Factors Affecting the Adsorption of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Colloidal Activated Carbon.

The immobilization of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by colloidal activated carbon (CAC) barriers has been proposed as a potential in-situ method to mitigate the transport of plumes of PFAS in the subsurface. However, if PFAS are continuously released from a source zone, the adsorptive sites on CAC will eventually become saturated, upon which point the breakthrough of PFAS in the barrier will occur. To predict the long-term effectiveness of CAC barriers, it is important to evaluate the factors that may affect the adsorption of PFAS on CAC. In this study, the adsorption of 7 PFAS on a polymer-stabilized CAC (i.e., PlumeStop®) and on a polymer-free CAC was investigated using batch experiments. The adsorption affinity of PFAS to CAC was in the following order: PFOS > 6:2 FTS > PFHxS > PFOA > PFBS > PFPeA > PFBA. This result indicates that hydrophobic interaction was the predominant adsorption mechanism, and that hydrophilic compounds such as PFBA and PFPeA will break through CAC barriers first. The partition coefficient Kd for the adsorption of PFAS on the polymer-stabilized CAC was 1.3 - 3.5 times smaller than the Kd for the adsorption of PFAS on the polymer-free CAC, suggesting that the polymers decreased the adsorption, presumably due to competitive sorption. Thus, the PFAS adsorption capacity of PlumeStop CAC barriers is expected to increase once the polymers are biodegraded and/or washed away. The affinity of PFOS and PFOA to CAC increased when the ionic strength of the solution increased from 1 to 100 mM, or when the concentration of Ca2+ increased from 0 to 2 mM. In contrast, less PFOS and PFOA were adsorbed in the presence of 1 - 20 mgC/L Suwannee River Fulvic Acid, which represented dissolved organic carbon, or in the presence of 10 - 100 mg/L diethylene glycol butyl ether (DGBE), which is an important component in some aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) formulations. The presence of 0.5 - 4.8 mg/L benzene or 0.5 - 8 mg/L trichloroethylene, the co-contaminants that may comingle with PFAS at AFFF-impacted sites, diminished PFOS adsorption but had no effect or even slightly enhanced PFOA adsorption. When the initial concentration of TCE was 8 mg/L, the Kd (514 ± 240 L/g) for the adsorption of PFOS was approximately 20 times lower than that in the TCE-free system (Kd = 9,579 ± 829 L/g). The results of this study provided insights into some key factors that may affect the adsorption of PFAS in in-situ CAC barriers.

A field-validated equilibrium passive sampler for the monitoring of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sediment pore water and surface water.

A simple equilibrium passive sampler, consisting of water in an inert container capped with a rate-limiting barrier, for the monitoring of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sediment pore water and surface water was developed and tested through a series of laboratory and field experiments. The objectives of the laboratory experiments were to determine (1) the membrane type that could serve as the sampler's rate-limiting barrier, (2) the mass transfer coefficient of environmentally relevant PFAS through the selected membrane, and (3) the performance reference compounds (PRCs) that could be used to infer the kinetics of PFAS diffusing into the sampler. Of the membranes tested, the polycarbonate (PC) membrane was deemed the most suitable rate-limiting barrier, given that it did not appreciably adsorb the studied PFAS (which have ≤8 carbons), and that the migration of these compounds through this membrane could be described by Fick's law of diffusion. When employed as the PRC, the isotopically labelled PFAS M2PFOA and M4PFOS were able to predict the mass transfer coefficients of the studied PFAS analytes. In contrast, the mass transfer coefficients were underpredicted by Br- and M3PFPeA. For validation, the PC-based passive samplers consisting of these four PRCs, as well as two other PRCs (i.e., M8PFOA and C8H17SO3-), were deployed in the sediment and water at a PFAS-impacted field site. The concentration-time profiles of the PRCs indicated that the samplers deployed in the sediment required at least 6 to 7 weeks to reach 90% equilibrium. If the deployment times are shorter (e.g., 2 to 4 weeks), PFAS concentrations at equilibrium could be estimated based on the concentrations of the PRCs remaining in the sampler at retrieval. All PFAS concentrations determined via this approach were within a factor of two compared to those measured in the mechanically extracted sediment pore water and surface water samples obtained adjacent to the sampler deployment locations. Neither biofouling of the rate-limiting barrier nor any physical change to it was observed on the sampler after retrieval. The passive sampler developed in this study could be a promising tool for the monitoring of PFAS in pore water and surface water.

Treatment of sulfolane in groundwater: A critical review.

This review critically examined the existing technologies for the treatment of sulfolane, which is an emerging groundwater contaminant. In general, sulfolane plumes are difficult to contain and mitigate because sulfolane is highly mobile and does not biodegrade to an appreciable extent under anoxic conditions typical of many subsurface environments. Several studies have shown that sulfolane biodegradation can be enhanced in the presence of oxygen, suggesting that in situ biosparging or ex-situ (i.e., pump and treat) aerobic biodegradation can potentially be effective means of remediating sulfolane-contaminated sites. While highly reactive species such as SO4•- and •OH radicals have been shown to oxidize sulfolane, whether sulfolane can be effectively treated by ex situ advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) or by in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) needs to be further examined. Besides chemical and biological treatments, pump and treat by adsorption on granular activated carbon (GAC) has been applied to remove sulfolane at several sites. To optimize the treatment as well as to identify more effective adsorbents, additional research is needed to investigate the mechanism and factors affecting sulfolane adsorption. In addition to assessing the treatment of sulfolane, this review also discussed the analytical methods for the quantification of sulfolane in the context that guidelines for sulfolane will likely become more stringent and, therefore, analytical methods with lower detection limit will be needed for future research.