Global benchmarks in primary robotic bariatric surgery redefine quality standards for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Whether the benefits of the robotic platform in bariatric surgery translate into superior surgical outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the 'best possible' outcomes for robotic bariatric surgery and compare them with the established laparoscopic benchmarks. METHODS: Benchmark cut-offs were established for consecutive primary robotic bariatric surgery patients of 17 centres across four continents (13 expert centres and 4 learning phase centres) using the 75th percentile of the median outcome values until 90 days after surgery. The benchmark patients had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnoea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, history of thromboembolic events, BMI greater than 50 kg/m2, or age greater than 65 years. RESULTS: A total of 9097 patients were included, who were mainly female (75.5%) and who had a mean(s.d.) age of 44.7(11.5) years and a mean(s.d.) baseline BMI of 44.6(7.7) kg/m2. In expert centres, 13.74% of the 3020 patients who underwent primary robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 5.9% of the 4078 patients who underwent primary robotic sleeve gastrectomy presented with greater than or equal to one complication within 90 postoperative days. No patient died and 1.1% of patients had adverse events related to the robotic platform. When compared with laparoscopic benchmarks, robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had lower benchmark cut-offs for hospital stay, postoperative bleeding, and marginal ulceration, but the duration of the operation was 42 min longer. For most surgical outcomes, robotic sleeve gastrectomy outperformed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with a comparable duration of the operation. In robotic learning phase centres, outcomes were within the established benchmarks only for low-risk robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. CONCLUSION: The newly established benchmarks suggest that robotic bariatric surgery may enhance surgical safety compared with laparoscopic bariatric surgery; however, the duration of the operation for robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is longer.

Infiltration Depth is the Most Relevant Risk Factor for Overall Metastases in Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Research in early esophageal adenocarcinoma focused on prediction of lymph node metastases in order to stratify patients for endoscopic treatment instead of esophagectomy. Although distant metastases were described in rates of up to 13% of patients within a follow-up of 3 years, their prediction has been neglected so far. METHODS: In a secondary analysis, a cohort of 217 patients (53 T1a and 164 T1b) treated by esophagectomy was analyzed for histopathological risk factors. Their ability to predict the combination of lymph node metastases at surgery as well as metachronous locoregional and distant metastases (overall metastatic rate) was assessed by uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Tumor invasion depth was correlated with both lymph node metastases at surgery (τ = 0.141; P = .012), tumor recurrences (τ = 0.152; P = .014), and distant metastases (τ = 0.122; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 1.02-1.67; P = .033) per increasing tumor invasion depth and of 3.5 (95% CI 1.70-6.56; P < .001) for lymphovascular invasion. The pre-planned subgroup analysis in T1b tumors demonstrated an even lower predictive ability of lymphovascular invasion with an odds ratio of 2.5 (95% CI 1.11-5.65; P = 0.028), whereas the predictive effect of sm2 (odds ratio 3.44; 95% CI 1.00-11.9; P = 0.049) and sm3 (odds ratio 3.44; 95% CI 1.00-11.9; P = 0.049) tumor invasion depth was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The present report demonstrates the insufficient risk prediction of histopathologic risk factors for the overall metastatic rate.

Complex gastric surgery in Germany-is centralization beneficial? Observational study using national hospital discharge data.

PURPOSE: This observational study explored the association between hospital volume and short-term outcome following gastric resections for non-bariatric indication, aiming to contribute to the discussion on centralization of complex visceral surgery in Germany. METHODS: Based on complete national hospital discharge data from 2010 to 2015, the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality was evaluated according to volume quintiles and volume deciles. Case-mix differences regarding surgical indication, age, sex, and comorbidities were considered for risk adjustment. In addition, rates of major complications and failure to rescue were analyzed across hospital volume categories. RESULTS: Inpatient episodes (72,528) with gastric resection were analyzed. Risk-adjusted mortality in patients treated in very low volume hospitals (median volume of 5 surgeries per year) was higher (12.0% [95% CI 11.4 to 12.5]) compared to those treated in very high volume hospitals (50 surgeries per year; 10.6% [10.0 to 11.1]). Failure to rescue patients with complications was 28.1% [27.0 to 29.3] in very low volume hospitals and 22.7% [21.6 to 23.8] in very high volume hospitals. Differences were similar within the subgroup of patients operated for gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in very high volume hospitals is associated with a lower in-hospital mortality compared to treatment in very low volume hospitals. This effect seems to be determined by the ability to rescue patients who experience complications. As the observed benefit is only related to very high volumes, the results do not clearly indicate that centralization may improve short-term results substantially, unless a very high degree of centralization would be achieved. Possibly, further research focusing on other outcome measures, such as clinical processes or long-term results, might lead to divergent conclusions.

Hospital Volume, In-Hospital Mortality, and Failure to Rescue in Esophageal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, complex esophageal surgery is often performed in hospitals with low case numbers. For these procedures, an association exists between hospital case numbers and treatment outcomes, possibly because of differences in complication management. This aspect of the association between volume and outcome in esophageal surgery has not yet been studied in Germany. METHODS: On the basis of nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) from the years 2010 to 2015, the association between volume and outcome was analyzed in relation to in-hospital mortality, the frequency of complications, and the mortality of patients who had complications. RESULTS: 22 700 cases of complex esophageal surgery were identified. The probability of dying after esophageal surgery was much lower in hospitals with very high case numbers (median, 62 per year) than in those with very low case numbers (median, two per year), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, [0.42; 0.60]). At least one complication was documented for more than half of all patients; no association was found between the frequency of complications and the hospital case volume. The in-hospital mortality among patients who had complications was 12.3% [11.1; 13.7] in hospitals with very high case numbers and 20.0% [18.5; 21.6] in hospitals with very low case numbers. Of the 4032 procedures performed in 2015, 83% were for cancer of the esophagus. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the quality of care for patients undergoing esophageal surgery in Germany could be improved if more patients were treated in hospitals with high case numbers. The observed association between case numbers and outcomes is tightly linked to failure to rescue.

Lymph Node Retrieval is Inferior in the Modified Merendino Resection for Early Barrett's Carcinoma: A Matched-Pair Comparison with Ivor Lewis Resection.

AIM OF THE STUDY: A matched-pair comparison between the modified Merendino resection (MER) and Ivor Lewis resection (ILR) for early Barrett's carcinoma. BACKGROUND: Early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (eACE) with positive risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) needs surgery for cure. MER appeared to be an alternative to ILR. METHODS: Between July 2000 and July 2012, 156 patients with high-grade dysplasia or eACE received ILR, whereas in 30 cases MER was performed in a tertiary care center for GI Surgery. A matched-pair analysis was performed on the basis of sex, age, BMI, ASA classification and tumor stage. Thirty patients were assigned to each group. The data were analyzed regarding perioperative aspects (e.g., operating time, hospital stay, complications, number of lymph nodes) and survival analysis. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 301.7 min for ILR, compared to 255.4 min for MER (p = 0.044). The hospital stay following ILR was significantly longer than for MER (22.4 days ILR vs. 16.4 days MER, p = 0.023). There was no statistically significant difference regarding complications between the two groups (p = 0.463). The number of resected lymph nodes was significantly lower in the MER group (median 21) compared to the ILR group, where a median of 31 lymph nodes could be removed (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall (p = 0.145) or tumor-specific survival (p = 0.353). CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node retrieval is significantly inferior in the MER. Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two operating techniques, although the operation time for ILR took longer and these patients required a longer hospital stay. MER should not be applied in cases with high risk of LNM.

Prognostic risk factors of early gastric cancer-a western experience.

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the leading cause of tumor recurrence in early gastric cancer (EGC). Since endoscopic resection (ER) can be performed in EGC with curative intention when no LNM are present, this study wants to determine the risk factors for LNM in EGC. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who have had an operative resection because of EGC were analyzed. Histopathological workup included tumor infiltration depth, lymphatic and vascular infiltration, lymph node infiltration, tumor differentiation, and the classification of Ming. A complete follow-up was achieved. RESULTS: There was no LNM among tumors meeting the standard or extended criteria for an ER. Lymphatic infiltration (p < 0.001) and infiltration of the submucosal layers (p = 0.018) proved to be the strongest risk factors for LNM. Tumors with a deeper infiltration depth (p = 0.015) and a lower grade of differentiation (p = 0.029) presented with a higher grade of lymphatic infiltration. Tumors located in the body of the stomach (p = 0.003) and tumors with infiltrative growth according to Ming (p = 0.021) had a significantly higher risk for lymphatic infiltration. The 5-year overall survival was 84 % in nodal negative patients and 42 % in patients with LNM (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: ER within the extended criteria with a meticulous histological workup should be performed in EGC to determine whether risk factors for LNM are present. If lymphatic infiltration is observed, surgery with lymphadenectomy is recommended. Tumors exceeding the extended criteria should undergo primary surgery with adequate lymphadenectomy.

Surgical Therapy of Early Carcinoma of the Esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The modern therapy of early esophageal carcinomas (pT1) requires an excellent cooperation between experienced gastroenterologists, pathologists, and esophageal surgeons. While endoscopic resection (ER) is accepted as the standard curative treatment for mucosal esophageal carcinomas, submucosal tumors are regarded as a strict indication for surgery. There is an ongoing discussion about the operative approach and the extent of lymph node dissection in these cases. METHODS: A literature review was performed to evaluate the operative treatment of early esophageal cancer. In view of oncological risk factors, treatment strategies, and operative procedures, current studies are summarized and compared to the results of our own center. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In early esophageal cancer, lymph node involvement is the only independent risk factor for survival and recurrence rates. There is evidence that infiltrated lymph nodes (N+) are significantly correlated with tumor infiltration depth, lymphovascular (L1) and microvascular invasion (V1), and poor tumor differentiation (G3). Several studies suggest that early squamous cell carcinomas (eSCCs) and early adenocarcinomas (eACs) have a different tumor biology and therefore need a different treatment strategy. While eSCCs in stage m1 and m2 can be cured by ER, tumors infiltrating the submucosal layer (sm1-3) show a high rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM); thus, surgical resection (SR) is clearly indicated. In tumors with invasion into the deep mucosa (m3) the risk of LNM is up to 11%; however, reliable data are rare and the type of therapy should be discussed with the patients individually. In eACs, ER is the standard curative treatment for all mucosal tumors (m1-m4) and sm1 tumors with low-risk constellation (G1, L0, VO, R0). All high-risk sm1 tumors and those with deeper submucosal infiltration (sm2, sm3) show a high rate of LNM and require SR. The standard operative procedure for early esophageal carcinomas is an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with radical, at least two-field lymphadenectomy.