Gender disparities are present in academic rank and leadership positions despite overall equivalence in research productivity indices among senior members of American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Fellowship Faculty.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to examine potential disparities in scholarly performance based on sex, academic rank, leadership positions, and regional distribution of faculty in accredited Head and Neck Surgery fellowships in the United States. METHODS: Online faculty listings for 37 accredited fellowships were organized according to academic rank, leadership position, sex, and institutional location. Academic productivity was measured with three bibliometric indices: h-index, m-index, and the weighted relative citation ratio. RESULTS: A total of 732 faculty members were included, of which 153 (21%) were female. Fifty-eight males (89.2%) held leadership positions, compared to seven females (10.8%). There was no significant difference in overall productivity between male and female senior faculty. There were regional differences in productivity by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Females are underrepresented in senior faculty and within three common leadership positions, although scholarly productivity for male and female senior faculty and for those in leadership positions is similar.

Surgery for Graves' disease in the era of robotic-assisted surgery: a study of safety and feasibility in the Western population.

PURPOSE: Thyroid surgery for Graves' disease is known to be associated with higher risk of complications. We seek to compare outcomes between robotic-assisted and open cervical approach thyroid surgery in patients with Graves' disease in the Western population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected databases for patients undergoing robotic-assisted or conventional cervical approach thyroid surgery for Graves' disease at two academic medical centers, one in North America (New Orleans, LA) and one in Europe (Paris, France). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included, of which 56 (55%) underwent robotic thyroidectomy and 46 (45%) underwent conventional open cervical thyroidectomy. Mean age was 40.2 ± 13.2 years and 94 (92%) were females. Mean BMI for the sample was 27.7 ± 10.2 kg/m2. There was a trend towards larger specimen volume in the robotic-assisted group, 84.9 ± 62.2 cm3 versus 65.2 ± 40.5 cm3 (p = 0.07). Mean length of stay for the French patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery was 3.2 ± 0.5 days. For the American cohort, length of stay was significantly shorter for robotic-assisted thyroidectomy, at 0.8 ± 0.4 days versus 1.0 ± 0.2 days (p = 0.003). Operative time was longer in patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy (174.4 ± 33.5 min) compared to patients who underwent traditional cervical approach (121.2 ± 41.1 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in complication rates for the overall sample of patients undergoing robotic-assisted or open cervical procedures. CONCLUSION: Robotic thyroid surgery is safe in a select group of patients with Graves' disease in the Western population. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate these findings.

Selective parathyroid venous sampling in primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy requires accurate preoperative localization techniques. There is considerable controversy about the effectiveness of selective parathyroid venous sampling (sPVS) in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the diagnostic accuracy of sPVS as a preoperative localization modality in PHPT. METHODS: Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of sPVS for PHPT were electronically searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases. Two independent authors reviewed the studies, and revised quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy study tool was used for the quality assessment. Study heterogeneity and pooled estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred and two unique studies were identified. Of those, 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of sPVS were 74%, 41%, and 1.55, respectively. The area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.684, indicating an average discriminatory ability of sPVS. On comparison between sPVS and noninvasive imaging modalities, sensitivity, PLR, and positive posttest probability were significantly higher in sPVS compared to noninvasive imaging modalities. Interestingly, super-selective venous sampling had the highest sensitivity, accuracy, and positive posttest probability compared to other parathyroid venous sampling techniques. CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis to examine the accuracy of sPVS in PHPT. sPVS had higher pooled sensitivity when compared to noninvasive modalities in revision parathyroid surgery. However, the invasiveness of this technique does not favor its routine use for preoperative localization. Super-selective venous sampling was the most accurate among all other parathyroid venous sampling techniques. Laryngoscope, 2662-2667, 2018.