RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess reliability and validity of the Resilience Scale 11 (RS-11) and develop a shorter scale in a population-based study. METHODS: The RS-11 scale was administered to 3942 participants (aged 64 - 94 years) of the KORA-Age study. To test reliability, factor analyses were carried out and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) was measured. Construct validity was measured by correlating scores with psychological constructs. The criterion for a shorter scale was a minimum internal consistency of .80. Shorter models were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of RS-5 to RS-11 was analyzed. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the RS-11 gave a 1-factor solution. Internal consistency was α = .86. A shorter version of the scale was developed with 5 items, which also gave a 1-factor solution and showed good validity. Internal consistency of this shorter scale: Resilience Scale 5 (RS-5) was α = .80. Sensitivity and specificity of RS-5 compared with RS-11 were .79 and .91 respectively. Both scales correlated significantly in expected directions with related constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The RS-11 and the RS-5 are reliable, consistent and valid instruments to measure the ability of elderly individuals to successfully cope with change and misfortune.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: prior literature suggests that comorbidity with depression significantly worsens the health state of people with chronic diseases. OBJECTIVE: the present study examines whether depressed mood increased medical care use for patients with a comorbid physical disease. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: the study was a population-based study (KORA-Age), with 3,938 participants aged 64-94. METHODS: we investigated differences in health services use in participants with and without depressed mood (Geriatric Depression Scale). A further adjustment for disease was done and differences were examined with the Mann-Whitney U test. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for doctors' appointments or the number of days in hospital were explored with (zero-inflated) negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: there are increased self-neglecting behaviours and medical comorbidities in participants with depressed mood. Depressed mood increased participants' use of medical services (P < 0.0001). Among participants who visited the doctor during the last 3 months, those with depressed mood had more visits than those without depressed mood, irrespective of somatic comorbidities (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05 for ill and healthy, respectively). Additionally, patients with coexisting depressed mood and physical disease visited the doctor's practice significantly more often. Having depressed mood significantly increases the likelihood for more doctor visits (IRR = 1.5, CI = 1.3-1.7) and longer hospital stays (IRR = 1.9, CI = 1.6-2.3). In participants with somatic comorbidities the risk is even greater (IRR = 1.6, CI = 1.3-2, for the number of doctors visits and IRR = 2, CI = 1.4-2.9, for the number of days in the hospital). CONCLUSIONS: results suggest that patients with depressed mood had increased use of health-care services overall, particularly those with somatic comorbidities.