Rates and Causes of Reoperations Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Within a 2-12 year Period.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation has been mainly used for the management of postsurgical persistent neuropathic. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the rate and causes for reoperation following spinal cord stimulation, and to identify risk factors for reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including patients who underwent surgical implantation of spinal cord stimulators within a 10-year period. The medical records of the included patients were reviewed for reoperations, demographics and certain clinical parameters. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared between patients with and without reoperations, and between patients with and without surgical site infections. RESULTS: Overall, 1014 index procedures and 175 reoperations were performed within the study period. At least 1 reoperation was performed in 97 (9.5%) cases. The most common cause for revision was lead migration or lead misplacement (n = 31, 3.0%). In 31 (3.1%) cases the stimulator was removed due to no pain relief. Surgical site infection that required reoperation developed in 30 cases (2.9%). Younger age was associated with a need for reoperation (Odds Ratio [OR]: .97,95% Confidence Interval [CI]:0.95-.99, P = .005), while higher Body Mass index and diabetes were associated with development of infection (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.11, P = .036 and OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.05-5.47, P = .033 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that certain measures could improve the overall reoperation rate after spinal cord stimulation, such as accurate positioning of the spinal cord stimulators and design of smaller generators. Moreover, preoperative optimization of patients could result in lower complication rate, lower reoperations rate, and subsequently better clinical outcomes.

Formal Patient Complaints and Malpractice Events Involving Orthopedic Spine Surgeons: A Ten-Year Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze patient complaints, potential risk, and malpractice events involving orthopedic spine surgeons over a 10-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unsolicited patient complaints may be associated with risk management and malpractice events. METHODS: We analyzed patient complaint, potential risk event, and malpractice event data for six orthopedic spine surgeons over a 10-year period. Patient complaints were analyzed and classified according to the Patient Complaint Analysis System. Baseline demographics were recorded for patients with complaints as well as the surgeons. A control group consisting of all patients seen by the six surgeons during the study period was created to identify patient and physician risk factors for formal patient complaints. Event rates (for complaints, risk, and malpractice events) were calculated by dividing the number of events by the total number of unique patients seen. RESULTS: There were 214 complaint designations among 202 patients with formal complaints, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.79%. Patients were most likely to complain about access and availability (35%) followed by care and treatment (32%). Of the 68 complaints regarding care and treatment, 34 were related to dissatisfaction with surgical outcome. Complications were identified in 26/34 cases. The malpractice event rate ranged from 0.06% to 0.65%. Patients who had surgery ( P < 0.0001) or a mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental disorder ( P = 0.0004) were more likely to file complaints compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: While infrequent, patient complaints against orthopedic spine surgeons are most related to access and availability. The rate of malpractice events varies widely between surgeons.

Development and validation of a simplified thoracolumbar spine fracture classification system.

STUDY DESIGN: Development and validation of fracture classification system. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a Simplified Classification System (SCS) for Thoraco-Lumbar (TL) fractures (SCS - TL fractures). SETTING: Tertiary Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India METHODS: Based on the International Spinal Cord Society Spine Trauma Study Group (ISCoS STSG, n = 23) experts' clinical consensus conducted by the senior author and on his own experience, the Denis classification for TL fractures was modified to develop a SCS-TL fractures that could guide the management. After Face and Content validation, Construct validation was done in two stages. First stage analyzed if management of 30 cases of TL fractures, as suggested by the SCS - TL fractures and ISCoS STSG (n = 9) as well as other (n = 5) experts, matched. Second stage was a one year prospective study analyzing if the management suggested matched the management actually carried out by different spine surgeons (n = 10) working at a single institution. RESULTS: In the first stage there was 100% agreement for management (conservative or surgical) as proposed by experts and that suggested by the proposed classification for TL fractures whereas for surgical approach there was 88% agreement. In the second stage, there was 100% agreement for the management as well as surgical approach as carried out at our centre and that proposed by the SCS for TL fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed SCS-TL fractures helps in classifying and in decision making for management of TL fractures. The next phase of validation would involve multicentric reliability studies and prospective application of the SCS- TL fractures.

Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative spinal wound infections are relatively common and are often associated with increased morbidity and poor long-term patient outcomes. The purposes of this study were to identify the common bacterial flora on the skin overlying the lumbar spine and evaluate the efficacy of readily available skin-preparation solutions in the elimination of bacterial pathogens from the surgical site following skin preparation. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. At the time of surgery, the patients were randomized to be treated with one of two widely used, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin-preparation solutions: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol) or DuraPrep (0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol). Specimens for aerobic and anaerobic cultures were obtained prior to skin preparation (pre-preparation), after skin preparation (post-preparation), and after wound closure (post-closure). A validated neutralization solution was used for each culture to ensure that the antimicrobial activity was stopped immediately after the sample was taken. Positive cultures and specific bacterial pathogens were recorded. RESULTS: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Propionibacterium acnes, and Corynebacterium were the most commonly isolated organisms prior to skin preparation. The overall rate of positive cultures prior to skin preparation was 82%. The overall rate of positive cultures after skin preparation was 0% (zero of fifty) in the ChloraPrep group and 6% (three of fifty) in the DuraPrep group (p = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.006 to 0.085). There was an increase in positive cultures after wound closure, but there was no difference between the ChloraPrep group (34%, seventeen of fifty) and the DuraPrep group (32%, sixteen of fifty) (p = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.284 to 0.483). Body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, and estimated blood loss did not a show significant association with post-closure positive culture results. CONCLUSIONS: ChloraPrep and DuraPrep are equally effective skin-preparation solutions for eradication of common bacterial pathogens on the skin overlying the lumbar spine.

Thoracolumbar injuries in the athlete.

Acute thoracolumbar injury in the athlete can be a disabling condition that requires thorough evaluation and treatment. Although most thoracolumbar spine injuries are benign myofascial strains that respond well to nonsurgical management, the spectrum of injuries is broad and includes fractures and bony instability, ligamentous instability, and neurologic compromise. Evaluation of thoracolumbar injuries requires a rapid and focused evaluation at the time of injury to rule out catastrophic and neurologically threatening injuries; a detailed history and physical examination carried out at a later point in time should be paired with appropriate imaging studies. Initial radiographs may be combined with dynamic radiography, bone scanning, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging to delineate the structural extent of injury. Acute treatment may be required and initiated at the time of injury; further treatment should be carried out once the nature and extent of the injury is fully understood. Nonoperative treatment is successful in most of the injuries. Operative treatment is applied in selected cases of structural instability or neurologic compromise.

Acute outcomes of cervical spine injuries in the elderly: atlantaxial vs subaxial injuries.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported on the outcomes of spinal cord injuries in the elderly. Our aim was to identify acute survival differences between elderly patients with atlantoaxial injuries relative to subaxial injuries at our institution and to determine whether operative treatment is associated with improved survival rates in either population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review of all traumatic cervical spine injuries in patients at least 65 years of age at a single tertiary care center. METHODS: A total of 193 consecutive patients at least 65 years of age treated at a single tertiary care center over a 12-year period were identified. Initial hospitalization records were reviewed. Patients were divided by anatomic level of injury: atlantoaxial (C1 or C2) and subaxial (C3 or below). Demographics, mechanism, and mortality rates were compared. Each group was further divided by treatment (operative or nonoperative), and inpatient survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Statistically similar survival rates were observed among patients with atlantoaxial and subaxial injuries (P = 0.10). Patients with nonoperatively treated subaxial injuries died at significantly higher rates than did their operatively treated peers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this large comprehensive series of elderly patients with cervical spine injuries, survival rates were comparable regardless of anatomic level of injury. The operative treatment of subaxial injuries was associated with an improved acute survival rate vs nonoperative management. Further prospective study is needed to better assess this relationship.

Acute mortality and complications of cervical spine injuries in the elderly at a single tertiary care center.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review of all traumatic cervical spine injuries at a single tertiary care center. OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute survival of patients aged 65 and over with a variety of cervical spine injuries, regardless of operative or conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with cervical spine injuries have historically suffered from high mortality rates. More recent literature has demonstrated improved outcomes among operatively treated elderly, but has suggested that the nonoperative treatment of cervical injuries in this population may itself contribute to increased mortality rates. METHODS: One thousand seventy-three consecutive patients were identified and initial hospitalization records reviewed. Ninety-four patients were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 979 patients were divided by age into young and elderly groups. Sex distribution, mechanism, injury type, comorbidities, and mortality and complication rates were compared. Elderly patients were further divided into operative and nonoperative groups and acute outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The overall acute mortality rate for all patients with cervical spine injuries was 5.92%. Eighty-six percent of all patients 65 and over survived, as did 96.1% of younger patients. Seventy-three percent of elderly patients with complete injuries survived, as did 80% of those with incomplete injuries, and 95.6% of intact elderly. Acute mortality rates were statistically comparable in both the operatively and nonoperatively treated groups of elderly. CONCLUSIONS: In this large comprehensive series of elderly patients with cervical spine injuries, statistically comparable survival rates were achieved in both operatively treated and nonoperatively treated patient populations. This finding challenges the conclusion that the nonoperative treatment of the elderly necessarily results in increased acute mortality.

Delayed epidural hematoma after spinal surgery: a report of 4 cases.

Symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma is a rare and potentially devastating complication of spinal surgery. The overwhelming majority of reported cases have occurred in the immediate postoperative period. A recent publication defined the clinical entity of delayed postoperative epidural spinal hematoma as neurologic deterioration due to an epidural hematoma occurring at least 3 days after the index procedure. Only 2 such cases have been reported in the lumbar spine to date. Four cases of delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematoma were identified over a 6-year period among the spine surgeons at a single large academic institution. Each case involved the lumbar spine. The details of each patient's initial surgery, presentation, and hospital course were then gathered from a retrospective chart review. The 4 patients presented are unusual in their delayed symptomatic presentations of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma. Despite the longer time to onset, however, our patients exhibited many of the characteristics common to cases that presented in the acute postoperative period. The spine surgeon must remain vigilant for the possibility of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma in at-risk patients, even weeks after the original surgical procedure.

Cervical spine injuries in the elderly: acute postoperative mortality.

STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively reviewed 12 years of consecutive patients with cervical spine injuries. OBJECTIVE: To establish reasonable expectations for short-term postoperative survival of the elderly patient with a cervical spine injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have outlined dismal expectations for patients older than 65 years, with cervical spine injuries. This result has led many surgeons to consider more conservative treatment when compared to younger patients with similar injuries. METHODS: A total of 458 patients treated surgically over a 12-year period at a single tertiary spine care center were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups by age, older and younger than 65 years. Prospective data were collected from the time of admission to discharge from the acute care facility, and included age, injury etiology, anatomic and neurologic injury patterns, and morbidity and mortality RESULTS: There were 74 patients older than 65 years and 384 younger than 65 years who underwent surgical stabilization of their injury. The overall mortality rate during the initial hospitalization was 3.9%. The mortality rate of the elderly group was 12.2%, while 2.3% for the younger patients. Common postoperative morbidities in the older group included myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, and gastrointestinal bleeds. In the younger group, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and urinary tract infections were more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: The realistic expectation for short-term postoperative survival in the elderly patient with a cervical spine injury is 87.8%. With a complete neurologic injury, 80.0% short-term survival was observed. Incomplete neurologic injury yielded 83.3% short-term survival. Close to 100.0% survival can be expected with no neurologic injury.