RESUMO
BackgroundAge/frailty are strong predictors of COVID-19 mortality. After the second BNT162b2 dose, immunity wanes faster in older ([≥]65 years) versus younger adults. The durability of response after the third vaccine is unclear. MethodsThis prospective cohort study included healthcare workers/family members[≥]60 years who received a third BNT162b2 dose. Blood samples were drawn immediately before (T0), 10{square}19 (T1), and 74{square}103 (T2) days after the third dose. Anti-spike IgG titers were determined using a commercial assay, seropositivity was defined as[≥]50 AU/mL. Neutralising antibody titres were determined at T2. Adverse events, COVID-19 infections, and clinical frailty scale (CFS) levels were documented. FindingsThe analysis included 97 participants (median age, 70 years [IQR, 66{square}74], 58% CFS level 2). IgG titres, which increased significantly from T0 to T1 (medians, 440 AU/mL [IQR, 294{square}923] and 25,429 [14203{square}36114] AU/mL, respectively; p<0{middle dot}001), decreased significantly by T2, but all remained seropositive (median, 8306 AU/mL [IQR, 4595{square}14701], p<0{middle dot}001 vs T1). In a multivariable analysis, only time from the first vaccine was significantly associated with lower IgG levels at T2 (p=0{middle dot}004). At T2, 60 patients were evaluated for neutralising antibodies; all were seropositive (median, 1294 antibody titre [IQR, 848{square}2072]). Neutralising antibody and anti-spike IgG levels were correlated (R=0{middle dot}6, p<0{middle dot}001). No major adverse events or COVID-19 infections were reported. InterpretationAnti-spike IgG and neutralising antibody levels remain adequate 3 months after the third BNT162b2 vaccine in healthy adults[≥]60 years, although the decline in IgG is concerning. A third vaccine dose in this population should be top priority. FundingNo external funding. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed on Aug 1, 2021, for published research articles with no date restrictions, using the search terms of "SARS-Cov-2", "COVID-19", "vaccine", "dose", "antibody response", and "adults" with English as a filter. Several studies were identified that investigated waning of immunity in healthy adults. It is well established through epidemiology and serology studies that in healthy adults, the protection conferred by the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (Pfizer/BioNtech) wanes significantly after several months. Studies have also shown that the immune response to the vaccine varies with age, and that after the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, the older adult population (65-85 years of age) typically has a lower immune response (as reflected in an analysis of anti-spike IgG antibodies and neutralising antibody titres), than younger adults (18-55 years of age), and that the immunity wanes in all age groups within several months. Added value of this studyThis is, to our knowledge, the first study that examined anti-spike IgG and neutralising antibody titres three months after the third BNT162b2 vaccine dose. The study has demonstrated that three months after that dose, participants, who were healthy adults aged 60 years and older, remained anti-spike IgG seropositive, although a significant decrease in anti-spike IgG titres was observed (compared to two weeks after the third dose). In addition, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the neutralising antibody titres and the anti-spike IgG titres, and all participants were seropositive for neutralising antibodies three months after the third dose. Also, no major adverse events or COVID-19 infections were reported. Implications of all the available evidenceAs our data suggest that a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine is effective in maintaining adequate immune response against COVID-19 for at least several months in healthy adults aged 60 years and older, and as it is well established that older adults are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 mortality, providing a third dose to this population should be a top priority. Our data also highlight that understanding the waning of the immune response in other age groups is key for making evidence-based policies regarding booster vaccinations for the population at large.
RESUMO
BackgroundMethodologically rigorous studies on Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection are critically needed to inform national and global policy on Covid-19 vaccine use. In Israel, healthcare personnel (HCP) were initially prioritized for Covid-19 vaccination, creating an ideal setting to evaluate real-world VE in a closely monitored population. MethodsWe conducted a prospective study among HCP in 6 hospitals to estimate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants filled out weekly symptom questionnaires, provided weekly nasal specimens, and three serology samples - at enrollment, 30 days and 90 days. We estimated VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Cox Proportional Hazards model and against a combined PCR/serology endpoint using Fishers exact test. FindingsOf the 1,567 HCP enrolled between December 27, 2020 and February 15, 2021, 1,250 previously uninfected participants were included in the primary analysis; 998 (79.8%) were vaccinated with their first dose prior to or at enrollment, all with Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. There were four PCR-positive events among vaccinated participants, and nine among unvaccinated participants. Adjusted two-dose VE against any PCR- confirmed infection was 94.5% (95% CI: 82.6%-98.2%); adjusted two-dose VE against a combined endpoint of PCR and seroconversion for a 60-day follow-up period was 94.5% (95% CI: 63.0%-99.0%). Five PCR-positive samples from study participants were sequenced; all were alpha variant. InterpretationOur prospective VE study of HCP in Israel with rigorous weekly surveillance found very high VE for two doses of Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 during a period of predominant alpha variant circulation. FundingClalit Health Services
RESUMO
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been raging for over a year, creating global detrimental impact. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has demonstrated high protection levels, yet apprehension exists that several variants of concerns (VOCs) can surmount the immune defenses generated by the vaccines. Neutralization assays have revealed some reduction in neutralization of VOCs B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, but the relevance of these assays in real life remains unclear. We performed a case-control study that examined the distribution of SARS-CoV-2 variants observed in infections of vaccinated individuals ("breakthrough cases") and matched infections of unvaccinated individuals. We hypothesized that if there is lower vaccine effectiveness against one of the VOCs, its proportion among the breakthrough cases should be higher than among unvaccinated cases. Our results show that vaccinees that tested positive at least a week after the second dose were indeed disproportionally infected with B.1.351, as compared with unvaccinated individuals (odds ratio of 8:1). Those who tested positive between two weeks after the first dose and one week after the second dose, were disproportionally infected by B.1.1.7 (odds ratio of 26:10), suggesting reduced vaccine effectiveness against both VOCs at particular time windows following vaccination. Nevertheless, the B.1.351 incidence in Israel to-date remains low and vaccine effectiveness remains high among those fully vaccinated. These results overall suggest that vaccine breakthrough infection may be more frequent with both VOCs, yet a combination of mass-vaccination with two doses coupled with non-pharmaceutical interventions control and contain their spread.
RESUMO
No studies evaluating the association between statins and outcomes of patients with seasonal influenza have been performed since the 2007-2008 and the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza seasons. All consecutive hospitalized patients between October 2017 and April 2018, diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed influenza A and B virus, were included. Patients were divided into two groups: statin and non-statin users. Outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, complications (pneumonia, myocarditis, encephalitis, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support), length of hospital stay, and readmission rates. A multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for mortality risk factors. To compare the groups, we matched patients to the nearest neighbor propensity score. Of the 526 patients ill with influenza A (201/526) and B (325/526), 36% (188/526) were statin users; 64% (338/526) were not. Statin users were older (78 vs.70; p = < 0.05) and suffered from more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity scores of 6 vs.4; p < 0.005). The 30-day mortality rate among statin vs. non-statin users was 6% vs. 8% (p = 0.3). On multivariate analysis, statin use was not associated with mortality benefit (OR = 0.67 (0.29-1.36)). After propensity score matching, the results were unchanged (OR = 0.71 (0.29-1.71)). Statin users were diagnosed with less complicated diseases as they were less likely to receive vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, and/or transfer to the ICU. Although statin users were significantly older and exhibited more comorbidities, 30-day mortality rates did not differ between statin users and non-users, which may signify a protective role of statins on seasonal influenza patients. Further studies performed during different influenza seasons and different subtypes are essential.
