO, respectively. LC patients were mainly women (87%), had a good education (36% with completed college or university education), and were admitted on average 3.5 months after the diagnosis of advanced disease. With respect to their advanced cancer, they put very little hope in the effectiveness of conventional medicine, but expected great help from anthroposophical treatment. Compared with the reference population they cared more for psychological well-being and quality of life, but an important factor for choosing treatment at the LC was clearly the patients' strong belief in the effectiveness of anthroposophical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: With its holistic approach, anthroposophical medicine intends to provide tumor treatment together with supportive care throughout the course of the illness. To some patients this is an attractive alternative to conventional medicine, which too often focuses on tumor treatment only. Conventional medicine should clearly be advised to give higher priority to supportive care already early in the course of the disease. We acknowledge some patients' need for a more holistic approach, but anthroposophical medicine or any other providers of alternative or complementary cancer therapies should evaluate treatment effectiveness more thoroughly according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. Copyright 2000 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

Defining clinical benefit in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer under second-line endocrine treatment: does quality of life matter?

PURPOSE: In endocrine therapy trials in advanced breast cancer, patients with response (complete response/partial response [CR/PR]) and patients with stable disease for at least 6 months (SD(6m)) have shown similar survival and therefore are often defined as a population with clinical benefit (patients with CR/PR or SD(6m)). We evaluated the impact of response and/or clinical benefit on quality of life (QL) in postmenopausal patients under second-line endocrine treatment after failure of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight of 177 eligible patients of a randomized trial (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research 20/90) receiving either formestane (250 mg intramuscularly biweekly) or megestrol acetate (160 mg orally daily) were analyzed. The baseline characteristics (with the exception of site of metastases) were balanced among patients with CR/PR, SD(6m), and progressive disease (PD). Patients completed QL indicators at baseline and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 months. Responders were separately compared with nonresponders (patients with SD(6m) or PD) and with patients with SD(6m), and patients with clinical benefit were compared with patients with PD by analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline scores. RESULTS: Overall, 88% (557 of 634) of expected QL forms were received. In the comparison of responders versus patients with both SD(6m) and PD, responders indicated better physical well-being (P =. 004) and mood (P =.02) at month 3. Compared only with patients with SD(6m), responders showed no significant difference in baseline QL and time to treatment failure (328.5 v 340 days). While under treatment, responders reported significantly better physical well-being (months 3 to 11), mood (months 5 to 11), coping (months 5 to 9), and appetite (months 7 to 11) and less dizziness (month 9) than patients with SD(6m). The changes between baseline and months 5 and 7, respectively, indicated improvement in responders but heterogeneous patterns in patients with SD(6m). CONCLUSION: Although the CR/PR and SD(6m) groups had similar times to treatment failure, patients with CR/PR reported better QL, suggesting more beneficial response to second-line endocrine treatment. Patients' subjective perspective should be taken into account in this mainly palliative setting. Future trials should be designed so that the CR/PR and SD(6m) groups are investigated separately.

Quality of life in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer after failure of tamoxifen: formestane versus megestrol acetate as second-line hormonal treatment. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) compared efficacy and toxicity of formestane (250 mg intramuscularly (i.m.) every 2 weeks) versus megestrol acetate (MGA; 160 mg orally daily) as second-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer and disease progression while on tamoxifen treatment in a randomised trial (Thürlimann B, Castiglione M, Hsu Schmitz SF, et al. Eur J Cancer 1997, 33, 1017-1024). Quality of life (QL) was evaluated as a secondary endpoint (n = 177). Overall, 83% (669/805) of expected QL forms were received, 88% (155/177) at baseline, 88% (402/457) on study treatment, and 65% (112/171) at treatment failure. Patients with no impairment in performance status reported better physical well-being (P = 0.0001), mood (P = 0.0007) and coping (P = 0.03), and less tiredness (P = 0.0001) and appetite/sense of taste disturbance (P = 0.0001) at baseline. After adjustment for baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in QL by treatment. Baseline QL was strongly predictive for QL under treatment but not for time to treatment failure. In conclusion, the question of whether oestrogen deprivation (e.g. formestane) or addition of progesterone (MGA) has a more beneficial impact on QL needs further investigation. The subjective experience of second-line endocrine treatment varies considerably as a consequence of the large variation in the individual course of the disease and has to be judged on an individual basis.

Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND: We examined whether patients with colon cancer undergoing surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy change the internal standards on which they base their quality-of-life (QL) estimation, and, if they do so, whether this reframing alters interpretation of QL findings. These questions were addressed within a randomized clinical trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK 40/93). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon (pT1-4pN > 0M0 and pT3-4pN0M0) and perioperative chemotherapy, patients were randomized to three treatment arms: observation only (A), 5-FU 450 mg/m2 plus Levamisol (B), or 5-FU 600 mg/m2 (C). QL was measured by linear analogue self-assessment indicators. Patients estimated their pre-surgery QL both before surgery and retrospectively thereafter, and their pre-adjuvant QL both at the beginning of randomly assigned chemotherapy or observation and retrospectively about two months later. Thereafter, current QL was assessed. Paired t-tests were used to test the hypotheses of no change. RESULTS: Overall, 187 patients with at least one pair of corresponding questionnaires were analyzed. Patients estimated their pre-surgery QL after surgery significantly lower than before and their pre-adjuvant QL under treatment or observation also lower than at the beginning. In the adjuvant phase, in contradiction to our hypothesis, chemotherapy had almost no impact on these changes attributed to reframing. Conventionally assessed changes indicated an improvement in QL. Patients with treatment C reported less improvement in functional performance than those with B or those under observation (P = 0.04). Patients with treatment B indicated a greater worsening in nausea/vomiting than those with C, whereas patients with observation only showed an improvement (P = 0.0009). After adjustment of current QL scores under treatment or observation to patients' retrospective estimation, the treatment effects were diluted but the overall improvement was substantially amplified in most QL indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with colon cancer substantially reframe their perception in estimating QL both under radical resection and under adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. This effect is an integral part of patients' adaptation to disease and treatment. An understanding of this phenomenon is of particular relevance for patient care. Its role in evaluating QL endpoints in clinical trials needs further investigation.

Interaction of tamoxifen with concurrent cytotoxic adjuvant treatment affects lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets counts in breast cancer patients.

The effects and interaction of endocrine and cytotoxic adjuvant treatment on measures of cellular immunity were assessed in 41 stage I-II breast cancer patients from International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Counts of lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets [(T, T4, T8, B, natural killer (NK) and activated T (AT) cells] were assessed by flow cytometry immediately before adjuvant therapy at baseline and on day 1 of the 3rd cycle. Twenty-two patients received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), 7 CMF and tamoxifen (TAM), and 12 TAM alone. On day 1 of the 3rd cycle the counts of total lymphocytes (P = 0.003) and all lymphocyte subsets (P<0.05) except AT cells were significantly lower than baseline in the CMF treatment group. There was no significant change in the CMF+TAM or in the TAM treatment group. The combination of CMF and TAM resulted in less pronounced decrease in lymphocyte and subset counts from baseline to day 1 of the 3rd cycle. It seems possible that there is an interaction between TAM with CMF that affects lymphocyte and lymphocyte subset counts during cytotoxic treatment.

The cognitive-spiritual dimension--an important addition to the assessment of quality of life: validation of a questionnaire (SELT-M) in patients with advanced cancer.

UNLABELLED: Questions of meaning and challenge by illness, i.e., the spiritual dimension of quality of life (QL) traditionally played an important role in anthroposophically oriented medicine and have gained importance in palliative medicine and supportive care. In the context of a research project on QL in patients with advanced cancer, we therefore investigated the psychometric properties of a questionnaire covering spiritual QL issues, with the aim of providing a module for the assessment of cognitive-spiritual QL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated 89 patients with advanced breast and gastro-intestinal cancer. Construct validity of a modified version of the SELT (Skalen zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität bei Tumorkranken), the SELT-M was tested by multitrait scaling analysis. Discriminant and convergent validity were also tested. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as a standard for validation. Results showed the SELT-M as feasible in administration. Four of the five SELT-M subscales were internally consistent (Cronbach's Alpha = > 0.7). The subscale on spiritual QL showed higher within than outside subscale correlations for six of its eight items. Association of the SELT-M with the EORTC QLQ-C30 was good for the items and subscales covering the same aspects of QL in both questionnaires: emotional (Spearman r = 0.61), physical functioning (r = -0.54) and fatigue (r = -0.75). In accordance with expectations, there was no association between spiritual QL with any EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales. Self-assessed spiritual QL in the SELT-M corresponded well with interviewer assessments (test for trend accross ordered groups, P = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Overall there is confirming evidence for the hypothesised structure of the SELT-M, especially for the newly developed module on spiritual QL. This module may be used as a module together with other cancer specific QL questionnaires.