RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) results, and to evaluate the treatment cycle outcomes of embryos derived from a single pronucleus (1PN) vs. two pronuclei (2PN). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study from January 2018 to December 2022 involving in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGT-M treatment cycles. SETTING: Single, academically affiliated fertility center. PATIENTS: A total of 244 patients underwent 351 IVF-PGT-M treatment cycles. INTERVENTION: Embryo biopsy with molecular testing for a monogenic disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The molecular diagnosis results and clinical outcomes after the transfer of embryos derived from 1PN and 2PN in IVF-PGT-M treatment cycles. RESULTS: Embryos derived from 1PN have a significantly low developmental potential with a lower rate of embryos that underwent biopsy compared with 2PN-derived embryos; 1PN-derived embryos demonstrated a significantly lower number of blastocysts (24% vs. 37.9%) and top-quality blastocysts (22.3% vs. 48.1%) compared with 2PN-derived embryos. Lower successfully completed and unaffected PGT-M results were achieved in 1PN compared with 2PN-derived embryos (47.1% vs. 65.5% and 18.7% vs. 31.6%, respectively), with significantly higher abnormal molecular results (39.6% vs. 22.7%). The embryo transfer of 24 1PN-derived embryos with no affected genetic disorder resulted in 5 (20.8%) clinical pregnancies and 4 (16.7%) live births (LBs). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of fewer embryos derived from 1PN that yielded unaffected embryos suitable for transfer, the clinical pregnancy and LB rate of 1PN embryos undergoing PGT-M are reassuring. We, therefore, suggest applying PGT-M to embryos derived from 1PN embryos to improve the cumulative clinical pregnancy and LB rates.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The surgical technique for uterine closure following cesarean section influences the healing of the cesarean scar; however, there is still no consensus on the optimal technique regarding the closure of the endometrium layer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of closure versus non-closure of the endometrium during cesarean section on the risk to develop uterine scar defect and associated symptoms. METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted of women undergoing first elective cesarean section at a single tertiary medical center. Exclusion criteria included previous uterine scar, preterm delivery and dysmorphic uterus. Women were randomized for endometrial layer closure versus non-closure. Six months following surgery, women were invited to the ambulatory gynecological clinic for follow-up visit. 2-D transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed to evaluate the cesarean scar characteristics. In addition, women were evaluated for symptoms that might be associated with uterine scar defect. Primary outcome was defined as the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) at the uterine cesarean scar. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. RESULTS: 130 women were recruited to the study, of them follow-up was achieved in 113 (86.9%). 61 (54%) vs. 52 (46%) of the women were included in the endometrial closure vs. non-closure groups, respectively. Groups were comparable for patient's demographic, clinical characteristics and follow-up time for postoperative evaluation. Median RMT was 5.3 (3.0-7.7) vs. 4.6 (3.0-6.5) mm for the endometrial closure and non-closure groups, respectively (p = 0.38). Substantially low RMT (< 2.5 mm) was measured in four (6.6%) women in the endometrial closure group and three (5.8%) of the women in the non-closure group (p = 0.86). All other uterine scar sonographic measurements, as well as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and intermenstrual bleeding rates were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Closure versus non-closure of the endometrial layer during cesarean uterine incision repair has no significant difference in cesarean scar characteristics and symptom rates at 6 months follow-up.