Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of islatravir (ISL, MK-8591), a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, following single-dose administration to treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1: an open-label, phase 1b, consecutive-panel trial.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir (also known as ISL and MK-8591) is a unique nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of people with HIV-1 infection. In preclinical studies, intracellular islatravir-triphosphate exhibits a long half-life and prolonged virological effects. In this study, we aimed to assess islatravir safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection. METHODS: This open-label, consecutive-panel, phase 1b trial was done at Charité Research Organisation (Berlin, Germany) and included men and women (aged 18-60 years, inclusive) with HIV-1 infection who were ART naive. Participants were required to have plasma HIV-1 RNA counts of at least 10 000 copies per mL within 30 days before the trial treatment phase, without evidence of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Participants were enrolled in one of five consecutive dosing panels, receiving a single oral dose of islatravir (0·5-30 mg). The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability of islatravir and change from baseline in HIV-1 plasma RNA; secondary outcomes were islatravir plasma and islatravir-triphosphate intracellular pharmacokinetics. We obtained descriptive safety and pharmacokinetics statistics, and estimated efficacy results from a longitudinal data analysis model. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02217904, and EudraCT, 2014-002192-28. FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2015, and May 11, 2017, we enrolled 30 participants (six per panel). Islatravir was generally well tolerated. 27 (90%) participants had 60 adverse events after receipt of drug, of which 21 (35%) were deemed to be drug related. The most common (n>1) drug-related adverse events were headache (in nine [30%] participants) and diarrhoea (in two [7%]). No serious adverse events were reported, and no participants discontinued due to an adverse event. Plasma islatravir pharmacokinetics and intracellular islatravir-triphosphate pharmacokinetics were approximately dose proportional. The islatravir-triphosphate intracellular half-life was 78·5-128·0 h. Least-squares mean HIV-1 RNA at 7 days after dose decreased from 1·67 log10 copies per mL (95% CI 1·42-1·92) at 10 mg dose to 1·20 log10 copies per mL (0·95-1·46) at 0·5 mg dose. No genetic changes consistent with development of viral resistance were detected. INTERPRETATION: Single doses of islatravir as low as 0·5 mg significantly suppressed HIV-1 RNA by more than 1·0 log at day 7 in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection and were generally well tolerated, supporting the further development of islatravir as a flexible-dose treatment for individuals with HIV-1 infection. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome with ianalumab (VAY736) targeting B cells by BAFF receptor blockade coupled with enhanced, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ianalumab (VAY736), a B cell-depleting, B cell activating factor receptor-blocking, monoclonal antibody, in patients with active primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II, single-centre study. METHODS: Patients with pSS, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) ≥6, were randomised to ianalumab single infusion at either 3 mg/kg (n=6), 10 mg/kg (n=12) or placebo (n=9). Outcomes were measured blinded at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 24, and unblinded at end of study (EoS) when B cell numbers had recovered. Clinical outcomes included ESSDAI, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), salivary flow rate, ocular staining score, physician global assessment and patient assessments of fatigue and general quality of life. Laboratory-based measures included circulating leucocyte subsets and markers of B cell activity. RESULTS: A similar trend showing positive therapeutic effect by ianalumab was observed across the primary clinical outcome (ESSDAI) and all secondary clinical outcomes (ESSPRI, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Short Form-36, global assessments by physician and patient) versus the placebo-treated group. Rapid and profound B cell depletion of long-lasting duration occurred after a single infusion of ianalumab at either dose. Serum Ig light chains decreased, with return to baseline levels at EoS. Changes in some clinical outcomes persisted through to EoS in the higher dose group. Adverse effects were largely limited to mild to moderate infusion reactions within 24 hours of ianalumab administration. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results in this single-dose study suggest potent and sustained B cell depletion by ianalumab could provide therapeutic benefits in patients with pSS without major side effects.

Antiviral Activity, Safety, and Tolerability of Multiple Ascending Doses of Elbasvir or Grazoprevir in Participants Infected With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype-1 or -3.

PURPOSE: Elbasvir (MK-8742) and grazoprevir (MK-5172; Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey) are hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific inhibitors of the nonstructural protein 5A phosphoprotein and the nonstructural protein 3/4A protease, respectively. The aims of these studies were to evaluate the antiviral activity and safety of different doses of elbasvir or grazoprevir each administered as monotherapy to participants infected with either HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT3. METHODS: These 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential-panel, multiple ascending dose studies were conducted to assess the safety and pharmacodynamics of 5 days of once-daily elbasvir or 7 days of once-daily grazoprevir in adult male participants chronically infected with either HCV GT1 or GT3. FINDINGS: Oral administration of elbasvir or grazoprevir once daily exhibited potent antiviral activity in participants with chronic GT1 or GT3 HCV infections. HCV RNA levels declined rapidly (within 1 day for elbasvir and 2 days for grazoprevir). At 50 mg of elbasvir once daily, the mean maximum reductions in HCV RNA from baseline were 5.21, 4.17, and 3.12 log10 IU/mL for GT1b-, GT1a-, and GT3-infected participants, respectively. At 100 mg of grazoprevir once daily, the mean maximum reductions in HCV RNA from baseline were 4.74 and 2.64 log10 IU/mL for GT1- and GT3-infected participants. IMPLICATIONS: The results in the elbasvir monotherapy study showed that 10 to 50 mg of elbasvir was associated with a rapid decline in HCV viral load; the results in the grazoprevir monotherapy study suggest that doses of 50 mg of grazoprevir and higher are on the maximum response plateau of the dose-response curve for GT1-infected participants. The results of these proof-of-concept studies provided preliminary data for the selection of the dosages of elbasvir and grazoprevir to test in Phase II and III clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00998985 (Protocol 5172-004) and NCT01532973 (Protocol 8742-002).

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single rising doses of BI 655064, an antagonistic anti-CD40 antibody in healthy subjects: a potential novel treatment for autoimmune diseases.

PURPOSE: The CD40-CD40L pathway is a promising treatment target for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. The safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BI 655064, a novel humanised antagonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, were investigated in this first-in-human trial. METHODS: Healthy male subjects (n = 72) were randomised 3:1, within each BI 655064 dose group, to single intravenous (IV; 0.2-120 mg) or subcutaneous (SC; 40-120 mg) doses of BI 655064 or placebo. Safety, plasma exposure, CD40 receptor occupancy and CD40L-induced CD54 upregulation were assessed over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 43% of subjects (n = 31). Frequency and intensity of AEs were generally similar between BI 655064 and placebo and showed no dose relationship. The most frequent AEs were headache and nasopharyngitis. One mild rash and one local reaction occurred with SC BI 655064; two serious AEs were reported, both judged unrelated to BI 655064. Pharmacokinetic evaluation demonstrated a more than proportional increase in plasma exposure relative to BI 655064 dose, with a terminal half-life between 4 h and 4 days IV and approximately 5 days SC; doses ≥ 20 mg IV and 120 mg SC showed > 90% CD40 receptor occupancy and inhibition of CD54 upregulation, which lasted 7 days in the 120 mg IV and SC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses up to 120 mg BI 655064 IV and SC were well tolerated and showed a high potential to block the CD40-CD40L pathway, supporting further clinical development of BI 655064 in patients with autoimmune disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01510782.

Antiviral Activity, Safety, and Exposure-Response Relationships of GSK3532795, a Second-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Maturation Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Atazanavir With or Without Ritonavir in a Phase 2a Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Controlled Trial (AI468002).

BACKGROUND: GSK3532795 is a second-generation human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) maturation inhibitor that targets HIV-1 Gag, inhibiting the final protease cleavage between capsid protein p24 and spacer protein-1, producing immature, noninfectious virions. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, dose-ranging multipart trial. In part A, subtype B-infected subjects received 5-120 mg GSK3532795 (or placebo) once daily for 10 days. In part B, subtype B-infected subjects received 40 mg or 80 mg GSK3532795 once daily with atazanavir (ATV) with or without (±) ritonavir (RTV) or standard of care (SOC) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and ATV/RTV 300 mg/100 mg) for 28 days. In part C, subtype C-infected subjects received 40 mg or 120 mg GSK3532795 once daily (or placebo) for 10 days. Endpoints included change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline on day 11 (parts A/C) or day 29 (part B). RESULTS: A >1 log10 median decline in HIV-1 RNA was achieved by day 11 in parts A and C and day 29 in part B at GSK3532795 doses ≥40 mg; part B subjects receiving GSK3532795 and ATV ± RTV achieved similar declines to those receiving SOC. Median of the maximum declines in HIV-1 RNA were similar for the 40-120 mg once-daily dose groups regardless of baseline Gag polymorphisms. There were no deaths, adverse events leading to discontinuation, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GSK3532795 demonstrated potent antiviral activity against subtype B (monotherapy or with ATV ± RTV) and subtype C, and was generally well tolerated, which supported continued development of GSK3532795 in subjects with HIV-1 subtype B or subtype C. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01803074.

Baculovirus-based vaccination vectors allow for efficient induction of immune responses against plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein.

Baculovirus vectors are able to transduce a large variety of mammalian cell types and express transgenes placed under the control of heterologous promoters. In this study, we evaluated the potential of baculovirus vectors for malaria vaccination. To induce efficient CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses, we produced a series of vectors that display the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite (CS) protein in the virion envelope and/or allow for CS expression upon transduction of mammalian cells. We found that baculovirus vectors can transduce professional antigen-presenting cells and trigger their maturation, which is a prerequisite for efficient antigen presentation. Upon intramuscular injection into mice, the vector that both displayed and expressed CS induced higher anti-CS antibody titers (of the immunoglobulin (IgG)1 and IgG2a type) and a higher frequency of interferon-gamma-producing T cells specific to CS, than the vectors which either only displayed or only expressed CS. The baculovirus CS display/expression vector was also superior in inducing CS-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses in vitro using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from naive donors. This, together with the absence of pre-existing immunity to baculoviruses in humans, the absence of viral gene expression in mammalian cells, and the relative low immunogenicity of baculovirus virions, makes these vectors promising tools for vaccination. Furthermore, the ability to produce large amounts in serum-free medium at a low cost adds a further advantage to this vector system.

Baculovirus vectors: novel mammalian cell gene-delivery vehicles and their applications.

Various methods have been developed to transfer and express genes in mammalian cells. Each method, whether virally, non-virally, or physically-based, has unique favorable features, but also drawbacks with respect to meeting desired and specific needs. Baculoviruses have been used since 1983 to express recombinant genes controlled by strong insect-virus promoters in their natural host (insect) cells. Today this is a well-established and easy to handle system for producing large quantities of recombinant proteins for numerous purposes. In 1995 it was first published that recombinant baculoviruses are able to deliver genes into mammalian cells. These genes are expressed provided that they are controlled by a promoter which is active in mammalian cells. Since then, various vector variants have been developed and numerous potential and meaningful applications have been described. It is not surprising that the use of baculovirus vectors as mammalian cell gene delivery vectors is constantly increasing and that the system is undergoing permanent improvements. Based on the convenience of the system to transfer genes into mammalian cells, baculoviruses can be applied in cell-based assays for drug screening to overcome the long periods of time required to generate stable cell lines. Baculovirus vectors are able to deliver very large DNA sequences into mammalian cells and vectors for toxic gene products can also be generated. In addition, baculoviruses are valuable tools for launching viral infection in cases where there is no appropriate cell culture system. Moreover, recent research has shown that the vectors can be applied in vivo. Depending on the design of the study, baculovirus vectors allow for sustained gene expression or are able to induce an immune response directed against the delivered and/or displayed gene product. The latter offers the opportunity to generate monoclonal antibodies against certain proteins that have failed by other means. In addition, it points to the potential usefulness of baculovirus vectors as new kinds of vaccines. Baculovirus vectors are therefore considered an enabling technology for various product opportunities.

Advances in the development of non-human viral DNA-vectors for gene delivery.

Within the last two decades, various vectors based on human viruses have been developed as gene transfer vehicles for gene therapy applications and vaccination. However, one yet unresolved problem connected to the use of viral vectors in humans is the pre-existing immunity to most of these vectors in the vast majority of the population which can result in impaired gene transfer efficiency and increased secondary toxicity. One approach to solve this problem is the development of recombinant viruses of non-human origin as vectors for gene transfer. The major rationale for using such vectors is the avoidance of vector neutralization by pre-existing antibodies directed against the virus on which the vector is based. Use of vectors based on non-human viruses may therefore allow the use of lower initial vector doses to achieve efficient gene transfer. Side-effects caused by interactions between vectors derived from human viruses with a primed immune system or with blood components could also be reduced. Furthermore, these vectors might show new cell type tropisms and could therefore infect tissue and organs that are not accessible to current viral vectors. This review outlines some of the problems inherent in the human origin of current viral vectors and describes features and progress with non-human adenovirus and baculovirus-derived vectors that may provide alternatives.