[Suspected allergy to COVID-19 vaccines: A retrospective study of 320 patients]. / Suspicion d'allergie aux vaccins anti COVID-19 : étude rétrospective sur 320 patients.

Introduction: The health context with COVID-19 pandemic has led to fast development of many vaccines against the SarS-Cov-2 virus. Four of them are currently available in France and contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 as excipients, already described as causing anaphylaxis. French recommendations have been suggested by allergology authorities and proposed a course of action in the event of a suspected allergy to these vaccines. Thus, allergies to excipients were the only contraindication to COVID-19 vaccination. Our main objective was to determine the impact of these allergology vaccine recommendations on the management of these patients. Our secondary objective was to determine prevalence of true allergies to these vaccines. Materials and methods: We conducted a unicentric descriptive retrospective study with all patients over 18 years of age referred for an allergological opinion before or after an injection of one of the anti-COVID-19 vaccines. Nineteen patients were classified into different interest groups, based on french recommendations. Results: The vast majority of patients did not require a pre-vaccination allergological assessment. Indeed, only 25 patients received skin tests prior to vaccination. The rest of patients were able to be vaccinated without allergological assessment. Patients not vaccinated due to allergy to excipients represent less than 1% of the population (n = 3/320). Conclusion: French recommendations made it possible to vaccinate the vast majority of patients included in our study. Allergy to PEG, polysorbate or their derivatives, the only contraindication to anti-COVID vaccination, according to the recommendations of February 2021, remains rare. Today, several authors propose tolerance inductions allowing the vaccination of patients allergic to PEGs or their derivatives with good tolerance.

Therapeutic management of adults with atopic dermatitis: comparison with psoriasis and chronic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic options in atopic dermatitis rely on consensus-based guidelines, also established for psoriasis and chronic urticaria. However, the therapeutic approach in atopic dermatitis, especially in the moderate-to-severe forms of the disease, seems less aggressive than in psoriasis and in chronic urticaria with a less frequent use of systemic agents. OBJECTIVES: To compare in real-life conditions the therapeutic management of adults with atopic dermatitis with those with psoriasis and chronic urticaria. METHODS: A transversal analysis was performed in May 2017, using retrospective data from a monocentric database. Data on epidemiology, severity, therapeutic educational intervention and systemic treatments were analysed from 401 patients with atopic dermatitis, compared with data from 230 patients with chronic urticaria and 535 patients with psoriasis. RESULTS: A high proportion (73%) of atopic dermatitis patients presented with a moderate-to-severe form of the disease compared to only 39% of chronic urticaria and 17% of psoriasis patients. Most of atopic dermatitis patients (78%) had completed a therapeutic educational programme, while the adherence was lower in chronic urticaria (35%) and in psoriasis (3%) patients. A systemic treatment, including biologicals, was recorded in 8% of atopic dermatitis patients, while it concerned 26% and 47% of chronic urticaria and psoriasis patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that atopic dermatitis treatment mostly relies on topical treatments. Only a minority of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients who are eligible for a systemic treatment receive such therapy. This may suggest promoting a more frequent use of systemic agents in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

[NSAID urticaria: Similar management to acute urticaria]. / Urticaire aux AINS : une prise en charge similaire à celle de l'urticaire aiguë.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most common providers of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Among these reactions, isolated acute urticaria is the most common clinical feature with a non-allergic origin. It is a pharmacological side effect resulting from the alteration of arachidonic acid metabolism induced by NSAIDs. Diagnosis of this acute urticaria is clinical, requiring no allergy testing. Currently, the recommended therapeutic management of NSAID urticaria is the avoidance of all NSAID with COX-1 inhibitor activity (even if when reintroduced, they are most often well tolerated) and the use of selective COX-2 inhibitors. This review focuses on urticaria reactions to NSAIDs, which are simple to manage.

[Fixed drug eruption to clarithromycin: The importance of challenge tests in diagnosis]. / Érythème pigmenté fixe à la clarithromycine : importance des tests de provocation pour le diagnostic.

BACKGROUND: Determining the substance responsible for recurrent fixed drug eruption (FDE) may be difficult in the case of patients on multiple medication. Allergy testing may prove invaluable in such situations, as we demonstrate herein with an original case. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 49-year-old man presented a rash on the seventh day of treatment with esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin prescribed for gastritis involving Helicobacter pylori. The condition regressed spontaneously within a few days, but left three areas of hyperpigmentation. The patient subsequently reported four further episodes consisting of stereotypical reactivation in the areas of the three initial lesions and occurring 24hours after use of clarithromycin (2 episodes) and amoxicillin (2 episodes). The patient resumed proton pump inhibitor therapy (esomeprazole) without incident. Based on history taking, an initial diagnosis was made of multiple fixed drug eruption involving amoxicillin and clarithromycin. The initial skin allergy investigations were negative (patch-tests for amoxicillin and clarithromycin on healthy skin on the patient's back and on the affected area). After discussion, we decided to reintroduce the suspected drugs in succession. Beginning with clarithromycin, 12h after a single dose of 250mg, we noted an erythematous reaction on the pigmented areas, together with a burning sensation. In an identical challenge test with amoxicillin (500mg), the latter drug was perfectly well tolerated, ruling out the diagnosis of FDE to amoxicillin and thus the diagnosis of multiple FDE suggested by the patient history. DISCUSSION: FDEs to macrolides are rare, and herein we report a new case. Our observation confirms the diagnostic value of challenge tests in FDE. These tests should only be performed in the event of non-severe FDE, in other words not in bullous or systemic reactions, and they often constitute the only diagnostic approach possible, since skin tests are rarely positive during investigation for FDE.

[Diversity of cutaneous bacteria decreases inflammation]. / Plus il y a de bactéries différentes, moins il y a d'inflammation : la révolution microbiotique.

Human microbiota includes all microorganisms, saprophytes and pathogens that colonize our bodies. Recent advances in metagenomic analysis techniques have expanded our knowledge of the microbiota and fundamentally changed our view of its relationships with the immune system. The commensal flora appears to be essential to the development of the immune system, and the diversity of the microbiota is correlated with good health status of individuals. These findings open up new conceptual and therapeutic approaches in chronic inflammatory diseases.

Measurement of skin thickness and skin elasticity to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive decongestive treatment in patients with lymphoedema: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) is used to treat patients with severe lymphoedema. The efficacy of CDP is usually quantified by calculating limb volume from repeated measurements of circumference at least 10 points before and after treatment of an affected limb. Measurement is time-consuming and operator-dependent. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether decreased dermal thickness is correlated with decreased volume after intensive CDP. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients admitted for intensive CDP were studied over a 6-month period. Before and after CDP, we measured circumference, dermal thickness elasticity and finally improvement in quality of life using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. Only three patients were previously untreated. The average relative reduction in limb volume was 4% and the reduction in the dermal thickness was 15% (correlation: r = 0.37, P = 0.05). Viscoelasticity was decreased by 13%. VAS quality of life score was improved by 30%. CONCLUSION: Changes in dermal thickness are slightly correlated with volume changes before and after 5-day intensive CDP in a selected series of patients previously treated at home.

Patients' acceptance of medical photography in a French adult and paediatric dermatology department: a questionnaire survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of medical photography by dermatologists, no study on patients' perceptions of photography in dermatology has been performed to date. OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to evaluate patients' perceptions of medical photography. Secondly, to assess whether perceptions differed between patients in our adult department and parents accompanying a child in our paediatric department. METHODS: An opinion survey was conducted at the Hospital of Tours (France) among adult patients (adult department) and accompanying parents (paediatric department) by completion of a questionnaire after any medical photography had been performed. RESULTS: We collected 272 questionnaires regarding 158 adults and 114 children. A camera used only in the department, and storage of the images in the department's records were the most accepted modalities (> 90%), especially in the paediatric survey. Respondents agreed with the sharing of the images with other practitioners and in medical meetings (> 85%) rather than distribution via publications (58·3%), e-mails (45·5%), health magazines (44·3%) and websites (32·0%). Most (78·8%) considered that the consent form should list all the possible uses of the images. Need for renewed consent for each use of the images was significantly more often expressed in the paediatric than the adult survey (44·5% vs. 24·5%, P = 0·001). More than 95% of respondents considered medical photography to be useful for improving diagnosis, monitoring of skin disease and aiding teaching. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could be used to improve practice, to increase the acceptability of medical photography and for devising a standardized consent form for medical practitioners performing medical photography.